Upload
colleen-marshall
View
232
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
{Action
Morality and Human Acts
Human acts are done with intellect, will, knowledge and consent
Human Acts
Each component must be good by nature in order for the act to be considered good
Components of Moral Choice
The act or actions being done
The Object
The motive or reason the act is being committed
The Intention
The who, what, when, where, why and how of the situation
The Circumstances
These are ways in which actions are rationalized to seemingly lessen their evil
None of these rationalizations can change the nature of evil actions
Moral Objectivity
PROBLEMS
The belief that morality can change with each set of circumstances
States that an action is good or evil in a particular circumstance or for a particular person
This is sometimes called Situation Ethics
Moral Relativism
PROBLEMS
Determines good or evil from the consequences that follow an act
Consequentialism
PROBLEMS
Deduces the moral value of an act from the proportion of good and evil effects
Proportionalism
PROBLEMS
Historically, people try to legitimize moral objectivity
They state that an act is evil or good by nature, and cannot be changed in nature by circumstances, but what will change is the degree of evil or good of the act
Arguing for objectivity
PROBLEMS
God is truth God has revealed his will to his
people Jesus has clarified and
simplified what it means to be a Christian with moral principles
No amount of objectivity can change the truth
Morality is based on Truth
PROBLEMS
Created by Christine SchmidtSt. Raymond HS for Boys