Upload
reagan-pingree
View
217
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© 2012 Autodesk
Bridging the Gap between Autodesk Moldflow and Nonlinear FEA of Reinforced Plastic PartsDr. Roger A. AssakerCEO, e-Xstream engineeringChief Material Strategist, MSC Software
© 2012 Autodesk
Class Objectives
To learn about the latest developments in modeling nonlinear behavior
of structures made of fiber reinforced plastics, including:
Long Fibers & MuCell Materials
Injection and Compression Molding Compression
Fatigue and Creep Performance
High Performance Computing
© 2012 Autodesk
Class Structure
Introduction & Motivation
Compression Molding
Long Fiber Reinforced Plastics
MuCell
Fatigue
Creep
Hybrid Solution Procedure
© 2012 Autodesk
Introduction & Motivation
© 2012 Autodesk
Composites in Automotive
© 2012 Autodesk
Opportunities: Weight Reduction Average/Indicative Facts: 1995 2005: +17% of mass (1118 kg1310kg) +200 kg +18% of Fuel consumption (4.8 l/100km 5.7 l/100km)
Objective : -200 kg or -15 to 20 g CO2/km by 2020
Plastic parts: interior, under the hood, … Optimize using advanced CAE/Material Modeling
Optimize design: e.g. engine mount: -40% weight & -15% in cost Reduce thickness
Part consolidation
Metallic parts: Platform, Cabin Frame, Skin,… Optimal mix of materials : Plastics, Composites, …
6
© 2012 Autodesk
Mutli (Composite) Materials
© 2012 Autodesk
Chopped Fibers/Injection Molding
Fully aligned flow
Flow lines
Weld lines
© 2012 Autodesk
Challenges of Reinforced Plastics
Process-dependent (Local)
Moldflow (Fiber orientation)
Nonlinear
Stain-rate dependent
Anisotropic
9
© 2012 Autodesk
Process Material Structure
Material Processing• Injection molding• Compression
modling• D-LFT
Material Microsturcure• Chopped fibers• Nano, ...
Material Chracteristics• Mechanical• Thermal• Electric, ...
Structural Performance
Stiffness
Strength
Fatigue, …
…
© 2012 Autodesk
Material Behavior: Measured
11
Source:
LKT, Prof. DrummerFriedrich-Alexander-Universität
Erlangen-Nürnberg
Skin-core effect
Source:
DatapointLabse-Xstream Users‘ Meeting 2011
© 2012 Autodesk
Material properties from ISO 527 specimen Average orientation
OT{Trace} = [ 0.80 | 0.15 | 0.05 ] Scaling (factor = 0.6 – 0.8)
Material properties from injection molded plate 0° properties Scaling (factor = ???)
Material properties from injection molded plate 0° / 30° / 45° / 60° / 90° properties Reverse engineering Skin-Core effect
OT = [ multi-layer RVE ]
Measured Properties FEA ?
Globalisotropic
Localanisotropic
© 2012 Autodesk
Local, Nonlinear, Anisotropic Material
ISO 527100%
IM 22%
2D 36%
Loading
© 2012 Autodesk
Local Results: Plastic Strain
14
anisotropic
isotropic
equivalent scaling
Without Moldflow & Digimat)
With Moldflow & Digimat)
© 2012 Autodesk
Local Results: Weldline
15
Accumulated plastic strain in material matrix
Fiber orientations
© 2012 Autodesk
Materials: Long Fiber Thermoplastics (LFT)
© 2012 Autodesk
LFT – Effect of Fiber Waviness
Tortuose
Straight
© 2012 Autodesk
LFT – Effect of Fiber Bundling
Without bundling
With bundling~ 2300 MPa
~ 2800 MPa
+ ~ 500 MPa
s11 [MPa]
e11
© 2012 Autodesk
LFT - Effect of Bundling in Digimat-MF
+ 5% fibers 5% bundling
ar = 50
ar = 5
s11 [MPa]
e11
© 2012 Autodesk
Materials: MuCell
© 2012 Autodesk
MuCell RVE Generation
Source: http://www.genesisllc.com/gpe/images/mucell_glass.gif
15 % fibers
20 % voids
© 2012 Autodesk
Strain Distribution in the Microstructure
TensileDirection mean
local
TensileDirection
© 2012 Autodesk
MuCell: Effect of Void on the Material Stiffness
aligned
© 2012 Autodesk
MF vs FE modeling of MuCell
7.8% voids
15% voids
© 2012 Autodesk
MuCell: Distribution of the VF of Air Inclusions
© 2012 Autodesk
MuCell: 3-Point Bending Beam
© 2012 Autodesk
MuCell: Armrest Vertical Load
© 2012 Autodesk
MuCell: Horizontal Side Impact
© 2012 Autodesk
MuCell: Horizontal Impact CAE Performance Curves
© 2012 Autodesk
Performance: Fatigue
© 2012 Autodesk
Chopped Fiber Reinforced Plastics: Fatigue Analysis Workflow DIGIMAT reinforces the fatigue life computation at two levels:
Computation of the unit load case (Digimat-CAE/Structural) Computation of the fatigue life prediction (Digimat-CAE/Fatigue)
DIGIMAT Fatigue software
Digimat Material File (.daf)
Orientation data
Fatigue data(SN curve)
Static tests data
DIGIMAT interface to fatigue software
Element ID, critical plane orientation, ...
S-N curve, damage accumulation, ...
Digimat to CAE
FEA result file(odb,rst, …)
FE model
Fatigue model
Fatigue loadingFatigue modeling
options
Resolution of FEA on « unit load test cases »
DIGIMAT including new fatigue modeling capabilities
Fatigue results
Including new capabilities to call DIGIMAT for material computations
Fatigue data
© 2012 Autodesk
Fatigue: Chopped Fiber Reinforced Plastics
© 2012 Autodesk
First Pseudo Grain Fatigue (FPGF) Model Ply composite
Using fatigue failure criteria (i.e. Tsai-Hill) Pros : Different « strengths » per direction, multi-axial Cons : Purely meso/macro if not coupled with multi-scale methodology
Tsai-Hill
S: Fatigue strengths depending over N (nb cycles to failure) 1/L: Fiber direction 2/T: Transverse direction
Users workflow Exp measurement: S-N curves measured for 0°, 45° 90° UD specimens Material modeling: Define the measured S-N curves and corresponding microstructure (0° vs 90°) Fatigue solution: Prediction of local S-N curves in each integration point (ply in each element) of the FE model, accounting for any
• Stress amplitude • Mean stress• Loading direction / Fiber alignment
Damage accumulation: Miner’s rule
Tensile 0°
Tensile 90°
© 2012 Autodesk
Fatigue of Chopped Fiber Reinforced PlasticsUnit Load: Stress S11
Fatigue life
© 2012 Autodesk
Creep & Relaxation
© 2012 Autodesk
Creep & Relaxation
© 2012 Autodesk
Creep: Affine vs General vs Spectral vs FE
© 2012 Autodesk
Thermo-ViscoElasticity
© 2012 Autodesk
Thermo-ViscoElastic Relaxation
© 2012 Autodesk
CPU Optimization: Digimat Hybrid
© 2012 Autodesk
Hybrid Solution Procedure
© 2012 Autodesk
Crush Simulation: Digimat-CAE/LS-Dyna
© 2012 Autodesk
2012 DIGIMAT Users’ Meeting 43
Bumper Beam impact Material definition
Digimat v4.3.1 Viso-plastic propety FPGF failure
Tsai-Hill-2D strains§ Micro: strain base§ Hybrid: stress base
Mircostructure Morphology Orientation Length: Short Fibers (AR=20) Weight Fraction of Fibers
Isotropic Use MD property from Digimat-MF result Viso-plastic property Failure : end point of MF curve
MD
TD
FP
GF
failu
re d
efin
ed
at t
his
st
rain
-ra
te
Digimat Nonlinear Micro Material Model
© 2012 Autodesk
Optimization Decomposition• Default decomposition
Digimat elements in 3 domains
29 domains have no Digimat elements
• Improved decomposition
Digimat elements in 22 domains
10 domains have no Digimat elements
•Optimized decomposition–Almost same as improved but all domain has Digimat elements.
Optimal Domain Decomposition
© 2012 Autodesk
16 cores 32 cores 64 cores
Iso(improved)
17 h 59 m 9h 17m 10h 0m
Hybrid(default)
- 42h 31m -
Hybrid(improved)
26 h 37 m 14h 16m 8 h 15 m
Hybrid(optimized)
- 12h 5m -
Micro(improved)
-152 h 51 m(6.4 days)
-
Iso
Hybrid
Iso
Hybrid
CPU Performance: Digimat vs Isotropic
© 2012 Autodesk
Conclusions Reinforced Plastics is a light weight alternative to metals Advanced CAE, including nonlinear multi-scale material modeling ,
enables effective & efficient design of reinforced plastic parts by Taking advantage the process simulation done with Moldflow
The latest developments in Multi-Scale Material & Structural Modeling support: Long Fiber and MuCell Fatigue and Creep Performance
Hybrid Solution Procedure and HPC make Nonlinear Multi-Scale a efficient solution procedure for accurate part and system simultion
© 2012 Autodesk
Autodesk, AutoCAD* [*if/when mentioned in the pertinent material, followed by an alphabetical list of all other trademarks mentioned in the material] are registered trademarks or trademarks of Autodesk, Inc., and/or its subsidiaries and/or affiliates in the USA and/or other countries. All other brand names, product names, or trademarks belong to their respective holders. Autodesk reserves the right to alter product and services offerings, and specifications and pricing at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. © 2012 Autodesk, Inc. All rights reserved.