• Home

  • Documents

  • 0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT 2018 - 19 Annual Performance … · 0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT...
2248
0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report 2018 - 19 Indicator 02: Dropout Rate Single Year Event Rate - Percent of students in grades 7-12 dropping out in a single year (Data from 2017/2018 School Indicator 01: Graduation Rate Four year Cohort Rate - Percent of students graduating in four years (Data from 2017/2018 School Year) Indicator 03-B: Assessment Participation Rate: Literacy Indicator 03-B: Assessment Participation Rate: Math Indicator 03-C: Assessment Proficiency Rate: Math Indicator 03-C: Assessment Proficiency Rate: Literacy ASSESSMENT PARTICIPATION & PROFICIENCY RATES GRADUATION & DROPOUT RATES 95.00% 95.00% Indicator LEA Rate Target Met by LEA LEA Difference from Target State Target State Rate Year to Year LEA Rate Change 84.61% 85.91% 75.00% 10.91% N 1.62% 1.98% 4.76% 2.78% N 99.11% Y 96.80% N/A 99.20% Y 97.87% N/A 10.50% 10.50% 5.49% 5.01% N 12.95% 12.95% 15.21% N/A Y ↓ ↓ ↓ ↑ ↓ ↓ Progress Slippage No Change Not Applicable Year to Year LEA Change: Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 1 of 2248

0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT 2018 - 19 Annual Performance … · 0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT 2018 - 19 Annual Performance Report Indicator 02: Dropout Rate Single Year Event Rate

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 02: Dropout Rate Single Year Event Rate - Percent of students in grades 7-12 dropping out in a single year(Data from 2017/2018 School

    Indicator 01: Graduation RateFour year Cohort Rate - Percent of students graduating in four years(Data from 2017/2018 School Year)

    Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Literacy

    Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Math

    Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Math

    Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Literacy

    ASSESSMENT PARTICIPATION & PROFICIENCY RATES

    GRADUATION & DROPOUT RATES

    95.00%

    95.00%

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    State Target

    State Rate

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    84.61% 85.91% 75.00% 10.91%N

    1.62% 1.98% 4.76% 2.78%N

    99.11% Y96.80% N/A

    99.20% Y97.87% N/A

    10.50% 10.50% 5.49% 5.01%N

    12.95% 12.95% 15.21% N/AY

    ↓

    ↓

    ↓

    ↑

    ↓

    ↓

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 1 of 2248

  • 0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    DISCIPLINE RATES & DISPROPORTIONALITY in DISCIPLINE

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 04-A: Suspensions & Expulsions > than 10 days(Data from 2017/2018 school year)

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    Indicator 04-B: Suspensions & Expulsions for > than 10 days by Special Education Race vs. General Education all races. (Data from 2017/2018 school year)

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    N/A

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts whose special edcuation rate exceeds the general education rate by more than 1.36 percentage points. (2) The LEA rate is the difference between the general education rate and special education rate. Any LEA that exceed the allowable 1.36 percentage points difference must complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices.(2) LEA rate is based on whether or not a LEA was identified as having possible disproportionality. Identification is the difference between the general education rate for all races and special education rate for specific races. Any LEA with a difference >4 percentage point is identified for a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    30.51% 29.50% N/AY

    N

    0.38% 0%

  • 0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (K-12)

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 05-C: School Age LRE Percent of students receiving special educatiion services in other settings

    Indicator 05-B: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom less than 40% of the day

    Indicator 05-A: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day

    LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (PreSchool)

    Indicator 06-B: Early Childhood LRE: Separate education class, separate school or residential facility

    Indicator 06-A: Early Childhood LRE: Regular Preschool Program Percent of children recieving with the majority of special education services with thier non-disabled peers

    Note: Other settings includes Day Schools, Residential, and Hosptial/Home Bound but does not include students in correctional facilities or private schools.

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    54.32% 63.77% 27.56% 36.21%N

    12.72% 12.00% 6.41% N/AY

    2.05% 2.40% Y0.64% N/A

    29.04% 35.94% N/AN/A N/A

    23.74% 26.65% N/AN/A N/A

    ↓

    ↓

    ↓

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 3 of 2248

  • 0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Appropriate Behaviors

    Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Appropriate Behaviors

    Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Knowledge and Skills

    Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Social Emotional

    Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Social Emotional

    Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Knowledge and Skills

    EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 7: Early Childhood OutcomesThere are two Summary Statements which are based the change between entry and exits scores for three outcome areas: (A) Social Emotional, (B) Knowledge and Skills, and (C) Appropriate Behvaiors.

    Summary Statement 1: Of those preschool children who entered the preschool program below age expectations in each Outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program.

    Summary Statement 2: The percent of preschool children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they turned 6 years of age or

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    87.89% 91.56% N/AN/A N/A

    57.92% 68.72% N/AN/A N/A

    89.49% 92.38% N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    45.15% 61.11% N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    90.63% 92.13% N/AN/A N/A

    65.22% 78.00% N/AN/A N/A

    --

    --

    --

    --

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 4 of 2248

  • 0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    PARENT INVOLVEMENT OUTCOMES

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Indicator 8: Parent InvolvementPercent of surveyed parents who reported school facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    Indicator 9: Disproportionality - EligibilityDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    DISPROPORTIONALITY: IDENTIFICATION & DISABILITY

    Indicator 10: Disproportionality - Child with a DisabiiltyDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    0.00% 0.00% ≤4.00 N/A

    0.00%0.00% N/A

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    93.83% 94.84% N/AN/A N/A

    95.82% 96.45% N89.47% 6.98%

    Y

    N N/A

    N N/A

    Y

  • 0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 11: Child FindPercent of children with parental consent to evaluate who are evaluated within the State established timeline of 60 days.

    CHILD FIND: TIMELY EVALUATION

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    TRANSITION

    Indicator 12: Early Childhood TransitionPercent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who arefound eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday.

    Indicator 13: Secondary TransistionPercent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals.

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    N/AN/A N/A

    99.62% Y100.00% N/A

    100.00% N/A N/A

    ↔

    --

    --

    --80.15%

    95.24% 100.00% N/AN/A N/A

    100.00

    100.00%

    99.87%

    N/A

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 6 of 2248

  • 0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Post-School Outcomes

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Indicator 14: Post-School OutcomesPercent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were:A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.

    A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.

    B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.

    C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other post-secondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    11.78% 15.80% N/AN/A N/A

    25.93% 51.49% N/AN/A N/A

    51.35% 63.26% N/AN/A N/A

    --

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 7 of 2248

  • 0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Timely and Accurate Data Reporting

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    State Indicator: Timely and Accurate Data.

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    100%

    100%

    100%

    100%

    N/A

    N/A

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

  • 0104 : STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 02: Dropout Rate Single Year Event Rate - Percent of students in grades 7-12 dropping out in a single year(Data from 2017/2018 School

    Indicator 01: Graduation RateFour year Cohort Rate - Percent of students graduating in four years(Data from 2017/2018 School Year)

    Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Literacy

    Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Math

    Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Math

    Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Literacy

    ASSESSMENT PARTICIPATION & PROFICIENCY RATES

    GRADUATION & DROPOUT RATES

    95.00%

    95.00%

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    State Target

    State Rate

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    84.61% 85.91% 88.88% N/AY

    1.62% 1.98% 1.53% N/AY

    99.11% Y99.28% N/A

    99.20% Y99.28% N/A

    10.50% 10.50% 2.89% 7.61%N

    12.95% 12.95% 6.52% 6.43%N

    ↑

    ↓

    ↓

    ↓

    ↓

    ↓

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 9 of 2248

  • 0104 : STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    DISCIPLINE RATES & DISPROPORTIONALITY in DISCIPLINE

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 04-A: Suspensions & Expulsions > than 10 days(Data from 2017/2018 school year)

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    Indicator 04-B: Suspensions & Expulsions for > than 10 days by Special Education Race vs. General Education all races. (Data from 2017/2018 school year)

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    N/A

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts whose special edcuation rate exceeds the general education rate by more than 1.36 percentage points. (2) The LEA rate is the difference between the general education rate and special education rate. Any LEA that exceed the allowable 1.36 percentage points difference must complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices.(2) LEA rate is based on whether or not a LEA was identified as having possible disproportionality. Identification is the difference between the general education rate for all races and special education rate for specific races. Any LEA with a difference >4 percentage point is identified for a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    30.51% 29.50% N/AY

    N

    0.38% 0%

  • 0104 : STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (K-12)

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 05-C: School Age LRE Percent of students receiving special educatiion services in other settings

    Indicator 05-B: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom less than 40% of the day

    Indicator 05-A: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day

    LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (PreSchool)

    Indicator 06-B: Early Childhood LRE: Separate education class, separate school or residential facility

    Indicator 06-A: Early Childhood LRE: Regular Preschool Program Percent of children recieving with the majority of special education services with thier non-disabled peers

    Note: Other settings includes Day Schools, Residential, and Hosptial/Home Bound but does not include students in correctional facilities or private schools.

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    54.32% 63.77% 57.64% 6.13%N

    12.72% 12.00% 17.47% 4.75%N

    2.05% 2.40% Y0.43% N/A

    29.04% 35.94% N/AN/A N/A

    23.74% 26.65% N/AN/A N/A

    ↑

    ↑

    ↓

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 11 of 2248

  • 0104 : STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Appropriate Behaviors

    Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Appropriate Behaviors

    Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Knowledge and Skills

    Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Social Emotional

    Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Social Emotional

    Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Knowledge and Skills

    EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 7: Early Childhood OutcomesThere are two Summary Statements which are based the change between entry and exits scores for three outcome areas: (A) Social Emotional, (B) Knowledge and Skills, and (C) Appropriate Behvaiors.

    Summary Statement 1: Of those preschool children who entered the preschool program below age expectations in each Outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program.

    Summary Statement 2: The percent of preschool children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they turned 6 years of age or

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    87.89% 91.56% N/AN/A N/A

    57.92% 68.72% N/AN/A N/A

    89.49% 92.38% N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    45.15% 61.11% N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    90.63% 92.13% N/AN/A N/A

    65.22% 78.00% N/AN/A N/A

    --

    --

    --

    --

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 12 of 2248

  • 0104 : STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    PARENT INVOLVEMENT OUTCOMES

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Indicator 8: Parent InvolvementPercent of surveyed parents who reported school facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    Indicator 9: Disproportionality - EligibilityDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    DISPROPORTIONALITY: IDENTIFICATION & DISABILITY

    Indicator 10: Disproportionality - Child with a DisabiiltyDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    0.00% 0.00% ≤4.00 N/A

    0.00%0.00% N/A

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    93.83% 94.84% N/AN/A N/A

    95.82% 96.45% N89.47% 6.98%

    Y

    N N/A

    Y N

    Y>4.00

    --

    ↓

    ↔

    ↑

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 13 of 2248

  • 0104 : STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 11: Child FindPercent of children with parental consent to evaluate who are evaluated within the State established timeline of 60 days.

    CHILD FIND: TIMELY EVALUATION

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    TRANSITION

    Indicator 12: Early Childhood TransitionPercent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who arefound eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday.

    Indicator 13: Secondary TransistionPercent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals.

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    N/AN/A N/A

    99.62% Y100.00% N/A

    100.00% N/A N/A

    ↔

    --

    --

    --80.15%

    95.24% 100.00% N/AN/A N/A

    100.00

    100.00%

    99.87%

    N/A

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 14 of 2248

  • 0104 : STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Post-School Outcomes

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Indicator 14: Post-School OutcomesPercent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were:A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.

    A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.

    B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.

    C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other post-secondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    11.78% 15.80% N/AN/A N/A

    25.93% 51.49% N/AN/A N/A

    51.35% 63.26% N/AN/A N/A

    --

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 15 of 2248

  • 0104 : STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Timely and Accurate Data Reporting

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    State Indicator: Timely and Accurate Data.

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    100%

    100%

    100%

    100%

    N/A

    N/A

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    100%

    N/A N/A

    Y

    --

    ↔

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 16 of 2248

  • 0201 : CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 02: Dropout Rate Single Year Event Rate - Percent of students in grades 7-12 dropping out in a single year(Data from 2017/2018 School

    Indicator 01: Graduation RateFour year Cohort Rate - Percent of students graduating in four years(Data from 2017/2018 School Year)

    Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Literacy

    Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Math

    Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Math

    Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Literacy

    ASSESSMENT PARTICIPATION & PROFICIENCY RATES

    GRADUATION & DROPOUT RATES

    95.00%

    95.00%

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    State Target

    State Rate

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    84.61% 85.91% 93.33% N/AY

    1.62% 1.98% 1.31% N/AY

    99.11% Y100.00% N/A

    99.20% Y100.00% N/A

    10.50% 10.50% 1.88% 8.62%N

    12.95% 12.95% 3.77% 9.18%N

    ↑

    ↓

    ↑

    ↑

    ↓

    ↓

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 17 of 2248

  • 0201 : CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    DISCIPLINE RATES & DISPROPORTIONALITY in DISCIPLINE

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 04-A: Suspensions & Expulsions > than 10 days(Data from 2017/2018 school year)

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    Indicator 04-B: Suspensions & Expulsions for > than 10 days by Special Education Race vs. General Education all races. (Data from 2017/2018 school year)

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    N/A

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts whose special edcuation rate exceeds the general education rate by more than 1.36 percentage points. (2) The LEA rate is the difference between the general education rate and special education rate. Any LEA that exceed the allowable 1.36 percentage points difference must complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices.(2) LEA rate is based on whether or not a LEA was identified as having possible disproportionality. Identification is the difference between the general education rate for all races and special education rate for specific races. Any LEA with a difference >4 percentage point is identified for a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    30.51% 29.50% N/AY

    N

    0.38% 0%

  • 0201 : CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (K-12)

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 05-C: School Age LRE Percent of students receiving special educatiion services in other settings

    Indicator 05-B: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom less than 40% of the day

    Indicator 05-A: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day

    LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (PreSchool)

    Indicator 06-B: Early Childhood LRE: Separate education class, separate school or residential facility

    Indicator 06-A: Early Childhood LRE: Regular Preschool Program Percent of children recieving with the majority of special education services with thier non-disabled peers

    Note: Other settings includes Day Schools, Residential, and Hosptial/Home Bound but does not include students in correctional facilities or private schools.

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    54.32% 63.77% 76.13% N/AY

    12.72% 12.00% 14.77% 2.05%N

    2.05% 2.40% Y0.00% N/A

    29.04% 35.94% N/AN/A N/A

    23.74% 26.65% N/AN/A N/A

    ↓

    ↑

    ↓

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 19 of 2248

  • 0201 : CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Appropriate Behaviors

    Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Appropriate Behaviors

    Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Knowledge and Skills

    Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Social Emotional

    Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Social Emotional

    Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Knowledge and Skills

    EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 7: Early Childhood OutcomesThere are two Summary Statements which are based the change between entry and exits scores for three outcome areas: (A) Social Emotional, (B) Knowledge and Skills, and (C) Appropriate Behvaiors.

    Summary Statement 1: Of those preschool children who entered the preschool program below age expectations in each Outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program.

    Summary Statement 2: The percent of preschool children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they turned 6 years of age or

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    87.89% 91.56% N/AN/A N/A

    57.92% 68.72% N/AN/A N/A

    89.49% 92.38% N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    45.15% 61.11% N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    90.63% 92.13% N/AN/A N/A

    65.22% 78.00% N/AN/A N/A

    --

    --

    --

    --

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 20 of 2248

  • 0201 : CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    PARENT INVOLVEMENT OUTCOMES

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Indicator 8: Parent InvolvementPercent of surveyed parents who reported school facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    Indicator 9: Disproportionality - EligibilityDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    DISPROPORTIONALITY: IDENTIFICATION & DISABILITY

    Indicator 10: Disproportionality - Child with a DisabiiltyDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    0.00% 0.00% ≤4.00 N/A

    0.00%0.00% N/A

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    93.83% 94.84% N/AN/A N/A

    95.82% 96.45% Y100.00% N/A

    Y

    N N/A

    Y N

    Y>4.00

    --

    ↔

    ↔

    ↑

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 21 of 2248

  • 0201 : CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 11: Child FindPercent of children with parental consent to evaluate who are evaluated within the State established timeline of 60 days.

    CHILD FIND: TIMELY EVALUATION

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    TRANSITION

    Indicator 12: Early Childhood TransitionPercent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who arefound eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday.

    Indicator 13: Secondary TransistionPercent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals.

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    N/AN/A N/A

    99.62% Y100.00% N/A

    100.00% N/A N/A

    ↔

    --

    --

    --80.15%

    95.24% 100.00% N/AN/A N/A

    100.00

    100.00%

    99.87%

    N/A

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 22 of 2248

  • 0201 : CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Post-School Outcomes

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Indicator 14: Post-School OutcomesPercent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were:A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.

    A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.

    B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.

    C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other post-secondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    11.78% 15.80% N8.33% 7.47%

    25.93% 51.49% N33.33% 18.16%

    51.35% 63.26% N33.33% 29.93%

    ↓

    ↓

    ↓

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 23 of 2248

  • 0201 : CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Timely and Accurate Data Reporting

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    State Indicator: Timely and Accurate Data.

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    100%

    100%

    100%

    100%

    N/A

    N/A

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    100%

    N/A N/A

    Y

    --

    ↔

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 24 of 2248

  • 0203 : HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 02: Dropout Rate Single Year Event Rate - Percent of students in grades 7-12 dropping out in a single year(Data from 2017/2018 School

    Indicator 01: Graduation RateFour year Cohort Rate - Percent of students graduating in four years(Data from 2017/2018 School Year)

    Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Literacy

    Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Math

    Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Math

    Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Literacy

    ASSESSMENT PARTICIPATION & PROFICIENCY RATES

    GRADUATION & DROPOUT RATES

    95.00%

    95.00%

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    State Target

    State Rate

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    84.61% 85.91% 100.00% N/AY

    1.62% 1.98% 3.22% 1.24%N

    99.11% Y99.09% N/A

    99.20% Y99.09% N/A

    10.50% 10.50% 10.09% 0.41%N

    12.95% 12.95% 10.09% 2.86%N

    ↔

    ↑

    ↓

    ↓

    ↑

    ↑

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 25 of 2248

  • 0203 : HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    DISCIPLINE RATES & DISPROPORTIONALITY in DISCIPLINE

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 04-A: Suspensions & Expulsions > than 10 days(Data from 2017/2018 school year)

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    Indicator 04-B: Suspensions & Expulsions for > than 10 days by Special Education Race vs. General Education all races. (Data from 2017/2018 school year)

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    N/A

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts whose special edcuation rate exceeds the general education rate by more than 1.36 percentage points. (2) The LEA rate is the difference between the general education rate and special education rate. Any LEA that exceed the allowable 1.36 percentage points difference must complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices.(2) LEA rate is based on whether or not a LEA was identified as having possible disproportionality. Identification is the difference between the general education rate for all races and special education rate for specific races. Any LEA with a difference >4 percentage point is identified for a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    30.51% 29.50% N/AY

    N

    0.38% 0%

  • 0203 : HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (K-12)

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 05-C: School Age LRE Percent of students receiving special educatiion services in other settings

    Indicator 05-B: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom less than 40% of the day

    Indicator 05-A: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day

    LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (PreSchool)

    Indicator 06-B: Early Childhood LRE: Separate education class, separate school or residential facility

    Indicator 06-A: Early Childhood LRE: Regular Preschool Program Percent of children recieving with the majority of special education services with thier non-disabled peers

    Note: Other settings includes Day Schools, Residential, and Hosptial/Home Bound but does not include students in correctional facilities or private schools.

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    54.32% 63.77% 67.21% N/AY

    12.72% 12.00% 4.37% N/AY

    2.05% 2.40% N2.73% 0.73%

    29.04% 35.94% N/AN/A N/A

    23.74% 26.65% N/AN/A N/A

    ↓

    ↓

    ↑

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 27 of 2248

  • 0203 : HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Appropriate Behaviors

    Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Appropriate Behaviors

    Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Knowledge and Skills

    Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Social Emotional

    Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Social Emotional

    Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Knowledge and Skills

    EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 7: Early Childhood OutcomesThere are two Summary Statements which are based the change between entry and exits scores for three outcome areas: (A) Social Emotional, (B) Knowledge and Skills, and (C) Appropriate Behvaiors.

    Summary Statement 1: Of those preschool children who entered the preschool program below age expectations in each Outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program.

    Summary Statement 2: The percent of preschool children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they turned 6 years of age or

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    87.89% 91.56% N/AN/A N/A

    57.92% 68.72% N/AN/A N/A

    89.49% 92.38% N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    45.15% 61.11% N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    90.63% 92.13% N/AN/A N/A

    65.22% 78.00% N/AN/A N/A

    --

    --

    --

    --

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 28 of 2248

  • 0203 : HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    PARENT INVOLVEMENT OUTCOMES

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Indicator 8: Parent InvolvementPercent of surveyed parents who reported school facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    Indicator 9: Disproportionality - EligibilityDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    DISPROPORTIONALITY: IDENTIFICATION & DISABILITY

    Indicator 10: Disproportionality - Child with a DisabiiltyDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    0.00% 0.00% ≤4.00 N/A

    0.00%0.00% N/A

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    93.83% 94.84% N/AN/A N/A

    95.82% 96.45% N94.11% 2.34%

    Y

    N N/A

    Y N

    Y>4.00

    --

    ↓

    ↔

    ↑

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 29 of 2248

  • 0203 : HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 11: Child FindPercent of children with parental consent to evaluate who are evaluated within the State established timeline of 60 days.

    CHILD FIND: TIMELY EVALUATION

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    TRANSITION

    Indicator 12: Early Childhood TransitionPercent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who arefound eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday.

    Indicator 13: Secondary TransistionPercent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals.

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    N/AN/A N/A

    99.62% Y100.00% N/A

    100.00% N/A N/A

    ↔

    --

    --

    --80.15%

    95.24% 100.00% N/AN/A N/A

    100.00

    100.00%

    99.87%

    N/A

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 30 of 2248

  • 0203 : HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Post-School Outcomes

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Indicator 14: Post-School OutcomesPercent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were:A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.

    A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.

    B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.

    C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other post-secondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    11.78% 15.80% N/AN/A N/A

    25.93% 51.49% N/AN/A N/A

    51.35% 63.26% N/AN/A N/A

    --

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 31 of 2248

  • 0203 : HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Timely and Accurate Data Reporting

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    State Indicator: Timely and Accurate Data.

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    100%

    100%

    100%

    100%

    N/A

    N/A

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    100%

    N/A N/A

    Y

    --

    ↔

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 32 of 2248

  • 0302 : COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 02: Dropout Rate Single Year Event Rate - Percent of students in grades 7-12 dropping out in a single year(Data from 2017/2018 School

    Indicator 01: Graduation RateFour year Cohort Rate - Percent of students graduating in four years(Data from 2017/2018 School Year)

    Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Literacy

    Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Math

    Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Math

    Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Literacy

    ASSESSMENT PARTICIPATION & PROFICIENCY RATES

    GRADUATION & DROPOUT RATES

    95.00%

    95.00%

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    State Target

    State Rate

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    84.61% 85.91% 87.50% N/AY

    1.62% 1.98% 0.00% N/AY

    99.11% Y96.96% N/A

    99.20% Y96.96% N/A

    10.50% 10.50% 14.06% N/AY

    12.95% 12.95% 26.56% N/AY

    ↑

    ↔

    ↑

    ↑

    ↑

    ↑

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 33 of 2248

  • 0302 : COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    DISCIPLINE RATES & DISPROPORTIONALITY in DISCIPLINE

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 04-A: Suspensions & Expulsions > than 10 days(Data from 2017/2018 school year)

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    Indicator 04-B: Suspensions & Expulsions for > than 10 days by Special Education Race vs. General Education all races. (Data from 2017/2018 school year)

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    N/A

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts whose special edcuation rate exceeds the general education rate by more than 1.36 percentage points. (2) The LEA rate is the difference between the general education rate and special education rate. Any LEA that exceed the allowable 1.36 percentage points difference must complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices.(2) LEA rate is based on whether or not a LEA was identified as having possible disproportionality. Identification is the difference between the general education rate for all races and special education rate for specific races. Any LEA with a difference >4 percentage point is identified for a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    30.51% 29.50% N/AY

    N

    0.38% 0%

  • 0302 : COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (K-12)

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 05-C: School Age LRE Percent of students receiving special educatiion services in other settings

    Indicator 05-B: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom less than 40% of the day

    Indicator 05-A: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day

    LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (PreSchool)

    Indicator 06-B: Early Childhood LRE: Separate education class, separate school or residential facility

    Indicator 06-A: Early Childhood LRE: Regular Preschool Program Percent of children recieving with the majority of special education services with thier non-disabled peers

    Note: Other settings includes Day Schools, Residential, and Hosptial/Home Bound but does not include students in correctional facilities or private schools.

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    54.32% 63.77% 69.44% N/AY

    12.72% 12.00% 3.70% N/AY

    2.05% 2.40% Y0.00% N/A

    29.04% 35.94% N/AN/A N/A

    23.74% 26.65% N/AN/A N/A

    ↓

    ↓

    ↓

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 35 of 2248

  • 0302 : COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Appropriate Behaviors

    Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Appropriate Behaviors

    Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Knowledge and Skills

    Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Social Emotional

    Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Social Emotional

    Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Knowledge and Skills

    EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 7: Early Childhood OutcomesThere are two Summary Statements which are based the change between entry and exits scores for three outcome areas: (A) Social Emotional, (B) Knowledge and Skills, and (C) Appropriate Behvaiors.

    Summary Statement 1: Of those preschool children who entered the preschool program below age expectations in each Outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program.

    Summary Statement 2: The percent of preschool children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they turned 6 years of age or

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    87.89% 91.56% N/AN/A N/A

    57.92% 68.72% N/AN/A N/A

    89.49% 92.38% N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    45.15% 61.11% N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    90.63% 92.13% N/AN/A N/A

    65.22% 78.00% N/AN/A N/A

    --

    --

    --

    --

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 36 of 2248

  • 0302 : COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    PARENT INVOLVEMENT OUTCOMES

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Indicator 8: Parent InvolvementPercent of surveyed parents who reported school facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    Indicator 9: Disproportionality - EligibilityDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    DISPROPORTIONALITY: IDENTIFICATION & DISABILITY

    Indicator 10: Disproportionality - Child with a DisabiiltyDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    0.00% 0.00% ≤4.00 N/A

    0.00%0.00% N/A

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    93.83% 94.84% N/AN/A N/A

    95.82% 96.45% N92.56% 3.89%

    Y

    N N/A

    Y N

    Y>4.00

    --

    ↓

    ↔

    ↑

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 37 of 2248

  • 0302 : COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 11: Child FindPercent of children with parental consent to evaluate who are evaluated within the State established timeline of 60 days.

    CHILD FIND: TIMELY EVALUATION

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    TRANSITION

    Indicator 12: Early Childhood TransitionPercent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who arefound eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday.

    Indicator 13: Secondary TransistionPercent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals.

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    N/AN/A N/A

    99.62% Y100.00% N/A

    100.00% N/A N/A

    ↔

    --

    --

    --80.15%

    95.24% 100.00% N/AN/A N/A

    100.00

    100.00%

    99.87%

    N/A

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 38 of 2248

  • 0302 : COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Post-School Outcomes

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Indicator 14: Post-School OutcomesPercent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were:A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.

    A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.

    B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.

    C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other post-secondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    11.78% 15.80% N/AN/A N/A

    25.93% 51.49% N/AN/A N/A

    51.35% 63.26% N/AN/A N/A

    --

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 39 of 2248

  • 0302 : COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Timely and Accurate Data Reporting

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    State Indicator: Timely and Accurate Data.

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    100%

    100%

    100%

    100%

    N/A

    N/A

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    100%

    N/A N/A

    Y

    --

    ↔

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 40 of 2248

  • 0303 : MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 02: Dropout Rate Single Year Event Rate - Percent of students in grades 7-12 dropping out in a single year(Data from 2017/2018 School

    Indicator 01: Graduation RateFour year Cohort Rate - Percent of students graduating in four years(Data from 2017/2018 School Year)

    Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Literacy

    Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Math

    Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Math

    Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Literacy

    ASSESSMENT PARTICIPATION & PROFICIENCY RATES

    GRADUATION & DROPOUT RATES

    95.00%

    95.00%

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    State Target

    State Rate

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    84.61% 85.91% 76.00% 9.91%N

    1.62% 1.98% 3.05% 1.07%N

    99.11% Y100.00% N/A

    99.20% Y100.00% N/A

    10.50% 10.50% 10.44% 0.06%N

    12.95% 12.95% 15.29% N/AY

    ↑

    ↑

    ↑

    ↑

    ↓

    ↑

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 41 of 2248

  • 0303 : MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    DISCIPLINE RATES & DISPROPORTIONALITY in DISCIPLINE

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 04-A: Suspensions & Expulsions > than 10 days(Data from 2017/2018 school year)

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    Indicator 04-B: Suspensions & Expulsions for > than 10 days by Special Education Race vs. General Education all races. (Data from 2017/2018 school year)

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    N/A

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts whose special edcuation rate exceeds the general education rate by more than 1.36 percentage points. (2) The LEA rate is the difference between the general education rate and special education rate. Any LEA that exceed the allowable 1.36 percentage points difference must complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices.(2) LEA rate is based on whether or not a LEA was identified as having possible disproportionality. Identification is the difference between the general education rate for all races and special education rate for specific races. Any LEA with a difference >4 percentage point is identified for a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    30.51% 29.50% N/AY

    N

    0.38% 0%

  • 0303 : MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (K-12)

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 05-C: School Age LRE Percent of students receiving special educatiion services in other settings

    Indicator 05-B: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom less than 40% of the day

    Indicator 05-A: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day

    LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (PreSchool)

    Indicator 06-B: Early Childhood LRE: Separate education class, separate school or residential facility

    Indicator 06-A: Early Childhood LRE: Regular Preschool Program Percent of children recieving with the majority of special education services with thier non-disabled peers

    Note: Other settings includes Day Schools, Residential, and Hosptial/Home Bound but does not include students in correctional facilities or private schools.

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    54.32% 63.77% 68.44% N/AY

    12.72% 12.00% 16.26% 3.54%N

    2.05% 2.40% Y0.72% N/A

    29.04% 35.94% N/AN/A N/A

    23.74% 26.65% N/AN/A N/A

    ↑

    ↔

    ↓

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 43 of 2248

  • 0303 : MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Appropriate Behaviors

    Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Appropriate Behaviors

    Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Knowledge and Skills

    Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Social Emotional

    Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Social Emotional

    Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Knowledge and Skills

    EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 7: Early Childhood OutcomesThere are two Summary Statements which are based the change between entry and exits scores for three outcome areas: (A) Social Emotional, (B) Knowledge and Skills, and (C) Appropriate Behvaiors.

    Summary Statement 1: Of those preschool children who entered the preschool program below age expectations in each Outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program.

    Summary Statement 2: The percent of preschool children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they turned 6 years of age or

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    87.89% 91.56% N/AN/A N/A

    57.92% 68.72% N/AN/A N/A

    89.49% 92.38% N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    45.15% 61.11% N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    90.63% 92.13% N/AN/A N/A

    65.22% 78.00% N/AN/A N/A

    --

    --

    --

    --

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 44 of 2248

  • 0303 : MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    PARENT INVOLVEMENT OUTCOMES

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Indicator 8: Parent InvolvementPercent of surveyed parents who reported school facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    Indicator 9: Disproportionality - EligibilityDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    DISPROPORTIONALITY: IDENTIFICATION & DISABILITY

    Indicator 10: Disproportionality - Child with a DisabiiltyDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    0.00% 0.00% ≤4.00 N/A

    0.00%0.00% N/A

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    93.83% 94.84% N/AN/A N/A

    95.82% 96.45% N94.65% 1.80%

    Y

    N N/A

    N N/A

    Y

  • 0303 : MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 11: Child FindPercent of children with parental consent to evaluate who are evaluated within the State established timeline of 60 days.

    CHILD FIND: TIMELY EVALUATION

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    TRANSITION

    Indicator 12: Early Childhood TransitionPercent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who arefound eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday.

    Indicator 13: Secondary TransistionPercent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals.

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    N/AN/A N/A

    99.62% Y100.00% N/A

    100.00% N/A N/A

    ↔

    --

    --

    --80.15%

    95.24% 100.00% N/AN/A N/A

    100.00

    100.00%

    99.87%

    N/A

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 46 of 2248

  • 0303 : MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Post-School Outcomes

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Indicator 14: Post-School OutcomesPercent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were:A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.

    A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.

    B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.

    C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other post-secondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    11.78% 15.80% N/AN/A N/A

    25.93% 51.49% N/AN/A N/A

    51.35% 63.26% N/AN/A N/A

    --

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 47 of 2248

  • 0303 : MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Timely and Accurate Data Reporting

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    State Indicator: Timely and Accurate Data.

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    100%

    100%

    100%

    100%

    N/A

    N/A

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    100%

    N/A N/A

    Y

    --

    ↔

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 48 of 2248

  • 0304 : NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 02: Dropout Rate Single Year Event Rate - Percent of students in grades 7-12 dropping out in a single year(Data from 2017/2018 School

    Indicator 01: Graduation RateFour year Cohort Rate - Percent of students graduating in four years(Data from 2017/2018 School Year)

    Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Literacy

    Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Math

    Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Math

    Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Literacy

    ASSESSMENT PARTICIPATION & PROFICIENCY RATES

    GRADUATION & DROPOUT RATES

    95.00%

    95.00%

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    State Target

    State Rate

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    84.61% 85.91% 88.88% N/AY

    1.62% 1.98% 0.00% N/AY

    99.11% Y100.00% N/A

    99.20% Y100.00% N/A

    10.50% 10.50% 30.76% N/AY

    12.95% 12.95% 33.33% N/AY

    ↑

    ↓

    ↑

    ↑

    ↓

    ↓

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 49 of 2248

  • 0304 : NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    DISCIPLINE RATES & DISPROPORTIONALITY in DISCIPLINE

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 04-A: Suspensions & Expulsions > than 10 days(Data from 2017/2018 school year)

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    Indicator 04-B: Suspensions & Expulsions for > than 10 days by Special Education Race vs. General Education all races. (Data from 2017/2018 school year)

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    N/A

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts whose special edcuation rate exceeds the general education rate by more than 1.36 percentage points. (2) The LEA rate is the difference between the general education rate and special education rate. Any LEA that exceed the allowable 1.36 percentage points difference must complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices.(2) LEA rate is based on whether or not a LEA was identified as having possible disproportionality. Identification is the difference between the general education rate for all races and special education rate for specific races. Any LEA with a difference >4 percentage point is identified for a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    30.51% 29.50% N/AY

    N

    0.38% 0%

  • 0304 : NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (K-12)

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 05-C: School Age LRE Percent of students receiving special educatiion services in other settings

    Indicator 05-B: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom less than 40% of the day

    Indicator 05-A: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day

    LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (PreSchool)

    Indicator 06-B: Early Childhood LRE: Separate education class, separate school or residential facility

    Indicator 06-A: Early Childhood LRE: Regular Preschool Program Percent of children recieving with the majority of special education services with thier non-disabled peers

    Note: Other settings includes Day Schools, Residential, and Hosptial/Home Bound but does not include students in correctional facilities or private schools.

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    54.32% 63.77% 56.06% 7.71%N

    12.72% 12.00% 18.18% 5.46%N

    2.05% 2.40% Y0.00% N/A

    29.04% 35.94% N/AN/A N/A

    23.74% 26.65% N/AN/A N/A

    ↑

    ↓

    ↔

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 51 of 2248

  • 0304 : NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Appropriate Behaviors

    Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Appropriate Behaviors

    Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Knowledge and Skills

    Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Social Emotional

    Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Social Emotional

    Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Knowledge and Skills

    EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 7: Early Childhood OutcomesThere are two Summary Statements which are based the change between entry and exits scores for three outcome areas: (A) Social Emotional, (B) Knowledge and Skills, and (C) Appropriate Behvaiors.

    Summary Statement 1: Of those preschool children who entered the preschool program below age expectations in each Outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program.

    Summary Statement 2: The percent of preschool children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they turned 6 years of age or

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    87.89% 91.56% N/AN/A N/A

    57.92% 68.72% N/AN/A N/A

    89.49% 92.38% N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    45.15% 61.11% N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    90.63% 92.13% N/AN/A N/A

    65.22% 78.00% N/AN/A N/A

    --

    --

    --

    --

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 52 of 2248

  • 0304 : NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    PARENT INVOLVEMENT OUTCOMES

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Indicator 8: Parent InvolvementPercent of surveyed parents who reported school facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    Indicator 9: Disproportionality - EligibilityDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    DISPROPORTIONALITY: IDENTIFICATION & DISABILITY

    Indicator 10: Disproportionality - Child with a DisabiiltyDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    0.00% 0.00% ≤4.00 N/A

    0.00%0.00% N/A

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    93.83% 94.84% N/AN/A N/A

    95.82% 96.45% N89.74% 6.71%

    Y

    N N/A

    N N/A

    Y

  • 0304 : NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 11: Child FindPercent of children with parental consent to evaluate who are evaluated within the State established timeline of 60 days.

    CHILD FIND: TIMELY EVALUATION

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    TRANSITION

    Indicator 12: Early Childhood TransitionPercent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who arefound eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday.

    Indicator 13: Secondary TransistionPercent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals.

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    N/AN/A N/A

    99.62% Y100.00% N/A

    100.00% 100.00% N/A

    ↔

    --

    --

    ↑80.15%

    95.24% 100.00% N/AN/A N/A

    100.00

    100.00%

    99.87%

    Y

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 54 of 2248

  • 0304 : NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Post-School Outcomes

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Indicator 14: Post-School OutcomesPercent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were:A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.

    A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.

    B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.

    C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other post-secondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    11.78% 15.80% Y33.33% N/A

    25.93% 51.49% Y66.66% N/A

    51.35% 63.26% Y66.66% N/A

    ↑

    ↑

    ↑

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 55 of 2248

  • 0304 : NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Timely and Accurate Data Reporting

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    State Indicator: Timely and Accurate Data.

    Early Childhood (3-5) Rate

    School Age (k-12) Rate

    100%

    100%

    100%

    100%

    N/A

    N/A

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    100%

    N/A N/A

    Y

    --

    ↔

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 56 of 2248

  • 0401 : BENTONVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 02: Dropout Rate Single Year Event Rate - Percent of students in grades 7-12 dropping out in a single year(Data from 2017/2018 School

    Indicator 01: Graduation RateFour year Cohort Rate - Percent of students graduating in four years(Data from 2017/2018 School Year)

    Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Literacy

    Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Math

    Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Math

    Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Literacy

    ASSESSMENT PARTICIPATION & PROFICIENCY RATES

    GRADUATION & DROPOUT RATES

    95.00%

    95.00%

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    State Target

    State Rate

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    84.61% 85.91% 86.55% N/AY

    1.62% 1.98% 1.17% N/AY

    99.11% Y99.25% N/A

    99.20% Y99.25% N/A

    10.50% 10.50% 24.93% N/AY

    12.95% 12.95% 27.05% N/AY

    ↑

    ↓

    ↑

    ↑

    ↑

    ↑

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 57 of 2248

  • 0401 : BENTONVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    DISCIPLINE RATES & DISPROPORTIONALITY in DISCIPLINE

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 04-A: Suspensions & Expulsions > than 10 days(Data from 2017/2018 school year)

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    Indicator 04-B: Suspensions & Expulsions for > than 10 days by Special Education Race vs. General Education all races. (Data from 2017/2018 school year)

    Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State

    Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices

    N/A

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts whose special edcuation rate exceeds the general education rate by more than 1.36 percentage points. (2) The LEA rate is the difference between the general education rate and special education rate. Any LEA that exceed the allowable 1.36 percentage points difference must complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices.(2) LEA rate is based on whether or not a LEA was identified as having possible disproportionality. Identification is the difference between the general education rate for all races and special education rate for specific races. Any LEA with a difference >4 percentage point is identified for a review of policies, procedures, and practices.

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    30.51% 29.50% N/AY

    N

    0.38% 0%

  • 0401 : BENTONVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (K-12)

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 05-C: School Age LRE Percent of students receiving special educatiion services in other settings

    Indicator 05-B: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom less than 40% of the day

    Indicator 05-A: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day

    LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (PreSchool)

    Indicator 06-B: Early Childhood LRE: Separate education class, separate school or residential facility

    Indicator 06-A: Early Childhood LRE: Regular Preschool Program Percent of children recieving with the majority of special education services with thier non-disabled peers

    Note: Other settings includes Day Schools, Residential, and Hosptial/Home Bound but does not include students in correctional facilities or private schools.

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    54.32% 63.77% 53.06% 10.71%N

    12.72% 12.00% 11.06% N/AY

    2.05% 2.40% N2.65% 0.65%

    29.04% 35.94% N/AN/A N/A

    23.74% 26.65% N/AN/A N/A

    ↑

    ↑

    ↓

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 59 of 2248

  • 0401 : BENTONVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Appropriate Behaviors

    Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Appropriate Behaviors

    Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Knowledge and Skills

    Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Social Emotional

    Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Social Emotional

    Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Knowledge and Skills

    EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES

    IndicatorLEA Rate

    Target Met by LEA

    State Target

    State Rate

    Indicator 7: Early Childhood OutcomesThere are two Summary Statements which are based the change between entry and exits scores for three outcome areas: (A) Social Emotional, (B) Knowledge and Skills, and (C) Appropriate Behvaiors.

    Summary Statement 1: Of those preschool children who entered the preschool program below age expectations in each Outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program.

    Summary Statement 2: The percent of preschool children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they turned 6 years of age or

    LEA Differencefrom Target

    Year to Year LEA Rate Change

    87.89% 91.56% N/AN/A N/A

    57.92% 68.72% N/AN/A N/A

    89.49% 92.38% N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    45.15% 61.11% N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    90.63% 92.13% N/AN/A N/A

    65.22% 78.00% N/AN/A N/A

    --

    --

    --

    --

    --

    --

    Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 60 of 2248

  • 0401 : BENTONVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19

    PARENT INVOL


Balsam Amicus in Dewitt Footlocker

Balsam Amicus in Dewitt Footlocker

Documents
0101 - ICA · 0101 . Created Date: 12/21/2011 1:01:19 PM

0101 - ICA · 0101 . Created Date: 12/21/2011 1:01:19 PM

Documents
NEWS RELEASE...Pure 94300 0101 82,100B 0101 0101 0101 SPECIAL Price NEW Arrival (SUPER HAKKAI Flower Tunic crescent Ribbon Tunic 'pour la himeì Classic Tœncn Coa Stand Collar Jumpe

NEWS RELEASE...Pure 94300 0101 82,100B 0101 0101 0101 SPECIAL Price NEW Arrival (SUPER HAKKAI Flower Tunic crescent Ribbon Tunic 'pour la himeì Classic Tœncn Coa Stand Collar Jumpe

Documents
DeWitt County, Illinois

DeWitt County, Illinois

Documents
Dewitt 1964

Dewitt 1964

Documents
Being DeWitt

Being DeWitt

Documents
DeWitt-Bath Review

DeWitt-Bath Review

Documents
01000101 0101 0101 001010101 0100 0001011 01 010 10101 010 00101 110101 010101 0101 001001 011 0101 0101 001010101 0101 001001 0101 001 01101 GEMIUS –

01000101 0101 0101 001010101 0100 0001011 01 010 10101 010 00101 110101 010101 0101 001001 011 0101 0101 001010101 0101 001001 0101 001 01101 GEMIUS –

Documents
SPECIAL EDUCATION DISTRICT PROFILESPECIAL EDUCATION DISTRICT PROFILE 2008/09 DISTRICT: DeWitt LEA: 0101 CHILD COUNT District October 1, 2008 Enrollment Percent Special Education By

SPECIAL EDUCATION DISTRICT PROFILESPECIAL EDUCATION DISTRICT PROFILE 2008/09 DISTRICT: DeWitt LEA: 0101 CHILD COUNT District October 1, 2008 Enrollment Percent Special Education By

Documents
DeWitt Area Recreation Plan -

DeWitt Area Recreation Plan -

Documents
CONGELADA.tariff code (hs 2002) descripcion base rate (april 2005) staging category 01 animales vivos 0101 caballos, asnos, mulos y

CONGELADA.tariff code (hs 2002) descripcion base rate (april 2005) staging category 01 animales vivos 0101 caballos, asnos, mulos y

Documents
Binder1 - Sun Pharmaceutical€¦ · iliiiii 0101, 010 010 010 101 111 oz. 0101. 0101 0101 1010 1001

Binder1 - Sun Pharmaceutical€¦ · iliiiii 0101, 010 010 010 101 111 oz. 0101. 0101 0101 1010 1001

Documents
0110 1010 1010 1001 0101 0101 0101 0010 1010 1011 0010 1010 1010 1010 1011 1010 0101 0010 0110 1010 1001 0101 0101 0010 1010 (robot enters frame)

0110 1010 1010 1001 0101 0101 0101 0010 1010 1011 0010 1010 1010 1010 1011 1010 0101 0010 0110 1010 1001 0101 0101 0010 1010 (robot enters frame)

Documents
DISTRICT: DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT LEA: 0101 · 2020. 3. 25. · SPECIAL EDUCATION DISTRICT PROFILE 2019/20 DISTRICT: DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT LEA: 0101 CHILD COUNT District October 1,

DISTRICT: DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT LEA: 0101 · 2020. 3. 25. · SPECIAL EDUCATION DISTRICT PROFILE 2019/20 DISTRICT: DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT LEA: 0101 CHILD COUNT District October 1,

Documents
DeWitt Era Enterprise

DeWitt Era Enterprise

Documents
Monitor 0101

Monitor 0101

Documents
ASSISTED LIVING BUSINESS PLAN - DEWITT

ASSISTED LIVING BUSINESS PLAN - DEWITT

Documents
DeWitt Bath Review

DeWitt Bath Review

Documents
cdn.ymaws.com€¦ · DistrictName BankName 0101 ATHOL SAVINGS BANK 0101 AVIDIA BANK 0101 BANCORP RHODE ISLAND, INC 0101 BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 0101 BANKFIVE 0101 BANKGLOUCESTER

cdn.ymaws.com€¦ · DistrictName BankName 0101 ATHOL SAVINGS BANK 0101 AVIDIA BANK 0101 BANCORP RHODE ISLAND, INC 0101 BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 0101 BANKFIVE 0101 BANKGLOUCESTER

Documents
Jamesville-DeWitt High School, DeWitt, NY Pinnacle Skylight with Solera Glazing

Jamesville-DeWitt High School, DeWitt, NY Pinnacle Skylight with Solera Glazing

Documents
Abbreviated Library of Helen DeWitt

Abbreviated Library of Helen DeWitt

Documents
TELECOM BUSINESS PLAN - DEWITT

TELECOM BUSINESS PLAN - DEWITT

Documents
Dewitt Jordan

Dewitt Jordan

Documents
Photo by Jerry DeWitt

Photo by Jerry DeWitt

Documents
NCLB Accountability Jamesville-DeWitt

NCLB Accountability Jamesville-DeWitt

Documents
Eric Jordan on Dewitt Jordan

Eric Jordan on Dewitt Jordan

Education
C. Morette-DeWitt and B.S. DeWitt, "Falling Charges," Physics, 1,3-20 (1964)

C. Morette-DeWitt and B.S. DeWitt, "Falling Charges," Physics, 1,3-20 (1964)

Documents
Visual Music Dewitt

Visual Music Dewitt

Documents
DeWitt - Overview of Quantum Theory

DeWitt - Overview of Quantum Theory

Documents
DISTRICT: DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT LEA: 0101 CHILD COUNT · SPECIAL EDUCATION DISTRICT PROFILE 2016/17 DISTRICT: DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT LEA: 0101 CHILD COUNT District October 1, 2016

DISTRICT: DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT LEA: 0101 CHILD COUNT · SPECIAL EDUCATION DISTRICT PROFILE 2016/17 DISTRICT: DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT LEA: 0101 CHILD COUNT District October 1, 2016

Documents