Upload
ann-mosley
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
06/22/04 1
Data-Gathering Systems
IRIS
Stanford/USGS
UNAVCO
JPL/UCSD
Data ManagementOrganizations
PI’s, Groups, Centers, etc.
Publications, Presentations,Data Products
Supported by NSF/MREFC, NASA, USGSSupported by NSF/MREFC, NASA, USGS Supported by PI-Driven ProposalsSupported by PI-Driven Proposals
EarthScope Science IntegrationEarthScope Science Integration
06/22/04 2
EarthScope Science IntegrationEarthScope Science Integration
IRIS
Stanford/USGS
UNAVCO
JPL/UCSD
Data-Gathering Systems
DataManagement
Organizations
EarthScopeCollaboratory
Publications, Presentations,Data Products,
Integrated Models, Predictive Simulations,
etc.
FSM
RDM
AWM
SRM
PI’s, Groups,Centers, etc.
What should be the structure and functionality of an EarthScope
collaboratory?
Example: SCEC Community Modeling EnvironmentA collaboratory to support distributed scientific activities and product development by the SCEC community for seismic hazard analysis and risk reduction in Southern California
(and elsewhere).
06/22/04 4
Pathway Instantiations
SCEC Community Modeling EnvironmentSCEC Community Modeling EnvironmentA collaboratory for system-level earthquake scienceA collaboratory for system-level earthquake science
Knowledge Base
OntologiesCurated taxonomies,
Relations & constraints
Pathway ModelsPathway templates,
Models of simulation codes
Code Repositories
Data & SimulationProductsData Collections
FSM
RDM
AWM
SRM
Storage
GRIDPathway Execution
Policy, Data ingest, Repository access
Grid ServicesCompute & storage management, Security
DIGITALLIBRARIES
Navigation &Queries
Versioning,Replication
MediatedCollectionsFederated
access
KNOWLEDGEACQUISITION
Acquisition InterfacesDialog planning,
Pathway constructionstrategies
Pathway AssemblyTemplate instantiation,
Resource selection,Constraint checking
KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION & REASONINGKnowledge Server
Knowledge base access, InferenceTranslation Services
Syntactic & semantic translation
Computing
Users
06/22/04 5
SCEC Crustal Motion Map• 833 crustal velocity estimates at 762 points833 crustal velocity estimates at 762 points
• Co-seismic offsets for the Landers, Northridge & Co-seismic offsets for the Landers, Northridge & Hector Mine earthquakes Hector Mine earthquakes
• Data from SCIGNData from SCIGN
CMM.3.0.1 (Agnew et al., 2003)
06/22/04 6
SHA Computational PathwaysSHA Computational Pathways
IntensityMeasures
Earthquake Forecast Model
AttenuationRelationship
1
Pathway 1: Standard Seismic Hazard Analysis
AWMGroundMotionsSRM
Unified Structural RepresentationFaults Motions Stresses Anelastic model
2
AWP = Anelastic Wave PropagationSRM = Site Response Model
Pathway 2: Ground motion simulation
RDM
FSM
3
FSM = Fault System ModelRDM = Rupture Dynamics Model
Pathway 3: Physics-based earthquake forecasting
Invert
Other DataGeologyGeodesy
4
Pathway 4: Ground motion inverse problem
Physics-basedPhysics-basedsimulationssimulations
EmpiricalEmpiricalrelationshipsrelationships
Improvement Improvement of modelsof models
06/22/04 7
IMIM RupRupn,in,i
Intensity-MeasureIntensity-MeasureRelationshipRelationship
Earthquake-Earthquake-RuptureRuptureForecastForecast
€
Prob(IMT ≥ IML) =1− 1− Prob(IMT ≥ IML,Site | n,iRup ) * Prob( n,iRup )[ ]n=1
N ( i)
∑ ⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
i=1
I
∏
Time SpanTime Span
Type, LevelType, Level
SourceSourceii
SiteSite
OpenSHAOpenSHAA Community Modeling Environment forA Community Modeling Environment for
Seismic Hazard AnalysisSeismic Hazard Analysis
Pathway 1: OpenSHAPathway 1: OpenSHA
Field, Jordan & Cornell (2002)Field, Jordan & Cornell (2002)
06/22/04 8
Example Application of Pathway 1:Scenarios for M 7.4 Southern San Andreas Rupture
Courtesy of Ned Field, USGS, PasadenaCourtesy of Ned Field, USGS, Pasadena
Without soil & basin effects With soil & basin effects
06/22/04 9
SHA Computational PathwaysSHA Computational Pathways
IntensityMeasures
Earthquake Forecast Model
AttenuationRelationship
1
1. Standardized Seismic Hazard Analysis
2. Ground motion simulation
3. Physics-based earthquake forecasting
4. Ground motion inverse problem
AWMGroundMotionsSRM
Unified Structural RepresentationFaults Motions Stresses Anelastic model
2
AWP = Anelastic Wave Propagation
SRM = Site Response Model
RDM
FSM
3
FSM = Fault System Model
RDM = Rupture Dynamics Model
Invert
Other DataGeologyGeodesy
4
Physics-basedsimulations
Empiricalrelationships
Improvement of models
06/22/04 10
SCEC Community Velocity ModelH. Magistrale et al. (2000)H. Magistrale et al. (2000)
06/22/04 11
SCEC Community Fault Model
A. Plesch and J. Shaw (2003)A. Plesch and J. Shaw (2003)
06/22/04 12
Unified Structural Representation
How can SCEC unify the development of structural
models (e.g. CVM) with tectonic models (e.g. CFM)?Tectonic models
Structural models
Community Fault Model Community Block Model
06/22/04 13
SCEC Community Block Model
Intended for use in:• fault systems analysis (FEM)• property modeling
Set of interconnected, closed volumes that are
bounded by major faults, as well as topography,
base-of-seismicity, and Moho surfaces.
J. Shaw et al. (2003)J. Shaw et al. (2003)
06/22/04 14
SHA Computational PathwaysSHA Computational Pathways
IntensityMeasures
Earthquake Forecast Model
AttenuationRelationship
1
1. Standardized Seismic Hazard Analysis
2. Ground motion simulation
3. Physics-based earthquake forecasting
4. Ground motion inverse problem
AWMGroundMotionsSRM
Unified Structural RepresentationFaults Motions Stresses Anelastic model
2
AWP = Anelastic Wave Propagation
SRM = Site Response Model
RDM
FSM
3
FSM = Fault System Model
RDM = Rupture Dynamics Model
Invert
Other DataGeologyGeodesy
4
Physics-basedsimulations
Empiricalrelationships
Improvement of models
06/22/04 15
Pathway 3: Physics-Based Earthquake Forecast
model feedback
data processing
model building
EarthquakeRuptureForecast
GeodeticData
GeologicData
SeismologicData
OtherData
data
GeodeticDeformation
Map
FaultActivity
Database
EarthquakeCatalog
Other DataProducts
data products
Fault Model Block ModelDeformation
Model
EarthquakeRupture
Simulation
models
06/22/04 16
Unified Structural Representation
Fault Systems
Source Physics
Ground Motion
Seismic Hazard
Analysis
SHA Computational PathwaysSHA Computational PathwaysFive SCEC Focus GroupsFive SCEC Focus Groups
Fault Model Block Model
DeformationModel
EarthquakeRuptureForecast
SeismicHazard
Products
AnelasticStructure
AttenuationRelationship
EarthquakeRupture
Simulation
GroundMotion
Simulation
06/22/04 17
Pathway 2 Verification
• Co-supported by SCEC, SCEC/CME, PEER-Lifelines
• Participation by 5 groups developing FD and FE codes
• Validation through hierarchy of standardized test cases
• Production of 96,000 synthetic seismograms for 6 earthquake scenarios on each of 10 faults
• SRB archive now available in CME
• Results are being analyzed to improve attenuation relationships
06/22/04 18
Pathway 3 Verification
• Supported by SCEC ESP Focus Group
• First workshop held in November, 2003
• Second workshop planned for Summer, 2004
• Results will be archived in CME
06/22/04 19
Ingredients for Successful Science Integration
• Problem focus– Regional tectonics & hazards
• Common objectives– Community data products & models
• Community identity & organization– History of collaboration, interactive working groups
• Collaboratory infrastructure– Code validation, standardization of products
• Regular forums for assessing progress– Workshops, annual meeting
• Funding– To support collaboration/collaboratory activities