Upload
phamdiep
View
225
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Проект: "Коллапс и квантовые фазы вихрей в Бозе-Ферми смеси с
притяжением между бозонами и фермионами"
аналитической ведомственной целевой программы "Развитие научного потенциала
высшей школы (2006-2008 годы)
Рук. А.М. Белемук
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 1/28
Introduction
Bose- Einstein condensation (BEC) first realized in 1995
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 2/28
Introduction
Bose- Einstein condensation (BEC) first realized in 1995
Atom’s de Broglie wavelength λdB = ~/(2πMkBT )1/2 is
small compared to the spacing between atoms ==>
quantum degeneracy
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 2/28
Introduction
Bose- Einstein condensation (BEC) first realized in 1995
Atom’s de Broglie wavelength λdB = ~/(2πMkBT )1/2 is
small compared to the spacing between atoms ==>
quantum degeneracy
In most cases, quantum degeneracy would simply
be-preempted by the more familiar transitions to a liquid
or solid
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 2/28
Introduction
Bose- Einstein condensation (BEC) first realized in 1995
Atom’s de Broglie wavelength λdB = ~/(2πMkBT )1/2 is
small compared to the spacing between atoms ==>
quantum degeneracy
In most cases, quantum degeneracy would simply
be-preempted by the more familiar transitions to a liquid
or solid
Temperatures 500 nK - 2 µK
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 2/28
Introduction
Bose- Einstein condensation (BEC) first realized in 1995
Atom’s de Broglie wavelength λdB = ~/(2πMkBT )1/2 is
small compared to the spacing between atoms ==>
quantum degeneracy
In most cases, quantum degeneracy would simply
be-preempted by the more familiar transitions to a liquid
or solid
Temperatures 500 nK - 2 µK
Densities 1014 - 1015 cm−3
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 2/28
Introduction
Bose- Einstein condensation (BEC) first realized in 1995
Atom’s de Broglie wavelength λdB = ~/(2πMkBT )1/2 is
small compared to the spacing between atoms ==>
quantum degeneracy
In most cases, quantum degeneracy would simply
be-preempted by the more familiar transitions to a liquid
or solid
Temperatures 500 nK - 2 µK
Densities 1014 - 1015 cm−3
The full cooling cycle may take from a few seconds to as
long as several minutes
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 2/28
Introduction
The problem is interesting, because:
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 3/28
Introduction
The problem is interesting, because:
– possible Fermi superfluidity, where the interaction
between fermions is mediated by bosons;
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 3/28
Introduction
The problem is interesting, because:
– possible Fermi superfluidity, where the interaction
between fermions is mediated by bosons;
– sympathetic cooling of fermions via a buffer gas of
bosons;
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 3/28
Introduction
The problem is interesting, because:
– possible Fermi superfluidity, where the interaction
between fermions is mediated by bosons;
– sympathetic cooling of fermions via a buffer gas of
bosons;
– wealth of novel quantum phases in these mixtures;
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 3/28
Introduction
The problem is interesting, because:
– possible Fermi superfluidity, where the interaction
between fermions is mediated by bosons;
– sympathetic cooling of fermions via a buffer gas of
bosons;
– wealth of novel quantum phases in these mixtures;
Example: mixture of 87Rb (bosons) and 40K (fermions).
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 3/28
Effective Hamiltonian
Grand-canonical partition function of the Bose-Fermi mixture:
Z =
∫
D[φ∗]D[φ]D[ψ∗]D[ψ] exp
{
−1
~(SB(φ∗, φ)+
+ SF (ψ∗, ψ) + Sint(φ∗, φ, ψ∗, ψ))} .
Here Bose field φ(τ, r) is periodic on the imaginary-time interval
[0, ~β], and Fermi (Grassmann) field ψ(τ, r) is antiperiodic on
this interval.
SB(φ∗, φ) =
∫
~β
0
dτ
∫
dr
{
φ∗(τ, r)
(
~∂
∂τ−
~2∇2
2mB
+ VB(r)−
− µB)φ(τ, r) +gB
2|φ(τ, r)|4
}
.
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 4/28
Effective Hamiltonian
SF (ψ∗, ψ) =
∫
~β
0
dτ
∫
dr
{
ψ∗(τ, r)
(
~∂
∂τ−
~2∇2
2mF
+
+ VF (r) − µF )ψ(τ, r)} .
Sint(φ∗, φ, ψ∗, ψ) = gBF
∫
~β
0
dτ
∫
dr|ψ(τ, r)|2|φ(τ, r)|2,
where gB = 4π~2aB/mB, gBF = 2π~
2aBF/mI ,
mI = mBmF/(mB +mF ), aB and aBF - boson-boson and
boson-fermion s wave scattering lengths respectively.
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 5/28
Effective Hamiltonian
Integral over Fermi fields is Gaussian, we can calculate this
integral and obtain the partition function of the Fermi system
as a functional of Bose field φ(τ, r).
ZF =
∫
D[ψ∗]D[ψ] exp
(
−1
~(SF (ψ∗, ψ) + Sint(φ
∗, φ, ψ∗, ψ))
)
=
=
∫
D[ψ∗]D[ψ] exp
{∫
~β
0
dτ
∫
dr
∫
~β
0
dτ ′∫
dr′×
× ψ∗(τ, r)G−1(τ, r, τ ′, r′)ψ(τ ′, r′)}
,
where
G−1 = G−10 − Σ
is the Dyson equation, and Σ(τ, r, τ ′, r′) is a selfenergy.
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 6/28
Effective Hamiltonian
G−10 (τ, r, τ ′, r′) = −
1
~
(
~∂
∂τ−
~2∇2
2mF
+ VF (r)−
− µF ) δ(r − r′)δ(τ − τ ′).
Σ(τ, r, τ ′, r′) =gBF
~|φ(τ, r)|2δ(r − r′)δ(τ − τ ′).
Gaussian integral over the Grassmann variables:
∫
∏
n
dψ∗ndψn exp
{
−∑
n,n′
ψ∗nAn,n′ψn′
}
= detA = eSp[ln A]
ZF = exp(
Sp ln(
−G−1))
= exp
(
−1
~Seff
)
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 7/28
Effective Hamiltonian
G−1 = G−10 − Σ = G−1
0 (I − G0Σ),
Sp(ln(−G−1)) = Sp(ln(−G−10 )) −
∞∑
n=1
1
nSp [(G0Σ)n] .
G0(τ, r, τ′, r′) =
∑
ω,n
−~
−i~ω + ǫn − µF
ξn(r)ξ∗n(r′)e−iω(τ−τ ′)
~β,
where ω = π(2s+ 1)/~β; s = 0,±1, ... and(
−~
2∇2
2mF
+ VF (r)
)
ξn(r) = ǫnξn(r).
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 8/28
Effective Hamiltonian
In the semiclassical Thomas-Fermi approximation one has:
∑
n
ξn(r)ξ∗n(r)F (ǫn) =1
(2π~)3
∫
dpF (H0(p, r)),
where H0(p, r) = p2/(2mF ) + VF (r) and F (x) is an arbitrary
function.
We suppose that all |φ(τi, ri)|2 have one and the same argument
(τ1, r1). In this approximation we have:
Seff =
∫
~β
0
dτdrfeff (|φ(τ, r)|),
feff (|φ(τ, r)|) = −β−1
(2π~)3
∫
dp ln(
1 + eβ(µF−gBF |φ(τ,r)|2−H0(p,r)))
.
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 9/28
Effective Hamiltonian
The effective boson Hamiltonian:
Heff =
∫
dr
{
~2
2mB
|∇φ|2 + (VB(r) − µB)|φ|2+
+gB
2|φ|4 + feff (|φ|)
.
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 10/28
Effective Hamiltonian
The effective boson Hamiltonian:
Heff =
∫
dr
{
~2
2mB
|∇φ|2 + (VB(r) − µB)|φ|2+
+gB
2|φ|4 + feff (|φ|)
.
In low temperature limit µ/(kBT ) ≫ 1:
feff (|φ|) = −2
5κµ5/2 −
π2
4κ(kBT )2µ1/2,
where µ = µF −VF (r)− gBF |φ(τ, r)|2 and κ = 21/2m3/2F /(3π2
~3).
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 10/28
Effective Hamiltonian
The effective boson Hamiltonian for gBF < 0 at T = 0:
Heff =
∫
dr
{
~2
2mB
|∇φ|2 + (Veff (r) − µB)|φ|2+
+geff
2|φ|4 +
κ
8µ1/2F
g3BF |φ|
6
}
.
Veff (r) =
(
1 −3
2κµ
1/2F gBF
)
1
2mBω
2B
(
x2 + y2 + λ2z2)
,
geff = gB −3
2κµ
1/2F g2
BF ,
µF = ~ωF (6λNF )1/3.
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 11/28
Variational approach
Variational boson wave function:
φ(r) =
√
NBλ
ω3a3π3/2exp
(
−(x2 + y2 + λ2z2)
2w2a2
)
.
a =
√
~
mBωB
.
Variational energy:
EB
NB~ωB
=2 + λ
4
1
w2+ bw2 +
c1NB
w3+c2N
2B
w6,
b =3
4
(
1 −3
2κµ
1/2F gBF
)
,
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 12/28
Variational approach
c1 =1
2
(
gB −3
2κµ
1/2F g2
BF
)
λ
(2π)3/2~ωBa3,
c2 =κ
8µ1/2F
g3BF
λ2
33/2π3~ωBa6.
Experimental system: Mixture of fermionic 40K and bosonic87Rb (Mogundo et al, Science 297, 2240 (2002)):
aB = 5.25 nm, aBF = −21.7+4.3−4.8 nm
Critical values: NBc ≈ 105;NK ≈ 2 × 104
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 13/28
Vortex state (variational approach)
Variational function
φ(r) =
√
λNB
(ωa)5π3/2ρ exp
(
−ρ2 + λ2z2
2ω2a2
)
eiϕl
Variational energy
Eb
NB~ωB
=2 + λ2 + 2l2
4
1
ω2+Bω2 +
C1NB
ω3+C2N
2B
ω6,
B =5
3b,
C1 =1
2c1,
C2 =2
9c2.
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 14/28
Variational approach
Fig. 1. Variational energy EB
NB~ωB
as a function of w for various numbers of
bosons.
Fig. 2. Critical number of bosons NBc as a function of the number of
fermions NF .
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 15/28
Variational approach
4,3 4,4 4,5 4,6 4,7 4,8 4,9 5,00,54
0,56
0,58
0,60
0,62
0,64
0,66
0,68
0,70
0,72
0,74 NF=20000 NF=200000 NF=500000 NF=100000
c
log10(NB)4,2 4,4 4,6 4,8 5,0 5,2 5,4 5,6 5,8 6,0
0,54
0,56
0,58
0,60
0,62
0,64
0,66
0,68
0,70
0,72
NB=50000 NB=70000 NB=40000 NB=80000
c
log10(NF )
Fig. 3. Critical angular vortex velocity as a function of a number of bosons
NB .
Fig. 4. Critical angular vortex velocity as a function of a number of bosons
NF .НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 16/28
Variational approach
Fig. 5. Density distribution of Fermions.
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 17/28
Variational approach
Fig. 5. Critical number of bosons as a function of boson-fermion scattering
length aBF .НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 18/28
Thomas-Fermi Approximation
The Gross-Pitaevski equation that follows from the effective
hamiltonian:(
−~
2
2mB
△φ+ (Veff − µB) + geff |φ|2 +
3κ
8µ1/2F
g3BF |φ|
4
)
φ = 0.
At high enough densities one can neglect the kinetic energy.
|φ|2 = θ(µB − Veff)geff
−1 +√
1 + (µB − Veff) 3κ
g2
eff2µ
1/2
F
g3BF
3κ
4µ1/2
F
g3BF
→
→ θ(µB − Veff)(µB − Veff)
geff
, if gBF → 0.
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 19/28
Thomas-Fermi Approximation
Density of Bosons:
n(r) = n(0)
(
1 −
√
1 +x2 + y2 + λ2z2 −R2
R2max
)
.
Here
ri = ri/ah; R2 =
2µB
c0mBω2Ba
2h
;
n(0) = −4
3
geffµ1/2F
κg3BF
; R2max = −
4
3
g2effµ
1/2F
κg3BF c0mBω2
Ba2h
;
c0 =
(
1 −3
2κµ
1/2F gBF
)
.
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 20/28
Thomas-Fermi Approximation
Vortex state in TFA: φ(r) =√
n(r)eiϕl,
where n(r) = n(0)
(
1 −
√
1 +ρ2+λ2z2+ l2
c0ρ2−R2
R2max
)
.
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 21/28
Расчет
−1.5−1
−0.50
0.51
1.5
−1.5
−1
−0.5
0
0.5
1
1.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
−1.5−1
−0.50
0.51
1.5
−1.5
−1
−0.5
0
0.5
1
1.50
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
Распределение бозонной плотности в магнитной ловушке для l = 0 и
l = 1.
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 22/28
Thomas-Fermi Approximation
Fig. 9. Critical angular vortex velocity as a function of a number of bosons
NB in TFA.
Fig. 10. Critical angular vortex velocity as a function of a number of
fermions NF in TFA.НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 23/28
Numerical solution of GGPE
0 1 2 3 40
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
r
φ(r)
φho
n′c= 1
n′c= 5
n′c= 10
n′c= 15
0 1 2 3 40
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
r
φ(r)
φho
n′c= 20
n′c= 40
n′c= 60
n′c= 90
0 1 2 3 40
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
r
φ(r)
0 1 2 3 40
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
r
φ(r)
n′c= 7 n′c= 20
Fig. 11. Evolution of the profile of the condensate wave function with
increasing central density n′
c. φho = π−3/4exp(−r2/2) corresponds to the
ground state of the ideal Bose.
Fig. 12 . The profile of the condensate wave function φ(r), found from the
numeric solution of GGPE (solid line), and the TF approximation
(dashed-dotted line).
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 24/28
Experiment
Fig. 6. Experimental stability diagram for the 40K-87Rb mixture(C.
Ospelkaus, S. Ospelkaus, K. Sengstock, and K. Bongs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96,
020401 (2006)). The solid line is based on the present theory and
aBF = −284a0.
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 25/28
Nature of the collapse transition.
A strong rise of density of bosons and fermions in the collapsing
condensate enhances intrinsic inelastic processes, in particular,
the recombination in 3-body interatomic collisions, as is the
case for the well-known 7Li condensates. In the presence of a
vortex there appears a hole in the middle of the condensate.
This reduces the maximum density of the condensate and
increases the critical number of bosons. However, for the
Bose-Fermi mixtures with attraction between components the
formation of the boson-fermion bound states is also possible
(M. Yu. Kagan et al, cond-mat/0209481). It seems that the
description of the evolution of the collapsing condensate should
include both these mechanisms.
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 26/28
Summary
Using the effective Hamiltonian for the Bose system, the
instability and collapses of the trapped boson-fermion mixture
due to the boson-fermion attractive interaction in the presence
of the quantized vortices was investigated.
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 27/28
Summary
Using the effective Hamiltonian for the Bose system, the
instability and collapses of the trapped boson-fermion mixture
due to the boson-fermion attractive interaction in the presence
of the quantized vortices was investigated.
We analyze quantitatively properties of the 87Rb and 40K
mixture. The calculated instability boson number NBc for the
collapse transition is in agreement with experiment.
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 27/28
Summary
Using the effective Hamiltonian for the Bose system, the
instability and collapses of the trapped boson-fermion mixture
due to the boson-fermion attractive interaction in the presence
of the quantized vortices was investigated.
We analyze quantitatively properties of the 87Rb and 40K
mixture. The calculated instability boson number NBc for the
collapse transition is in agreement with experiment.
References: A.M. Belemuk, N.M. Chtchelkatchev, V.N. Ryzhov, S.-T. Chui,
"Vortex state in a Bose-Fermi mixture with attraction between bosons and
fermions", Phys. Rev. A 73, 053608 (2006); А.М. Белемук, В.Н. Рыжов, С.Т.
Чуи, "Механизм коллапса конденсатной волновой функции в
бозе-ферми-смеси с притяжением между компонентами", Письма в ЖЭТФ,
2006, т. 84, вып. 6, стр.354-359; A.M. Belemuk, V.N. Ryzhov, S.-T. Chui, "Stable
and unstable regimes in Bose-Fermi mixtures with attraction between
components", Phys. Rev. A 76, 013609 (2007); А.М. Белемук, В.Н. Рыжов, С.Т.
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 27/28
Заключение
"Сильно коррелированные электронные системы и квантовые критические
явления"(Троицк, 2007); "23rd International Conference on Statistical
Physics"(Genova, Italy, 2007).
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 28/28
Заключение
"Сильно коррелированные электронные системы и квантовые критические
явления"(Троицк, 2007); "23rd International Conference on Statistical
Physics"(Genova, Italy, 2007).
Thank you!
НТС (МФТИ, 19 Декабря 2007) – p. 28/28