Upload
beverly-wilcox
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
COOLIDGE HOUSE
Comprehensive Program ReviewJuly 20, 2012
Program Highlights Developed a More Formalized Training Program for New Hires
◦ Incorporated components from Watson Academy ‘Basic Training’ curriculum with program specific modules. ◦ This has allowed for more educational/theoretical exposure initially, followed by ‘shadowing’ and/or observation of job
functions by coworkers.
Creation of Emergency Plan ◦ The Plan specifically outlines our strategy to respond to any future power outage affecting the Coolidge and McGrath House facilities. ◦ In addition to the updated plan, CRJ will be investing in a generator to be installed at Coolidge House – this will provide backup power in the
event of a future outage, ensuring that electrical power is maintained allowing operations at the facility to continue uninterrupted.
Proof of Identification Document for Residents◦ Currently working with the District Manager of the Social Security Office to create a document for CH, which they will accept as ‘proof’ of
identification to allow them to issue/reissue Social Security Cards to residents. The District Manager is awaiting approval from Regional Director.
Blister-Packed Medications ◦ Working with Whittier Community Health Center Pharmacy to ‘blister pack’ meds for our clients. ◦ Residents will be able to have prescriptions sent to them from PCP (at Whittier or not), which the pharmacy will fill, blister pack,
and deliver to CH nightly. Waive med deductible for clients with PCP at Whittier.
Facility improvements
◦ All Resident rooms have been repainted, medication storage and distribution system has been enhanced.
Areas in Need of Improvement
Recruitment;
Further development of training curriculum; and
Policy and Procedure updating and development.
Data obtained from HR Personnel Summary
STAFFINGStaff Turnover Rate
3/1/2011 –2/29/2012 (12 Mo.)
SJS Overall: 35.7%
Overdue Performance Evaluations (Over the 6 Mo. Period)
November: 8 FTE; 1 PTE
December: 6 FTE; 1 PTE
January: 8 FTE; 1 PTE
February: 7 FTE; 1 PTE
March: 4 FTE; 1 PTE
April: 4 FTE; 1 PTE
The above reflects 2 PTE and a total of 12 FTEs receiving a late performance evaluation during the 6 mo period (a total of 16 late reviews).
A decrease of 14 for the previous CPR.Last CPR March 1, 2011 to Feb. 29, 2012
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
39%
49%
Data Obtained from the Adult Utilization Report
Utilization
An Average of 93.4 Clients per Month over the 6 month period.
(A decrease of ~8 clients from previous CPR)
November December January February March April
98.1
94.6
91.5
90.090.5
95.4
Data Obtained from MMRs
Programming
An Average of 0.4 Adaptive Life Skills Hours per Client per Month over the 6 Month Period.
(Consistent with the last CPR)
An Average of 3.3 Cognitive Behavioral Hours per Client per Month over the 6 Month Period.
(A decrease of ~1 hour per client from pervious CPR)
November December January February March April0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
Average No. of Life Skills Hours per Client
Average No. of Cog. Beh. Hours per Client
Data Obtained from MMRs
Programming (cont’d)
Twelve (12) Medication Incidents over the time period
(A decrease of 3 from previous CPR)
November December January February March April0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.04
0.05
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.02
Medication Issues per Client
Data Obtained from the MMR
Completions
An Average of 93% of Clients Successfully Completed the Program over the 6 month period.
(An increase of 9% from previous CPR)
Reasons for Termination:
Drug/Alcohol Use
Out of Place
Continued Noncompliance
Despite Progressive Discipline
November December January February March April
95% 96%89%
94% 92% 92%
Successful CompletionsNovember, 2011 - April, 2012
Data Obtained from the MMR
Completions (cont’d)
An average of 43% of Clients Completed the Program Employed over the 6 month period.
(A decrease of 8% from previous CPR)
a
Employment Areas:
General Labor
Restaurant Services
Retail
Car Salespersons
City/Government Jobs
November December January February March April
45%
50%
32%35%
50%
43%
Percentage Completing with JobsNovember, 2011 – April, 2012
Data Obtained from the MMR
Completions (cont’d)
An average of 100% of Clients Completed the Program with Housing over the 6 month period.
(Consistent with last CPR)
November December January February March April
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Percentage of Clients Completing with HousingNovember, 2011 – April, 2012
Figures Obtained from the June 2012 Client Satisfaction Survey Results
Client Satisfaction Surveys
Overall, the program is
clean
Everything in my room is working properly
I receive medical care when I need
it
The food is good
I receive emergency financial
assistance if I need it
I know what to do if there
was a fire
Staff observe me when I
give a urine sample
I know what to do if I
wanted to make a
complaint
The program rules are
clear to me
I know what items are
considered contraband
0
5
10
15
20
25
1 1
6
0
5
1 1
3
0
2
June 2012 - Program Information
Never
Sometimes
Most Times
Always
No Answer/Not Applicable
Figures Obtained from the June 2012 Client Satisfaction Survey Results
Client Satisfaction Surveys (cont’d)
My case man-ager involved
me in decisions regarding my
activities
My case man-ager let me
know how I was doing in the
program
When I met with my case
manager, I had enough time to
meet
I met with my case manager at least bi-weekly
My case man-ager gave me useful sugges-tions, advice,
and guidance to help me suc-
ceed
My case man-ager took time to listen to me
My case man-ager talked to
me in a respect-ful manner
My case man-ager referred me to appropriate services and
programs
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0
3
01 1 1 1 1
June 2012 - Case Management Results
Never
Sometimes
Most Times
Always
No Answer/Not Applicable
Data Obtained from the June 2012 Client Satisfaction Survey Results
Client Satisfaction Surveys (cont’d)
59% of Resident Responses Reported that the Program was Performing “Most Times” or “Always” in the Respective Functions.
This is consistent with the January, 2011 Survey Results (a 2% increase).
14%
18%
22%
37%
9%
Client Satisfaction Results (All Responses; N = 25)
"Never""Sometimes""Most Times""Always""No Answer/ N/A"