Upload
bee-bee
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
1/29
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
2/29
STRUCTURE OF THE CHAPTER
Defining action research
Principles and characteristics of actionresearch
Participatory action research Action research as critical praxis
Action research and complexity theory
Procedures for action research Reporting action research
Reflexivity in action research
Some practical and theoretical matters
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
3/29
ACTION RESEARCH
Action research is a small-scale interventionin the functioning of the real world to addresspractitioners own issues, and a closeexamination of the effects of such an
intervention. Kemmis and McTaggart (1992: 10): to do
action research is to plan, act, observe andreflect more carefully, more systematically,and more rigorously than one usually does ineveryday life.
Action research combines diagnosis, actionand reflection.
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
4/29
ACTION RESEARCH COMBINES
SIX NOTIONS1. A straightforward cycle of: identifying a
problem, planning an intervention,implementing the intervention, evaluatingthe outcome;
2. Reflective practice;
3. Political emancipation;
4. Critical theory;5. Professional development; and
6. Participatory practitioner research.
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
5/29
ELEMENTS OF ACTION RESEARCH
It works on participants own problems;
It seeks to improve practice;
It is collaborative and participatory;
It is problem-solving;
It is undertaken in situ;
It is an ongoing cycle of diagnosis, planning,
implementation and evaluation; It is methodologically eclectic;
It requires reflection;
It builds on professional development.
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
6/29
ACTION RESEARCH IS . . .
Critical(and self-critical) collaborative inquiry by
Reflectivepractitioners being
Accountableand making results of their enquiry
public Self-evaluatingtheir practice and engaged in
Participatoryproblem-solving and continuingprofessional development.
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
7/29
PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH
It commences with explicit social and politicalintentions that articulate with the dominated and poorclasses and groups in society;
It involves popular participation in the researchprocess;
It regards knowledge as an agent of socialtransformation as a whole, constituting a critique ofthose views of knowledge (theory) as separate frompractice;
Its epistemological base is rooted in critical theory andits critique of the subject/object relations in research;
It engages issues of power;
It raises the consciousness of individuals and groups;
It is a democratic activity.
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
8/29
ACTION RESEARCH AS CRITICAL
PRAXIS
The emancipatory interest of Habermas: tounderstand and change the world
Ideology critique and action
People taking control of their own lives A challenge to the illegitimate operation of power
A concern for equality and social justice
Empowerment of individuals and groups
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
9/29
ACTION RESEARCH AS CRITICAL
PRAXIS
Constructing a system of meaning;
Understanding dominant research methods andtheir effects;
Selecting what to study;
Acquiring a variety of research strategies;
Making sense of information collected;
Gaining awareness of the tacit theories andassumptions which guide practice;
Viewing teaching as an emancipatory, praxis-based act.
Praxis: action informed through reflection, withemancipation as its goal.
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
10/29
CRITICISMS OF ACTION RESEARCH
AS CRITICAL PRAXIS
It is utopian and unrealizable; It is too controlling and prescriptive;
It adopts a narrow and particularistic view ofemancipation and action research;
It undermines the significance of the individualteacher-as-researcher in favour of self-criticalcommunities.
It assumes that rational consensus is achievable,that rational debate will empower all participants(i.e. it understates the issue of power);
It overstates the desirability of consensus-oriented research;
Power cannot be dispersed or rearranged simply
by rationality;
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
11/29
CRITICISMS OF ACTION RESEARCH
AS CRITICAL PRAXIS
It is uncritical and self-contradicting; It will promote conformity through slavish
adherence to its orthodoxies;
It is nave in its understanding of groups and
celebrates groups over individuals; It privileges its own view of science (rejecting
objectivity) and lacks modesty;
It privileges the authority of critical theory;
It is elitist whilst purporting to serve egalitarianism; It assumes an undifferentiated view of action
research;
It attempts to colonize and redirect action
research.
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
12/29
ACTION RESEARCH AND
COMPLEXITY THEORY
Both accept that systems are unpredictable, openand non-linear;
Both concern issues of adaptation to environment;
Action research can lead to bifurcation (i.e. when asystem moves from one point of stability toanother);
Both celebrate the interaction of participants;
Both require feedback and feed forward;
Both are reflective;
Both show an interest in exceptions or outliers(which can lead to major change);
Both are less concerned with controlling variables;
Both accept that the systems in which action takes
place are complex and dynamic.
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
13/29
IDENTIFY
PROBLEM
PLAN ACTION
ACT
EVALUATE
PROCEDURES FOR ACTION
RESEARCH
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
14/29
STEPS IN ACTION RESEARCH
(McNiff, 2002)1. Review your current practice;
2. Identify an aspect that you wish to improve;
3. Imagine a way forward in this;
4. Try it out;
5. Monitor and reflect on what happens;
6. Modify the plan in the light of what has beenfound, what has happened, and continue;
7. Evaluate the modified action;
8. Continue until you are satisfied with thataspect of your work (e.g. repeat the cycle).
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
15/29
AN EIGHT-STAGE MODEL OF
ACTION RESEARCHStage One:Decide and agree one commonproblem that you are experiencing or need thatmust be addressed.
Stage Two: Identify some causes of the problem(need).
Stage Three: Brainstorm a range of possiblepractical solutions to the problem, to address thereal problem and the real cause(s).
Stage Fou r: From the range of possible practicalsolutions decide oneof the solutions to theproblems, perhaps what you consider to be themost suitable or best solution to the problem. Planhow to put the solution into practice.
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
16/29
AN EIGHT-STAGE MODEL OF
ACTION RESEARCHStage Five:Identify success criteria by which youwill be able to judge whether the solution hasworked to solve the problem,
Stage Six: Put the plan into action; monitor, adjustand evaluate what is taking place;
Stage Seven: Evaluate the outcome to see howwell it has addressed and solved the problem orneed, using the success criteria identified in Stage
Five.Stage Eigh t:Review and plan what needs to bedone in light of theevaluation.
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
17/29
THE ACTION RESEARCH CYCLE
(Tripp, 2003)
Reconnaissance(First Cy cle)
FirstPlan
Action
ThenPlanResearch
FirstProduce
Data
ThenAnalyse
Data
and
ImplementAction
MonitorAction
and
(separately
and together)
(together)
Reflect(on Action)
Review(Research)
Process
Planaction
Researchaction
Evaluateaction
Actthoughtfully
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
18/29
STEPS IN EMANCIPATORY
ACTION RESEARCH1. Strategic planning
2. Implementing the plan (action)
3. Observation, evaluation and self-evaluation4. Critical and self-critical reflection on the
results of (1)(3) and making decisions for
the next cycle of research.
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
19/29
IDENTIFY THE PROBLEM
CAUSES NOT SYMPTOMS
Diagnosis:
What actually is the realproblem?
What are the causes?
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
20/29
PLAN INTERVENTIONS
Divergent Phase: What actions are possible?
What alternatives are there?
Evaluate alternatives.
Convergent Phase:
Which intervention will be adopted?
Decide from amongst the alternatives.
Planning:
How will the intervention be implemented?
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
21/29
IMPLEMENTATION
Putting the plan into action
Initiation
Development
Sustenance
Follow-up
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
22/29
EVALUATION
How successfully has the intervention
addressed the issue?
What are the success criteria?
How will you know if the intervention has been
successful?
What are the outcomes of the intervention?
What ongoing monitoring will there be?
What will you do if the intervention is not
working?
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
23/29
INITIAL PROBLEM
PROPOSED
INTERVENTION
IMPLEMENTATION
OUTCOME
E
V
A
L
U
A
T
IO
N
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
24/29
IDENTIFY
PROBLEM
PLAN ACTION
ACT
EVALUATE
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
25/29
ADVICE FOR NOVICE ACTION
RESEARCHERS
Stay small, stay focused; Identify a clear research question;
Be realistic about what you can do;
Plan carefully;
Set a realistic time scale; Involve others (as participants, observers, validators
including critical friendspotential researchers);
Ensure ethical practice;
Concentrate on learning, not on the outcomes of action;
The focus of the research is you, in company withothers;
Beware of happy endings;
Be aware of political issues.
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
26/29
REPORTING ACTION RESEARCHReport:
The research issue and how it came tobecome a research issue in the improvementof practice;
The methodology of, and justification for, theintervention, and how it was selected fromamongst other possible interventions;
How the intervention derived from an
understanding of the situation; What data were collected, when, and from
whom;
How data were collected, processed and
analyzed;
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
27/29
REPORTING ACTION RESEARCHReport:
How the ongoing intervention was monitoredand reviewed;
How reflexivity was addressed;
What were the standard and criteria forsuccess, and how these criteria were derived;
How conclusions were reached and howthese were validated;
What and how the researcher learnt as aconsequence of the action research;
How practice was changed as aconsequence of the findings.
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
28/29
REFLEXIVITY IN ACTION RESEARCH A self-conscious awareness of the effects that
the participants-as-practitioners-and-
researchers are having on the research
process, how their values, attitudes,perceptions, opinions, actions, feelings etc.
are influencing the situation being studied.
How the researcher/practitioner may bebiasing the research.
8/12/2019 01 Additional Notes
29/29
MAKING ACTION RESEARCH WORK
Collegiality must be present, e.g.: Participatory approaches to decision-making;
Democratic and consensual decision-making;
Shared values, beliefs and goals;
Equal rights of participation in discussion;
Equal rights to determine policy; Equal voting rights on decisions;
The deployment of sub-groups who are accountableto the whole group;
Shared responsibility and open accountability; An extended view of expertise;
Judgements and decisions based on the power of theargument rather than the positional power of theadvocates;
Shared ownership of decisions and practices