26
© Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosoph y.co.uk

© Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

© Michael Lacewing

The value of art

Michael [email protected]

.uk

Page 2: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Constable, The Hay Wain (1821)

Page 3: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Some basics

• We often praise a work for its likeness to life.

• Paintings represent objects so we can see the object in the painting.

• If we can’t, the painting often loses its point, e.g. portraits, or fails as a painting.

• Artists and actors spend years developing techniques for realism.

Page 4: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Heda, Still Life with a Lobster (1650-9)

Page 5: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

How does art represent reality?

• Art is not an imitation, nor do pictures try to get us to confuse art with reality

• Nor does art literally copy reality, e.g. when there is no reality to copy, but the artist makes it up as they go

• And the value of art is not judged by how exact a copy it is

Page 6: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Vernet, A Landscape at Sunset (1773)

Page 7: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Turner, The Scarlet Sunset (1830-40)

Page 8: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Copying (cont.)

• If art was copying, wouldn’t photographs be better than paintings?

• A good forgery is a good copy, but not good art.

• What about dance, music, literature? Nothing is being copied…

Page 9: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Representation

• We could still argue that good art represents ‘authentically’

• But if nothing is represented, then nothing is represented ‘authentically’

• Not only painting, but music

Page 10: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Newman, New Adam (1951-2)

Page 11: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

The artist’s ‘vision’

• Art can convey some ‘truth’ about reality without representing reality - it can convey a ‘vision’ of the world, a ‘deeper’ sense of reality

Page 12: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Grünewald The Crucifixion (c. 1502)

Page 13: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Advantages

• We can distinguish what is represented from what is expressed.

• We can value the artwork as an artwork without valuing what is represented.

• We can distinguish the value of an original from the value of a forgery.

Page 14: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Emotional expression

• This takes us towards the idea that art is valuable for emotional expression.

• The vision is always emotional (if it is valuable to us as art), i.e. it expresses emotional responses to or understandings of the world.

• But how can art express emotion?

Page 15: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Schedoni’s The Holy Family with the Virgin teaching the Child to Read (c. 1615)

Page 16: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Applying psychological terms to artworks

• A painting can’t literally be calm, content, intimate, sad…

• Are we describing what the painting is of, e.g. content, intimate people?

Page 17: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Jan Steen The Effects of Intemperance (1663-5)

Page 18: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Audience emotion

• Suggestion: a ‘sad’ painting is a painting that arouses sadness

• Obj.: a painting can arouse sadness without expressing sadness– E.g. someone might feel sad looking at

Schedoni because it reminds them that they don’t have an intimate family

– This doesn’t mean the painting is a sad painting - it isn’t

Page 19: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Artist emotion

• A sad painting expresses the artist’s sadness• Objection: this limits what an artist can paint

to what she or he feels• Better: a sad painting is one that the artist intends to evoke sadness in the audience

• A painting is experienced ‘correctly’ when the audience feels or at least understands the emotion the artist intended to arouse

Page 20: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Intention

• ‘Intention’ here is broad, i.e. all psychological states that bring the artist to make the painting just as it is– The artist does not have to be conscious of

their intention– Their intention may evolve with the artwork

• At some point, the artist accepts that the work is as it should be– This process of finding exactly the right

expression of emotion is a large part of art.

Page 21: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Picasso The Three Dancers (1925)

Page 22: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Form and content

• Emphasis on representation leads to a focus on what is represented, not how

• Many aesthetic judgments pick out form - grace, elegance, balance, harmony

Page 23: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Leonardo da Vinci, The Virgin of the Rocks (1491-1508)

Page 24: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Bell on significant form

• We appreciate art for its form.• All art, in fact, every picture, movement,

series of sounds, has some form. • Aesthetic response is not to form per se,

but ‘significant form’.• We can only identify whether something

has significant form by our aesthetic response to it.

• Art is about the exploration of form, the contemplation of form for its own sake.

Page 25: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Discussion

• Formalism works best where there is no representation, e.g. music– But even here, expressivism can argue

that it is the emotions expressed that matter - form is just a means to this.

• Significant form isn’t defined.• We don’t just respond to the form

of an artwork.

Page 26: © Michael Lacewing The value of art Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Rembrandt, Self-portrait at the age of 63 (1669)