Upload
votu
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
Exploring the interplay between learning, knowledge, biography and practice:
The tale of an experienced track and field athletics coach
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
Abstract
This paper examines how the learning biography of Jack (pseudonym), an
experienced track and field athletics coach, shaped his thoughts about coaching
practice. Data were collected through seven in-depth, semi-structured, narrative-
biographical interviews that formed part of a cyclical and iterative data analysis
process. Our analysis of Jack’s narrative revealed how his understanding of two
distinct features of his coaching practice (i.e. implementation of periodization and
pedagogical delivery style) developed in contrasting ways. Jack’s story was primarily,
although not exclusively, interpreted using Alheit’s concepts of biographical learning
and biographicity, Biesta and Tedder’s writings on agency and learning in the life-
course, and Jarvis’ discussion of learning as a process of becoming. The findings of
this study raise significant questions for how the field of sports coaching seeks to
understand coach learning.
Key words: biography, coaching, knowledge, learning, practice.
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
Introduction
There has, in recent years, been increasing scholarly interest in coach learning
(Christensen, 2014; Cushion & Nelson, 2013; Cushion, Nelson, Armour, Lyle, Jones,
Sandford & O’Callaghan, 2010; Gilbert & Trudel, 2004; Nelson, Cushion & Potrac,
2006). The construction of coaching knowledge and its day-to-day application in
practice have become increasingly focal points of research in the academic and
professional community (Christensen, 2014). Arguably, the development of such
insights has an important role to play if current efforts to raise coaching standards and
enhance the impact of coach education provision are to be successful (Christensen,
2014; Potrac, Jones, Gilbourne, & Nelson, 2013).
To date, our understanding of how coaches learn remains partial and
embryonic at best (Cushion & Nelson, 2013). For example, much of the available
coach learning literature has tended to focus on the identification of those learning
sources and situations that practitioners access to acquire knowledge (Cushion &
Nelson, 2013; Cushion et al., 2010). This body of research evidence has principally
served to reinforce the finding that coaches tend to learn more through their
participation in informal, when compared to formal and nonformal, learning situations
(Cushion & Nelson, 2013; Mesquita, Isidro, & Rosado, 2010).
While the body of scholarship outlined above has certainly provided an
important first step in our efforts to understand how coaches learn, Werthner and
Trudel (2009) urged coaching scholars to consider and “explain the variations or
idiosyncrasies that seem to prevail in the coaches’ learning paths within different
coaching contexts” (p. 436). Central to this proposed line of inquiry is a better
appreciation of the "complex, messy, fragmented" nature of coaches’ narratives and
the "need to understand the interconnections between coaches' lives and their
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
professional practice" (Jones, Armour, & Potrac, 2004, p. 1) than has been achieved
to date. Despite this laudable call, there remains a paucity of research considering
how coaching knowledge is shaped by the learning biographies of individual
practitioners (e.g. Cushion & Nelson, 2013; Christensen, 2014; Duarte & Culver,
2014; Jones, Armour, & Potrac, 2003, 2004). Equally, while the limited available
studies have certainly helped to advance our understanding of the complex,
idiosyncratic, and multidimensional features of coach learning, aside from some
notable exceptions (e.g., Callary, Werthner, & Trudel, 2012, 2013; Christensen, 2014;
Wertner & Trudel, 2009) little attention has yet been afforded to examining how
specific facets of knowledge that guide and inform everyday practice are developed.
The outcome of this situation is the (unintended) representation of coaching
knowledge (e.g. technical, tactical, bio-physical, and socio-pedagogical) as being
something that is generated in a largely uniform fashion. Indeed, there has been
limited consideration of how coaches’ individual biographies may shape their learning
about specific topics in particular ways (c.f. Biesta & Tedder, 2007; Christensen,
2014).
In seeking to build upon the existing body of coach learning literature then,
this study aimed to illustrate how the biography of Jack, an experienced track and
field athletics coach, influenced his learning about two distinct features of his
coaching practice (i.e. the implementation of periodized training programmes and his
pedagogical delivery style). Here, biographical learning is concerned with the
“learning processes of individual social actors”, which includes “formal and informal
learning processes, binding emotional, existential and cognirive aspects, and uniting
preconscious and conscious diemsnions” (Hallqvist, 2014, p. 499). )The significance
of this work lies in uncovering the complex formation of coaching knowledge, thus
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
going beyond the labeling of learning episodes as formal, non-formal, or informal.
Instead, we seek to explore how coach learning is, in Jack’s case at least, inherently
interconnected with the people, phases of time, and specific events that featured in his
life and, importantly, his subsequent engagement with them (c.f. Goodson, Biesta,
Tedder, & Adair, 2010; c.f. Kelchtermans, 2009a, 2009b). We hope that, by focusing
on what learning actually meant and did in the life of Jack, this paper might contribute
to an evolving epistemology of coach learning that recognizes the contextually
situated and historical dimensions of learning (c.f. Biesta & Tedder, 2007; c.f.
Goodson et al., 2010). Indeed, in taking our inspiration from the work of Christensen
(2014) and Goodson et al. (2010), we believe that coaching scholarship has much to
gain from considering how coach learning is not only the consequence of an
individual coach participating in a particular social and cultural milieu, but also his or
her biography and “the history of the practices and the institutions through which
learning takes place” (Goodson et al., 2010, p. 5).
Methodology
This study was conducted from an interpretivist perspective, which is characterised by
an internal-idealist/relativist ontology (i.e. there is no reality independent of
perception), a subjectivist epistemology (i.e. knowledge is subjective and socially
constructed), and an ideographic methodology (i.e. the focus is on the individual case)
(Potrac, Jones, & Nelson, 2014; Sparkes, 2002). The interpretivist paradigm provides
a radical alternative to the (post)postitivistic orthodoxy, as it rejects the belief that the
social world (e.g. people, cultures, social practices) can be examined and understood
using the assumptions and methodologies that guide the scientific investigation of the
physical world (Potrac et al., 2014). Rather, interpretive researchers principally utilise
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
qualitative methodologies to understand the subjective experiences of individuals and
groups (Guba & Lincoln, 1994; Markula & Silk, 2011).
Given our philosophical position, we selected a qualitative methodology that
would permit us to gather rich insights into Jack’s biography, his beliefs about
coaching, and, ultimately, how he had come to develop such understandings. Our aim
was to not only consider the relationship that existed between learning and biography,
but also the “influence of biography on learning processes and practices” (Tedder &
Biesta, 2007, p. 3). Here, our thinking was particularly influenced by Kelchtermans’
(1993, 2002a, 2002b, 2009a, 2009b) narrative-biographical approach. The narrative-
biographical perspective when applied to sports coaching is less interested in coaches’
formal careers (i.e. the chronological list of positions a coach takes up over the years),
focusing instead on what Kelchtermans’ (2009a) terms subjective careers (i.e.
coaches’ personal experiences in their professional lives over time). The narrative
aspect of this approach refers to the central role of stories and story-telling in the way
that coaches, like Jack, deal with their career experiences and learning (cf.
Kelchtermans, 2009a). The biographical aspect acknowledges the temporal nature of
human existence. As such, we did not consider Jack’s experiences to be historical
artefacts, but rather we placed emphasis on those meanings that Jack attached to this
learning and the various events that he had experienced in his life and coaching career
(cf. Kelchtermans, 2009a). This study received Institutional Research Ethics board
approval and written informed consent was obtained.
Jack was selected through a process of purposive sampling. That is, he was
deemed an information rich participant whose story permitted us to address the aims
of the proposed research project (Patton, 2000; Tracy, 2013). Prior to this study, the
principle, second and fourth author had each worked with Jack in contrasting
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
capacities. Through our individual and collective conversations with Jack it became
clear to us that Jack's understanding of the distinct features of his coaching practice,
and how he perceived that these had been biographically developed in contrasting
ways, presented an elaboration and deepening of our understanding of coach learning.
It was for these reasons that we decided to investigate, analyse and share Jack's
story.At the time of study, Jack was a 42-year-old coach, who possessed the United
Kingdom Athletics (UKA) Level Three Performance Coach certificate in sprints and
hurdles. This is the highest level of coaching certificate in athletics. Jack had also
completed a Masters degree in Sport and Exercise Science and was a UK Strength and
Conditioning (UKSCA) and National Strength and Conditioning (NCSA) certified
practitioner. Jack had been coaching for approximately 20 years in various capacities.
During this period, he had worked with more than 30 individual junior and senior
sprint athletes, who competed ar various levels of athletics (e.g. amateur to high
performance). Jack had also worked with professional athletes in other sports, such as
rugby league, bobsled, and fencing. Throughout the duration of the study, Jack was
not directly affiliated with a club. Instead he worked independently out of his local
athletic stadium, two evenings per week, with a small group of young competitive
athletes. Jack was not renumerated for his coaching. Coaching was something that he
did alongside his full-time employment as a university lecturer. Jack was employed
by a higher education institution, where he led two strength and conditioning modules
on a sports coaching and performance related undergraduate degree programme.
Jack participated in seven informal, semi-structured, interviews, each lasting
between 60-90 minutes. Each of the interviews was conducted at a location of his
choosing, with most occurring in his office of work. The first five interviews were
conducted by the lead author and the final two interviews were conducted by the
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
second and fourth authors. All of the interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed
verbatim. At the start of the first interview Jack was reminded of the purpose of the
investigation and it was made clear that he was free to withdraw from the study at any
point. The interviews focused on gaining a detailed understanding of what Jack
considered to be the key features of his preferred approach to coaching and how he
had learnt to practice in these ways. More specifically, Jack was invited to discuss: (a)
his beliefs regarding effective coaching, (b) why he preferred to coach in the ways
that he did, and (c) how he had come to coach in these way. During our interviews
with Jack a range of question types were employed in effort to develop rich insights.
These included, demographic questions (i.e. questions about Jack’s identity
characteristics and experiences), behaviour and action questions (i.e. questions about
specific events that had occurred during Jack's coaching career), experience questions
(i.e. questions that prompted Jack to share his stories), motive questions (i.e. questions
that asked Jack why he had been inspired to think, feel and act in certain ways),
example questions (i.e. questions that required Jack to provide instances that were
illustrative of his answer), and timeline questions (i.e. questions that asked Jack to
articulate the order in which events occurred), alongside the use of follow-ups (i.e.
verbal and nonverbal affirmations of Jack's responses) and probes (questions designed
to elicit further understanding by asking Jack to clarify and elaborate on his
responses) (Tracey, 2013). The interview process was cyclical in nature. Following
each interview the transcribed data were analysed to elicit themes, introduce tentative
interpretations, and identify topics requiring further exploration in the following
interviews (Kelchtermans, 1993, 2009a).
While the collection, analysis, and writing-up of data are frequently
understood as three distinct phases, in this study they formed a cyclical and iterative
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
process (Taylor, 2014; Tracy, 2012, 2013). Consistent with the previously discussed
narrative-biographical approach, attention was given to identifying those critical
incidents, phases of time, and persons that operated as key experiences or turning
points for Jack and his learning (Kelchtermans, 2009a). Here, we focused on those
experiences that caused Jack to “rethink and reassess particular ideas or beliefs or to
reconsider taken-for-granted actions and practices” (Kelchtermans, 2009a, p. 32). Of
central importance here was not so much the critical incident, person or phase per se,
but rather the meanings that Jack attached to these experiences and how they directly
shaped his beliefs about the practice of coaching (Kelchtermans, 2009a).
This iterative process entailed alternating between these emic (i.e. emergent
readings of the data) and etic (i.e. using existing theory) readings of the data (Huggan,
Nelson, & Potrac, 2015; Tracy, 2013). During emic phases of analysis interview
transcripts were coded to establish meaningful data that responded to the aims of the
study (Tracy, 2013). Here, we sought to identify data that provided insights into how
Jack's understandings of the contrasting features of his coaching practice had
been influenced by certain events and people. Like Jones et al (2004), our intention
was to develop a rich appreciation of how Jack's career experiences had shaped his
understandings about practice. In addition to this, we also engaged etic readings of the
data whereby we sought to critically examine and interpret the findings of our emic
analysis. At this stage in the process, 'analytical memos' were used to make
preliminary links to explanatory frameworks (Maykut & Morehouse,
1994). Establishing such tentative theoretical links raised further questions that were
explored in greater detail during subsequent interviews. Jarvis’ writing on learning as
a process of becoming, Bietsa and Tedder’s writings on agency and learning in the
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
life-course, and Alheit’s concepts of biographical learning and biographicity offered
considerable utility here.
Results
In this section, we outline two features of Jack’s coaching knowledge and practice.
The first theme considers Jack’s desire to construct and implement detailed, evidence-
based, periodised training programmes for his athletes. The second theme charts how
he sought to interact with, and relate to, his athletes. Both themes explore those
learning experiences that Jack perceived significantly influenced his understanding of
these components of his coaching.
Periodised Training Programmes
Jack identified the construction of meticulously planned and evidence-based
individualised annual training schedules for his athletes, as being one of the central
features of his coaching. This included giving consideration towards not only macro,
meso, and micro cycles, but also the careful planning of individual training sessions.
Jack felt that periodising the season was essential as it permitted him to “have a
handle on every aspect of what’s going on in training.” This was important to him as
he strove to be the knowledgeable and supportive coach that, in some respects, he did
not believe that he always received as an athlete. Indeed, Jack indicated that the
importance he attached to periodisation was born out of his own experiences as an
athlete. In this regard, he shared his frustration at what he considered to be an
unfulfilled and injury plagued athletic career; a topic reoccurred he frequently
returned to in his narrative. In reflecting back on his time as an athlete, he highlighted
how he had become increasingly angry at the quality of the coaching programmes that
he had received. In his own words:
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
While he (the coach) was a nice guy, a caring coach, one of the best I’ve come
across, he just did not have the knowledge to help me with the issues that I was
experiencing. For me, his inability to support me physically in the right way,
cost me. My career as an athlete lasted a lot less than it probably should have
and I think I ought to have ran faster times. In the end, I didn’t just stop running
due to the injuries, I was physically unable to train and compete anymore. I was
quite literally broken. So, it was thinking about the frustrations of that really,
that drove me to want to find out more. I didn’t want to provide programmes to
others that didn’t work or harmed them in terms of injury and the like. I just
didn’t want people to go through what I had experienced as an athlete. It still
haunts me today.
For Jack then, periodisation not only promoted high-level athletic performances, but it
represented a “responsible approach” that helped to mitigate against the “dangers of
over-training”. Here he noted:
It’s (periodisation) based on the results of hundreds and hundreds of Eastern
European athletes… So it’s well validated as far as I’m concerned as a method
of achieving success, but, equally, from a responsibility and ethical perspective,
it ensures that you’re not overloading your athletes. You’re not hammering
them, you’re not risking over training and giving them injuries that they
shouldn’t be getting. It encourages a responsible approach to monitoring your
training as well, so you’ve kind of got everything more controlled, you’re better
informed as a coach.
Ironically, it was during a period of injury as an athlete that Jack decided to take
his first steps into coaching by attending a Level 1 sprints coach education
programme. His motivation, at that point in time, was simply to “stay involved in the
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
sport” that he had grown to love. Despite his wanting to continue competing, two
years after attaining his Level 1 sprint qualification Jack took the difficult decision to
retire from the sport. His ongoing injuries were eventually attributed to stress
fractures in the tibias of both legs. It was his desire to understand and address his own
injuries that was to serve as a driving motivator for much of his learning during this
period of his developmental journey.
Following his retirement, Jack took up an invitation to assist Chris, a regional
level coach, with his coaching sessions. From the outset, Jack was impressed with
Chris’ meticulous planning and his caring approach to working with athletes.
Importantly, Chris introduced Jack to the principles of periodization and opened a
new vista for him to consider his own coaching. In his own words:
At the time, I just thought he was an excellent coach. His people skills and
technical knowledge were just first class. He was a very well respected coach, a
great guy to learn off and that kind of motivated me from there I suppose…He
introduced me to the periodization of training. It was new, exciting, and made
me think about my coaching in a completely new way.
During this period, Jack also enrolled himself onto the Level 2 sprint
qualification, which he later converted to a level three award, the highest qualification
attainable in his sport. It was during his attendance of this coach education
programme that Jack further enhanced his knowledge of periodisation. Jack was
immediately struck by the detailed knowledge that the course instructors used to
underpin this type of planning:
They were talking about physiological and biomechanical principles, how
aspects of performance might be developed over time using these principles and
so on. Their understanding and analysis was at a much deeper level than mine
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
was at. What I thought was good practice, I now saw as second rate. I just did
not know what they knew.
Following the course, Jack soon realised that those coaches with whom he was
interacting (and admired) were not implementing these principles to the level he had
been taught on the course. In his own words:
Looking back, I guess they were products of the existing coach education
programmes plus their years of hands-on practical experience. At first, I thought
everything they did was great but, over time, I began to see gaps in their
practice. There were times when Chris and I, for example, could not figure out
why an athlete was performing or responding in the ways that they were. We
gave them technical points until we were blue in the face, but I had nagging
doubts that there were other issues that we needed to understand in order to
make meaningful and safe improvements in their techniques happen. However,
neither Chris nor I had the physiological or biomechanical knowledge to help
like that. It just was not there. It’s hard to diagnose and respond to what you
don’t know. It made me feel inadequate and I didn’t want to carry on like that.
It was in light of these observations that Jack decided to pursue the formal
academic study of sports science. At that time, Jack thought that engaging in
additional formal education would permit him an opportunity to become more
knowledgeable than those with whom he had been working:
I wanted to be better than them didn’t I. I wanted to be successful as a coach
and have a good coaching career. The best way for me to do was to be able to
look after athletes in the right ways training wise… I needed the knowledge to
do that. I wanted to be the full package, I didn’t want any stone left unturned.
So while I learned an awful lot from them (his mentor coaches), I’d reached a
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
point where I thought I can do things a little bit better. So I felt that I needed the
qualifications to allow me to kind of stand on my own two feet and do that
without anybody really being able to question what I did and why I did it,
because I knew the area inside out.
The pursuit of further formal education was also driven by Jack’s desire to prove to
himself that he was capable of developing a detailed understanding of scientific
subjects, areas of academic inquiry that he had difficulty learning while at school:
I suppose I had a bit of a bee in my bonnet about science not being my thing at
school. I wasn’t very good at science. I struggled with physics, chemistry and
maths and I had a bit of a bee in my bonnet about that and I kind of thought that
having a BA was a lesser qualification. I thought science was the path to truth
and so a Bachelor of Arts wasn’t delivering that for me. So there was a bit of a
personal need to prove that I could do science and that I understood science I
suppose.
To achieve these aims Jack completed a Business and Technology Education Council
(BTEC) qualification in sport at a local college, before eventually progressing onto
postgraduate (MSc Sport and Exercise Science) study. The latter course in particular
introduced Jack to the underpinning principles of exercise physiology and
biomechanics, among other topics; disciplines that featured heavily in Jack’s
construction of periodised training programmes.
At the time of being interviewed, Jack had just completed his sixth year of
employment in the sports department of his local university, where he taught the
principles of periodization (and other aspects of strength and conditioning) to
undergraduate students studying for a degree in sports coaching and performance. In
this role Jack kept abreast of current thinking in this area of the curriculum through
14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
the reading of peer reviewed journal articles and scholarly textbooks. While this was
expected of him in this role, Jack explained to us that his desire to continually develop
his knowledge and to share this understanding with those that he taught could,
ultimately, be traced back to those feelings he experienced in response to the various
injuries that he sustained during his athletics career:
I’ve always been interested in the mechanisms, understanding the mechanisms
behind things. So in my case, why did I get injured? Why couldn’t I run? What
was the problem? Trying to get a greater understanding of that, which is why I
then ended up deciding: ‘Right well I actually do want to study science, study
anatomy, study biomechanics, study physiology.’ Try and solve some of these
problems myself because I couldn’t get answers from the people that I was
talking to… So that very much underpinned everything I did, that excited me…
It didn’t save my athletics career, it came much too late for that. I suppose, with
the understanding I’ve got now, I might have been able to help myself, but I like
to think that I’ve invested all that time and energy, you know, learning and
understanding through experience, and that I can apply that and help other
people out and help them maybe avoid some of the problems and issues that I
encountered.
However, and importantly, Jack shared with us that it was through applied
coaching experience that he had also come to learn that the development of
individualised training programmes required more than the application of scientific
knowledge, principles, and scientific research evidence. Rather, Jack was of the belief
that the development and delivery of individualised training programmes also
necessitated a detailed understanding of one’s athlete and the application of practice-
based intuition. In his own words:
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
You’ve still got to use intuition and you’ve still got to adapt that system
(periodised training programmes) to the individual athlete… At that point in my
career (early in his career) it was like rigid adherence to programmes, you
know. For example, I used to work to what I thought was as an optimum cycle
length … Then it was a six to eight-week cycle lengths and that’s what the
literature said… I tried that and I was finding athletes stagnating and I didn’t
think that was working as well. So intuition was telling me I needed to change
it… So you start to adapt that and then with a bit of intuition and a bit more
confidence you’re starting to play around with that and then that cycle becomes
whatever you want it to be.
Pedagogical Delivery Style
Through our discussions with Jack it became clear that his preferred delivery style
was developed, over time, as a result of different learning experiences. Central to this
feature of his coaching was a desire to establish a certain type of relationship with his
athletes: “I like it to be, you know, informal, relaxed, enjoyable, bit of banter, have a
laugh, but do quality work and hopefully build really good working relationships.”
Jack wanted his athletes to enjoy his sessions and feel comfortable within the
environment. Jack’s thinking, here, had been influenced by his own athletic
experiences, especially his time working under Alan. Jack felt that Alan’s delivery
style made him, as well as the other athletes in the training squad, feel welcomed
members of the group:
When I started out as an athlete that was the environment that I got in, you
know, training with this guy, Alan. Training used to be a laugh. We’d work hard
together and there’d be a really good atmosphere. Alan was totally
approachable. Everybody’d have a bit of banter with him. We’d have a bit of
16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
banter with each other… He’d know what you’d been up to, ask you about how
you were doing, really put you at ease from the word go… If you were
struggling, if you weren’t good enough, he’d of helped you out. He’d have still
made you feel at home.
In an effort to foster the above described environment, Jack explained that he
endeavoured to forge positive relationships with his athletes by trying to appear
relaxed and upbeat whenever in their presence:
In terms of communication style, I like things to be fairly relaxed… so that you
can knuckle down and train hard when you need to, but, so that we can
exchange pleasantries, so I know what my athletes are doing. It’s certainly not
about raising voices, shouting and balling at athletes. I very rarely, if ever, do
that and, again, that’s probably a conscious decision from seeing that done when
I first started training and seeing other coaches.
He went on to share with us the disappointment that he had experienced when
observing coaches acting in what he perceived to be an overly authoritarian and
aggressive fashion. Jack consciously tried to avoid communicating to his athletes in
these ways. When discussing this issue he recalled a particularly negative experience
relating to the first time that he attended a track session:
The first time I turned up at the track he (one of the coaches) was stood in one
corner screaming at his athletes and telling them ‘you’re not hitting the targets,
you’re shit, run faster.’ Just shocking really… It was like a speculative trip
down to the track to see who was there. I remember turning up and somebody
telling me I’ve got to see so and so. I went outside, didn’t even know what he
looked like, got outside and there was a coach in the far corner of the track with
a stopwatch, literally screaming at athletes that were running around the track,
17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
balling them out and shouting abuse at them as they were running. So
everybody could hear it and if you weren’t on time and you weren’t in your
target time everybody knew about it and I thought, ‘Shit is that the guy they’re
on about, is that going to be my coach?’ It wasn’t. It was another coach who
was totally different… But every time I was down at the track training this guy
was there screaming and shouting at his athletes… I was never going to work
like that.
Talking about the above example also prompted Jack to recall what were for him
numerous negative sporting experiences of teachers and coaches as a child:
PE at school was probably the other good example of it, so we had some PE
teachers that used to make PE an uncomfortable experience in every sense of
the word… There was one who used to like hitting pupils and stuff like that as
well, so we used to get a bit of that. He used to make a bit of a joke out of it,
but most people would usually get a crack each week for one thing or another,
you know if you weren’t paying attention or you got something wrong, like a
proper sergeant major type… And then there was another PE teacher who came
a bit later at school who had a totally different approach, like really enjoyable
lessons, relaxed, you could choose what activity you wanted to engage in… I’d
never really enjoyed sport in school, it was always a bit of a pain in the arse at
school, if I’m being honest, because of the people that taught it and then he’d
completely turn that on his head and the environment that he fostered was
relaxed. You wanted to work hard because you were in an environment that
you enjoyed… You weren’t being screamed and shouted at and made to do stuff
that you didn’t want to do or you didn’t agree with.
18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
It was in light of such experiences that Jack sought to praise his athletes wherever
possible. While Jack acknowledged the role and place of constructive criticism, he felt
that the provision of positive feedback not only helped him to create a buoyant
working environment, but maintain the focus and motivation of his athletes:
You’ve got to keep the athletes motivated, and especially if you’re new to
something or if you’re trying to learn a new skill; you’re going to have more
bad times than good times, things are going to be going wrong more often than
there are going right, but you can’t just be constantly on their backs about that
and constantly criticising them, knocking them for that. You’ve got to keep
them motivated. Keep them thinking that what they are doing is working, that,
you know, they’re getting somewhere, that they’re making progress. And the
only way you’re going to do that is with some praise. So for me, I think, it’s an
essential part of what you do.
When discussing this aspect of his coaching, Jack recalled how the coach education
programmes that he attended emphasised the importance of remaining positive,
especially when working at the participation level. Jack also witnessed ‘first hand’
some of the benefits to be had from providing athletes with positive feedback,
especially when working with Chris and Derrick, practitioners that Jack identified as
having significantly influenced his beliefs about coaching. Observing the practices of
Chris and Derrick also shaped Jack’s thoughts about the use of questioning. It was
light of such observations that Jack learnt that questions could be used to check the
understanding of his athletes and whether or not he had effectively conveyed his
messages to them:
So obviously I’d replicate that model, I replicate that model and I still do it now.
It’s always the conversation at the start of their session to find out how
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
somebody’s feeling and then to allow you to adjust what you’ve planned for the
session based on that and that would be a conversation… I also like to use
questioning. I like to try to find out what the athlete knows or what the athletes
understands from the information that I’ve given them. So, you throw
information at them, but have they taken it on board? Do they understand what
you’re getting at or what you’re trying to do? So [I use questions] to check
understanding.
Here, Jack explained that he particularly liked the multifaceted and inclusive nature of
the questions that they posed to their athletes. He was also impressed by the way that
Chris and Derrick used the information that they gathered to inform the delivery of
their sessions.
I think it was like multilayered, the way that they did it. So the first thing that
they’d do when athletes turned up to training was questioning, but it was
disguised as conversation and it was about ‘how are you? How are you feeling?
What have you been up to this week? What have you been up to today?’ Really
trying to just tease out, you know, are they feeling under the weather, do they
feel good, have they had a hectic week, have they been doing other sports, have
they had PE that day… And then you could see them scaling back or changing
the skeleton of their session based on the answers they got to those questions. In
the session they’d observe, they’d watch, they’d question and then they’d make
decision about their inputs… Their questions were well timed, because they
were very well considered, they weren’t just question, question, question, it was
with a purpose. It was planned, it was part of a decision making process and
they also incorporated the feedback from that.
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
Contrary to the development of his understanding of periodization, however, Jack
never sought to pursue the academic study of coaching pedagogy (e.g. Armour, 2011;
Cassidy, Jones, & Potrac, 2004, 2009, 2016; Nelson, Groom, & Potrac, 2016;
Tinning, 2010) . When asked about why this was the case, Jack explained that he had
only recently become aware of this area of academic investigation:
I really had no concept of the study of pedagogy, you know, I wouldn’t have
considered it an area that I could’ve expanded on. It wasn’t something that was
on that BTEC syllabus and it wasn’t available on the Master’s programme or
my coach education courses, so I had no concept of it. I just thought it was
common sense coaching stuff and that if you wanted to be better as a coach it
was more about how much you knew in terms of your programming and stuff
like that rather your pedagogical approach.
While Jack acknowledged that his preferred pedagogical delivery style had been
informed by those various experiences outlined above, it is important to note that
active experimentation also played an important role in the development of this aspect
of his coaching practice. Jack explained that it was through his application of
knowledge and his subsequent reflections that he was able to elucidate the practical
utility of such learning experiences. In his own words:
I think it’s very much been a learning curve, so it’s like anything you know,
you’ll see something new, for me, I’ll evaluate it in my head whether that’s
going to be of use or not to my practice, then I’ll try it out. If I’ve made a
decision that it is going to be useful for me I’ll try it out and then I’ll reflect on
it and make some decisions about whether I want to continue using it, if I need
to tweak the approach or whether I bin it and try something brand new. So
things like, erm, questioning style that I’ve built into my coaching practice has
21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
kinda come later. I probably didn’t see that early on in my coaching career. I
came across that from speaking to a couple of elite coaches who’d kinda
introduced us to this concept of using questioning… So I tried that out for a
while, aspects of it worked, aspects of it didn’t work… So I’ve taken something
on board from what they’ve told me, but I’ve got rid of other aspects of what
they’ve told me because I tried it, it worked alright, but it wasn’t really working
towards what I wanted.
Discussion
The results section illustrated how Jack’s learning about his coaching practice was
influenced by his own biographical experiences, his critical reflection upon them, and,
importantly, those choices that he subsequently made. In this respect, Jack’s
experiences as an unfulfilled athlete, which he believed stemmed from frequent and
unnecessary injuries, a poor quality training programme, as well as his experiences of
coach-athlete relationships of varying quality, appeared to significantly influence his
choices and directions about his learning as a coach. Indeed, we would argue that
Jack’s learning endeavours were perhaps not only shaped by a strong desire to avoid
reproducing “bad” and “harmful” practices with the athletes in his charge, but also a
longing to find answers as to why he thought, felt, and experienced athletics in the
ways that he did.
The degree to which Jack subsequently engaged in various learning episodes
could, then, be understood in relation to the concepts of biographical learning and
biographicity (Alheit, 1995; Alheit & Dausien, 2002). According to Alheit and
Dausien (2002, p. 17), biographical learning refers to:
the self-willed, autopoietic accomplishment on the part of active subjects, in
which they reflexively organise their experiences in such a way that they also
22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
generate personal cohenernce, identity, a meaning to their life history and a
communicable socially viable lifeworld perspective for guiding their actions.
Biographicity, meanwhile, is concerned with the social formation of an individual’s
experiences, and, in particular, the self-reflexive temporal structure that is bodily
bound to an individual in the span of his or her life. According to Alheit (2003, p. 16
cited in Maier-Gutheil & Hoff, 2011) biographicity “means that we can always re-
interpret our lives in the contexts where we (have to) live in and that get to know
these contexts themselves as ‘formable’ and ‘shapeable’”. That is, biographicity is
“something that concerns how we perceive and interpret our lives in relation to the
opportunities that we have and the choices we make” (Illeris, 2007, p. 73). In this
respect, Biesta, Field, Hodkinson, Maclaod, & Goodson (2011) remind us that an
individual’s learning can be stimulated by structured transitions (e.g. becoming a
coach) and/or more incidental experiences (e.g. illness, injury, or re-deployment),
with such incidences stimulating engagements with new formal and informal learning
opportunities. Interestingly, they also argued that such learning is inextricably linked
to the process of performing a particular role, assuming a specific identity, as well as
an individual’s efforts to gain control over a particular aspect of their lives (Biesta et
al., 2011). Importantly, then, biographicity is concerned with the ways in which
individuals attempt to shape and re-shape their lives (and learning) to meet their own
needs and desired ends (Alheit & Dausien, 2002). As indicated above, this certainly
appeared to be the case in Jack’s story.
Equally, it is important to note that, from our perspective, Jack’s learning as a
coach was not characterised by unfettered agency (Jones, Potrac, Cushion, &
Ronglan, 2010; Jones, Edwards, & Filho, 2016). In this regard, our reading of Jack’s
story suggested that, rather than being an individual activity that took place inside of
23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
him, his learning depended on his communication and interaction with a variety of
other people and texts (e.g. coach education and academic curricula) (Alheit &
Dausien, 2002; Biesta & Tedder, 2007). That is, Jack’s learning biography was
characterised by its sociality and, importantly, serves to illuminate the connection
between the biographical and the institutional (Alheit & Dausien, 2002). Such an
outlook is also in keeping with the arguments of Jones, Edwards, and Filho (2016),
who eloquently argued that, given the socially mediated nature of thought and action,
an individual’s learning and behaviours cannot be understood outside of the
environment in which they took place. Indeed, we would argue that Jack’s biography
both structured and was structured by his learning process (Alheit & Dausien, 2002;
Christensen, 2014) or, in other words, it demonstrated what might be understood as
“agency within structure” (c.f. Tedder and Biesta, 2007, p. 5).
To date, much of the coach learning literature has suggested that informal
learning, primarily through interaction with other coaches and ‘hands-on’ coaching
experience, has been the dominant mode of learning engaged in by coaches (Cushion
et al., 2010; Cushion & Nelson, 2013). While Jack’s learning regarding the
pedagogical aspects of his coaching practice certainly appeared to reflect the role and
significance of informal learning episodes and the apprenticeship of observation in the
coaching context (Mallett, Rynne, & Billett, 2016; Mallett, Rynne, & Dickens, 2013),
the importance he gave to academic knowledge regarding periodised training
programmes did not. Indeed, the value that Jack attached to his formal studies of
coaching and sports performance reflected the findings of more recent research (e.g.
Mallett et al, 2016; Mallett et al., 2013) illuminating the value attached to formal
study programmes by high performance coaches. On one level then, Jack’s thoughts
about his learning and practice highlight how formal, informal, (and, indeed, non-
24
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
formal) learning episodes are interconnected and “may exist simultaneously in concert
or conflict” with each other (Cushion & Nelson, 2013, p. 361). Jack’s story also
suggested that specific components of a coach’s knowledge and working practice
were informed, to different degrees, by a diverse range of learning experiences. For
example, while Jack learned a great deal from some coaches about the ways in which
they developed and advanced working relationships with athletes, he was,
simultaneously, critical of the lack of scientific evidence underpinning their respective
training programmes. As such, we believe that the field has much to gain in terms of
developing a more nuanced understanding of coach learning by exploring ‘when’,
‘how’, ‘to what extent’, and ‘why’ various learning experiences are understood to
inform (or not) particular aspects of a coach’ everyday practice.
Importantly, Jack also described how a large part of his learning also stemmed
directly from his efforts to implement the knowledge he had gleaned from others, be it
from formal or informal learning situations. This finding resonated with Jarvis’ (2009)
observation that, while individuals are able to learn knowledge how (i.e. practical
knowledge about how to do something) from secondary experiences (i.e. the learner’s
interpretation of another’s experiences and knowledge), this does not equip him or her
with an ability to practically implement this information in the desired way. Rather,
the ability to implement knowledge can only be achieved through its application in a
primary experience (i.e. an individual’s practice in the field) (Jarvis, 2009; Jarvis,
Holford, & Griffin, 2003). When applying such theorising to Jack’s narrative we can
see that primary experiences not only provided Jack with an opportunity to implement
the knowledge that he had gained through secondary experiences, but also to reflect
upon its appropriateness and practical utility. Indeed, it was through his primary
coaching experiences that Jack ultimately made decisions about whether to reject,
25
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
adapt, or integrate those understandings that he had initially acquired through
secondary experiences.
From our perspective, Jack’s practices here are illustrative of Thompson’s (2000)
discussion of the practical theorist. In this respect, the knowledge he had developed
from his engagement in various formal and informal learning episodes provided a
pivotal resource in his thinking about the direction and nature of his coaching
programme. However, introspective consideration of his efforts to practically enact
these ideas provided an additional form of learning that he subsequently incorporated
into his ongoing decision-making. Indeed, the learning he gleaned from putting
others’ ideas and suggestions into practice became an important source of learning
and knowledge in its own right. Jack’s narrative, then, would appear to offer support
to Jarvis’ (2006) observation that people are always in the process of not only being
but becoming. That is, “we are always incorporating into our biographies the
outcomes of our new learning” (p. 119). Relatedly, Jack’s outlook here is also in
keeping with the work of Schempp, Webster, McCullick, Busch, and Mason (2007),
which explored the learning and self-monitoring of expert golf instructors.
Specifically, like the participants in their study, Jack not only monitored his
perspectives, skills, knowledge base, but, importantly, he also used this information
“to plan and execute” his strategies for his individual growth and development as a
coach (Schempp et al., 2007, p. 187).
Conclusion
We believe that Jack’s narrative sheds valuable light on the complex nature of coach
learning. In particular, Jack’s experiences question the fracturing of practice,
knowledge and learning, as his beliefs about coaching could not be understood
without our having established a detailed appreciation of Jack’s learning biography.
26
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
Jack’s narrative illustrates how his preferred approaches to coaching were influenced
by his sporting and coaching life experiences, inclusive of his interactions and
relationships with others, and the cultural context in which they were embedded. In
this respect, our findings also reinforce the belief that knowledge developed through
engagement in formal, nonformal, and informal settings while often separated for
analytical purposes should, in fact, “be understood as interconnected modes of a
complex learning process rather than discrete entities” (Cushion et al., 2010, p. 23;
Cushion & Nelson, 2013; Nelson et al., 2006). Reflecting wider discussion in the
adult learning literature (e.g. Harrison, Reeve, Hanson, and Clarke, 2002; Goodson &
Gill, 2011), our efforts to generate richer insights into coach learning, then, might be
better served by seeking to establish a greater understanding of how learners generate,
apply, and reflect on knowledge as they seek to navigate those challenges and
dilemmas that they face.
Given the findings of this study, we encourage coach educators to consider the
potential value of including (auto)biographical approaches to coach learning in formal
coach education programmes. Such activity might, from our perspective, include
asking coach learners to consider the critical incidents, people, and phases of time that
have informed their learning, as well as assisting them to deconstruct the wider
discourses, language, and other cultural means that have influenced their thinking
(Cassidy et al., 2009; Jones, Denison, & Gearity, 2016; Jones et al., 2016). In this
regard, we believe that such activity has an important role to play in helping coaches
to consider the role of tradition and dogma in their learning, as well as the issues
associated with technical rationality and the fallacy of theoryless practice (Cassidy et
al., 2009). Indeed, while having the potential to be a very challenging exercise, this
type of activity has much to offer in encouraging coaches to consider what they know,
27
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
why they know it, how they use knowledge in practical situations, and helping them
to become “more confident about thinking differently and coaching in more
innovative ways” (Jones, Denison, & Gearity, 2016, p. 170). Equally, coach educators
may wish to consider the place of self-study in their respective curricula and
development programmes. This approach to professional development, which has
gained increasing traction in the preparation of teachers (e.g. LaBoskey, 2004; Ovens
& Fletcher, 2014), aims to enhance learning, improve practice, as well as enhance the
the knowledge base of teaching (Hamilton, Loughran, & Marcondes, 2009). In
practical terms, self-study entails practitioners systematically exploring, acting upon,
and sharing their knowledge, choices, and ideas about teaching and learning
(Dinkelman, 2003; Hamilton, Loughran, & Clarke, 2009). Importantly, this form of
inquiry provides valuable opportunities for better understanding (and grappling with)
the messy social and institutional contexts of coaching, and genuinely involving
coaches in the process of deliberation and choice regarding alternative courses of
action (Cushion, 2016; Fendler, 2003).
While this and other studies (Duarte & Culver, 2014; Jones et al., 2003, 2004)
have started to illustrate the benefits associated with the narrative-biographical
investigation of coach learning, we would suggest that future inquiry might also wish
to adopt longitudinal methodologies that seek to capture the intricacies,
contradictions, and complexities that are an inherent feature of the learning process.
Conceivably, this could include the use of written or audio diaries alongside follow-
up interviews over an extended period of time. This methodology would arguably
help to develop a more nuanced understanding of coach learning, and potentially
nonlearning, inclusive of those factors and motivations driving a given learning
episode, the experiencing of barriers to learning, along with those contemplations that
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
result from the coming together of new knowledge and insights with previous
understandings and beliefs (c.f. Jarvis, 2006).
References
Alheit, P. (1995) Biographical learning. Theoretical outline, challenges and
contradictions of a new approach in adult education. In P. Alheit, A. Bron-
Wojciechowska, E. Brugger & P. Dominicé (Eds.). The biographical
approach in European adult education (pp. 57-74). Vienna: Verband Weiner
Volksbildung.
Alheit, P. (2003). Biographizitat“ als Schlusselqualifikation. Pladoyer
furtransitorische Bildungsprozesse. In Arbeitsgemeinschaft betriebliche
Weiterbildungsforschung e.V./Projekt Qualifikations-Entwicklungs-
Management (Ed.). Weiterlernen - neu gedacht; QUEM-Report, Heft 78, pp.
7-21. Cited in Maier-Gutheil, C &Hof, C. (2011). The development of the
professionalism of adult educators: A biographical and learning perspective.
European Journal of Research on the Education and Learning of Adults,
12(1), 75-88.
Alheit, P., & Dausien, B. (2002). The ‘double face’of lifelong learning: Two
analytical perspectives on a ‘silent revolution’. Studies in the Education of
Adults, 34(1), 3-22.
Armour, K. (2013). Sport Pedagogy: An Introduction for Teaching and Coaching.
London: Routledge.
Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an
ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132-149.
Biesta, G., Field, J., Hodkinson, P., Macleod, F. J., & Goodson, I. F. (2011).
Improving Learning Through the Lifecourse: Learning Lives. London:
Routledge.
Callary, B., Werthner, P., & Trudel, P. (2012). How meaningful episodic experiences
influence the process of becoming an experienced coach. Qualitative research
in sport, exercise and health, 4(3), 420-438.
Callary, B., Werthner, P., & Trudel, P. (2013). Exploring coaching actions based on
developed values: A case study of a female hockey coach. International
Journal of Lifelong Education, 32(2), 209-229.
Cassidy, T. G., Jones, R. L., & Potrac, P. (2004). Understanding Sports Coaching.
29
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
London: Routledge.
Cassidy, T. G., Jones, R. L., & Potrac, P. (2008). Understanding Sports Coaching (2nd
Ed). London: Routledge.
Cassidy, T. G., Jones, R. L., & Potrac, P. (2016). Understanding Sports Coaching (3rd
Ed). London: Routledge.
Christensen, M. K. (2014). Exploring biographical learning in elite soccer coaching.
Sport, Education and Society, 19(2), 204-222.
Cushion, C. J. (2016). Reflection and reflective practice discourses in coaching: a
critical analysis. Sport, Education and Society, 1-13.
Cushion, C & Nelson, L. (2013) Coach education and learning: Developing the field.
In P. Potrac, W. Gilbert, & J. Denison (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sports
coaching (pp. 359-374). London: Routledge.
Cushion, C., Nelson, L., Armour, K., Lyle, J., Jones, R., Sandford, R., &
O’Callaghan, C. (2010). Coach Learning and Development: A Review of
Literature. Sports Coach UK, Leeds, UK.
Dinkelman, T. (2003). Self-study in teacher education a means and ends tool for
promoting reflective teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 6-18.
Duarte, T., & Culver, D. (2014). Becoming a coach in developmental adaptive
sailing: A lifelong learning perspective. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology,
26, 441-456.
Fendler, L. (2003). Teacher reflection in a hall of mirrors: Historical influences and
political reverberations. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 16-25.
Gilbert, W., & Trudel, P. (2004). Analysis of coaching science published from 1970-
2001. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 75, 388-399.
Goodson, I. F., Biesta, G., Tedder, M., & Adair, N. (2010). Narrative Learning.
London: Routledge.
Goodson, I., & Gill, S. (2011). Narrative Pedagogy: Life History and Learning. New
York: Peter Lang.
Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In
N.K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.). The handbook of qualitative research (pp.
105-117). London: Sage.
Hallqvist, A. (2014). Biographical learning: Two decades of research and discussion.
Educational Review, 66(4), 497-513.
Hamilton,M., Loughran, J., & Marcondes, M. (2009). Teacher educators and the self-
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
study of teaching practices. In A. Swenned & M. van der Klink (Eds.).
Becoming a teacher educator: Theory and practice for teacher educators (205-
217). London: Springer.
Harrison, R., Reeve, F., Hanson, A., & Clarke, J. (2002). Supporting life-long
learning. London: Routledge.
Huggan, R., Nelson, L., & Potrac, P. (2015). Developing micropolitical literacy in
professional soccer: a performance analyst’s tale. Qualitative Research in
Sport, Exercise and Health, 7(4), 504-520.
Illeris, K. (2007). How we Learn: Learning and Non-learning in School and Beyond.
London: Routledge.
Jarvis, P. (2006). Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Human Learning. London:
Routledge.
Jarvis, P. (2009). Learning to be a Person in Society. London: Routledge.
Jarvis, P., Holford, J., & Griffin, C. (2003). The Theory & Practice of Learning (2nd
Ed.). London: Routledge.
Jones, R.L., Armour, K.M., & Potrac, P. (2003). Constructing expert knowledge: A
case study of a top-level professional soccer coach. Sport, Education and
Society, 8, 213-229.
Jones, R.L., Armour, K.M., & Potrac, P. (2004). Sport Coaching Cultures: From
Practice to Theory. London: Routledge.
Jones, R. L., Potrac, P., Cushion, C., & Ronglan, L. T. (Eds.). (2010). The Sociology
of Sports Coaching. London: Routledge.
Jones, R. L., Edwards, C., & Viotto Filho, I. T. (2016). Activity theory, complexity
and sports coaching: An epistemology for a discipline. Sport, Education and
Society, 21(2), 200-216.
Jones, L., Denison, J., & Gearity, B. (2016). Robin Usher: A post-structuralist reading
of learning in coaching. In L. Nelson, R. Groom, and P. Potrac (Eds.),
Learning in sports coaching: Theory and application (pp. 161-173). London:
Routledge.
Kelchtermans, G. (1993). Teachers and their career story: A biographical perspective
on professional development. In C. Day, J. Calderhead, & P. Dencolo (Eds.).
Research on teacher thinking: Understanding professional development (pp.
198-220). London: Routledge.
Kelchtermans, G. (2009a). Career stories as gateway to understanding teacher
31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
development. In M. Bayer, U. Plauborg, & S. Rolls (Eds). Teachers’ career
trajectories and working lives (pp. 29-48). London: Springer.
Kelchtermans, G. (2009b). Who I am in how I teach is the message: Self-
understanding, vulnerability and reflection. Teachers and Teaching: Theory
and Practice, 15(2), 257-272.
Kelchtermans, G., & Ballet, K. (2002a). Micropolitical literacy: Reconstructing a
neglected dimension in teacher development. International Journal of
Educational Research, 37, 755-767.
Kelchtermans, G., & Ballet, K. (2002b). The micro-politics of teacher induction: A
narrative-biographical study of teacher socialisation. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 18, 105-120.
LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical
underpinnings. In International handbook of self-study of teaching and
teacher education practices (pp. 817-869). Springer Netherlands.
Mallett, C. J., Rynne, S. B., & Billett, S. (2016). Valued learning experiences of early
career and experienced high-performance coaches. Physical Education and
Sport Pedagogy, 21(1), 89-104.
Mallett, C. J., Rynne, S. B., & Dickens, S. (2013). Developing high performance
coaching craft through work and study. In P. Potrac, W. Gilbert & J. Denison
(Eds.), Routledge Handbook of sports coaching (pp. 463-475). London:
Routledge.
Markula, P & Silk, M. (2011). Qualitative Research for Physical Culture. London:
Palgrave Macmillan.
Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophic
and Practical Approach. London: The farm press.
Mesquita, I., Isidro, S., & Rosado, A. (2010). Portuguese coaches’ perceptions of and
preferences for knowledge sources related to their professional background.
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 9(3), 480-489.
Nelson, L.J., Cushion, C.J., & Portac, P. (2006). Formal, non-formal, and informal
coach learning: A holistic conceptualisation. International Journal of Sport
Science and Coaching, 3, 247-259.
Nelson, L., Groom, R., & Potrac, P. (Eds.). (2016). Learning in Sports Coaching:
Theory and Application. London: Routledge.
Ovens, A., & Fletcher, T. (2014). Self-study in physical education teacher education.
32
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE, BIOGRAPHY & COACHING PRACTICE
London: Springer.
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd Ed.).
London: Sage.
Nelson, L., Allanson, A., Potrac, P., Gale, L., Gilbourne, D., & Marshall, P. (2013).
Thinking, feeling, acting: The case of a semi-professional soccer coach.
Sociology of sport journal, 30(4).
Potrac, P., Jones, R., & Nelson, L. (2014). Interpretivism. In L. Nelson, R. Groom, &
P. Potrac. (Eds.), Research methods in sports coaching (pp. 31-41). London:
Routledge.
Schempp, P.G., Webster, C., McCullick, B.A., Busch, C., & Manson, S. (2007). How
the best get better: An analysis of the self-monitoring strategies used by expert
golf instructors. Sport, Education and Society, 12(2), 175-192.
Sparkes, A. (2002). Telling Tales in Sport and Physical Activity: A Qualitative
Journey. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Press.
Taylor, W. (2014). Analysis of qualitative data. In L. Nelson, R. Groom, & P. Potrac.
(Eds.), Research methods in sports coaching (pp. 181-191). London:
Routledge.
Tedder, M., & Biesta, G. (2007, March). Learning from life and learning for life:
Exploring the opportunities for biographical learning in the lives of adults. In
ESREA Conference on Life History and Biography, Roskilde University,
Denmark (pp. 1-4).
Thompson, N. (2000). Theory and practice in human services. London: McGraw-Hill
Education.
Tinning, R. (2010). Pedagogy and Human Movement: Theory, Practice, Research.
London: Routledge.
Tracy, S.J. (2012). The toxic and mythical combination of deductive writing logic for
inductive qualitative research. Qualitative Communication Research, 1(1),
109-141.
Tracy, S.J. (2013). Qualitative Research Methods. Chichester, UK: John Wiley &
Sons.
Werthner, P., & Trudel, P. (2009). Investigating the idiosyncratic learning paths of
elite Canadian coaches. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching,
4, 433-449.
33
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33