Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AggiE-Challenge
High Efficiency, Low Cost Water Purification: Solar Powered Membrane Distillation
By: Maria Gracia, Matthew Martinez, Troy Menendez, Matt Moerbe, Kori Mondin, Cody Wainscott
Faculty Sponsors: Dr. Devesh Ranjan, Dr. Arun Srinivasa
Need Statement:
Create a low cost, simplistic, efficient, and reliable
system to improve water quality utilizing a non-grid
energy source.
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Membrane Pore Size (um)Dirty Water Salt Concentration (M)
Mem
bra
ne M
ass F
lux (
kg/m
2/h
r)
Molarity (M) F Ratio Pore Size (mm) F Ratio Pore Size (mm) F Ratio
0.001 0.170 0.2 1.54 0.2 0.052
0.01 2.29 0.45 1.46 0.45 0.854
0.1 1.48 1 4.51 1 0.343
Varying Molarity 2nd SetVarying Molarity 1st SetVarying Pore Size
Membrane Distillation Unit Solar Collector
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000
So
lar
Ra
dia
tio
n D
en
sity
(W
/m
2)
Time (s)
IR
Start Time: 9:36:35am 4/13/13 End Time: 1:16:00pm 4/13/13
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000
Te
mp
era
ture
( C
)
Time (s)
Temperature Differential
T1
T2
T2-T1
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000
Flo
w R
ate
(m
L/s)
Time (s)
Flow Rate
System Decomposition
In order to gain an understanding of the factors affecting each
component of the system, the system was decomposed into three
main sub-blocks:
Membrane Distillation Unit
Solar Collector
Pump
Since the pump will be a standard pump powered by
thermoelectrics it was not considered in the testing conducted
this semester. The membrane distillation unit and solar collector
were constructed and tested separately. The data collected from
them was then used to develop a design for a 2nd generation
system which integrates all of the components.
System Operating Principles
The design uses solar radiation and a hydrophobic membrane to
purify water. The dirty water is heated by a solar radiation
collector to create a temperature gradient between the hot and
cold sides of the system. This temperature gradient creates a
vapor pressure differential which causes water vapor to pass
through a hydrophobic membrane and condense on the other side.
The pure water is then collected to be used for drinking and
sanitation purposes.
System Schematic
Testing Results
Conclusions and Recommendations
Testing Results
Conclusions and Recommendations
Using a 90% confidence interval with 2
degrees of freedom in the numerator and 9
degrees of freedom in denominator, an F
ratio of 3.006 is required for statistical
significance. Due to the extra trials
conducted with the 0.01M dirty water, the
0.01M varying pore size F ratio requires a
different value for statistical significance.
For this case 2 degrees of freedom were
used in the numerator and 21 degrees of freedom were used in the denominator,
requiring an F ratio of 2.575 for statistical significance at a 90% confidence interval. As
can be seen from the table, only the 1mm pore size while varying molarity on the 1st set
resulted in statistical significance using the 90% confidence interval. It is felt,
however, that the statistical significance shown by the 1mm pore size while varying
molarity on the 1st
set is an erroneous result and can be ignored.
Membrane pore size and the dirty water salt concentration have no
effect on the mass flux through a hydrophobic PTFE membrane
within the ranges tested
As long as fresh water is used specific salt concentrations in the
water do not need to be determined as they will not affect system
performance
A corser (and therefore cheaper) membrane can be used just as
effectively in the system as a more expensive and finer membrane