Upload
theresa-elliott
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Idealism metamorphoses into Liberalism
Central Assumptions of Liberalism/Pluralism
Anarchy is only a partial truth. Order is not just maintained through power.
Norms, institutions, and interdependence mediate the security dilemma and diminish the significance of military power.
State and Nonstate actors are important entities in international relations. The state is not a unitary actor. The state is not some reified entity.
Pluralists disaggregate the state—break it into its component parts.
The state is not necessarily a rational actor. International relations cannot be reduced to the primacy of security concerns.
The Waning of War In recent years, a strong trend toward fewer
wars has become evident. For the world as a whole, the current period is one
of the least warlike ever, with fewer and smaller wars than in the past.
World wars killed tens of millions and left whole continents in ruin.
Cold War – proxy wars killed millions and the world feared a nuclear war that could have wiped out our species.
Iraq and Sudan and wars like these kill hundreds of thousands. We fear terrorist attacks, but we do not fear that life on the
planet will be destroyed.
Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
The Waning of War Events in the post-Cold War era continue this
long-term trend toward smaller wars. Today’s most serious conflicts consist mainly of
skirmishing rather than all-out battles. In 2008, war abated in Iraq and worsened in
Afghanistan – serious fighting continued in Sudan and Sri Lanka. Democratic Congo – small scale but brutal fighting among
factions since war ended in 1999. Today there are 13 wars in progress; down from 20 ten years
ago. Consistent trend downward.
Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
Figure 3.1
Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
Liberal Theories Realism offers mostly dominance solutions to
the collective goods problems of IR. Alternative theoretical approaches that draw
mostly on the reciprocity or identity principles are called liberal theories.
These approaches are generally more optimistic than realism about the prospects for peace. Evolution: build up of international organizations and
mutual cooperation (reciprocity) and changes in norms and public opinion (identity)
Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
Figure 3.2
Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
Kant and Peace What explains this positive trend toward peace? Kant gave 3 answers over 200 years ago:
1. States could develop the organizations and rules to facilitate cooperation, specifically by forming a world federation resembling today’s United Nations (reciprocity).
2. Peace depends on the internal character of governments-- specifically that republics, with a legislative branch that can hold the monarch in check, will be more peaceful than autocrats (identity principle).
3. Trade promotes peace, relies on the presumption that trade increases wealth, cooperation, and global well-being -- all making conflict less likely in the long term because governments will not want to disrupt any process that adds to the wealth of their state. Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Longman © 2010
Liberal Institutionalism Reciprocity Kant argued that states could join a worldwide federation and
respect its principles. Remain autonomous But forego certain short-term individual gains
Kant: International cooperation more rational option than going to war. To realists, war is a rational option; to liberal theorists, war is an
irrational deviation that results from defective reasoning and that harms the interests of warring states.
Neoliberal approach differs from earlier liberal approaches in that it concedes to realism several important assumptions: States are unitary actors rationally pursuing their self-interests, but
they say states cooperate because it is in their self-interest. Mutual gains better than cheating or taking advantage of each other. Claim that neorealists’ pessimism is unjustified. States cooperate
MOST of the time. Positive reciprocity
Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
Liberal Institutionalism Prisoner’s Dilemma – illustrates the
neoliberal argument that cooperation is possible. Both actors lose when they each defect. Dilemma resolved if they play over and over again – an
accurate model of IR Strategy of strict reciprocity after an initial cooperative
move can bring about mutual cooperation in a repeated PD game.
Reciprocity and runaway hostility Israeli relations with Palestinian militants
Many norms mediate states’ interactions Diplomatic practices Participation in international organizations Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Longman © 2010
Figure 3.3
Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
International Regimes Set of rules, norms, and procedures around which the
expectations of actors converge in a certain issue area. Participants have similar ideas about what rules will govern
their mutual participation. Regimes can help solve collective goods problems by
increasing transparency. Conception of regime
Combines elements of realism and liberalism Come into existence to overcome collective goods dilemmas
by coordinating the behaviors of individual states. States continue to seek their own interests, but create
frameworks to coordinate their actions with those of other states if and when this is necessary to realize self-interest
Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
International Regimes Regimes do not substitute for basic calculations of
costs and benefits by states Open up new possibilities; more favorable benefit-cost
ratios. Enforcement and survival of regimes
Rely on state power; role of hegemons; but may survive when hegemons that created them decline
Role of permanent institutions such as the UN, NATO, and the IMF
Culmination of liberal institutionalism to date is the European Union (EU) Stable peace with strong international institutions to bind
themPearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Longman © 2010
Collective Security Concept grows out of liberal
institutionalism. Refers to the formation of a broad alliance
of most major actors in an international system for the purpose of jointly opposing aggression by any actor. Kant League of Nations Organization of America States, Arab League,
and the African UnionPearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Longman © 2010
Collective Security Success of collective security depends on two
points: Members must keep their alliance commitments to the
group. Enough members must agree on what constitutes
aggression. Ex: 1990-91 – Iraq’s aggression against Kuwait
All the great powers bore the cost of confronting Iraq Iraq: World’s collective security system is
“creaky” and not always effective, but bypassing it to take military action also holds dangers.
Concept of collective security has broadened in recent years. Failed states – weak control over territory – implications
for their neighbors and the international system Domestic politics as international anarchy – need for
intervention
Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
The Democratic Peace IR scholars have linked democracy with a
kind of foreign policy fundamentally different from that of authoritarianism. Theory: Democracies are more peaceful than
authoritarian regimes. Not true: Democracies fight as many wars as do
authoritarian states. Democratic Peace:
What is true about democracies is that although they fight wars against authoritarian states, democracies almost never fight each other.
Trend is toward democratization in most of the world’s regions.
Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
Domestic Politics Many liberal theoretical approaches see
international outcomes as the result of processes within states rather than simply as those among states.
The actions of a state in the international arena result from individual human choices aggregated through the state’s internal structures.
Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
Bureaucracies Different states maintain different foreign policy
bureaucracies, but share some common elements: Diplomats
Virtually all states maintain a diplomatic corps, or foreign service, of diplomats in embassies in foreign capitals
Political appointees Career diplomats Tension common between state leaders and foreign policy
bureaucrats Interagency tensions
Bureaucratic rivalry as an influence on foreign policy challenges the notion of states as unitary actors in the international system.
Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
Interest Groups Coalitions of people who share a common
interest in the outcome of some political issue and who organize themselves to try to influence the outcome
Lobbying The process of talking with legislators or officials to
influence their decisions on some set of issues. Three important elements:
Ability to gain a hearing with busy officials Ability to present cogent arguments for one’s case Ability to trade favors in return for positive action on an issue
Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
The Military Industrial Complex
Huge interlocking network of governmental agencies, industrial corporations, and research institutes, working together to supply a nation’s military forces
Response to the growing importance of technology
Encompasses a variety of constituencies, each of which has an interest in military spending Corporations, military officers, universities, and scientific
institutes that receive military research contracts Revolving door Campaign contributions from the military industry Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Longman © 2010
Public Opinion Range of views on foreign policy issues held by
the citizens of a state Has a greater influence on foreign policy in
democracies than in authoritarian governments Legitimacy Propaganda Journalists as gatekeepers Importance of the government as a source of information Popularity of leader and influence on support of war Referendum
Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
Public Opinion In democracies, public opinion generally
has less effect on foreign policy than on domestic policy. Attentive public Foreign policy elite Rally ’round the flag syndrome Diversionary foreign policy
Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010
Legislatures Conduit through which interest groups and public
opinion can wield influence Presidential systems; separate elections
Legislatures play a direct role in making foreign policy Different rules apply, however, to the use of military force
Rally ’round the flag May challenge the president if they have power of the “purse”
Parliamentary systems; political parties are dominant Often parliamentary executives do not need to submit treaties or
policies for formal approval by the legislature. Call elections; new executive Legislatures play a key role in designing and implementing
foreign policy.
Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman © 2010