16
Nick Miller, Joanne Kline, Tom Bernthal, John Wagner, Chris Smith, Max Axler, Matt Matrise, Michele Kille, Matt Silveira, Patricia Moran, Sally Gallagher Jarosz, Josh Brown

, Chris Smith, Max Axler, Matt Matrise, Michele Kille

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: , Chris Smith, Max Axler, Matt Matrise, Michele Kille

Nick Miller, Joanne Kline, Tom Bernthal, John Wagner, Chris Smith, Max Axler, Matt Matrise, Michele Kille, Matt Silveira,

Patricia Moran, Sally Gallagher Jarosz, Josh Brown

Page 2: , Chris Smith, Max Axler, Matt Matrise, Michele Kille

Why Wetlands?Why Ecosystem Services?

Multiple Services: valued 10x > any upland

Multiple Services: Restoration value $600/ac > current land use

Flood abatement: flood costs reduced by 92%

Water quality: one treatment wetland saved $282M

Multiple services: $1.6M/acre/year

Nitrate reduction: 5x more effective than

upland practices

Multiple Services: >$3B/year

Page 3: , Chris Smith, Max Axler, Matt Matrise, Michele Kille

Why a Watershed Approach?

Page 4: , Chris Smith, Max Axler, Matt Matrise, Michele Kille

Wetland Conservation Opportunities

Preservation OpportunitiesRestoration Opportunities

Page 5: , Chris Smith, Max Axler, Matt Matrise, Michele Kille

A. Determine Watershed Needs

B. Prioritize Sites

C. Consider Wetland Wildlife Habitat

Page 6: , Chris Smith, Max Axler, Matt Matrise, Michele Kille

A. Watershed Needs

HistoricalService Provision

CurrentService Provision

NeedOpportunity

Watershed Service Loss

Flood AbatementFish & Aquatic Habitat

Sediment RetentionNutrient Transformation

Surface Water Supply

Page 7: , Chris Smith, Max Axler, Matt Matrise, Michele Kille

SW Lake Michigan Milwaukee River

Lower Milwaukee

River

Pigeon Creek

A. Watershed Needs (Results)

Page 8: , Chris Smith, Max Axler, Matt Matrise, Michele Kille

Example: Flood abatement

OpportunityEffectivenessSocial significance

Water Quality• Nitrogen Reduction• Phosphorus reduction• Sediment Reduction

Shoreline protectionFish & aquatic habitatSurface water supplyCarbon storageFloristic Integrity

B. Prioritize Sites

Page 9: , Chris Smith, Max Axler, Matt Matrise, Michele Kille

Flood AbatementCarbon Storage

Phosphorus RetentionSurface Water Supply

Sediment Retention

Pigeon Creek (Milwaukee River)

B. Prioritize Sites (Results)

Page 10: , Chris Smith, Max Axler, Matt Matrise, Michele Kille

C. Wetland Wildlife Habitat

Forest Interior Guild

Shallow Marsh Guild

Open Waters Guild Shrub Swamp Guild

Page 11: , Chris Smith, Max Axler, Matt Matrise, Michele Kille

C. Wetland Wildlife Habitat (Results)

All Guilds

Forest Interior Guild

Shrub Swamp Guild

Shallow Marsh Guild

Open WatersGuild

Page 12: , Chris Smith, Max Axler, Matt Matrise, Michele Kille

Watershed-to-Site

Page 13: , Chris Smith, Max Axler, Matt Matrise, Michele Kille

Site-to-Watershed

Page 14: , Chris Smith, Max Axler, Matt Matrise, Michele Kille

Validation: Comparing GIS & Field Assessments

Flood Abatement

Floristic Quality

Page 15: , Chris Smith, Max Axler, Matt Matrise, Michele Kille

Land TrustsLocal governments

Wetland ConsultantsPlanners (Counties, RPC’s)

Nutrient Management SpecialistsMitigation regulators & project sponsors

Wildlife & Natural Resource ManagersUniversities & Extensions

Watershed PlannersPrivate BusinessesLake Associations

Watershed plans Grant proposalsConservation planningOutreach & educationSite selection, assessment, and designLocal & regional Comprehensive PlansNutrient trading & Adaptive ManagementSiting natural infrastructure (e.g., for flood control)Lake management plans (incl. shoreline protection)Nutrient management planningWetland service valuationHabitat improvementPrioritizing projectsResearch

Who is this for? Potential Applications

Page 16: , Chris Smith, Max Axler, Matt Matrise, Michele Kille

www.WetlandsByDesign.org

Report Wetlands & Watersheds Explorer Webinar training