12
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 6: Arguments and Explanatory Writing Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching and Learning

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 6: Arguments and Explanatory Writing Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 6: Arguments and Explanatory Writing Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

Module 6: Arguments and Explanatory

Writing

Tennessee Department of EducationScience

Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching and Learning

Page 2: © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 6: Arguments and Explanatory Writing Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

GoalsDeepen understanding of scientific argument

and informational/explanatory writing byanalyzing the similarities and differences in

the two types of writing;engaging in a short research project writing

task; andconsidering writing tasks and strategies to

support your students as they write in both styles.

Reflect on your learning.

2

Page 3: © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 6: Arguments and Explanatory Writing Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

Norms for Working Together

Keep students at the center.

Be present and engaged.

Monitor air time and share your voice.

Challenge with respect.

Stay solutions oriented.

Risk productive struggle.

Balance urgency and patience.

3

Page 4: © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 6: Arguments and Explanatory Writing Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

Writing: Understanding Text

Types

Page 5: © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 6: Arguments and Explanatory Writing Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

Task SheetUnderstanding Text Types

Part I—Writing to Inform and Make Arguments

1.As you watch the Writing to Inform and Make Arguments video clip, think about these two questions:

a. What are the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) expectations for student writing?

b. How can we support student writing in our science classrooms?

2.Following the video clip, write a response to the above two questions.

5

Page 6: © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 6: Arguments and Explanatory Writing Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

Task SheetUnderstanding Text Types

Part II—Understanding the Writing Standards

1.Please take about 5 minutes to individually

a. review the writing standards for your grade band

6

Page 7: © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 6: Arguments and Explanatory Writing Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

Task SheetUnderstanding Text Types

Part II—Understanding the Writing Standards (continued)

2. In pairs, discuss (about 3 minutes) the following questions:

a.What are the differences between argument and explanatory writing according to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)?

a. Be prepared to share your thinking with our whole group.

7

Page 8: © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 6: Arguments and Explanatory Writing Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

Task SheetUnderstanding Text Types

Part III—Whole Group Discussion

What is distinctive about these two different types of writing?

Why are they both important to being literate?

Why are they both important to science education?

8

Page 9: © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 6: Arguments and Explanatory Writing Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

Short Research Project Writing Task

Page 10: © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 6: Arguments and Explanatory Writing Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

Task SheetShort Research Project

Writing TaskPart I—Reading and Writing to Inform or Make Arguments

A.Count off by twos; then read the directions for your assigned task.

1. = Argument (green, “Argument Task”)

2. = Explanatory (blue, “Explanatory Task”)

10

Page 11: © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 6: Arguments and Explanatory Writing Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

Task SheetShort Research Project

Writing TaskPart I—Reading and Writing to Inform or Make Arguments (continued)

B.Locate and read your texts.1. Connected by the Light

2. Exchange Cycles

3. Use the blank pages to write your response. Take 20 minutes (this will probably not be enough time to finish the task) to individually write the essay as an adult.

C.Use the appropriate rubric to guide your writing.1. Argument (Green)

2. Explanatory (Blue)

11

Page 12: © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 6: Arguments and Explanatory Writing Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

Bridge To PracticeThe BTP Assignment for our next meeting is to

complete the writing assignment you DID NOT complete today.

It is essential that we as educators be exposed to both types of writing tasks before our next PD session.

In our next session we will un-pack both writing tasks and discuss implications for teaching and learning in our classrooms.

Thank you for your time!

12