MUKILTEO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL 2015-46

SUBJECT TITLE: Meeting Date:Parking Garage Feasibility Study ILA April 20, 2015

Staff Lead: Exhibits:Patricia Love, Community Development 1. Study LocationsDirector 2. Feasibility Study Requirements

3. Draft ILADepartment Director: 4. Sound Transit 2 Plan ProjectMayor Jennifer Gregerson Description

5. Draft Power Point PresentationEstimated Time:30 minutes

Budget Information

Amount Budgeted: $o Account Name(s): AccountNumber:

Budget Remaining: $0

Expenditure Required: $47,500

Appropriation Required: $47,500

ILA Partner $47,500Participation

RECOMMENDATION:City Council MOTION to authorize the Mayor or her designee to sign the attachedInterlocal Agreement (ILA) as written or with minor modifications with Sound Transit,Port of South Whidbey and Island County to accept funding in the amount of $47,500for a parking garage feasibility study.

BACKGROUND:In 2008, Puget Sound voters approved a transit tax that would be used by Sound Transitfor high capacity projects that provide an alternative to rising gas prices and greenhousegas emissions. The resulting Sound Transit 2 Plan included partial funding for a jointuse parking garage as part of the Washington State Ferry terminal project. Siting thepotential parking garage is relevant with the pending construction of the new ferryterminal and pending adoption of the City’s Draft Downtown Waterfront Master Plan.

Parking Garage Feasibility Study hA AB 2015-46.docx 1

This Interlocal Agreement pairs city coordination with partner funding in order tocomplete a study of parking garage locations in the next nine months, followingapproval by all parties.

PROPOSAL:Sound Transit, the Port of South Whidbey, Island County and the City all desire to havea feasibility study prepared to determine the need, size, and potential location for aMukilteo Parking Garage and have agreed to work together to fund a joint feasibilitystudy that comprehensively addresses the parking demand on the Mukilteo waterfront.

The purpose of the study is to identify the location(s), costs, and feasibility of a futureshared use parking garage in downtown Mukilteo. Users of the garage could includeSound Transit riders, Whidbey Island day and overnight commuters, park users,business patrons, Downtown Business District employee parking, and potentiallyWashington State Ferries employee parking.

Our agencies have agreed to fund the study according to the following formula:

Agency ContributionSound Transit: $35,000

Port of South Whidbey: $10,000

Island County: $2,500

City of Mukilteo: Staff Time to Manage the Project

In addition to funding the feasibility study, our agencies have agreed to evaluate aminimum of four sites which include: i) Transit Center on the Tank Farm, 2)

Lighthouse Park Commuter Parking Lot, 3) Public Works Facility on 2’ Street & ParkAvenue, and 4) Lower Rosehill Parking Lot. We anticipate that it will takeapproximately nine months from a signed contract to complete the study which willinclude holding several public meetings on the proposal.

Attached is the Draft Interlocal Agreement outlining the responsibilities of each agency.Each of our legal departments have reviewed the Agreement and once the final signaturehas been obtained the City will advertise for consultants. A contract with the selectedconsulting firm will be brought back to Council for final approval.

ALTERNATIVE: Request staff to amend the Interlocal Agreement.

Parking Garage Feasibility Study hA MI 2015-46.docx 2

Exhibit r: Parking Garage Study Locations

lH)

Old TownParking Option— Old Town Sidew Necds

— r.jfl5

Ei City patcIs (July 2C41

City Lirn ts

Potential Old Town Parking

LZZ] Ci,

Pnrip

Private

lllldg.iI y Si iii

Snohomih County. 2012

0 l7it 2t0Li I I I

Parking Garage feasihilib’ Study ILA AB 2015-46.ducx 3

Exhibit 2— Feasibility Study Requirements

The int’ormation gathered From the study will be used to help the project pai-tners identify whichlocations(s) may be appropriate for construction of a new parking garage(s). The Cityanticipates that the Feasibility study will need to address:

Size: Prepare a needs assessment matrix and sizing model based on the number of parking stallsneeded by local businesses, Lighthouse Park users. Washington State Ferries, Island CountyCommuters, Port of South Whidbey, and any others identified through the initial sizing andparking stall turn over analysis. Sound Transit completed a Station Access Study in September2012, which identi lies the parking need for Sounder patrons and is recommended to be used asreference For this analysis. It is anticipated that the selected consultant team would gather thisinformation through a series of interviews or joint meetings with various interest groups.

Location: Using the pre-selected site map as a starting point at least six sites shall be initiallyselected for consideration then narrowed down to three to be included in the final analysis. Onthe three selected alternatives, a parking garage footprint shall be drawn to scale on aerial mapsto show the impact to adjacent properties. The analysis shall also include a typical floor planwith an estimated number of parking spaces that can be provided per floor based on the parkinggarage footprint and zoning by location. As part of the location analysis, any and all propertyencumbrances such as easements, covenants and restrictions shall be identified and included inthe site priority and selection process.

Massin. Diarams: Prepare 3D block renderings or other visual aids that replicate theapproximate massing of the proposed parking structures at each site that meet current zoning andbulk dimensions including: height, setbacks, bulk, and scale. This is not a design exercise. but abasic site analysis that should address massing, potential ingress/egress, and circulation.Mukilteo Municipal Code 17.20 contains the bulk Downtown Business District bulk regulationsand 1 7.25A contains the design standards for the DB district. Mukilteo Municipal Code Chapter

I 7B contains the City’s Shoreline regulations.

Cost Recovery Analysis & Fundin. Opportunities: Neither the City nor our partners are in theparking garage business, therefore the selected consultant will need to identify creative strategiesto fund and operate the parking garage. This overall funding strategy must be flexible enough sothat it can be applied to any of the selected sites. The funding strategy should include a pricingstrategy, demand assumptions, over sell assumptions, operating expenses, escalation factors,public/private partnerships, bonding, potential tax revenue, and/or other successful fundingstrategies known by the consultant to make the parking garage economically feasible. Thepricing strategy should consider Sound Transit’s current policy of not charging Soundercommuters for parking.

Cost / Benefit Analysis: Based on the information gathered during the site analysis phase of theproject, a preliminary cost estimate for each parking garage site shall be prepared. This costestimate shaLt be used to determine a cost-benefit factor of building a parking garage at each of

Parking Garage Feaibi1ityStudyILAM3 2015-46.docx 4

the sites. The final study shall include a ranking of site alternatives based on the combinedFactors of cost / benefit, number of stalls and zoning compatibility.

Operations: While the City and our partners will be working together to identify the size andbest location for the parking garage, it is anticipated that the City would be responsible for thelong term operations and management of the facility. The feasibility plan needs to include a

comparison analysis of the pro’s and con’s of operating and maintaining the facility with City

resources or by out sourcing to a private company. This analysis should address long term laborcosts including staffing, enforcement, and property / facility maintenance.

Comparaison Matrix: A matrix shall be prepared that compares the constructability factors ofeach site which includes: minimum number of parking spaces, private property impacts, adjacentland uses, level of permitting difficulty, potential access points, cost factors, and some type ofranking or prioritization scale.

Recommendation: A conclusion and recommendations on next steps to move the project forwardshould be included in the final report including but not limited to: identifying level of effortneeded to successfully implement a parking garage program and estimated costs for design,permitting, environmental, land acquisition and construction phases. Include as an element tothe report, an all-inclusive cost per stall estimate for the garage alternatives.

Parking Garagc Fcasibility Study hA AB 2015-46.dOCx 5

Exhibit 3: Draft ILA

Interlocal Agreement by and Betweenthe City of Mukilteo, Sound Transit, Port of South Whidbey and Island County RegardingConducting a Feasibility Study for Constructing a New Parking Garage(s) in the City of

Mukilteo

TI-uS AGREEMENT: The Parties to this Agreement are the City of Mukilteo, aWashington municipal corporation (hereafter “City”), the Central Puget Sound Regional TransitAuthority, a regional transit authority under the laws of Washington (hereafter “Sound Transit”),Port of South Whidbey, a Port District within Island County (hereafter “Port”) and IslandCounty, a political subdivision of the State of Washington (hereafter “the County”) and may beindividually referred to as “Party” and collectively referred to as “the Parties.” The Parties arelocated in and exist under the laws of the State of Washington.

WHEREAS, the City of Mukilteo sits on the shores of Possession Sound and is home tothe Mukilteo/Clinton ferry terminal and Mukilteo Sounder Commuter Rail Station; and

WHEREAS, Washington State Ferries (WSF), Port of Everett, Sound Transit,Department of Defense/US Air Force, National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationcNOAA), City of Mukilteo, Island County and others have been meeting regularly over the pastfive years in connection with an Environmental Impact Statement to relocate theMukilteo/Clinton Ferry Terminal facilities and establish a smooth transition for the transfer anddevelopment of the Mukilteo Tank Farm property; and

WHEREAS, the Mukilteo Tank Farm was transferred from the federal Government tothe Port of Everett in October of 2013; and

WI-IEREAS, the Mukilteo Multimodal Project includes construction of a new ferryterminal and transit center that connects to the Mukilteo Sounder Commuter Rail Station; and

WHEREAS, Sound Transit runs four daily commuter train round-trips between Everett

and Seattle with stops at a single platform in Mukilteo. A “south platform and pedestrian bridge”

expansion project is currently under construction and is expected to be opened late spring of2015; and

WHEREAS, in 2008, Puget Sound voters approved a transit tax that would he used bySound Transit for high capacity transit projects that provide an alternative to rising gas prices

and greenhouse gas emissions. One of Sound Transit’s listed projects includes the possibility of

funding one or more transit system access projects for the Mukilteo Sounder Commuter RailStation; and

Parking Garagc Feasibility Study ILA AB 2015-46.docx 6

Wl-IEREAS. in addition to the parking needs of Sound Transit patrons, there is a highdemand for overnight commuter parking spaces. parking for daytime reverse commuters, bothdaytime and overnight parking to promote Island County tourism, as well as additional parkingto support local businesses in the Downtown Business District; and

WI-IEREAS, Sound Transit, the Pott, the County and the City all desire to have afeasibility study prepared to determine the need, size, and potential location for a MukilteoParking Garage; and

WI-IEREAS, the agencies have agreed to work together to fund a joint feasibility studythat comprehensively addresses the parking demand on the Mukilteo waterfront.

NOW, TI-IEREFORE, the Parties agree:

1. AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE

A) Authority. This Interlocal Agreement (hereafter “Agreement”) is entered into

pursuant to chapter 39.34 RCW (Interlocal Cooperation Act).

B) Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to create a binding contract betweenthe Parties with respect to funding a Parking Garage feasibility Study.

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Part of Mukilteo’s long range vision for the waterfront is to create a pedestrian-friendly

and inviting place to visit while balancing waterfront access with parking demand. Thisvision includes the development and operation of a parking garage within walkingdistance to high demand areas such as the Sounder station, ferry terminal, businesses andLighthouse Park. The Parties have agreed to conduct a feasibility study to help identifywhich locations(s) may be appropriate for construction of a new parking garage.

The City has prepared a Request for Qualifications (hereafter “RFQ”) requesting qualified

parking facility design consultant firms to assist in determining the feasibility ofconstructing and operating a new parking garage in Mukilteo (Appendix A). The purposeof the study is to identify the location(s), costs, and constructability of a future shared useparking garage in downtown Mukilteo. Users of the garage could include Sound Transitriders, Whidbey Island day and overnight commuters, park users, business patrons,Downtown Business District employees, and Washington State ferries employees

(Mukilteo Tank farm site only). Appendix B includes a copy of the City’s standard

consultant contract.

3. DURATION

This Agreement shall become effective upon execution by the Parties and recording withthe Snohomish County Auditor, and shall remain in effict until the work described belowis completed.

Parking Garage Feasibility Study 1L4 AB 2015-46.dOCX 7

4. CITY RESPONSIBILITY

The City oCMukilteo is the Project Manager for the Parking Garage Feasibility Study. Asthe project lead, the City has the following responsibilities:

A) Parking Garage Statement of Qualifications: The City shall prepare and issue anRFQ to consultants interested in conducting the Mukilteo Parking GarageFeasibility Study. Upon receipt of the statements of qual i flcations (hereafter

“SOQ”s), the City will shortlist, interview, and enter into a consultant contract

with the jointly selected firm to conduct the Parking Garage Feasibility Study.The consultant contract, the form of which is attached (Exhibit B), shall include ascope of work approved by the City and the Parties.

B) Parking Garage Feasibility Study: The City shall manage the consultant contractaccording to standard City practices. Work under this element includes managingthe project schedule, payment of invoices, and review and approval of workproducts. Work products shall be distributed to the Parties and the Parties giventhe opportunity to review and comment on the materials. Timelines for workproduct turn around shall be discussed and assigned with each distribution.

C) Invoices: The City shall provide a monthly tally sheet of the fund balance,expenditures, and completed tasks to the Parties.

D) Open Houses/Public Meetings: The City shall host any and all public meetingsheld on the Parking Garage Feasibility Study.

E) Draft & Final Report: The City shall distribute the draft and final report to theParties for review and comment. Each agency shall determine their adoptionprocess for the final document.

5. SUPPORT STAFF, MEETINGS, REVIEW, AND PAYMENT

The Parties shall provide the staff support necessary to conduct the feasibility study in atimely manner. Work shall include:

A) Staff Support: Each Party shall appoint a staff person as their representativethroughout the duration of the feasibility study.

B) SOQ Process: The Parties shall participate in the parking garage SOQ review,interview, consultant selection, and finalization of the scope of’ work in a processoutlined by the City.

C) Feasibility Study: The Parties shall attend and participate in meetings, openhouses, or public hearings held on the fiasibility study. Review and comments on

Parking Garage Feasibility Study ILA AB 2015-46.docx 8

work product materials shall he provided within the timeline provided by the

City’s Project Manager.

D) Draft & Final Report: The Parties shall review and provide comments on both thedraft and final report. Each agency shall determine their adoption process for thefinal document.

E) Sound Transit will pay the City for 74% of the cost of the study, up to a not toexceed amount of $35,000, within 30 days of its receipt of a fully documented

invoice showing Sound Transit’s share of amounts expended by the City to the

feasibility study contractor. Invoices must be sent to Sound Transit, Attn:Accounts Payable, 401 S. Jackson Street, Seattle, Washington 98104. The Citywill not invoice more than once per month.

F) Port of South Whidbey will pay the City for 21% of the cost of the study, up to anot to exceed amount of $10,000, within 30 days of its receipt of a fully executedILA between all of the parties

G) Island County will pay the City for 5% of the cost of the study, up to a not toexceed amount of $2,500, within 30 days of its receipt of a frilly executed ILAbetween all of the parties.

6. INDEMNIFICATION

Each Party to this agreement shall be responsible for its own acts and/or omissions andthose of its officers, employees and agents, and shall indemnify and hold the other Parties

harmless from claims resulting from that party’s acts or omissions. No Party to this

Agreement shall be responsible for the acts and/or omissions of entities or individuals nota Party to this agreement.

7. INSURANCE

A) The City shall require the consultant performing the Work to maintainCommercial General Liability Insurance, Commercial Automobile Insurance, andWorkers Compensation insurance.

B) The City shall require the consultant performing the Work to be solely andcompletely responsible for safety and safety conditions at the job site, includingthe safety of all persons and property during performance of the work. Theconsultant shall be required to comply with all applicable City and Stateregulations, ordinances, orders, and codes regarding safety.

8. TERMINATION

If a Party fails to comply with any material provision of this Agreement, the other Partiesmay terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, for default upon 30 days written

Parking Garage feasibility Study ILA AB 20t5-46.docx 9

notice to the defaulting party. Any extra costs, expenses or damages incurred by the non-

defaulting party as a result othe termination for default shall be borne exclusively by theParty in default. The rights and remedies of this provision are in addition to any otherrights or remedies provided to the non-defaulting party by law or under this Agreement.Any termination of this Agreement for default shall not relieve the defaulting party of anyobligation, which may arise ocit of work already performed prior to such termination.

9. PRO.JECT RECORDS

During the progress of the contract and for the period specified by the applicable recordsretention laws, all records pertaining to the Project and accounting shall be kept availablefor inspection and audit by the State and copies of all records, accounts, documents orother data pertaining to this Agreement and the Project will be furnished upon request. Ifany litigation, claim, or audit is commenced, the records and accounts along withsupporting documentation shall be retained until all litigation, claim or audit finding hasbeen resolved even though such litigation, claim, or audit may continue past the specifiedretention period.

10. DISPUTE RESOLUTION

If a dispute arises between the Parties, the Parties agree that they will attempt to resolvethe issued through mutual negotiation. In the event that the Parties are not able to reachan agreement through such negotiation, the Parties agree to engage in mediation in orderto resolve the dispute. Mediation may be requested by either Party, and shall beattempted prior to the institution of any lawsuit arising under the Agreement. The Partiesagree to share the cost of mediation equally. Venue for any lawsuit arising under thisAgreement shall be Snohomish County Superior Court.

11. CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS

A Party may request changes, amendments, or additions to any portion of thisAgreement; however, no such changes, amendments, or addition to any portion of thisAgreement shall be valid or binding upon either Party unless it is in writing and executedby all Parties. All amendments shall be attached to and made part of this Agreement.

12. NOTICES AND CONTACTS

A) Unless otherwise directed in writing, notices, reports, invoices and payments shallbe delivered to each party as follows:

B) Notices mailed by either Party shall be deemed effictive on the date mailed.Either Party may change its address for receipt of reports, notices, invoices, orpayments and/or designation of Project Manager by giving the other writtennotice of not less than seven days prior to the effective date.

C) Staff contact for each Party is as follows:

City of Mukilteo

Parking Garage Feasibility Study ILA AU 2015-46.dOCx 10

Patricia LoveDirector of Community Development11930 Cyrus WayMukilteo, WA 98275425-263-8041plove@ci.mukilteo.wa.us

Sound TransitKen LeeProject Manager401 S. Jackson StreetSeattle, WA 98104206-398-5000Ken. lee@soundtransit.org

Sound TransitAttn: Accounts Payable401 5. Jackson StreetSeattle, WA 98104206-398-5000accountspayable(soundtransit.org

Port of South WhidbeyAngi MozerInterim Executive Director1804 Scott Road, Suite 101Freeland WA 98249portfinance(portofsouthwhidbey.com

Island CountyIsland County Public WorksDoug CoxTransportation PlannerP.O. Box 5000Coupeville, WA 98239360-678-7959d.cox@co.island.wa.us

13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT

These provisions represent the entire and integrated agreement of the Parties and may notbe modified or amended except as provided herein. Any understanding, whether oral orwritten, which is not incorporated herein is expressly excluded.

14. SEVERABILITY

Parking Garage Feasibility Study ILA AB 2015-46.dOCx 11

Should any clause, phrase. sentence or paragraph of the Agreement or its application toany Party or circumstance he declared invalid or void by a court of competentjurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement and/or their application to otherparties and circumstances, not declared invalid or void, shall remain in full force andeffect.

CITY OF MUKILTEO APPROVED AS TO FORM

Jennifer Gregerson Date Angela G. SummerfieldMayor Attorney for City of Mukilteo

ISLAND COUNTY APPROVED AS TO FORM

Helen Price Johnson, Chair Date Daniel B. MitchellIsland County Commissioner Attorney for Island County

SOUND TRANSIT APPROVED AS TO FORM

Name Date Jordan WagnerTitle Senior Legal Counsel

PORT OF SOUTH WHIDBEY APPROVED AS TO FORM

Name Date NameTitle Attorney for Port of South

Whidbey

Parking Garage Feasibility Study ILA AB 2015-46.dncx 12

Exhibit 4: Sound Transit 2 Plan Project Description

Parking Garage Feasibility Study ILA M3 2015-46.dOCX 13

Project Number

_______________

Subarea

_______________

Primary Mode Impacted

______________

Facility Type

______________

Version Number

______________

Date Last Modified

_______________

Short Project DescriptionProvide funding to construct up to 130 structuredparking stalls for Sounder riders in a joint-useparking garage developed as part of WashingtonState Ferries’ Mukilteo Landing multimodal terminalproject or other access improvements.

Project Purpose: to accommodate future Sounderparking demand.

Costin Millions of 2007$

Design Basis Conceptual

Environmental Documentation RequiredT EmAronmental Impact Statement Required

r Environmental Assessment Required

F EmAronmental Checklist Required

Relationships to Other ProjectsRelationship ProjectDependent on

Note: WSDOT/WSF is expected to issue draft EIS for Mukilteo multimodalterminal project in Spring 2007.

Sounder: Mukilteo Station AccessN22

SnohomishSounder

Park & Ride7.0

4/24/2008

Low HighAgency Admin $0.5 $0.6Environmental Clearance and PE $0.6 $0.7Final Design, Specs, Permitting $0.6 $0.7ROW Acquisition $2.1 $2.5Construction $4.8 $5.5Vehicles $0.0 $0.0Contingency $0.8 $0.9Total $9.4 $10.8

Mukilteo Landina multi-modal terminal (WSF oroiect

Long DescriptionThis capital project scope, and the companion capital cost estimate, are intended to include the entire project development cycle (agency and projectadministration, environmental clearance, design, all aspects of property acquisition, permits, agreements, construction, testing, commissioning andcontingencies) from project initiation through the start-up of the revenue operations.

Description:Provide funding to construct up to 130 parking spaces for ST transit riders in a joint-use parking garage developed with Washington State Ferries andthe City of Mukilteo at the Mukilteo Landing multi-modal terminal. This project scope assumes that all other transit facility components of the multi-modal terminal, aside from those already funded in Sound Move, are funded by others.

Project Elements Included:• Up to 130 parking spaces for ST transit riders in structure• 1 percent for art per ST policy

Utilities:• Electrical, stormwater

Right-of-Way and Property Acquisition:• Miscellaneous easements

Mitigation:• The final project scope will include all mitigation(s) committed to by ST in pertinent, future project-level environmental documents.

Exclusions:• Non-structural architectural and aesthetic elements in excess of the ST art program• Public restrooms• Modifications to the local street network• Any portion of the bus transit center to be co-located with the garage• Items not directly related to adding stalls to the already planned garage• Additional bike storage, lockers, and racks

Permits Required:• Building permit• Electrical permit• Mechanical permit• Utility connection permits• Shoreline permit

Agreements Required:• City of Mukilteo, WSF

Flexible Access to ST Facilities:The goal of this project is to accommodate the future demand for ridership on transit services available at the station/center, by improvingaccess/egress for this location. The scope of the transit parking components included in this project could be revised to include a range of strategiesfor providing rider access to the transit facility. Along with, or instead of parking for private vehicles or van pools, a mix of other investments could beaccomplished through the budget for this project. These other strategies include:

• Pedestrian improvements within one-quarter mile of Mukilteo Station,• Additional bus/transfer facilities at Mukilteo Station,• Bicycle improvements within one-half mile,• Transit speed and reliability improvements on routes connecting to the facility,• Expanded or new kiss-&-ride areas at Mukilteo Station, and/or• Off-site parking along an existing bus route that connects frequently (20-minute or shorter headway) to Mukilteo Station during the peak periods.

This flexible approach would permit ST staff to examine alternatives to expanded parking and could lead to even lower GHG emissions and less landconsumed by parking. ST’s highest priority for this project budget would remain meeting demand and riders’ needs. The budget for flexible accesswill not exceed the Board-adopted budget for this project. Access and demand studies would be required prior to changing this project’s scope.Determination of what level and mixture of investments would be most effective and affordable within the project’s budget would be done through aplanning effort that includes a more-detailed examination of demand and use, as well as coordination with affected jurisdictions and partner agencies,the community surrounding the station/center, and the users of the transit services available at the location. ST Board action is required to change aproject’s scope in this manner.

ST has developed scope definitions for ST2 project proposals for the purposes of developing cost estimates, phasing of investments, a financial plan,and the estimation ofproject beneifts. This scope definition should not be construed as a commitment that all defined features will be included in thefinal developed project.

Sounder: Mukilteo Station Access

Sounder: Mukilteo Station Access

Evaluation MeasuresMeasurement!

Measure Rating NotesAverage Weekday Ridership N/ACapital Cost $9.4- $10.8 in Millions of 2007$Annual Operating Cost $0.4 in Millions of 2007$Travel Time & Reliability N/AConnectivity & Integration Medium # transit routes: 1 ST (Sounder), 5 CT, 1 ET, 1 WSFLand Use & Development HighCustomer Experience MediumRisk Avoidance Low

Key Issues and BenefitsIssues• This project must be done at the same time that the parking garage for the WSF Mukilteo Landing project is built, andtiming is dependent on that project, which is currently anticipated to begin construction in 2008.• Ability to limit use of the spaces to Sounder Transit users is dependent on an unspecified enforcement program.

Benefits• Parking will accommodate forecasted future Sounder demand.• Co-developed parking might be less costly than developing a garage independently and minimizes the real estatedemands on the waterfront.• Supports the City of Mukilteo’s long range goals for downtown/waterfront redevelopment.

4/14/20 15

Parking Garage

Feasibility Study

Discussion Points:

• Brief History

• Potential Locations

• Feasibility Study Elements

.2

1

4/14/20 15

Parking Garage:

How Did We Get Here?

.3

24 Years Working Towards

Tank Farm Ownership

Previous Agreements:• 1991, 1993, & 1999 Memorandum of Understandings

o 1991: Mukilteo & Port

o 1993: Mukilteo, Port, City of Everett, SnohomishCounty, Governors Office, WSDOT, WDFW, WA STParks, & DOE

o 1999: Mukilteo, Port, WA Transportation Commission,City of Everett, Sound Transit

4 Mayors: Sullivan, Doran, Marine, & Gregerson

• 6 4-year Council terms

.4

2

4/14/20 15

2007 - Present:

Tank Farm Working Group

• Unprecedented agency cooperation to facilitate TF Transfer &Development:

• Agencies: US Air Force, Mukllteo, Port of Everett, WSF, SoundTransit, NOAA, Island County, Tulalip Tribes

• Legislative Support: Patty Murray, Maria Cantwell, & RickLarsen

• Together We’ve Accomplished:• Transfer of Tank Farm from Federal Government to Port• WSF EIS & Record of Decision• WSF Shoreline Permit• Tank Farm Binding Site Plan

.5

ST2:

Sound Transit 2 Plan

• In 2008 Transit Tax: high capacity projects

• Sound Transit 2 Plan: partial funding for a joint use parkinggarage as part of the Washington State Ferry terminal project.

• Funding: --$10M

• Comp Plan: Waterfront Key Objectives #6o Building a Parking Structure: Through a partnership between

Sound Transit and other entities for passenger, commuter andbusiness parking. (pg 53)

.

3

4/14/2015

Project Schedule

Path / ScheduleMultimodal Project Schedule

2013 2014

• lSnk ann Prop.Thbal

•NPA

0

•Pt

2016 2017 2018• Triuk,

040

p Priniji for Phase 1

II UI Li

NOW

e Construction Task

— Pier Removal

Dredging

Design & Permitting tot Phase 2

ROW Acquisition for Phase 2

• Phase2Ad

k, Utilities & Paving

nap Building A Toil Plaza

Structures A flanster Span

Idestrion Loading Bridge

New lerminal DI

hoisting Terminal Demo

WSfOpens

Fjnailzo Ownership Agreemonto —

Racord Binding Sit. P11 —T

3 ‘Years to Design, Permit &Construct A Parking Garage .7

Parking Garage:Feasibility Study Locations

4

• The purpose of the study Is to identity the location(s), costs, andconstructability of a future shared use parking garage in downtown Mukifteo.

• Does not obligate City to any future action — provides information forthe City to make decisions.

4/14/2015

Propose:

Purpose of Study

J*PfldIW GULCH

_::.:Ht’’

Parking Garage:

Potential Locations

Six Locations:

• Transit Center

LighthouseHouse ParkPW Facility

Rosehill

2 OtherLocations TBD

.10

5

4/14/20 15

Parking Garage:

Potential Locations

Transit Center:• 2-3 Stories (25’ or

35’ Height)•

— 300 - 500 Stalls

• —800 — 1,000 If

Parking Garage:

Potential Locations

Lighthouse Park:

• Commuter ParkingLot

• 3 Stories

• 400 Stalls• 1,800 — 2,000 If

• Ped ConnectionUnder RR Tracks

• Potential PedConnection WestSide of SR 525

.12

6

4/14/2015

Parking Garage:

Potential Locations

-

.:\\.

Old TownParking Optiani

E1

Public Works Facility:

• 2 — 3 Stories

• 250 — 300 StallsLand Acquisition

Ped RR Overpass onPark Avenue

SidewalkImprovements

•13

Parking Garage:

Potential Locations

Old TownParkingOptwni

.,

Rosehill:

• Rosehill LowerParking Lot

• 3 Stories

• 230 Stalls

• SidewalkConnections on5R525

. . 4

7

4/14/2015

Size:

Study Parameters

o Number of parking stalls needed by local businesses,Lighthouse Park users, Washington State Ferries, IslandCounty Commuters, Port of South Whidbey

• Location:

o 6 sites for consideration

o Reduce to 3 sites

o Prepare parking garage footprint

o typical floor plan

o Identity property encumbrances

•16

S

4/14/2015

Study Parameters

• Massing Diagrams:

o Prepare 3D block renderings: height, setbacks, bulk, andscale

• Cost Recovery Analysis & Funding Opportunities:

o Funding & pricing strategy: demand assumptions, over sellassumptions, operating expenses, escalation factors,public/private partnerships, bonding, potential tax revenue

• .17

• Cost / Benefit Analysis:

Study Parameters

o Preliminary cost estimate for each site

o Cost-benefit factor at each sites

• Operations:

o pro’s and con’s ot operating and maintaining thefacility with City resources or by outsourcing

.18

9

4/14/2015

Study Parameters

• Comparison Matrix:

o Comparison matrix: minimum number of parking spaces,private property impacts, adjacent land uses, level ofpermitting difficulty, potential access points, cost factors,and some type of ranking or prioritization scale.

• Recommendations:o A conclusion and recommendation

o Next steps

• 9

10

4/14/2015

Funding Formula:

Funding for Study

AgencySound Transit:

Contribution

Port of South Whidbey:$35,000

Island County:$10,000

City of Mukilteo:$2,500Staff lime

.21

Council Direction

Moving Forward:

1) City Council MOTION to authorize the Mayor or her designeeto sign the attached Interlocal Agreement (ILA) as written orwith minor modifications with Sound Transit, Port of SouthWhidbey and Island County in the amount of $47,500 to funda parking garage feasibility study.

Or

2) Bring Back for Further Discussion

. ‘22

11

4/14/20 15

Parking Garage Feasibility Study:

Is there consensus to move forward?

•23

12