Referral of a Petroleum Site

To~. Chuck Schwer, Supervisor, Sites Management Section Th : June Middleton, Permit Administrator, UST Program · From: usan Thayer, Env. Anlayst, UST Program Date: 12/14/2001 *************************************************************** On 11/26/2001 the Management and Prevention Section was notified of a Leak/LUST found during the monitoring/closing of UST PiPING at St Albans Exxon. The petroleum contamination was reported by Rob Danckert of Griffin. Telephone #802-865-4288

Name of Facility owner: WESCO Facility contact: Dave Simendinger

Telephone# Telephone#802-864-5155 ·

UST Facility ID#: 560 SMS#: 2001 Site Manager initials:

Responsible Party: __ ~-----~--~------------Was the Land Owner DI ED by DEC to remove tank(s)? _No _Yes Is Land Owner eligible for reimbursement for cost of removing tank(s)? _No_Yes Were tank(s) permitted for operation at any time? No _Yes If tank(s) abandoned year of abandonment: .. - ________ _ Use of tank(s) at time of abandonment:

Farm Residential _Commercial _Service Station Retail _State Federal

UST Financial Responsibility: c::-5 ( PCF Assessment # ______ 0 __ __._ ____ _ PCF Eligible _No LYes

Deductible _No J Yes Cost Recovery applicable_No _Yes

If "yes", reason: -----------------------------Insurance Company: ______________________ _ Self Insured: Federal Insured:

No_Yes _No_Yes

This referral to SMS is believed to involve: -Soil Contamination No Groundwater Contamination No Free Product Contamination No Vapor Impact on Buildings No Threatened/Impacted Water Supply No Surface Water Impact No

Yes Maybe Yes Maybe Yes Maybe Yes Maybe Yes Maybe Yes Maybe

Attached is a copy of the Pull Form. _Trip Report Enclosed

Comments:

_Going Expressway

.)

November 16, 2001

Ms. Sue Thayer Vermont Agency ofNatural Resources Dept. of Environmental Conservation Waste Management Division 103 S. Main St., West Building, Waterbury, VT 05671 - 0404

RE: St. Albans Exxon Facility, Piping Replacement Inspection, St. Albans, Vermont.

Dear Ms. Thayer:

On!November 14, 200 I, I conducted a piping replacement inspection at the above-stated facility. On this date product piping associated with three gasoline underground storage tanks (USTs) and one diesel UST were disconnected from their respective USTs and removed from the excavation for proper disposal. No USTs were removed from the excavation. Enclosed are site photographs, the completed State of Vermont inspection forms, and a site location map.

The age of the piping removed is believed to be between I 0 and 15 years old . Piping replacement activities were performed by WESCO of South Burlington, Vermont. Removed product piping was visually inspected for signs of petroleum leakage, corrosion, and overall integrity. Visual inspection of the piping showed it to be in good condition. No signs of significant pitting or corrosion were present on the piping surface.

Stained soils.were observed at the base of the former location of the diesel dispenser. The screened soil sample at this location had a VOC concentration of over I 00 ppm as measured with the Pl D. Significant levels were also observed at the base of the former gasoline dispensers.

The soi Is excavated to gain access and allow screening of soils consisted of well-sorted, fine brown sands extending from the ground surface to the base of the excavation, which was approximately three feet below surface grade. Neither groundwater nor bedrock were encountered during excavation activities .

A total of thi1teen soil samples were collected from the piping excavation with the use of a backhoe and shovel. Samples were screened for volatile organic carbons (VOCs) with an I-I-Nu model Pl- I 0 I photoionization device (PIO). An average reading of 45 .9 ppm was recorded for all thirteen of the samples screened . All soil samples were collected and screened in accordance with Griffin soil sampling protocols. which comply with state and industry standards. The PIO was properly calibrated in accordance with Griffin and manufacture protocols prior to use. The location. depth . and VOC concentration for each sample are tabulated below (See Site Diagram) .

P.O. Box 943 • \\-'iHistc,n, VT 05,.~95 -3 Phone 802--865 -4288 ·~Fax 802-6.57--4129 )'~ Clint.c•n .~tree t., Plattsbnrgh, NY t2901 ill f'hon~ Si 8-562-4666 ~Fax 5 18-56 1-6832

, St. Albans Exxon Griffin International. Inc. Piping Replacement /n.~peclion

Page 2

1 1.0 S. Dispenser 158 2 1.0 S. Dispenser 6.8

·------<f------+---------+----~--3 1.0 N. Dispenser 170

------i------t---------+------4 1.0 N. Dispenser 128

f---·---f-------11----------1------ - --5 3.0 Product Lines 2.2

1-----t------1----------- 1------·-----6 3.0 Product Lines 3.0

-----7 --·--·315-product Lines ---·-cr.7··-·--- -__ _ 8 ______ 1])_ Above USTIP.L. ________ ·5:2--- ---------9 --- - -·-- ·--To---P:b0Ve·usn P-:-c--------·a.·r -----~

10 1.0 Above UST/P.L. 0.0 11 6.0 Beneath Dies. Disp. 122 12 - 3.0 Product Lines 0.9 13 3.0 Product Lines 0.3

Based o n data co llected during the assessment and visua l observatio ns, G ri ffi n has arrived at the fo llow ing conc lus ions:

I . T he product pip ing removed fro m the excavation appeared to be in good cond iti on .

2 . The average PIO reading of 45 .9 ppm was recorded th ro ug ho ut so il s screened during the p iping replacement inspection.

3. A ll res ide nces and bus inesses located in the immediate vic inity of this s ite a re reportedl y se rved by a mun ic ipa l wate r source.

If you have any quest ions regarding thi s c los ure report, please g ive me a ca ll a t your convenie nce.

S incere ly,

-.. -~-·· -----? -c. _ __ _

Ro b Dancke rt Geo logist

,.--... __ ___ '

\ ,...----:::7""-----'

Cc: WESCO Fi le 090 14 1833

-

'

St. Albans Exxon Piping Replacement Inspection

November 2001

Figures 1 & 2. These photographs are of the open trench before removal of the product lines. A monitoring well is visible in both photos as a white PVC riser. .·•

Figure 3. This photograph shows the location of the diesel dispenser. Grey, contaminated soils were observed from surface grade to the base of the excavation.

Griffin International, inc.

NORTH

Griffin Job Number: 90141833

Source: USGS Mapping St. Albans, VT 7.5" Quadrangle 1970, Photorevised 1987

FIN RNATIONAL

St. Albans Exxon St. Albans, Vermont

Site Location Map USGS Mapping

Date: 11/16/01 Drawing No. 1 Scale: 1 :24,000 By: RD

From: To:

Date sent: Subject: Priority:

"Ted Unkles" <TEDU@dec.anr.state.vt.us> Andy Shively <andys@dec.anr.state.vt.us>, June Middleton <junem@dec.anr.state.vt.us>, Susan Thayer <susant@dec.anr.state.vt.us> Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:55:45 -0500 Wesco, St. Albans normal

I just received a call from Jeff Gadaou at wesco. the machine that crimps the brass fittings onto the Environ Piping is broken, and they are behind schedule. They will not be ready for an inspection tomorrow. Jeff also said that when he began measuring the grade, he saw that the diesel dispenser is in a low spot on the lot, and the tank is not buried deep enough , so the pipe pitches downhill from the tank to the island. This means that they will have to have sensors in the sumps at both ends -- the dispenser sump will be a mandatory monitoring point.

Jeff will call tomorrow to let us know when he thinks he'll be ready for an inspection. Right now, he doesn't know if the crimping machine is repairable , or if they will have to have a new one shipped to the job site.

Ted Unkles Coordinator, Underground Storage Tank Program Vermont Dep't of Environmental Conservation Waste Management Division 103 South Main Street Waterbury, VT 05671-0404 (802)241-3882 e-mail: tedu@dec.anr.state.vt.us

June Middleton -- 1 -- Wed, 28 Nov 2001 15:45:28

UNDERGRO CLOSURE FORM Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Cmtservation, Waste Management Division

103 South Main. Street, West Building, Watel'bury, Vermont 0561HM64, Te ephone: 02) 241-3888 "'

Agency Use Only ~~ . Date of schedµled Activity l . I "': ' · Facili DEC initials: - - - S

Section A. Facility Information: Name of facility : ~-r. A illM"" ~~,i · Number of employees: :t "3 Street address: k: -::r- Town/city ~. ~~\ .:_,~ Owner of UST(s) to be closed: · b.JF:!.l.A Contact(if different than owner) : f>,u. <;?1µ1"'101..Jt.-t:;y't_ Mailing address of owner: Q-0. QJQ)d 1]-a...<t>-=r 5. ~P-\..l...J"'~ , v< os4 o....,,,. Telephone number of owner: ~ - <t»t,4 -<;;1 S'"S'"' Contact telephone# : __ <>--"-~~-=---------

Section B. UST Closure Information : (please check one) Reason for initiating UST closure : Suspected Leak Liability ·~{Replacement - - . , - Abandoned

J

USTs i in J is considered a art of UST s stein ermanent closure. Include condition of USTs

UST# Prodµct Size (gallons) Tank age Tank Condition Piping age Piping condition

1 \

,, Which tanks, if any, will be closed in-place: USTs# ...8 Authorized by: -=--- Date: --r--1-Disposal/destruction of removed UST(s): Location ---- M·7e;;tf'hh~od;:r----=::====- Date: -:;. ; -Amount (gal.) and type of waste generated from USTs: 1JOiJC (tank contents are hazardous wastes unless recovered as usable product) Tank cleaning company (must be trained in confined space entry) Certified hazardous waste hauler: ..-- - --G=--en_e_r-at-o-r"""J=Dc-n-u-m-..-be_r_: __________ _

-----------Section C. Initial site characterization: Work in this sectio11 must be completed by a professional environmental consultant or hydrogeologist with experience in environmental sampling for the presence of hazardous materials. A full report from the conmltant must accompany this fom1. Excavation information: (some tank pulls reauire more than one excavation)

Tank(s) # Depth Groundwater and Peak of Avg Bedrock encountered?

Excavation Depth Excavation PID Peak PID Depth (yin) and at Soll type (A,B,C,ctc) (ft) size(ft1

) reading (ft) reading (ft) depth (ft)

...... I "'ll-te>w.._ 1-=to l.D 1

14~' utJ'K ,AJ ~M(~toN~~\ l--::!> -

Dig Safe Number: ,J I ~ PJD in~ rmation: ____ _.______________ i

Make: , J Model : Jw · /O{ Calibration information (date, time , gas): 11/1~ /ol c:::A>\o - ~z&~ Locate all readings and samples on site diagram Number of soi l samples collected for laboratory analysis? .% results due date - I I Have any soils been polyencapsulated on site? Yes_ (#yds1 _ PID range above zero 10w _-__ ""•k) No~ Have any soils been transported off site? Yes_ list amount (ydg) : No~ Location transported to: DEC official who approved ----Amount of soils backfilled(yds3) : 'fl-)1'"/I) PID range above zero 1"'" O•O - l1l> p<•k

Have limits of contamination been detiiied? Yes_ No_K Is there any other known contamination on- site? Yes_ No-2!._Comments: _____________ _

Free Phase product encountered? Yes :thickness sheen No X Groundwater encountered? - Yes depth(ft) --No ~ Are there existing monitoring wells on-site? Yes X how many:_f_(locate on site diagram)No Have new monitoring wells been installed? Yes how many: __ (locate on site diagram)No __ Samples obtained from monitoring wells.for lab analysis? Yes_ results due date_/_/_ No X

Is there a water supply well on site? Yes_ (check type: shallow __ rock_spring~ No X Number of public water supply wells are located within a 0.5 mile radius?_min. distance (ft.): <.)IJ-=::::..: Number of private water supply wells located within a 0.5 mile radius?_ min distance (ft.): U,.J ~

Receptors impacted? ~soil _indoor air _ ambient air _ groundwater _surface water _water supply

Page 1of2

.. I

_.....,.Facility ID#_~~~ Section D: Tanks/Piping Remaining/installed Regardless of size, include USTs at site as to *status, e.g. "abandoned", "in use", or installations re uire ermits and advance notice to this office. ----

"to be installed" . (Most .~~11.co)

•Piping Status - · Product - -- - -·--~Tank age •Tank status Piping age

... It;;" -/. ()

ro ~ ~ ·'° · /D ... /~i.l) .

There are no other tanks ac this site.

Section E. Statements of-iJSt closure-complianee: (must have both signatures or site assessment not complete)

As the party responsible for compliance with the Vermont UST Regulations and related statutes at this facility, I hereby certify that the al of the information provided on this form is trllf and correct to the best of my knowledge.

I ; I I A

Signature of UST owner or owner's authorized representative Date of signature

As the environ~ental consultant on site, I hereby ~e1J1jfy that the site assessment requCements were performed in accordance with DEC policy and regulations, and that information which I have provided on this form is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. ' lJJ / P !/

~ 11 / /'-f / Of Sig~nvironm sultant Date of signature Company :__ ~<&..IA ~"~ .~<--Telephone #:'a-.. -~<.,S- - ye"i>~ Date of Closure: JlJd../E.i Date of Assessment !l_l lL/ /~

Return form along with complete narrative report and photographs to the Department of Environmental Conservation(DEC), Underground Storage Tank Program within 72 hours of closure .

Site diagram

~ c:o\I(. O....u..P).. c.~ ~

I•<..,.:. I~~ c.~ ,.,"'('·

t-l'---.... -

L t:r(" ~ -- l This Closure Form may only be issued for the facility and the date indicated at top of page 1. Changes in the scheduled closure date should be phoned in at least 48 hours in advance. Both the yellow aruf white copies of this form must be returned to the address on the top of pa1ie 1 of this form: the pink: copy should be retained by the UST owner. A written report from an environmental consultant covering all aspects of closure and site assessment, complete with photographs and any other relevant data, must accompany this form. All procedures must be conducted by qualified personnel, to include training required by 29 CFR 1910.120. Documentation of all methods and materials used must be ade9uate. All work must be performed in compliance with DEC policy "UST Closure and Site Assessment Requirements" as well as all applicable statues, regulations, and additional policies. ·The DEC may reject inadequate closure forms and reports.

Page 2 of2