Upload
ngonguyet
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Effect of Temperature Change on Earthworm Interaction
Nayeli Alvarado
Aaron Alfaro, Eren Benyo, Yaritza Criollo, Maria Gudino
October 4, 2015
Period: 3, Biology I Honors
Purpose/Problem(s):
What real world problem could relate in doing an experiment on earthworms? How can it be
related?
Background:
Knowing that worms are a very big part of how plants and vegetables grow and is a way that can
help animals survive , if we were to get rid of them it would soon cause many problems. Which
then relates to global warming. The reason why global warming relates to an experiment like this
is because it comes to show that if the environment was either too cold or too hot, either way the
worms will be prone to die out and will soon later become extinct. You may not know it yet but
worms play a big role in our environment. Without these worms, organic matter wouldn't be
decomposed, the nutrients in plants and vegetables wouldn't increase and will in fact decrease,
and the soil structured will soon be corrupted which then will affect the rate of water infiltration,
and last but not least without worms the food chain will become a disaster and much more. As
can be seen, without earthworms our environment will the environment will then be effected.
Question: What topics are you going to link to your research?
Answer: Topics we are going to link to our research is the general behavior of earthworms, the
temperature underground, and facts about global warming and what global warming really is.
Question: What is your real world problem?
Answer: The real world problem is how global warming actually affects earthworm interactions
towards one another and the environment.
Question: What data do you have to suggest that this is actually a problem?
Answer: Data we have to suggest that this is an actual problem is because if it gets warm the
worms will be too spread out and the ground won't get enough nutrients affecting the growth of
plants, vegetables and etc.
Hypothesis:
If the earthworms are in a colder environment then they will group together to preserve
warmth.
Independent Variable:
Temperature
Measured by: Fahrenheit
Dependent Variable:
Earthworm Interaction
Number of Worms in a Group
Constants:
1. Same number of worms in a group
2. Same type of soil
3. Same type of base
4. Same worms used
Materials:
Item Price # of
Items
Total Cost Per
Item
Group Member in Charge of
Supplying Item
Shoebox $0 1 $0 Eren
Plastic Wrap $0 1 $0 Yaritza
Potting Soil $0 1 $0 Aaron
Thermometer $0 1 $0 Maria
(Paper, pencils/pens, and internet use as well. Everyone has it and for free.)
Safety:
1. Always wear gloves when handling the worms.
2. Take caution when handling the shovel and be careful to not hurt yourself if you are
digging up the worms.
3. Be careful when poking holes through the clear wrap, you might stab yourself.
4. No horseplay around the experiment and careful with all the equipment.
5. Clean up after yourself when doing the experiment and keep a clean work space.
6. Always wash your hands after touching dirty substances.
7. Always ask permission or questions from adults and/or teacher(s).
Procedure:
1. Gather three healthy worms, either store bought or from underground, or the ones your
biology teacher gives you.
2. Get a shoebox without a lid of 31” length and 17” width.
3. Place a thin layer of potting dirt that reaches ½” in height on the bottom of the shoe box.
4. Place the worms carefully on the soil.
5. Next, place a thermometer to measure the temperature of the soil, to keep it as the
control.
6. Get plastic wrap with at least six holes and cover the top of the shoebox. After getting
temperature measurements as well as observations record data in chart form.
7. Place shoebox in a room temperature environment for one day and record every hour for
three hours and record temperature measurements as well as observations in chart form.
8. Repeat step seven but place box outside in the sunlight.
9. Repeat step seven again but this time place the box in a dark and cold environment.
Data:
Cold Environment
(F)
Hot Environment
(F)
Room Temp
(control) (F)
Temp before the
experiment
59 degrees 80 degrees 70 degrees
1 hour 57 degrees 81 degrees 71 degrees
2 hour 58 degrees 80 degrees 71 degrees
3 hour 49 degrees 80 degrees 69 degrees
Observations in a Cold
Environment
Observations in a Hot
environment
Observation in a Room Temp
Environment
1 hour= So far the
worms have made no
interactions with each
other, and each of the
worms seem to be in
their own little corners.
1 hour= By the first hour
their actions seem all very
normal, besides their skin
looking a bit drier than
usual, they are still alright.
No interactions with each
other so far.
1 hour= During the first hour the
worms would sometimes huddle
up with one another, but other
than that their actions are once
again normal.
2 hour= As it's started to
get colder the worms
(well 2 of them) started
to intertangle with one
another.
2 hour= As for the second
hour they seemed to be all
separate from each other.
Once again no
Interactions. However, 2 of
the worms began to
somewhat crawl under the
dirt.
2 hour= The temp is still the
same as it was during the first
hour but the worms however
started to go back into their own
little corners.
3 hour= It has gotten a 3 hour= All the worms 3 hour= Two of the worms were
bit more colder than the
last time they were
checked on and by the
looks of it all of them
are still curled up
together.
were lying under the dirt
not wanting to go back to
the surface at the third
hour.
lying underneath the dirt while
the other one was on the surface.
However after a while, the 2
other worms went back onto the
surface. But once again no
actual interactions with one
another.
Analysis:
The worms in a cold environment of 57° F for the first hour of the experiment were
normal. There was no causal interaction per say but each worm was in their corner doing their
own thing. However, in the third hour when the temperature dropped 49 ° F it was easy to
conclude that their behavior in the third hour was completely different to their actions in the first
hour. In the third hour all the worms were curled up and intermingling with one another looking
for warmth. At first the worms, were all separate from one another but now they are all huddled
together.
Now the worms were placed in a hot environment of 81° F. By the first hour the worms
were once again making no interactions with one another, and everything seemed to be quite
normal. Then in the second hour, there were still no interactions, but this time instead of them
going back to their corners they crawled under the dirt. By the third hour, as the temperature
went down to 80°F the worms were still buried underneath the dirt.
Lastly, the worms were put in a room temperature environment of 70°F. Unlike the
worms in a cold or hot environment where in the first hour they had no interactions with one
another, the worms in the first hour that were placed in room temperature, would actually for
most of the time huddle next to each other. However, once the second hour hit, the worms this
time went back to their own corners, like they did in the first hour of when they were in a cold
environment. Then when the third hour came, two of the worms were lying underneath the dirt,
but then after a while came back to the surface. All in all, the worm’s interactions were casual.
All these interactions could tell us what might happen to other species if the earth
continued to endure global warming.
Conclusion:
Aaron Alfaro:
The purpose of the lab was to find out how worms react to each other depending on the
temperature. The problem could relate to real life because if the temperatures change because of
global warming then animal behavior may also change. This problem was thought about after
seeing that the worms were clumped together after coming out of a freezer, and after being put in
warmer temperatures they spread out more. As a result of these observation the hypothesis for
this experiment was "If earthworms are in a cold environment then they will group together."
After completing the experiment, it was found out that the hypothesis was correct.
The behavior of the worms changed as the temperature changed, as the hypothesis stated.
In temperatures around 49 degrees Fahrenheit the worms grouped up for warmth. In
temperatures higher than or equal to 70 degrees Fahrenheit, the worms went to their own corner
and went underground. The worms went underground in an attempt to cool off. The experiments
ran without any difficulties. There is no apparent reason to disbelieve these results as there were
little to no outside variables that could have messed up the experiment.
The experiments showed that worms do in fact change their behavior and interactions
with each based on the temperature. Along with that, it was found that the hypothesis was correct
and that worms do huddle together in cold environments. The way the experiment could be
improved is in multiple ways. First, the box could be bigger and there should be a larger amount
of worms, that way information on behavior could be more accurate. Also, if there was a way to
control the temperature more effectively, that might also give more accurate results. From the
data collected there doesn't seem to be any room for a follow-up experiment.
There doesn't seem to be any more questions that could be asked that aren't answered by
the experiment. The only questions that come to mind are temperatures that worms can survive
in. This could easily be found by searching for articles on worms through a search engine. This
information could be important because if the Earth's surface gets too hot for worms, it could
cause a major problem. This is because, of how worms distribute nutrients in the soil. They eat
soil closer to bedrock, and then bring up the nutrient rich soil to replace the topsoil, and then
Bringing the topsoil down below. If the surface is too warm for the hot for the worms to get up
to, then plants wouldn't be able to get the rich soil from below, and so there would be less plants,
or not at all. These are the only questions that would need to be researched in order to be
answered.
Nayeli Alvarado:
The purpose of this lab was to find a problem associated with the worms we were given
and relate them to a real world problem (and do an experiment with them). The question I came
up with is if we put worms in different environments with different temperatures how would they
interact with each other. The hypothesis was "If the earthworms are in a cold environment then
they will group together to preserve warmth." This experiment can relate to global warming,
which as everyone knows is making a gradual increase in the average temperature of the Earth's
atmosphere, and show us animal (and even human) interactions based on the climate change.
After testing our experiment, our hypothesis was proven right.
Looking at the data table it was shown that the worms behavior towards eat other
changed whenever the temperatures changed, further agreeing with the hypothesis stated above.
When the temperature was below 60 degrees Fahrenheit the worms would group together and try
and save warmth. They would huddle together and look interlock with each other. During room
temperatures (70 degrees) the worms acted different, some would group together while others
would just go underground and/or stay solitary. If the temperature rose above 75 degrees
Fahrenheit then the worms would stay as far away as they could from each other and even go
underground to cool themselves down. Not only that but there skin also seemed to look dry and
rough. There were almost no difficulties when doing this experiment because we basically just
moved the worms to different locations and then observed them. The only difficulty was to make
just that the worms didn’t die from overbearing heat and/or cold. There is only one reason as to
why I could have any disbelief to my data and that is because worms were not put outside in
actual sunlight, instead it was just a warm room.
Throughout this experiment I have learned that worms change their behavior in different
environments. Basically if it is too hot the worms would look somewhere to cool themselves off
and in cold environments they would try and conserve heat. However that’s just vaguely what it
taught me, because the worms were just a part of the actual experiment. What I mean is that it’s
not just the worms that change behavior and interactions with each other, but it could in fact be
an example of what other types of species might do in this situation. Humans, plants and animals
will need to change how they react to different environments to survive with global warming
happening. Although, this experiment was successful in answering my problem and proving my
hypothesis correct, there are many things we could have done to improve our experiment. First
of all, we could have run the experiment on for longer as well as for more days, allowing us to
obtain more data. We could have also made the box bigger and more realistic to a worm’s natural
habitat. Some errors could have been that the dirt was not moist enough, or deep enough. Putting
the worms outside and in different areas could have given us more accurate data as well. Adding
more worms in would have helped our experiment and shown us even more evidence that our
hypothesis was right (or maybe it could have even proven it wrong). All these flaws and minor
mistakes could result in us making follow up experiments. Even different but closely related
experiments having to deal with adaptation and population could happen.
What’s next? In science that is always the question. What comes after this? There are
some questions I have left over this subject. For instance, is it just worms that react this way?
Does the structure and anatomy affect the way an animal reacts to environmental changes? What
will happen if global warming continues to happen? What will happen if it stops? All these
questions can only be answered by research and my own conclusions/thoughts. I’d have look up
animal behaviors, global warming, animal adaptation, evolution and much more. However doing
this is what will help me become a better and smarter person. Having done this experiment has
broadened my knowledge over species interactions and global warming. It has opened my mind
to the new possibilities that could happen in the world with global warming adaptation, and
much more. It started with just a small experiment on worms, but ended with knowledge needed
to be seek. But hey, that’s what science does.
Erendira Benyo:
Temperature affects all living organisms in the world, no matter how insignificant an
average person might think. Specifically, earthworms are constantly under differentiating
temperature, as they inhabit the underground. Earthworms have to endure the hardships of the
scorching heat and numbing cold, even in the underground. One who is unfamiliar with
earthworms might wonder how the insects survive during long bouts of cold, as well as heat, in
their natural habitat. What would they behave with one another? A hypothesis: If earthworms are
in a cold environment, then they will group together to preserve warmth.
By acting on this hypothesis, an experiment is to be executed, and the variables and
constants are all clear. The independent variable is the temperature, measured in degrees
Fahrenheit. The dependent variable would then in turn be the earthworm interaction, and this
would be measured with a group of earthworms in an enclosed area. The constants for this
experiments would be the same number of worms, soil, base, and specie of worm. In order for
the experiment to be successful, a clean cardboard box should be used, the top part cut and
covered with transparent plastic wrap. The plastic wrap would have small holes littering the top,
keeping in mind that the worms need oxygen to live. Once that is finished, the worms were
placed in three different environments on three different days. One day, the worms would be in a
room temperature environment, the second day in a cold, and the third day in a hot environment
for three hours. For the first hour of the room temperature environment, the worms huddled
together sometimes, but ultimately acted typically. The second hour the worms went into their
own small corners, and would sometimes act like they did in the first hour. The third hour, two
worms were underneath the dirt while one was on the surface. After a while, the two worms
resurfaced but never truly interacted again. On the next day with the first hour of the worms in a
hot environment, their actions were normal, but their skin seemed slightly dry. The second hour,
two worms crawled underneath the dirt. On the third hour, all the worms refused to stay on the
surface. The last day, the worms stayed in a cold environment. In the first hour, the worms made
no interaction amongst one another and stayed in their respective corners. The second hour
consisted of the worms beginning to intertwine with each other. The third hour, all of the worms
were curled up in a knot. There were no difficulties within this experiment, and it was all
genuine, since the variables and constants stayed the same.
Moving on, this experiment teaches that in the cold, earthworms knot together, and in the
heat, they dig underground. By using our knowledge, earthworms must knit together in order to
preserve their body heat. If they stayed in their corners, then they would have most likely died. If
the worms stayed on the surface during intense heat, then they would have dehydrated, and
eventually die from heat exhaustion. Despite these findings, this experiment could be improved.
The worms could have been exposed to the same intense heat, but over the course of longer
hours, to see if their behavior is static to the findings, or if it stays limited to what happened
during the trials. There could have also been a few errors during the experiment. The amount of
heat could have been too intense for the worms, and too much direct exposure could have posed
as threatening to the worms. More experiments could be done by keeping in mind of these
possible errors, experiment being having the earthworms in the environments for six hours
instead of three, etc.
In conclusion, the hypothesis aforementioned was correct. It was proved true through the
experimentation of three trials with typical backyard earthworms. It was done over the course of
three days and the results were accurate. However, more research can be done. This earthworm
lab can be helpful for seeing a bigger picture. Global warming is a very controversial issue, and
this lab can be seen in determining if global warming is happening currently. Modifications are
needed, though, in order to make the earthworm lab pertain to global warming. More worms and
longer periods of time can be used in determining if global warming is affecting the earthworms.
Global warming may affect the worm's eating habits, way to homeostasis, reproduction, and
overall equilibrium of its environment. Earthworms may seem insignificant, but they prove
insightful when it comes to world concern. They can show society how global warming is an
actual problem, and how people have the power to prevent it.
Yaritza Criollo:
What I did in my lab was experimenting on how 3 different types of worms would
interact with each other based on the temperature of the environment. I placed the worms in a hot
environment of about 81°F, a cold environment of 50°F, and a room temperature area of 70°F.
The purpose of this experiment was to see how the worms connected with one another and to
give an example how Global warming can affect even the smallest of animals. Going into the
experiment my group and I made a hypothesis that if the earthworms are in a colder environment
than they will group together for warmth. This hypothesis that we created proven to be true
throughout the experiment.
The data from the experiment technically states that if the worms were to be in a chilly
environment then they would huddle around each other looking for warmth, and that worms in a
warm environment would want to be separate from one another and lay underneath the dirt.
However, if the earthworms were placed in a room temperature environment then their
interactions with each other will be "casual". The experimental and control group of this
experiment is that the room temperature room is the control room and the cold/hot room is the
experimental group. The reason why the worms had grouped together for warmth in a cold
environment is because since they have no exoskeleton they are very sensitive to the
temperature. For example, an earthworm in a 50°F environment will feel like a worm that's in
about a 47°F room. The only difficulty with this experiment, to believe or not is, that I had to
make sure that the worms wouldn't die of overheating or too long of an exposure to the cold. The
only reason to disbelief my results is that if you actually did an experiment outside where the
worms were in their natural habitat them have to adapt to the temperature in my house.
What I've learned from this experiment is that animal's interaction with one another can
actually be affected by temperature. Before this experiment I really didn't believe that the way
animals acted towards each other can change based off temperature, especially from small
animals such as worms. However, after doing this experiment it proved to me that these small
animals can do just that and interact differently depending on the change of temperature. Ways I
could have improved my experiment was by actually testing the worms in their natural habitat
and adjusting the box where I kept to resemble more of their natural habitat. Experimental errors
that could have possibly occurred is that the dirt that I used wasn't moist enough, and or if I have
let the worms under a certain temperature for a too long. These results can create questions like,
can earthworms quickly adapt to habitats that aren't similar to their natural habitat? Also
questions like, how long can earthworms withstand severe heat or cold?
Research that can be done to answer my remaining questions is more research about
global warming and how too much exposure to hot and cold weather can really affect animals.
Also to answer what is next I would have to respond by saying that what is next is now figuring
out how and why exposure to too much heat of to the coldness will really affect the animals of
all around. For instance, many animals have already suffered from severe heat and or severe
coldness. Like amphibians such as frogs, toads, salamanders, and etc. However, some
implications to this problem is suggesting things like climate control or having people to start
using less gas, start saving energy and much more. All in all, from this experiment I have learned
many new information about earthworms and have experienced something new.
Maria Gudino:
In this lab we tested the effect of temperature change on earthworm interaction to see if
the earthworms are in a cold environment then they will group together to preserve warmth. The
hypothesis was correct b cause in the cold environment the worms were all curled together to
preserve worm just like all living things do to preserve warmth.
The data says the control group that was the room temperature experience showed that by
the during the experience the worms had some interaction but very little because the worms have
some body heat already. Unlike in the experimental groups which was the cold temperature and
warm temperature the worms had to interact with each other to preserve warmth in the cold
temperature because like all things living we find ways to preserve heat and in the warm
temperature the worms were just under the dirt not wanting to come back up to the hot surface
because it was too hot for the worms. But there was one difficulty in this experience which was
keeping the worms alive. There is no reason to disbelieve the results.
In this experience I learned that worms interact with each other very little in room
temperature and interact with each other in cold temperatures. We could improve the experience
by having more hours recorded to find the how the worms would interact with each other with
for a week in cold, warm and room temperature environments. The follow up experiment that
these results can lead to is if the worm’s interaction would be affected by the changes of the cold
temperature.
The research that is next would be how different worms would react to the room
temperature and warm, cold temperatures because this in this experiment we are only testing it
with earthworms and if we tested it with different worms we might get different results. Another
thing that can be researched is the type of soil and how different types of effect the result of the
interaction with the worms.
Citations:
● Ground Temperatures as a Function of Location, Season, and Depth. (n.d.). Retrieved
October 4, 2015
● World of Change: Global Temperatures: Feature Articles. (n.d.). Retrieved October 4,
2015
●
● Can We Predict How Earthworm Effects on Plant Growth Vary With Soil Properties?
(n.d.) Retrieved October 4, 2015
●
● Natural Resource Conservation Service (n.d.). Retrieved October 20, 2015.