32
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 % Zone or Grid Samples Overall MN SD ND MT MB

% Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

Trend for Precision Soil Testing% Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to

Total Samples

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

% Z

on

e o

r G

rid

Sam

ple

s

Overall MN SD ND MT MB

Page 2: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

%Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to

Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016

81%

38%

74%

27%

38%

65%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

MN ND SD MT MB Overall

Page 3: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

AGVISE Laboratories%Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory

1997 - 2016

22%18%

14%15%11%

8%11%

15%11%

15%16%

26%28%

31%33%

39%40%39%41%41%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

% Grid or Zone Samples Tested Compared To

Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples Tested

Page 4: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

Fall 2016 samples

34

49

36

Average Soil Nitrate following Wheat in 2016

(lb/a 0-24” samples)

29

52

Page 5: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

42%

29%

14%

6%

4%

5%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

0-20

21-40

41-60

61-80

81-100

>100

Nit

rate

Cate

go

ry

To

tal

Nit

rate

0-2

4"

lb/a

% of Fields Testing in Each Category

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields

Following “WHEAT” in Montana - 2016

Page 6: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

41

3638

4345

60

30 34

45

36

50

44

39 4345

Average Soil Nitrate following Wheat in 2016

Fall 2016 Samples

(lb/a 0-24” samples)

MB

ND

SDMN49

43

19

45

37 36

37

4255

32

Page 7: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

Fall 2016 samples

51

52

52

Average Soil Nitrate following “Fallow” in 2016

(lb/a 0-24” samples)

44

52

Page 8: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

9%

30%

34%

16%

6%

5%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

0-20

21-40

41-60

61-80

81-100

>100

Nit

rate

Cate

go

ry

To

tal

Nit

rate

0-2

4"

lb/a

% of Fields Testing in Each Category

Soil Nitrate Variability Between Fields

Following “Fallow” in Montana - 2016

Page 9: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

% Soil Samples with Phosphorus less than 10 ppm

Fall 2016 samples (0-6”)

56%

53%

31%

39%

46%

(Olsen P test)

36%

Page 10: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

% Soil Samples with Potassium less than 150 ppm

Fall 2016 samples (0-6”)

6%

13%

1%

2%

17%8%

Page 11: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

19%

13%4%

5%

5%5%

5% 1%

41%

36%

10% 26%

26%26%

13%6%

% Soil Samples with Potassium less than 150 ppm

Fall 2016 samples

(0-6” samples)

MB

ND

SDMN

25%13%

46%

35%

8%

43%43%

33%32%5%2%

1%

59%

72%

21%

Page 12: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

% Soil Samples with Zinc less than 1.0 ppm

Fall 2016 samples (0-6”)

80%

58%

79%

84%

51%55%

Page 13: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

58%

41%73%

49%70%77%

82%

53

65%

31% 33%

47%

26%

58%

62%

44%76%

% Soil Samples with Zinc less than 1.0 ppm

Fall 2016 samples

(0-6” samples)

MB

ND

SDMN

26%

27%

44%

51%19%

38%

44%

43%57%

75%

21%

34%

52%

81%

Page 14: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

% Soil Samples with Sulfur less than 15 lb/a

Fall 2016 samples (0-6”)

54%

34%

51%

59%

26%54%

Page 15: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

13%21%

32%

52%40%

49% 27%

43%

21%

16% 16%

16%

9%

23%

16%

25%20%

% Soil Samples with Sulfur less than 15 lb/a

Fall 2016 samples

(0-6” samples)

MB

ND

SDMN

21%

80%

65%

88%90%

76%

52%

68%

49%

44%

34%

68%

67%

Page 16: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

% Soil Samples with Copper less than 0.5 ppm

Fall 2016 samples (0-6”)

5%

9%

1%

1%

4%

3%

Page 17: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

23%15%

11%

15%10%

6% 3%

4%

10%

30%

36%

34%

6%

1%6%

7%

16% 22%

31%28%

18%17%

% Soil Samples with Copper less than 0.5 ppm

Fall 2016 samples

(0-6” samples)

MB

ND

SDMN

12% 7%

14%

6%

16%

56%

36%

5%

Page 18: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

% Soil Samples with Boron less than 0.4 ppm

Fall 2016 samples (0-6”)

6%

11%

5%

15%

5%22%

Page 19: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

4%

7%3%

4%

11%17%

2%

34%

8%

2% 11%

6%3%

9%2%

% Soil Samples with Boron less than 0.4 ppm

Fall 2016 samples

(0-6” samples)

MB

ND

SDMN

2%

14%

57%

84%

27%

9%13%

10%37%9% 11% 36%

4%

1%

1%

16%

Page 20: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

% Soil Samples with Chloride less than 40 lb/a

Fall 2016 samples (0-6”)

70%

50%

75%

80%

48%80%

Page 21: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

54%

67%61%

64%

86%85%

84% 69%

86%

59%

45%

92%

62%

61%

52%

37% 41%

24% 63%42%

55%80%

% Soil Samples with Chloride less than 40 lb/a

Fall 2016 Samples

(0-24” samples)

MB

ND

SDMN

44%

83%

90%

39%

75%

75%

Page 22: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

% Soil Samples with Carbonate greater than 5.0%

Fall 2016 samples (0-6”)

14%

18%

20%

10%58%

2%

Page 23: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

11%

17%11%

9%

4%

4%

10%

26%

26%

24%

10%

12%1%

8% 33%

22%25%

14%2%

% Soil Samples with Carbonate greater than 5.0%

Fall 2016 samples

(0-6” samples)

MB

ND

SDMN

30%

4%1%

19%

56%

7%

11%

0%

2%

5%

Page 24: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

% Soil Samples with Salts greater than 1.0 mmhos/cm

Fall 2016 samples (0-6”)

3%

5%

3%

6%

9%2%

Page 25: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

19%

24%15%

12%3%4%

3% 8%

1%

3%

7%

11%

2%

8%

2%

19%

12% 20%

19%13%

4%8%

% Soil Samples with Salts greater than 1.0

Fall 2016 Samples

(0-6” samples)

MB

ND

SDMN

9%1%

2%

3%

6%

18%

20%

Page 26: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

% Soil Samples with soil pH greater than 7.3

Fall 2016 samples (0-6”)

82%

83%

68%

70%

88%60%

Page 27: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

64%

73%75%

43%

27%43%

72% 54%

30%

55%

78%

96%

47%

40%

21%

17%

73% 78%

72%79%

57%69%

% Soil Samples with Soil pH greater than 7.3

Fall 2016 samples

(0-6” samples)

MB

ND

SDMN

62%

28%43%

16%

11%

8%

45%

94%

91%

Page 28: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

% Soil Samples with soil pH less than 6.0

Fall 2016 samples (0-6”)

2%

5%

5%

3%

1%6%

Page 29: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

3%

6%1%

14%

13%16%

2% 4%

35%

19%

4%

1%

16%

9%

43%

16%

1% 7%

4%4%

15%1%

% Soil Samples with Soil pH less than 6.0

Fall 2016 samples

(0-6” samples)

MB

ND

SDMN

2%

10%16%

18%

17%

34%

11%

0%

0%

13%

Page 30: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

% Soil Samples with %OM less than 3.0%

Fall 2016 samples (0-6”)

76%

76%

73%

92%

80%48%

Page 31: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

29%

26%33%

30%

35%60%

71% 45%

27%

28%

24% 25%

34%

10%

21%

34%22%

% Soil Samples with %OM less than 3.0%

Fall 2016 Samples

(0-6” samples)

MB

ND

SDMN

8%

4%

10%

76%

37%

9%7%29%

28%

25%

55% 13%25%

11%

Page 32: % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to 20% Total ... · %Zone or Grid Samples Tested Compared to Conventional Whole Field Composite Samples in 2016 81% 38% 74% 27% 38% 65% 0% 10%

592

593

594

595

Zip codes for Montana

590-591

599

598

597

596