Upload
cordelia-bryant
View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MEASURING STATE FRAGILITY IN THE CONTEXT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES
Anda Taropa-Iacob
Failure Ethnic or civil war in a current period
Risk of failure Ethnic or civil violence in the current or previous two years; or ethnic or civil war in the previous four years (but not the current years)
Centre of Systemic Peace
A fragile state is…
‘bereaved of political commitment and with an insufficient capacity to develop pro-poor policies’
‘a state with weak capacity to carry out the basic state functions of governing a population and its territory and that lacks the ability or political will to develop mutually constructive and reinforcing relations with society’
OECD
Capacity and will
States with relatively good performanceWeak states but willing in providing core
services and basic securityCorrupt and repressive statesStates unwilling in providing core services and
basic security
Level of insecurity
Sites of ongoing U.S combat and reconstruction effortsActive or potential WMD proliferatorsPast or present safe havens for terrorismAnchors for regional instabilityBases of narcotic trafficking and crimePotential sources of uncontrolled migrationCritical energy suppliersLocation for epidemic diseaseSetting for recent atrocities and humanitarian crisis
Violence index Countries newly
emerged from a conflict with another state
States involved in war or conflict
States that are likely to encounter due to growing polarization of domestic politics
State performance
Under – consolidated states
Over – extended states
Reaction to collapse States in which the privatization of state assets and prerogatives of state rule have
become extreme, and in which there are deepening challenges to that rule from former associates as well as from liberation fronts
States with a marked historical mismatch between the nature and orientation of states institutions and socio-political processes and divisions within the society concerned
States in which there are deepening conflicts over the control of strategic resources – diamonds, oil, timber etc. – involving rebel groups and privatized armies, making state institutions irrelevant
States undergoing a major struggle over power and over the political and cultural orientation and organization of society
State in which secession attempt get out of hand, potentially affecting the continuity of the state system as a whole
Fragile states suddenlty facing deteriorating economic conditions which seriously affect the livelihood of a large majority of the population, leading to a breakdown of state institutions
States in which institutional failures to provide basic security in one or more respects (physical security, health, nutrition) have gone beyond a point of repair, for whatever specific reasons, thus invoking a state bankruptcy of sorts.
State fragility
Weak political institutions
Insecurity
Illegitimacy
Political institutions
Formal (National Police)Informal (Customary Legal Courts)State (Parliaments)Non-state institutions (NGOs)
Three generation of human rightsKarel Vasak
1st Generation – political and civil rights
2nd Generation – social and economic rights
3rd Generation – solidarity rights
Abuse of power – Illegitimate use of powerPeople Leadership
Obedience Domination
Legitimate use of powerPeople Leadership
Obedience under the limits provided by the Constitution
Persuasiveness achieved by argumentation/constraint based on force
Hanna Arendt
YEMEN SUDAN
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
IDPs 35.000 23.000 175.000 250.000 250.000 5.800.000 4.900.000 4.900.000 1.624.100 4.430.000
Refugees 117.363 140.169 170.854 190.092 2.075 222.722 181.605 152.375 520.000 379.067
Who
Did what
To whom
SYRIA
A violent minority may dominate a passive majority
Cases of human rights abuses: 375
10 Constitutional articles violated
WHO DID WHAT TO WHOM
Juristic institutions
Political imprisonment Human rights defenders
Political activists
Incommunicado detentions
Human rights defenders
Unfair trials
Arbitrary detentions
Death sentences (incl. executed) Detainees
Identity-based violence Kurds
Armed forces
Identity based violence Kurds
Unlawful killings
Detainees
Civilians
Children
Incommunicado detentions Journalists
YEMEN
A military branch provides water, electricity and gas to Jaar city
Cases of human rights abuses: 131
Seven Constitutional articles violated
WHO DID WHAT TO WHOM
Juristic institutions
Death sentences (incl. executed) Detainees
Arbitrary detentions Journalists
Human rights defenders
Incommunicado detentions Protesters
Armed forces
Unlawful killings Civilians
Protesters
Limitation of freedom of expression Journalists
Arbitrary detentions Human rights defenders
Incommunicado detentions Asylum-seekers
SUDAN
Developed group paranoia
Cases of human rights abuses: 775
16 Constitutional articles violated
WHO DID WHAT TO WHOM
Government forces
Arbitrary detentions Human rights defenders
Gender-based violence Women
Abductions Civilians
Unlawful killings
Rebel groups
Unlawful killings Civilians
Identity-based violence Ethnic groups
Armed forces
Arbitrary detentions
IDPs
Civilians
Human rights defenders
Protesters
Opposition members
Torture Protesters
Unlawful killings Civilians
Limitation of freedom of expression Journalists
Gender-based violence Women
Incommunicado detentions Journalists
Conclusions
Consequences:• relegating a government from a given state to
the lowest ranking• reducing the appeal to foreign investors• damaging relations with donors• increasing social discontent• decreasing human development
THANK YOU FOR YOURATTENTION!