28
Pareto If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it. EFFICIENCY is king. If there’s a loser, compensate. If no compensation … no guidance I give to others because I’m happy

If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it. EFFICIENCY is king. If there’s a loser, compensate. If no compensation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Pareto

If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.

EFFICIENCY is king. If there’s a loser, compensate. If no compensation … no guidance I give to others because I’m happy

Page 2: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Utilitarian

The greatest happiness for the greatest number

U1 + U2 + … + U150000000 If utility shows marginally

decreasing returns to income, can trade off utility

I give to others if their gain is greater than my loss.

Notice: ends justify means

Page 3: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Two “Utilitarians”

Singer If we can prevent a great deal of misery

without sacrificing anything of comparable moral value, we should.

Each person has a duty to maximize SWF Give 5%, 25%, a lot more, to reduce hunger.

Page 4: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Two “Utilitarians”

Singer If we can prevent a great deal of misery

without sacrificing anything of comparable moral value, we should.

Rawls Veil of ignorance 1 – Be free 2 – Choose the distribution to make the least

happy person as happy as possible Max(U1), then max (U2), then max (U3),

then….

Page 5: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Non-Utilitarian

1 – Deontology: the study of duty This is what you ought (not)

to do This is what a good person

would do. Doing something you should that

you don’t want to? How holy!

I give because I ought to.

Page 6: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Non-Utilitarian

1 – Deontology: the study of duty

2 – Virtue Ethics: the virtuous person Who are you becoming? “Not virtuous acts, but being a virtuous

person” – Schiller I give because I want to be a

compassionate person.

Page 7: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Non-Utilitarian

1 – Deontology: the study of duty2 – Virtue Ethics: the virtuous person

3 – Rights Duty holder and duty bearer Charity vs. Entitlement vs. Right

India ~2001

Page 8: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

“Non”-Utilitarians s

1 – Deontology: the study of duty2 – Virtue Ethics: the virtuous person3 – Rights

4 – Sen capabilitiesDevelopment is capability or freedomTransform resources into valuable activitiesMulti-dimensional

Page 9: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Non-Utilitarians

1 – Deontology: the study of duty2 – Virtue Ethics: the virtuous person3 – Rights4 – Sen capabilities

5 – NozickFreedomIs the process fair?Was the start fair?

Page 10: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

INEQUALITY AND POVERTYIn our Classroom!

Page 11: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Inequality: Kuznets

Richest/PoorestRichest 1 / Poorest 1 = 42/0Richest 10%/Poorest 10% = 119/0.3 ~ 376

R25%/P25% = 275/47 = 5.9

Page 12: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Inequality: Gini

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 310.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Page 13: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Poverty line

Right now, 26 points/46 At end of the semester, 60/100

Headcount ratio: 68% Poverty gap: 46% Pov gap squared: 31%

Page 14: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Nozick says

You all started fairly. The process that

determines grades was fair and impartial.

The grades as they stand are equitable.

Page 15: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Karl Marx - Egalitarian

No student owns their own points. The entire class owns all points.

“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.”

Page 16: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Marxism in Practice

Now the distribution has

Page 17: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Marxism in Practice

Now the distribution has

everyone flunking.

Page 18: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Marxism in Practice

Now the distribution has

Page 19: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Marxism in Practice

Now the distribution has

everyone flunking.

Page 20: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Marxism in Practice

Now the distribution has

Page 21: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Marxism in Practice

Now the distribution has

everyone flunking.

Page 22: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Marxism in Practice

Now the distribution has

Page 23: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Marxism in Practice

Now the distribution has

everyone flunking.

Page 24: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Marxism in Practice 20% of the points go to the government. Now the distribution has everyone flunking.

Winston Churchill:The inherent vice of capitalism is the

unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.

Page 25: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Rawls – Poorest of Poor

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 310.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Page 26: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Robin Hood – Help Least-Poor

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 310.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Page 27: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Before and After

A

C

D

F

A B

C

D

F

Page 28: If we can make one person better off without making anyone else worse off, do it.   EFFICIENCY is king.  If there’s a loser, compensate.  If no compensation

Singer

What is my duty to help my fellow students who aren’t doing as well as I am?