01616686(2)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/4/2019 01616686(2)

    1/3

    Abstract A natural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)contrast based on the pulp of a fruit Euterpe Olercea,popularly known as Aa, was investigated. T1 and T2contrasted images shown the effects of the contrast agentincreasing the ability to visualize the contour of segments ofthe gastrointestinal tract.

    INTRODUCTION

    sing contrast agents is a common practice in

    medical imaging protocols, as is the case of

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The evaluation of GI

    tract by means of MRI has a close relation to

    availability of oral contrast agents. Oral contrasts are

    attractive to MRI if they have good digestive

    acceptance, uniform distribution in the bowel lumen,

    unchanged contrast effect when diluted throughout the

    gastrointestinal tract (GI), no toxicity, no peristalsis

    stimulus, and acceptable cost. Although some of them

    are commercially available, they are still not used

    routinely in most clinical centers nowadays, due to

    many factors, such as possible side effects. Oral

    contrast agents are usually classified by their increase

    (positive agents) or decrease (negative agents) of the

    magnetic resonance imaging signal within the bowel

    [1].

    GI agents change intra-luminal signal either by a

    paramagnetic shortening of T1 or T2 of nearby tissues

    or by having intrinsically short relaxation times [1,2,3].

    Actually, many contrast solutions would be capable of

    changing signal intensity, typically based on heavy

    metal ions, as of Gadolinium (III), Manganese (II),Manganese (III), Iron (III), and copper (II) [4]. However,

    they have generally intrinsic side effects when used

    orally [0]. Ferric iron, for example, can provoke teeth

    staining, gastric irritation, nausea, diarrhea, and

    constipation. Mannitol may cause nausea, vomiting,

    and diarrhea [2]. Gd-DTPA without Mannitol is well

    Manuscript received March 10, 2005. This work was supported in part

    by the CNPq and CAPES. T. Arruda-Sanchez DFM FFCLRP Av

    Bandeirantes, 3900 14.040-901 Ribeirao Preto SP Brazul

    [email protected].

    tolerated but usually fails in opacifying the entire

    bowel. It also needs to be buffered when used orally

    since this chelate is not very stable at low pH found in

    the stomach, what can alter the gastric function.

    We herein present the preliminary implementation of a

    natural oral contrast agent, Euterpe Olercea(popularly named Aa), as a possible alternative

    contrast agent for MRI of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.

    The pulp of Aa, a fruit from the Amazon area, can be

    widely found in tropical regions. Considering the

    biphasic contrast revealed in the preliminary study [4],

    this natural oral contrast agent could be clinically used,

    primarily to assist for a better contrast in images from

    stomach and from a rotine examination of the

    biliopancreatic tract, in Magnetic Resonance

    Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).

    During MRCP, difficulties in the assessment of the

    gallbladder, cystic duct, common bile duct (CBD), and

    pancreatic duct may be encountered because thesestructures are frequently masked by the overlap of the

    signal hyper-intensity from the surrounding tissues

    contend [5]. We investigate the feasibility of using this

    natural solution as a gastrointestinal oral negative

    contrast agent to null the bowel signal during MRCP.

    METHODOLOGY

    All images were acquired using a Siemens 1.5 T

    Scanner (Magneton Vision). A body array coil was

    used to generate T1-weighted images (TR/TE =

    177.8/4.1 ms, FOV 350 mm, 256 x 256, 6 mm slice

    thickness) and T2-weighted images (TR/TE = 4400/64

    ms, FOV = 350 mm, 256 x 256, 6 mm slice thickness)

    at a standard turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence.

    We studied 10 non-symptomatic subjects, with 12

    hours of fasting. Ten axial slices centered at the

    stomach region were acquired, under three distinct

    experimental conditions: first in the fasting state with

    an empty stomach (baseline), followed by the ingestion

    of water and finally by the ingestion of Aa. As to

    implement the contrast agent in the clinical

    environment, these subjects more 35 patients were

    Preliminary Results from Clinical Application of a Natural OralContrast Agent in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the

    Gastrointestinal (GI) System

    T. Arruda-Sanchez; L.E.A. Troncon; R. Brandt-Oliveira; J. Elias Jr., L.A. Colnago,

    D.B. Arajo, D.B. and Baffa O.

    University of So Paulo Ribeiro Preto SP - Brazil

    U

    Proceedings of the 2005 IEEEEngineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual ConferenceShanghai, China, September 1-4, 2005

    0-7803-8740-6/05/$20.00 2005 IEEE. 1382

  • 8/4/2019 01616686(2)

    2/3

    submitted to the same hospital protocol for MRCP that

    is based in the same T2-weighted standard TSE

    sequence parameters, which was approved by the

    institutional ethics committee.

    RESULTS

    T1 and T2 weighted images from the stomach of a

    fasting healthy volunteer are presented in figure 1. In

    figure 1a and figure 1d we observe an empty stomach.

    Subsequently, the subject ingested 200 ml of water,

    and another set of T1 (Fig. 1b) and T2 (Fig. 1e) was

    acquired. The expansion of the gastric volume is

    clearly observed and two phases can be identified on

    the images: a small dark region corresponding to air

    and a larger area of slight contrast increase

    corresponding to water. Finally, 200 ml of the Aa pulp

    was ingested by the subject and the last series of MR

    images were obtained. Figure 1c shows one T1-

    weighted image. The increase of contrast due to the

    presence of Aa is conspicuous. Three well definedregions can be identified: air, water and Aa. Also, the

    T2 sequence presents a high contrast in the gastric

    lumen due to low signal intensity from Aai (Fig. 1f).

    We looked for intrinsic properties that could be

    responsible for the T1 signal enhancement and T2

    opacification. Atomic Absorption spectra revealed the

    presence of Fe, Mn and Cu ions in Aai. Although

    there is no information yet about how these ions are

    complexed with the organic matrix, their presence is

    probably the main cause for the image contrast

    changes.

    Figure 1. T1 and T2 weighed images in an axial plane. T1

    images are on the top line, while T2 are on the bottom. (a)

    T1 image of an empty stomach. (b) T1 of the same volunteerwith air and 200ml of water. (c) T1 image with air, 200ml of

    water and 200ml of Aai. (d) T2 image of an empty

    stomach. (e) T2 image of air and 200 ml of water. (f) T2

    image of air, 200ml of water and 200ml of Aai.

    Figure 2 shows T2 images, in the coronal plane,

    from 2 patients submitted to MRCP. The MRI signal

    from bowel loops, superposed to the common bile

    duct, is subtracted, allowing the complete observation

    of the gall bladder after the ingestion of Aa.

    We can see the image clearance (Fig. 2) due to the

    reduced signal from the Aa pulp present in stomach

    and bowel loops.

    DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

    The contrast enhancement due to Aa in T1-weighed

    images is evident, producing a better definition of the

    gastric lumen. These results open a wide perspective

    for the clinical use of such contrast agent, as an

    alternative oral contrast for imaging the intestinal

    lumen, functional evaluation of dyspepsia and otherpathological states.

    The contrast enhancement due to Aa in T1-weighted

    images is evident (Fig. 1c), producing a better

    definition of the gastric lumen. Thus, these results

    open a wide perspective for Aa as an alternative oral

    contrast agent that can be employed for imaging the

    intestinal lumen, functional evaluation of dyspepsia, in

    addition to the applications of the gastrointestinal

    motility [6,7].

    Figure 2. T2-weighed images from 2 patients (a)

    and (b) during fasting (left) and after Acai

    ingestion (right). Overlap is eliminated (pentagram)

    which allows gallbladder and biliary ducts (large

    and small arrows ) to be more visible after Aai

    ingestion.

    1383

  • 8/4/2019 01616686(2)

    3/3

    Aa has great advantages since is a natural and

    palatable food with no expected side effects or adverse

    reactions. In every patient studied thus fat, only one

    had nausea after ingesting the Acai pulp. As for

    MRCP, the results indicate a possible application from

    the signal reduction of gastric acid and intestinal loops.

    The Acai pulp may improve the visualization of

    pancreatic and biliary ducts.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENT

    The authors thanks the technical support of Loureno

    Rocha, Carlos Brunello, Matheus Guerreiro, Reginaldo

    Ferreira Chagas, Luciano Kazuo Akita and the MRI

    service of Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de

    Medicina de Ribeiro Preto to make available its

    facilities.

    REFERENCES

    [1] Giovagnoni A, Fabbri A, and Maccioni F. OralContrast agents in MRI of the Gastrointestinal Tract.

    Abdominal Imaging 2002;27:367-75.

    [2] Runge VM. Contrast Media in Magnetic

    Resonance Imaging: A Clinical Approach. J B

    Lippincott Company, 1992.

    [3] Lomas DJ, MRCP, FRCR, and Graves MJ.

    Small Bowel MRI using water as a Contrast Medium.

    The British Journal of Radiology 1999;72:994-7.

    [4] T.C. Fraga, D.B. de Arajo , T.A. Sanchez, J.

    Elias Jr., A.A.O. Carneiro, R. Brandt Oliveira, M. Sosaand O. Baffa Euterpe olercea (Aa) as an

    Alternative Oral Contrast Agent in MR Imaging (MRI)

    of the Gastrointestinal (GI) System: Preliminary

    Results, Magn Reson Imaging, vol. 22, no. 3, pp.

    389-93. 2004.

    [5] Chan JHM, Tsui EYK, Yuen MK, Szeto ML, Luk

    SH, Wong KPC, Wong NOW. Gadopentetate

    Dimeglumine as an Oral Negative Gastrointestinal

    Contrast Agent for MRCP. Abdom Imaging 2000;

    25:508-10.

    [6] de Zwart IM, Mearadji B, Lamb HJ, Eilers PHC,

    Masclee AAM, de Roos A, Kunz P. Gastric motility:

    Comparison of assessment with real-time MR imaging

    or barostat measurement - Initial experience.

    Radiology 2002;224(2):592-7.

    [7] Carneiro AAO, Baffa, O, Oliveira RB. Study of

    Stomach Motility Using Magnetic Tracers. Phys Med

    Biol 1999; 44: 1691-7.

    1384