Upload
jackriden
View
225
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/4/2019 01616686(2)
1/3
Abstract A natural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)contrast based on the pulp of a fruit Euterpe Olercea,popularly known as Aa, was investigated. T1 and T2contrasted images shown the effects of the contrast agentincreasing the ability to visualize the contour of segments ofthe gastrointestinal tract.
INTRODUCTION
sing contrast agents is a common practice in
medical imaging protocols, as is the case of
Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The evaluation of GI
tract by means of MRI has a close relation to
availability of oral contrast agents. Oral contrasts are
attractive to MRI if they have good digestive
acceptance, uniform distribution in the bowel lumen,
unchanged contrast effect when diluted throughout the
gastrointestinal tract (GI), no toxicity, no peristalsis
stimulus, and acceptable cost. Although some of them
are commercially available, they are still not used
routinely in most clinical centers nowadays, due to
many factors, such as possible side effects. Oral
contrast agents are usually classified by their increase
(positive agents) or decrease (negative agents) of the
magnetic resonance imaging signal within the bowel
[1].
GI agents change intra-luminal signal either by a
paramagnetic shortening of T1 or T2 of nearby tissues
or by having intrinsically short relaxation times [1,2,3].
Actually, many contrast solutions would be capable of
changing signal intensity, typically based on heavy
metal ions, as of Gadolinium (III), Manganese (II),Manganese (III), Iron (III), and copper (II) [4]. However,
they have generally intrinsic side effects when used
orally [0]. Ferric iron, for example, can provoke teeth
staining, gastric irritation, nausea, diarrhea, and
constipation. Mannitol may cause nausea, vomiting,
and diarrhea [2]. Gd-DTPA without Mannitol is well
Manuscript received March 10, 2005. This work was supported in part
by the CNPq and CAPES. T. Arruda-Sanchez DFM FFCLRP Av
Bandeirantes, 3900 14.040-901 Ribeirao Preto SP Brazul
tolerated but usually fails in opacifying the entire
bowel. It also needs to be buffered when used orally
since this chelate is not very stable at low pH found in
the stomach, what can alter the gastric function.
We herein present the preliminary implementation of a
natural oral contrast agent, Euterpe Olercea(popularly named Aa), as a possible alternative
contrast agent for MRI of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.
The pulp of Aa, a fruit from the Amazon area, can be
widely found in tropical regions. Considering the
biphasic contrast revealed in the preliminary study [4],
this natural oral contrast agent could be clinically used,
primarily to assist for a better contrast in images from
stomach and from a rotine examination of the
biliopancreatic tract, in Magnetic Resonance
Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).
During MRCP, difficulties in the assessment of the
gallbladder, cystic duct, common bile duct (CBD), and
pancreatic duct may be encountered because thesestructures are frequently masked by the overlap of the
signal hyper-intensity from the surrounding tissues
contend [5]. We investigate the feasibility of using this
natural solution as a gastrointestinal oral negative
contrast agent to null the bowel signal during MRCP.
METHODOLOGY
All images were acquired using a Siemens 1.5 T
Scanner (Magneton Vision). A body array coil was
used to generate T1-weighted images (TR/TE =
177.8/4.1 ms, FOV 350 mm, 256 x 256, 6 mm slice
thickness) and T2-weighted images (TR/TE = 4400/64
ms, FOV = 350 mm, 256 x 256, 6 mm slice thickness)
at a standard turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence.
We studied 10 non-symptomatic subjects, with 12
hours of fasting. Ten axial slices centered at the
stomach region were acquired, under three distinct
experimental conditions: first in the fasting state with
an empty stomach (baseline), followed by the ingestion
of water and finally by the ingestion of Aa. As to
implement the contrast agent in the clinical
environment, these subjects more 35 patients were
Preliminary Results from Clinical Application of a Natural OralContrast Agent in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the
Gastrointestinal (GI) System
T. Arruda-Sanchez; L.E.A. Troncon; R. Brandt-Oliveira; J. Elias Jr., L.A. Colnago,
D.B. Arajo, D.B. and Baffa O.
University of So Paulo Ribeiro Preto SP - Brazil
U
Proceedings of the 2005 IEEEEngineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual ConferenceShanghai, China, September 1-4, 2005
0-7803-8740-6/05/$20.00 2005 IEEE. 1382
8/4/2019 01616686(2)
2/3
submitted to the same hospital protocol for MRCP that
is based in the same T2-weighted standard TSE
sequence parameters, which was approved by the
institutional ethics committee.
RESULTS
T1 and T2 weighted images from the stomach of a
fasting healthy volunteer are presented in figure 1. In
figure 1a and figure 1d we observe an empty stomach.
Subsequently, the subject ingested 200 ml of water,
and another set of T1 (Fig. 1b) and T2 (Fig. 1e) was
acquired. The expansion of the gastric volume is
clearly observed and two phases can be identified on
the images: a small dark region corresponding to air
and a larger area of slight contrast increase
corresponding to water. Finally, 200 ml of the Aa pulp
was ingested by the subject and the last series of MR
images were obtained. Figure 1c shows one T1-
weighted image. The increase of contrast due to the
presence of Aa is conspicuous. Three well definedregions can be identified: air, water and Aa. Also, the
T2 sequence presents a high contrast in the gastric
lumen due to low signal intensity from Aai (Fig. 1f).
We looked for intrinsic properties that could be
responsible for the T1 signal enhancement and T2
opacification. Atomic Absorption spectra revealed the
presence of Fe, Mn and Cu ions in Aai. Although
there is no information yet about how these ions are
complexed with the organic matrix, their presence is
probably the main cause for the image contrast
changes.
Figure 1. T1 and T2 weighed images in an axial plane. T1
images are on the top line, while T2 are on the bottom. (a)
T1 image of an empty stomach. (b) T1 of the same volunteerwith air and 200ml of water. (c) T1 image with air, 200ml of
water and 200ml of Aai. (d) T2 image of an empty
stomach. (e) T2 image of air and 200 ml of water. (f) T2
image of air, 200ml of water and 200ml of Aai.
Figure 2 shows T2 images, in the coronal plane,
from 2 patients submitted to MRCP. The MRI signal
from bowel loops, superposed to the common bile
duct, is subtracted, allowing the complete observation
of the gall bladder after the ingestion of Aa.
We can see the image clearance (Fig. 2) due to the
reduced signal from the Aa pulp present in stomach
and bowel loops.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
The contrast enhancement due to Aa in T1-weighed
images is evident, producing a better definition of the
gastric lumen. These results open a wide perspective
for the clinical use of such contrast agent, as an
alternative oral contrast for imaging the intestinal
lumen, functional evaluation of dyspepsia and otherpathological states.
The contrast enhancement due to Aa in T1-weighted
images is evident (Fig. 1c), producing a better
definition of the gastric lumen. Thus, these results
open a wide perspective for Aa as an alternative oral
contrast agent that can be employed for imaging the
intestinal lumen, functional evaluation of dyspepsia, in
addition to the applications of the gastrointestinal
motility [6,7].
Figure 2. T2-weighed images from 2 patients (a)
and (b) during fasting (left) and after Acai
ingestion (right). Overlap is eliminated (pentagram)
which allows gallbladder and biliary ducts (large
and small arrows ) to be more visible after Aai
ingestion.
1383
8/4/2019 01616686(2)
3/3
Aa has great advantages since is a natural and
palatable food with no expected side effects or adverse
reactions. In every patient studied thus fat, only one
had nausea after ingesting the Acai pulp. As for
MRCP, the results indicate a possible application from
the signal reduction of gastric acid and intestinal loops.
The Acai pulp may improve the visualization of
pancreatic and biliary ducts.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors thanks the technical support of Loureno
Rocha, Carlos Brunello, Matheus Guerreiro, Reginaldo
Ferreira Chagas, Luciano Kazuo Akita and the MRI
service of Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de
Medicina de Ribeiro Preto to make available its
facilities.
REFERENCES
[1] Giovagnoni A, Fabbri A, and Maccioni F. OralContrast agents in MRI of the Gastrointestinal Tract.
Abdominal Imaging 2002;27:367-75.
[2] Runge VM. Contrast Media in Magnetic
Resonance Imaging: A Clinical Approach. J B
Lippincott Company, 1992.
[3] Lomas DJ, MRCP, FRCR, and Graves MJ.
Small Bowel MRI using water as a Contrast Medium.
The British Journal of Radiology 1999;72:994-7.
[4] T.C. Fraga, D.B. de Arajo , T.A. Sanchez, J.
Elias Jr., A.A.O. Carneiro, R. Brandt Oliveira, M. Sosaand O. Baffa Euterpe olercea (Aa) as an
Alternative Oral Contrast Agent in MR Imaging (MRI)
of the Gastrointestinal (GI) System: Preliminary
Results, Magn Reson Imaging, vol. 22, no. 3, pp.
389-93. 2004.
[5] Chan JHM, Tsui EYK, Yuen MK, Szeto ML, Luk
SH, Wong KPC, Wong NOW. Gadopentetate
Dimeglumine as an Oral Negative Gastrointestinal
Contrast Agent for MRCP. Abdom Imaging 2000;
25:508-10.
[6] de Zwart IM, Mearadji B, Lamb HJ, Eilers PHC,
Masclee AAM, de Roos A, Kunz P. Gastric motility:
Comparison of assessment with real-time MR imaging
or barostat measurement - Initial experience.
Radiology 2002;224(2):592-7.
[7] Carneiro AAO, Baffa, O, Oliveira RB. Study of
Stomach Motility Using Magnetic Tracers. Phys Med
Biol 1999; 44: 1691-7.
1384