Document of

The World Bank

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Report No. 12166-IlN

STAFF APPRAISAL REPORT

INDONESIA

INTEGRATED SWAMPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

MAY 17, 1994

MI CROGRAPH I CS

Report No: 12166 IDType: SAR

Agriculture Operations DivisionCountry Department IIIEast Asia and Pacific Region

This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance oftheir official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authoization.

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

CURRENCY(As of March 1994)

Currency Unit = Rupiah (Rp)US$1.00 = Rp2,105Rp 1,000 = US$0.475Rp I million = US$475.06

WEIGHIS AND MEASURES

The metric system is used throughout the report

INDONESIAN FISCAL YEAR

April 1 - March 31

ABBREVIATIONS

AARD - Agency for Agricultural Research and DevelopentAAET - Agency for Agriculture Education and TrainingAMDAL - Environmental Impact AnalysisAWB - Asian Wetiand BureauBAPEDAL Environmental Impact Control AgencyBAPPEDA Provincial Development Planning OfficeBAPPENAS - National Development Planning AgencyBPKP - Government Audit AgencyBPN National Land AgencyDFCAE Directorate of Food Crop Agriculture Extension (in DGFCH)DGE Directorate General of EstatesDGFCH - Directorate General of Food Crops and HorticultureDGPHPA Directorate General of Forestry Protection and Nature

ConservationDGWRD Directorate General of Water Resources DevelopmentDLRD - Directorate of Land Rehabilitation and Development Cm DGFCH)DOS - Directorate of Swamps (in DGWRD)EA - Environmental AssessmentFSTA - Farming Systems Technology AdaptationGOI - Government of IndonesiaICB - International Competitive BWdingISDP - Integrated Swanps Development ProjectKOMPUS - Central Commission for Environmental Impact Assessment

(in MPW)

LCB - Local Competitive BiddingMOA - Ministry of AgricultureMOF - Ministy of FinanceMPW Ministry of Public WorksO&M - Operation and MaincePASS - Potential Acid Sulphate SoilsP2DR - Swamp Area Development ProjectP3S - TIdal Land Irrigation ProjectPIMPRO - Piplnan Proyek (Project Manager)PMU - Project Management UnitPRAS - Provincial Agricultural ServicesPWRS - Provincial Water Resources ServicesREC - Rural Extension CeXnersSOE - Statement of ExpendituresSSKSDA - Provincial National Parks ServiceTCSDP - Tree Crops Smaliholder Developmenw ProjectWID - Women In DevelopmentWUA - Water Users Associaion

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

WDONESIA

INTEGRATED SWAMPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

LOAN AND PROJECT SummARY

Borrower: Republic of Indonesia

Loan Amount: US$65.0 million equivalent

Terms: Twenty years, including five years of grace, at the Bank'sstandard variable interest rate.

Project Description: The main objective of the project is to alleviate poverty inselected swamp schemes through further development of theiragricultural potential. It would also assist GOI in itsmanagement of part of the coastal zone and help ensuresound environmental practices in swamp development. Theproject would be implemented over a six year period(1994 - 2000) in twenty existing swamp settlement schemes,covering a potential net cultivable area of about 55,000 ha,in Jambi, Riau and West Kalimantan Provinces which areamong the poorest provin.es in Indonesia. It would includethe following main components:

(a) rehabilitation of existing and construction of new watercontrol structures, ,and support for better water managementpractices;

(b) promotion of food crop production through support forresearch and extension with associated provision of seeds,pest control and seasonal inputs;

(c) development of tree crops, including land titling andcertification, in an area of about 12,500 ha;

(d) improvement of rural infrastructure through rehabilitation ofexisting or construction of new roads, bridges and jetties,and provision of potable water facilities; and

(e) improvement of coastal zone land use management, includingthe preparation of an Environmental Profile in WestKalimantan and support for the development of the BerbakNational Park Buffer Zone in Jambi. Training and technicalassistance would be provided to assist GOI agencies with theinplementation of the project.

Benefits and Risks: The project is the first attempt at an integrated approach toupgrading of existing transmigration schemes in Indonesia'scoastal swamp areas. It would help provide greater

|This document has a restricted distnbution and may be used by recipients only in the perfmaneof theiofficial duties Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authozation.

- ii -

protection of environments of swamp schemes, thus ensuringtheir long-term sustainability for agricultural produeion, andas such provide a basis for upgrading other swamp schemesin Indonesia. The project would directly improve theincomes of about 32,000 farm families with average presentincomes below US$300 per annum through increased foodcrop and tree crop production and enhanced on-farmemployment opportunities. The main potnti project riskinclude: (a) lack of itegration of infastructureimprovements with agricultural development activities;(b) slow progress in the farmers' adoption of the proposedtechnological improvements; and (c) lapses in O&M of watermanagement infrastructure. With a focus on inter-agencycoordination, provision of improved agricultral supportservices (adaptive research, extension and input financing),and efficient O&M of the water control i uc, theproject has been designed to minimize risks.

Estmated Cost La Local Foreig TotalUS$ million

A. Water Control Infrastructre 21.4 10.7 32.1B. Food Crop Production 9.7 1.3 11.0C. Agricultural Field Research 2.8 0.4 3.2D. Tree Crop Development

Cocomnt Plating 13.8 2.6 16.4Land Itling 0.8 0.2 1.0

Subtotal D 14.6 2.8 17.4

E. Rural ItructureRoads and Bridges 4.3 2.9 7.2Potable Water Supply 6.0 2.0 8.0

Subtotal E 10.3 4.9 15.2

F. Coastal Zone ManagementBerbak Park & Buffer Zone 1.5 1.2 2.7Envhuiental Profile 0.2 0.2 0.4

Subtotal F 1.7 1.4 3.1

G. Project Management 2.3 1.7 4.0

Total Baseline Cost 62.8 23.2 86.0Physical Contingencies 4.8 2.2 7.0Price Contingencies 10.9 2.1 13.0

Total Project Cost zX

La Inclusive of taes and duties esimated at US$7.1 minlion equivalent.

- iii -

Fnancing Plan Local Foreign Total- -- US$ tnillion -

Benficiaries 5.2 - 5.2Government 33.5 2.3 35.8IBRD 39.8 25.2 65.0

Total zES JfLa

Es_mated IBRD Disburse

Bank FY FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FYOO FY01

Anmual 4.8 9.7 14.2 15.4 12.0 6.5 2.4Cumulative 4.8 14.5 28.7 44.1 56.1 62.6 65.0

EconomicRate of Return: 15%

Poverty Cateory: Program of targeted interventions to improve living standardsof predominantly poor swamp farmers, intr alia, throughincreased food and tree crop production, provision of potablewater, and enhanced on-farm employment oppornmities.

Map: IBRD 24868 - 24873

- iv -

IDONESIA

INTEGRATED SWAMPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

CONTM

1. SECTOR AND PROJECT BACKGROUND ...................... 1Agricultural Sector . ................................... 1Swamp Faming ...................................... 2

GOI's Swamp Development Objectives and Strategy .... ........... 3Challenges and Issues in Swamp Development ................... 3Insttutionl Framework ................................. 5

2. BANK INVOLVEMENT AND LESSONS LEARNED .... ........... 7Experience in Swamp Development .......................... 7

Lessons Learned from Previous Projects ....................... 8Bank Strategy and Rationale for Involvement .................... 9

3. THE PRJE ....................................... 10

A. Project Background ........... ..................... 10

B. Project Concept and Objectives ......................... 11

C. Project Scope ..................................... 12D. Detaied Project Features ........ .................... 12

Water Control Infrastructure ......................... 12Food Crop Production ........ ..................... 13Tree Crop Development ........ .................... 14Land Titling .................................... 15Rural Inastucre. .............................. 15Coastal Zone Land Use Management .................... 16Technical Assistance ......... ..................... 17

E. Status of Preparation and Implementation Schedule .... ......... 18F. Environmental Aspects .................. ,..19

This report is based on the findings of an appraisal mission comprised of Messrs.H. van Voorthuizen (Task Manager), G. Tumusiime, D. Leeuwrik, R. Crooks,G. Temple, J. Prunel, W. Soehendro (Bank) and S. Niaz (Consultant) which visited

Indonesia in January/Februay 1993. The Peer Reviewers were Messrs. J. Cunningham(civil works) and K. Yeow (agriculture development) and Ms. J. Aden (environmental

aspects). Mrs. M. Haug, Director, EA3, and Mr. A. Cole, Division Chief, EA3AG, have

endorsed the project.

4. PROJECT COSTS AND FINANCING ......... ............... 21Project Costs ............ 21Financing Plan ....... 22Financing of Proposed Development Activities ....... 22Procurement ....... 23Disbursements ....... 26Accounts and Audits ........ 27

5. ORGANIZATION, MANAGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION .... ... 28Project Orgaiation and Management ...................... 28Project Monitoring .......... ........................ 29Budget Procedures .......... ........................ 29

6. PRODUCTION, MARKETING, FARM INCOMES AND COST RECOVERY 31Agricultural Production ............................... 31Marketing ........................................ 31Farm Incomes . ..................................... 32Cost Recovery . .................................... 33

7. PROJECT BENEFITS AND JUSTIFICATION ................... 35Benefits .......................................... 35Economic Analysis .................................. 35.Project Risks and Uncertainties ........................... 36

8. AGREEMENTS REACHED AND RECOMMENDATION .... ........ 37Assurances ........................................ 37Conditions of Disbursement ............................. 38Recommendation ........... ........................ 39

Tables in the Main Text

Table 3.1 Technical Assistance Requirements .................... 18Table 4.1 Project Ccit Summary ............................ 21Table 4.2 Project Financing Plan ............................ 22Table 4.3 Procurement Arrangements ......................... 26Table 6.1 Net Crop Income per Ha .......................... 32Table 6.2 Summary Indicators for Farm Budgets ...... ............ 33Table 7.1 Sensitivity Analysis . ............................. 36

- vi -

Annexes

1. Criteria for Selection of Swamp SchemesTable 1. Project Area

2. Drainage Structures, Roads and JettiesTable 1. Hydrological Civil Works and EquipmentTable 2. Procurement Packages for Civil Works

3. Operation and Maintenance

4. Agricultural Extension for Swamp Areas

5. Agricultural Research for Swamp Areas

6. Tree Crop DevelopmentAttachment 1. Criteria for Screening Coconut FarmersTable 1. Proposed Participants for Coconut DevelopmentTable 2. Planting Phasing for Coconut Development

7. Potable Water Supply

8. Coastal Zone Land Use ManagementAttachment 1. Draft Terms of Reference for Technical Specialists

9. Consultant ServicesTable 1. Technical Assistarce Requirements

10. Project CostTable 101 Coordination of Provincial Activities - JambiTable 102 Coordination of Provincial Activities - RiauTable 103 Coordination of Proinvical Activities - West KalimantanTable 104 Consulting ServicesTable 201 Drainage and Irrigation - JambiTable 202 Drainage and Irrigation - RiauTable 203 Drainage and Irrigation - West KalimantanTable 301 Agricultural Development - JambiTable 302 Agricultural Development - RiauTable 303 Agricultural Development - West KalimantanTable 401 Agricultural Research - JambiTable 402 Agricultural Research - RiauTable 403 Agricultural Research - West KalimantanTable 404 Agricultural Research - Karang AgungTable 501 Coconut Development - JambiTable 502 Coconut Development - RiauTable 503 Coconut Development - West KalimantanTable 504 Coconut Development - Jakarta

- ii -

Table 601 Rural Roads and Bi.ges - JambiTable 602 Rural Roads and Bridges - RiauTable 603 Rural Roads and Bridges - West KalimantanTable 701 Household Water Supply - JambiTable 702 Household Water Supply - RiauTable 703 Household Water Supply - West KalimantanTable 801 Berbak Boundaries and Park Management

11. Project Financing and DisbursementsTable 1. Proposed Allocation of LoanTable 2. Estimated Disbursement Schedule

12. Economic AnalysisTable 1. Fmancial and Economic PricesTable 2. Economic BudgetTable 3. Economic Analysis by Scheme

13. Project Supervision Plan

14. Selected Documents in the Project File

15. Project implementation Schedule

Charts: 54182 Project Organization

Maps: IBRD 24868-24873

1. SECTOR AND PROJECT BACKGROUND

Agricutural Sector

1.1 Agriculture remains a key sector of the Indonesian economy, contributing21 percent of GDP, providing employment to some 55 percent of the labor fOrce, andgeneratng 26 percent of non-oil exports. Of some 24 million ha under cultivation, about16 million ha are under anmal crops, of which approximately 5.5 million ha are irrigated.With fte exception of estate crops, nearly all agricultural production is undertkn by the18 million smallholders, most of whom farm less than 1.0 ha. Farm incomes areincreasingly being supplemented by off-farm employment, contributing 30 perc2nt or moreof net farin incomes. A notable feature of Indonesia's robust economic growth andmacroeconomic stability has been a significant reduction in the incidence of poverty,particularly in rural areas. Nevertheless, it is estimated that 15 percent (about 18 millionpeople) of the ural population still live below the poverty line, compared to 20 percent(about 10 million peopLb) of the urban population. The large majority of the rural poorlive in non irrigated areas, i.e., the uplands and swamps.

1.2 Food crops account for around 60 percent of agricultural GDP. Rice, thestaple food and dominant crop, accounts for 62 percent of the harvested area of all foodcrops and 21 percent of agricultural GDP. Maize (17 percent of the food crop area),cassava (8 percent), and soybeans (6 percent), are important subsidiary food crops.Indonesia has strong comparative advantages in maize exports and in the production of ricefor the domestic market.

1.3 Growth in agricultural production was about 3.8 percent during 1969-89,compared with a population growth of 2.1 percent. During that period rice has been teengine of growth in the sector. The large expansion in irrigation infrastructre has madea major contribution to the achievement of rice self-sufficiency since 1984 and allowed percapita consumption to increase from 100 kg per annum in 1976 to almost 140 kg atpresent. Paddy production of about 44.0 million tons in 1991 was more than double thelevel in 1970, with the increase coming mainly from higher yields on existing irrigatedarea. Paddy yields on lava are now around 5.4 ton/ha on irrigated lowlands and 3.6ton/ha on rain-fed lowlands, and are among the highest in Asia. Average yields tend tobe lower on the Outer Islands but sfill are around 4.7 ton/ha on irrigated lowlands and 2.5ton/ha on rain-fed lowlands. They are, however, only around 1.0 ton in swamp areas.Although increased yields accounted for perhaps 75 percent of the increase in output since1970, the harvested area also rose by more than 30 percent.

-2-

1.4 The World Bank price projections indicate declining real prices for mostconuiodities and increasing fertilizer prices well into the next cenury. This, accompaniedby a leveling of yields and no major breakthrough in rice research on the near horizon,could make the objective of sustained rice self-sufficiency somewhat fragile. However,experience of other countries indicates that high growth in the economy is generallyaccompanied by a changing food demand pattern leading to a decline in rice demand atleast for the higher income groups. Recent estimates 1/ indicate that the growth ofagricultural GDP is likely to stabilize at about 3 percent per annum, whereas about2 percent per annum growth in rice production will be neede! to meet the domesticdemand for rice in the medium term while maintaining rice self-sufficiency. TheGovernment of Indonesia's (GOI) present strategy to maintain this level of growth, as wellas to provide for balanced regional growth and to relieve the pressure in most denselypopulated areas, includes expansion of agricultural production into more marginal reas,including coastal swamps.

Swamp Farming

1.5 Indonesia has an esimated 39 million ha of inland and coastal swamps(about 20 percent of the total land area), nearly equally divided among Sumatra,Kaliantmn and Irian Jaya. About 90 percent of the swamps are classified as tidal swampsdue to the influence of tidal water incursion. Most of the swamp area comprises fragiledeep peats and acid sulphate soils which are less productive and difficult to manage. Theextent of arable swampland has not been assessed in detail but it is estimated that a totalof 7.5 million ha are suitable for the production of rice, other food crops and tree cropsunder controlled water management. Recent estimates indicate that about 1.4 million hahave good potential for rice production. The remaining 6.1 million ha are more suited forte cultivation of a variety of food crops and tree crop development.

i.6 Over the last 70 years about 2.1 million ha of swamp land have beendeveloped spontaneously by Banjarese and Buginese farmers of Kalimantan and SouthSulawesi, respectively, and by local people for rice and coconut cultivation. A further 1.2million ha have been reclaimed through GOI sponsored schemes. Planned swampreclamation in Indonesia began on a modest scale in 1939, and there were six small GOIsponsored schemes in West and South Kalimantan in the 1950s and the early 1960s.During GOI's first five year development plan (Repelita I: 1969-1973) GOI establishedthe Project Unit for Tidal Swamp Reclamation in the Ministry of Public Works, and beganreclaiming large areas for the settlement of transmigrants from the densely populatedislands of Java, Bali and Lombok. With the mounting pressure on land on these islands,the area reclaimed under GOI sponsored schemes increased rapidly from about 35,000 hain Repelita I to an average of 280,000 ha in each of the last three Repelita periods(Repelita II-IV). With an average farm size of 2 ha, it is estimated that the 3.3 millionha of swampland developed to date support about 1.6 million families or a total of about8 million people. The remaining 4.2 million ha considered suitable for agriculture have

1I ndmoneia Agrinulur Trmsformaion Chalnges and Opportunities, Septmber 1992. ReportNo. 10504-IND.

-3 -

the potential fo; supporting a further 14 million people. However, there are at present nofirm plans to reclaim new swamp areas. Government's plan in the upcoming Repelita VI(1993-1997) is to Improve and intensify the productive capacity of existing schemes.

GOI's Swamp Development Objectives and Strategy

1.7 Government's basic principles and objectives of swamp development aregiven in Regulation No. 27 of May 2, 1991. These are in line with the overall agriculturalsector objectives and include: (a) protecting and conserving swamps; (b) making beneficialuse of swamps to alleviate poverty by providing cultivable land to poor landless people;(c) reducing environmental problems resulting from overcrowding in the most denselypopulated "Inner Islands"; (d) supporting balanced regional development; and (e)maintaining the balance of the ecosystem.

1.8 Government's strategy for swamp dev4lopment has evolved over tme.Initially, Jevelopment focussed on swamp reclamation using low cost, simple technologyfor the establishment of only essential drainage and basic infrastructure that primarilysupported rice-based subsistence agriculture. The strategy for swamp reclamation changedduring Repelita V to focus on second-stage development activities including upgrading ofhydraulic infrastructure, promoting integrated agricultural development throughintroduction of new technological packages, and strengthening of agricultural supportservices. Ihe proposed project would upgrade 20 swamp schemnes covering a gross areaof about 78,000 ha and involving about 128,000 people in Jambi and Riau Provinces ofSumatra and West Kalimantan Province. The project would establish a basis for upgradingother existing schemes.

Challenges and Issues in Swamp Development

1.9 Although carefuily selected coastal swamp areas have considerable poteialfor rice and other agricultural production, their development presents major chalienges andproblems both from the point of view of ecological preservation of fragile swampenvironments and the development of sustainable agriculture on largely marginal soils.Swamp soils have severe limitations for sustainable agricultural production, unless verycarefully mnaged. The peat and peaty soils are high in organic matter, low in nutrientsand very acidic, pardcularly under stagnant water conditions. Water control is thereforeextremely critical, both to keep water tables at a controlled depth and to flush outexcessive acidity. Deep peats in excess of 100 cm are generally unsuitable for food cropcultivation but can be used for tree crops. Deep drainage of peats often leads to serioussubsidence with the peat layer eventually disappearing, exposing unsuitable mineralsubsoils. Salt water intrusion in tidal areas in the dry season gives rise to soils with highsodium content.

1.10 In its approach to swamp development, Government has tended to perceiveswamp land as a rich, empty and exploitable resource to increase agriculural producdon,relieve pressure on land in the densely populated areas, and to meet the growing demandfor land for expanding privae sector activities in commercial agricultu. So far, swampreclamaton schemes have been developed on an ad hoc basis in the absence of a coherent

-4-

policy for the sustainable management and development of the country's extensive coastlzone. Settlements in swamp areas, particularly by spontaneous migrants, have beenestablished without due consideration to the impact on the environment Some of thesesettlements are located in ecologically sensitive areas and uncontrolled reclamation ofswamps has had a negative impact on water quality, wildlife, adjacent primary forests andmangrove areas. As the effects of settlement on fragile coastal ecosystems become beterknown, it is clear that policies, strategies and programs need to be reviewed in context oftheir ecological impact.

1.11 The development of the full potendal of coastal zones is very nmchdependent on mantainng the functional integrity of the natural ecosystem rather thamconverting it to one single alternate land use. Swamps and mangroves perform a nunberof functions and generate economic benefits that are often not fully understood by plannersand implementers of coastal zone development. The interdependent nature of the differentecologies in river basins, from uplands to estuaries and beyond is also frequendymisunderstood or neglected. Until now, no proper assessment of coastal resources hasbeen made. Planning of development for multiple use (e.g agriculture, aquacut andsustainable utilization of forest products) has paid litde attention to retaining ecologicalintegrity. Planning is mostly on site basis for single purpose use, but it is becoming clearthat the grest, sustainable economic returns will be derived from well managed multipleuse activities.

1.12 The sustainability of agriculture in swamp schemes represents the mostcritical challenge that Government has faced in the implementation of its swampsreclamation program. Government's earlier approach was to provide low cost basicdrainage facilities and social infrastructure for the primary development phase with the

pection at further, sutainable agricultural development would follow. ITis approachhas not been successful except under the most favorable condidons. Many schemessupport settlers only at a subsistence level. Food crops need to be supplemented with treecrops, cash crops and other high value added activities. Agricultural development onswamp lands has been impeded by three irr.n factors: First, site selection and schemeimplementation have been deficient resulting from inclusion of unsuitable land. Second,there are physical constraints, including: (a) lack of control structures in the drainagesystems, particularly those designed to prevent toxicity in the potentially acid sulphatesoils; (b) droughts and floods resulting from a highly variable and unpredictableenviromnert caused by daily ddes and erradc rainfall patterns; and (c) proliferation ofpests such as piss and rats. These problems are exacerbated by the remoteness of mostof the swamp schemes from markets and supplies, poor physical infrastucre, and limitedaccess to capital and skilled labor. And Third, there are major weaknesses in organizationand coordination of agriculture and other support services, particularly: (a) deficienciesin applied agricultral research and absence of a strong extension service to guide thesetters in soil and water management; (b) neglect of O&M of drainage systems; and (c)inadequate interagency coordinatiorn of development activities. Experience under past andongoing Bank-supported projects in the swamps, irrigation and other subsectors shows thainadequate coordination among agencies inhibits effective and successful projectimplementation. Typically work programs of the different agencies have proceeded onseparate tracks witi no real accountability for performance of the overall project.

- 5 -

Coordination among the different agencies at the central, provincial and local governmentlevel must be improved if the proposed project and future investments in upgradingexisting swamp schemes are to be successful.

1.13 Despite the enviromental, physical and management challenges whichconstrain swamps development, swamps can support a wide variety of sustainableagricultural activities if these constraints are recognized and taken into account at all stagesof development, particularly at the planning stage. In fact swamps enjoy certain advantagesover upland areas: (a) low cost drainage by gravity flow at low tide is often possible; (b)some of the swamp soils are rich in organic matter and can produce relatively good yieldswith low fertilizer applications; (c) swamp lands are flat, allowing rice production in thewet season and moisture retention for dry season crops; (d) wide waterways crossing thelowlands offer avenues for economic transportation; and (e) swamp lands are usuallyuninhabited before drainage, and therefore relatively free of land claims which often hinderlarge scale development elsewhere.

Institutional Framework

1.14 Responsibility for swamp development primarily lies with tmree GOIagencies: (a) the Ministry of Public Works (A4PW) is responsible for the development ofdrainage systems and establishment of related physical infrastructure; (b) the Ministry ofAgriculture (MOA) for agncultural development activites; and (c) the NationalDevelopment Planning Agency (BAPPENAS) for the overall planning and approval ofbudgets for swamp development programs. With priority being given to the upgrading ofexisting swamp schemes rather than opening new areas for resettlement of tanmgrt(para. 1.6), the role of the Ministry of Transmigration in swamp development programsis diminishing and is currently limited to the consolidation of settlements on existingschemes.

1.15 Within MPW, the Directorate General of Water Resources Development(DGWRD) through the Directorate of Swamps (DOS), is responsible for the planning,design and construction of drainage systems and other works such as roads and jeties.The DOS is represented at the Provincial level by the Tidal Land Irrgation Project(Proyek Pengairan Pasang Surut or P3S).

1.16 Within MOA, at the national level, the Directorates of the DirectorateGeneral of Food Crops and Horticulture (DGFCH), coordinated by the Directorate of LandRehabilitation and Development (DLRD) are responsible for agricultural extension anddevelopment in conjunction with the Agency for Agricultural Education and Training(AAEI). The Directorate General of Estates (DGE) is responsible for tre crops. TheAgency for Agricultural Research and Development (AARD) is responsible for research.Swamps research is conducted at two main stations, Karang Agung in Sumatra andBanjarbaru in South Kalimantan, and a number of smaller research farms and field sites.Swamps research has been supported under the Bank-assisted Swamps Reclamation IIProject (Loan 2431-IND). Research activities are generally well focussed and of asatisfactory standard but need to be expanded to additional areas. The proposed project

-6-

would provide continued support to the main research stations and would also assit inestablishing facilities for fileld research in the prcject area.

1.17 At the provincial level, the Provincial Agricultural Services (PRAS) hasresponsibility for the various agricultural activities through subservice units representfigthe national entities. At the field level, agricultural extension staff (PPL) who provideextension services to the famers are responsible to the Bupati (District Admitr) butreceive technical guidance from MOA. Technical support is provided by subject matterspecialists (PPS) based at provincial or district level. GOI is planning to reorganize andrevitalize the extension service in response to changing demands of the agriculture sector.While the mmnbers of field extension staff in the proposed project area are generallyadequate, many staff have only recently been appointed and lack experience. There Is alsolack of senior extension staff, especially in Riau and West KaHmantan, as well asnaequate transport, equipment, and operating funds. The proposed project would address

these shortcomings.

-7 -

20 BANK INVOLVENMM AND LESSONS LEARNED

Experience in Swamp Development

2.1 Over the years te Bank has supported many irrigation, drainage and floodcontrol development projects in East and South Asia, and also rice production on swampschemes in Sierra Leone, Guinea, Liberia and Mexico. However, the Bank's pecificexperience with tropical tidal swamps development is limited to Indonesia. As tropicalpeat swamps in Indonesia are quite unique (para. 1.5), broad global experience indeveloping swamp3, particularly in temperate climates cannot be directly related toIndonesian conditions.

2.2 Bank assistance for swamp reclamation in Indonesia began in 1975 with areview of the hydrological and pedological aspects of developing tidal swamp lands andthe definition of criteria for the selection of suitable areas for development. In 1976 Xt

Bank provided assistance for surveys and studies of specific projects in South Sumatr andJambi. This was followed in 1979 by Bank fimancing of the detailed design of the KangAgung scheme and feasibility studies to develop about 350,000 ha in South Sumata andKalimantan. Since then the Bank has supported the implementation of two swampreclamation projects.

2.3 Swamps Redam I Project (Swamps 1), supported by a Bank loan ofUS$22.0 million equivalent (Loan 1958-IND), was approved in 1981 and implementedover a six year period. The Loan was closed in 1987, one year behind the originalschedule.Z/ Swamps I provided for drainage, land clearing, settler housing and publicfactes, transport and setlement of transmigrant farmers (3,200 families), foodsubsistence and other services to the settlers in the inidal settlement period, projectmonitoring, and a series of studies. Due to difficult soils, high labor requirements for landpreparaion, and poor supportng services, agricultural development proceeded slower hnexpected. The harvested crop area at project closing was only 30 percent of atanticipated at appraisal. Although the availability of family labor limits the area developedfor cultivation, it was anticipated that by 1993 the harvested area would be about 75percert of the appraisal estmate and that yields and incomes would gradually climb tothose assumed at appraisal.

2.4 Project results showed clearly that investments in infastructure must beaccomnpanied by support for agricultural development to ensure realization of the inteded

21 Prforme Audit Rat No. 11431, OED, Daeember 1S, 1992.

- 8 -

agricultural production. It also became clear that some form of unified managementstructure is necessary and that special provisions must be made for agricultural extension.The original concept that basic drainage, housing, community facilities and infrastructureand some land clearing would suffice for critical settlement, and that the settler wouldgradually develop the whole allocated area and install further drainage control, did notwork. There were hidden costs, over and above those provided for in the project, whichcould not be met by the farmers. Therefore, the settlers were unable to develop theirholdings as intended. Phased implementation, emphasizing pest control, potable watersu,pply, and agricultural research and development must also be given due inportance.

2.5 Swamps Reclamation II Project (Swamps II), supported by a Bank loan(Loan 2431-IND) of US$65.0 million equivalent, has been implemented since 1984. Theloan was closed on December 31, 1993. The project financed the reclamation anddevelopment of about 30,000 ha swamp land in South Sumatra and settement of about10,800 families. It comprised the entire primary and secondary drainage infrastructure,60 percent of tertiaries, houses and settlement, studies for future swamp reclamationschemes, and upgrading of older schemes.

2.6 Swamps II was designed and implemented before the results and lessons ofSwamps I were fully known. However, project formulation reflects some of theexperience gained in the first project in that its thrust is on (a) improving the quality ofprogram preparation (site selection and design); (b) improving the implementationstandards; and (c) providing potable water facilities and agricultural support services. Inaddition, Swamps II has provided one consolidated 1.75 ha farm plot per family (insteadof two smaller separate plots given under earlier GOI schemes), to facilitate faster landdevelopment. The project also has made provisions to: (a) encourage the farmers tocooperate in clearing and developing their entire farm; (b) train site managers inconstruction supervision and management; and (c) support a three-year time slice of aswamps research and development program.

2.7 Due to the initial delays in implementation, the project was reformulated to:(a) provide enhanced Bank support for settlement and agricultural components; (b) shiftthe responsibility for implementation coordination from the Ministry of Transmigraton toBAPPEDA of South Sumatra; and (c) increase the allocations for consultant services,mainly for preparing the present project and for construction supervision of transmigrationcomponents. Although agricultural extension and support services have improved, theagricultural benefits are lagging behind the appraisal targets, as in the previous project.

Lessons Leaned from Previous Projects

2.8 The main lesson learned from Swamps I and II is that more time and betterintegrated approaches are needed than originally assumed in order to convert swamp areasinto fully developed agricultural land. Both projects have been fairly successful inproviding a basic livelihood to poor people from other parts of Indonesia. But the low re-esthnated Economic Rates of Return of 6 percent and 2 percent for Swamps I and II,respectively, reflect the slow progress made by the farmers in clearing the land, planingtheir crops, controlling the water, coping with pests, etc. There clearly is scope for

-9 -

improvement of the settlers' living conditions and agricultural practices through a propercombination of further investments in infrastructure and agricultural support activities tothe settlers.

2.9 Other lessons learned concern the need for: (a) careful monitoring ofpotentially adverse effects on the environment (e.g., attacks by pests and diseases) and theeffectiveness of proposed mitigatory measures; (b) preparation of detailed guidelines forprequalification of tenderers in order to make the selection process more transparent andreduce the risk of implementation delays; (c) better coordination of activities by the variousagencies; and (d) more effective supervision of implementation.

Bank Strategy and Rationale for Involvement

2.10 The key objectives of the Bank's Country Assistance strategy for Indonesiaare: (a) maitaining economic growth with macroeconomic stability; (b) reducing povertyand enhancing human resource development; (c) enhancing private sector development andcompetitiveness; (d) improving public sector management; and (e) improvingenvironmental management. Agriculture remains central to the Government's growth andpoverty reduction strategy, as poverty is still heavily concentrated in agriculture,particularly the non-irrigated areas such as swamps and uplands. Accordingly, investmentin agriculture contines to be important to the Bank's assistance strategy in ndonesia,given the sector's role in employment generation, poverty reduction, sustainable naturalresource management, and protection of the environment.

2.11 The Bank supports Government's efforts to enhance the potential of existingswamp schemes in order to improve incomes and social welfare of existig poor farmfamilies. The proposed project is fully consistent with the Bank's Country AssistanceStrategy discussed by fte Board on April 12, 1994. The project would supportGovernment's objectives in the agricultural sector: sustained growth, reduced ruralpoverty, and more balanced regional growth. Based on the experience gained under theprevious Bank-assisted swamp projects, the Bank is well placed to assist Government indesigning and implementing programs for the sustainable development of existing swanpschemes. Bank support would also foster sound environmental practices in swampdevelopment and would assist the provincial governments of Jambi, Riau and WestEalimantan in formulating policies and actions to ensure efficient management andsustainable development of their coastal zones.

- 10-

3. TE PlROJEICT

A. PROJECT BACKGROUND

3.1 Project Locaton. The proposed project would be located in Jambi andRiau Provinces of Sumatra and West Kalimantan Province of Kalimntan, and cover agross area of about 78,000 ha (Annex 1). In Jambi, the project comprises five schemeswith a gross area of about 26,000 ha located in Kabupaten Tanjung Kabung, some 80 kmnortheast of Jambi city. In Riau, the project would cover two geographically disdnctareas: (a) the Siak subproject in Kabupaten Bengkalis some 90 kn north of Peaarcomprising one scheme with a gross area of about 8,000 ha; and (b) the Indragirisubproject in Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir about 200 km southeast of Pekanbaru, with threeschumes anei a gross area of about 11,000 ha. In West Kalimantan, the project wouldcomprise eleven schemes covering a total gross area of about 33,000 ha in KabupatenPontianak. Within the project area about 46,000 ha land is now cultivated and a furtier9,000 ha could be brought under cultivation with the improvements provided for under theproject. The total potential cultivable area in the twenty project schemes is about55,000 ha. Rice-based cropping systems, comprising pure stand rice areas and mixedrice/coconut fields, account for more than 90 percent of agricultural land in the schemeareas. The population in the selected schemes is estimated (1990 census) at about 27,500households (128,000 people) of whom 9,100 are in Jambi, 5,200 in Riau and 13,000 InWest Kaemantan In addition some 4,500 farm households, living in the finge areas ofthe selected shemes, would participate in the project's coconut development component.The large majority of the people are living at subsistence level, and there is a strongdemand for better water control and improved living conditions.

3.2 Climate and Soils. Eighteen of the twenty project schemes are located intidal swamp areas; the other two are in inland swamps in West Kalimantan. All scbemesare accessed through navigable rivers or drainage channels while some schemes in WestKalimantan are also accessible by road. The climte is classified as tropical rain forestclimate, characterized by high temperatures, relative humidity and rainll. Averageannual rainfall ranges from 2,000 mm in lambi and Riau to about 3,000 mm in WestKalimantan. The Jambi and Riau schemes have a bimodal rainfall pattern with maximain November/December (20 -400 mm/month) and in April (250 mm/month) and minimain February (90 mm/month) and August (110 mm/month). The higher rainfall in WestKalimantn has a pronounced maximum in November (400 mm/month) and mininum inAugust (190 mm/month). Most schemes lie in flat, poorly drained zones ht are paryimmdated during the rainy eason by high tides or floods in the adjacent rivers or creeks.In spite of flood protecdon afforded by existing dikes in some of the schemes, fooding

- 11 -

remains a considerable problem in most of the others. Recent marine or fluvio-marineclays are dominant soils types overlain by peat layers of various depth and at variousstages of decomposition. The soils of the project areas can be broadly classified as almost50 percent swamp mineral and the remainder as a mixture of peat and peaty mineral soils.Soils in the Jambi schemes are mostly good to moderately suitable for rice. Soils in theSiak area of Riau Province are well drained and suitable for most crops. In WestKaliman the inland swamp schemes are mostly classified as moderately suited for rice.

3.3 Exisng Infrastructure. Existing drainage infrastructure in the projectschemes consists of navigation channels, primary and secondary drainage canals, and fielddrains. Almost all schemes are accessed through rivers or navigation channels which areconnected to the drainage networks. In some of the schemes part of the secondary canalsare equipped wiff timber stoplog structures. These provide a rudimentary control on theentry of tidal fresh water, or an exit to the saline or acid drainage affluent. Moresophisticatd structures like vertical sluice gates or flap gates exist on some secondary orprimary canals of a few schemes but still are an exception. Most of the gated structuresand some of the stoplog structures are not in working order because of poor maintenanceor lack of technical guidance.

D. Panoacr CONCEPr AND ORJECiVES

3.4 Concept. Te project would support intersectoral activities designed toupgrade the level of agricultural production services in the selected schemes and threbythe people's standard of living. First, water management would be improved though theconstruction of new and rehabilitation of existing water control structures. These workswould reduce flood damage, improve drainage, facilitate flushing of toxic chemicals, andhelp control acidity in the scheme areas. Also, the project would encourage theintroduction of improved operation and maintenance (O&M) practices and procedures fordrainage networks and water control structures by improving on-farm water managementpractices and organization. Second, specific agricultural research and extensionprograms,with associated seed and pest control programs and the provision of a revolving fund forseasonal inputS, would help the farmers take advantage of the physical improvements inthe selected swamp schemes. These programs would, amongst others, aim at introducinghigher yielding crop varieties, more intensive cultural practices, and balanced use offertilizer and soil amendments. Third, the cultivation of coconuts would not only bepromoted inside the scheme areas, but also in suitable adjacent areas with a view to createeconomic production units and also to provide an opportunity to the original inhabitantsof the area to share in the benefits of swamps scheme development. Fourth, road andwater transport communications would be improved and potable water faciLities would beprovided to all households in the scheme areas. Implemenation of the above actionswould be accompanied by a series of activities to integrate conservation with developmentactivities and to maintain the ecological balance in the coastal swamp areas.

3.5 Objectives. The project has two main objectves. First, it would reducepoverty in the selected swamp schemes through further development of their agrcultural

- 12-

potential. Second, the project would assist GOI in its management of part of the coastalzones and help ensure sound environmental practices in swamp development.

C. PROJECr SCOPE

3.6 The proposed project would be implemented over a six year period (1994-2000) in about twenty existing swamp schemes, covering a potential net cultivable area ofabout 55,000 ha, in Jambi, Riau and West Kalimantan Provinces (see Annex 1 and Maps24868 - 24872). In order to qualify for financing under the project, the schemes wouldhave to meet selection criteria that emphasize technical, environmental and economicviability (Annex 1). An asswuww to that effect has been obtained from GOI duringnegotiations. The project would include the following main components: (a) rehabilittionof exisig and construction of new water control structures, and support for bettr watermanagement practices, including on-farm water management; (b) promotion of food cropproduction through support for research and extension with associated provision of seeds,peSt control and seasonal inputs; (c) development of tree crops, including land tling andcertification, in an area of about 12,500 ha; (d) improvement of rural infrastructurethrough rehabilitation of existing or construction of new roads, bridges and jeties, andprovision of potable water facilities; and (e) improvement of coastal zone land usemanagement in the three provinces, including the preparation of an Environmental Profilefor West Kaliantan and support for the development of the Berbak National Park BufferZone in Jambi. Traning and technical assistance would also be provided to assist GOIagencies with the implementation of the proposed project.

D. DrAuI) PROJE FEATURE

Water Control Infrastructure

3.7 Infrastructure. The project would rehabilitate existing and construct newdrainage infrastucture in the selected schemes with a view to provide adequae floodprotction, drainage relief, and water level control capability for promoting furtheragricultral development in the schemes. Project works would include: (a) strengtheningand raising of existing dikes to provide adequate flood protection; (b) construction of newdikes; (c) improving te drainage capacity of canals where it is insufficient or has beenimpaired by vegetal clogging; (d) rehabilitation of existing water control strucures, wherefeasible; and (e) construction of new stoplogs, sluice gates, and flap gate struct. I isesmated that total project earthworks would be about 5.5 million m3, consitng of about1.9 million e3 in dikes, and about 3.6 million in in chamels. About 1,200 structureswould be constructed on secondary and primary canals. Ihe projet would alsosupplement the existng hydrological data collection network in the scheme areas byproviding rainfall recording, and automatic water level recording equipment and sions.Further details are given in Annex 2.

3.8 During the appraisal of the project it was found that several of the schemes,as proposed, had low economic rates of return (see also Chapter 7). One of the reasons

- 13 -

for the low ERRs is a tendency among agency personnel and consultants to over-designthe structures. During the first project year all proposed designs of the works for futureyears would be reviewed in order to ensure their economic justification. The schemeselection criteria specify that the average cost cf the civil works for drainage, irrigationand flood control would not exceed Rp 1.5 million (US$723 equivalent) per cultivable hafor each individual scheme, unless the ERR of the direct investments for those works isat least 12 percent (Annex 1).

3.9 Operation and Maintenance. The proposed project would support thestrengthening and improvement of O&M of existing, rehabilitated and new drainageinfrastructure. An optimum level of operation, including the removal, supply andcirculation of water, would help maximize crop production in the project areas. Regularand periodic maintenance programs would be developed to keep the system facilities ingood working condition. Specifically, the project would support: (a) partial financing ofincremental O&M costs after completion of construction; (b) the provision of equipmentand transport; (c) the formation of water users associations (WUA) to facilitate O&M oftertiary canals and on-farm water management; and (d) training of PWRS and PRAS staffand WUA members in the preparation and implementation of water management plms.Further details are given in Annex 3.

Food Crop Production

3.10 To take advantage of the improved water control, the project wouldstrengthen agricultural support services, including adaptive research, exension, theestablishment of tertiary level hydraulic management units, improved seed production anddistribution, introduction of draft animals or small hand tractors to overcome currentshortages of power, training of staff and farmers, and the provision of small one-timegrants for seasonal inputs to be managed as a revolving fund through farmers' groups.Special training in agro-processing techniques would be provided to women to faclitatetheir involvement in income generation arising from increased food crop production. Theproject would assist in the formation of farmers groups for the purpose of improved waterand soil management, and rat and pig control, and would also organize contract growersfor improved seed production. The project would support pilot efforts to introduceplantings of tree crops and timber species in previously cleared and now abandoned ormarginal areas as a means of restoring ecological balance and providing additional incometo local communities.

3.11 Adaptive Research. The project would support the ongoing swampsresearch program at Karang Agung and would extend field level research into the projectarea in ten selected farmiing systems technology adaptation (FSTA) sites. Research inKarang Agung would concentrate on technology component research on acid sulphate soils,especially that related to soil and water management, changes of soil charaistics,environmental impacts, and improvement of the crop and animal management in integratedfarming systems. Component research would include varietal improvement, fertilizer use,livestock/fish culture, and modification and utilization of simple farm machbiery andequipment. Field level research would entail: (a) land characterization of the project areasgenerally, and more detailed site characterization of the ten research and thirty intensive

- 14 -

tertiary unit locations. At selected FSTA sites, the research would include aquaculture andat others an assessment of the potential for tractor hire service on a sustaining basis in aprogram involving farmer groups, extension workers, cooperatives, artisans and privateentrepreneurs. Project financing for research, would include: (a) equipment, materialsand transport, and operational costs for ongoing swamp research at Karang Agung researchstation and field research sites; and (b) the provision of facilities for adaptive anddevelopmental research at various field research sites (see Annex 5 for further details).

3.12 Agricultural Extension and Development. Extension activities under theproject also would be considerably intensified under the responsibility of PRAS withtechnical support and supervision from the various Directorates within DGFCH and DGEstaff. Twelve of the existing RECs and associated staff accommodation would berehabilitated. Thirty tertiary hydraulic management units would be set up along the samelines as the FSTA units implemented by AARD for demonstrating and extending improvedtechnology and introducing new technology developed by research. Using the experienceand demonstration effect of these tertiary hydraulic units, the program would be extendedto other tertiary units covering about 600 farmer groups and about 30,000 farmers. Allfarmers would receive a one time grant through their farmer groups during the projectperiod in the form of a complete input package for one ha for one season. After theharvest the farmers would deposit the value of the input package in a revolving fund. Therevolving funds would be managed by the farmer groups and used to purchase inputs formembers during following crop seasons. With the help of the revolving funds the areacoverage of improved farming practices would expand to at least 45,000 ha, and possiblyto the full 55,000 ha of cultivated land in the twenty project schemes. An assurance hasbeen obtained from Government during negotiations that in all scheme areas farmer groupswould be formed, and the ability of those groups to manage a revolving fund ascertained,before the input packages are made available to the farmers in those areas.

3.13 In addition to providing extension workers with the required training,supervision and specialist support, the project would provide equipment, materials andoperating funds for establishing the tertiary hydraulic management units, conductingmeetings, workshops, training programs, field days and other extension activities; as wellas transport, travel and associated expenses for extension workers, trainers, supervisingstaff from provincial and national levels, and farmers. Supporting programs to be financedunder the project would include equipment and operational costs for efficient seedproduction and distribution, funds for pest control programs and the procurement of inputs,and the establishment of a revolving fund for the purchase of inputs by resource poorfarmers (further details are given in Annex 4).

Tree Crop Development

3.14 About 12,500 ha of hybrid coconuts would be planted in pure stands onsuitable land under the proposed project. Of the total of 12,500 ha, about 4,200 ha wouldbe witin the project schemes and 8,300 ha in land adjoining the schemes. About 8,000smallholders would be involved. An assurance has been obtained from GOI duringnegotiations that agreed criteria (Annex 6, Attachment 1) for screening participants wouldbe followed, and a record kept of the screening process of the selected participarts.

- 15 -

3.15 To ensure the establishment of "economic units" for collection, processingand marketing of coconuts, DGE would be responsible for implementing the componentthrough project management units (PMU) which would assist the farmers with theestablishment of their plantations. An assurance has been obtained from GOI atnegotiations that PMUs would be established in the project areas. In general, the areaschosen for coconut planting would be unsuitable for rice production due to the depth ofpeat. The areas would be segregated from rice land to permit appropriate watermanagement for the respective crops. Farmers would be supplied with selectedpolybagged seedlings, produced in project nurseries, or by qualified private contractors,and would receive fertilizers and other necessary inputs, as well as advice from specializedextension staff. The hybrids would be selected to provide good yield potential andresistance to Phytophtora disease. Smallholders would receive a grant to cover allexpenditures for the first year's establishment of the trees. They would be responsible forthe maintenance of the stand from the second year onwards until bearing, using credit ifnecessary (see para. 4.4). Smallholders in mixed cropping areas would also be providedwith extension and seed nuts of high yielding hybrid varieties. To enhance their incomegeneration capacity, women would be trained by PMUs in the manufacture of coconutsugar and oil. The project would finance incremental staff. civil works, vehicles andtransport costs, equipment and materials, training and TA, and operational costs ( seeAnnex 6 for fiurther details).

LAnd Titing

3.16 Of the total proposed area of 12,500 ha of coconut development, about4,200 ha would be in schemes settled by transmigrant families (about 3,200) about 10-15years ago and the rest would comprise land occupied by about 4,700 original settlers onthe fringe of the transmigration settlements. Project assistance would be provided forsettlers on the swamp schemes as well as for original settlers whose farms are adjacent tothe transmigration settlements (see para 3.14). Most transmigrant families on the swampschemes already have titles (hak milik) to their plots of land, but the majority of thefarmers in the fringe areas do not. The project would therefore provide financing for landtitling activities, including cadastral and land use surveys and certification. These activitieswould be carried out by the National Land Agency (BPN) in accordance with the phasingof the coconut planting program. For the sake of efficiency and cost-effectiveness,neighboring fanners not participating in the coconut planting scheme would also receivetitles. An assurance has been obtained from GOI during negotiations that the cadastraland land use surveys would be completed during the year prior to planting, and the titlesissued to the participating coconut growers during the year of planting. Completion of theprevious year's land titling program would be a condton of disbursement during thefollowing year against expenditures on agricultural labor for the coconut planting program.

Rural Infrastructe

3.17 Rural Roads and Navigation Facilities. The existing rural road network,comprising earth, paved or asphalted single lane roads or motorcycle tracks, and rivernavigation facilities, mainly jetties, in and around the scheme areas would be improvedunder the project so that increased traffic, likely to be generated after the project, could

- 16 -

be accommodated. The road construction program would be more extensive in WestKalimantan because of the large number of widely separated schemes and the need tointerconnect them. The rural roads component would consist of: (a) rehabilitation andasphalting of 25 kn of existing roads in Jambi (15 kn) and Riau (10 kn); and(b) construction of a total of 126 km of roads in Riau and West Kalimantan. The newconstruction would consist of 26 km of asphalt roads in Riau and 96 km of asphalt roadsand 4 km of earth roads in West Kalimantan. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of severalbridges on these roads is also included in the project. Some navigation canals would becleared of clogging vcgetation and silt. Four jetties in West Kalimantan would be repairedand two jetties in Riau and West Kalimantan would be extended. One collapsed jetty inJambi would be reconstructed and three new small jetties (one in each province) would beconstructed. Guidelines for the construction of the roads would be prepared by DGWRDin consultation with Bina Marga and sent to the Bank for comment by March 31, 1995.An assurance to that effect has been obtained from GOI during negotiations. In thepreparation of these guidelines there will be a special fccus on miniizing theenvironmental risks (see Annex 2 for further details).

3.18 Potable Water Supply. The project would provide potable water supplysystems to about 27,270 individual households and about 55 village centers. The capacityof the systems would be based on ten liters per capita per day required for drinking andcooking only; for other domestic requirements river and canal water would be used. Theproposed household water supply systems would consist mainly of rainwater storage tanksof about 2.5 m3 capacity made of ferrocement or other suitable material, with roof guttersand down spouts. In areas with suitable water from canals and rivers, an alternativesolution would be to use a simple individual water treatment system made of cheap localmaerials. in addition to the arrangements for individual households, the project wouldprovide potable water at critical locations, such as village centers, health clinics andschools. This would ensure normal year-round supply and provide for water supply in thesurrounding areas in case of extreme drought. Pending the outcome of geohydrologicalinvestigations, both groundwater and surface water would be considered as sources ofsupply. Deep tubewells and water treatment plants would be planned accordingly. InWest Kalimantan Province no suitable water resources are available for this purpose, andhere the project scope would be limited to the rainwater option only. The project wouldsupport the training of local technicians. The approach will be community based as underthe Water Supply and Sanitation for Low Income Communities Project (WSSLIC, Loan3629-IND), based on a village action plan which will specify responsibilities for planning,design, implementation and O&M. The plans would provide for the beneficiaries tocontribute at least 10 percent of the value of the facilities in the form of labor, or anyother mutually agreeable form of contribution, and to fully cover the O&M costs of thesystems to ensure their sustainable use; these assurances have been obtalned from GOIduring negotiations (see Annex 7 for more details).

Coastal Zone Land Use Mlanagement

3.19 The project would support coastal zone management activities in twoprovinces. InJambi Province, ongoing coastal zone land use management activities wouldbe supported by expanding an existing GIS to create a natral resource database which

- 17 -

would be used to identify ecologically important areas for protection and/or restoration andto generate a spatial plan based on development potential. Environmentally sensitive areasin the coastal zone would be identified and incorrorated in the planning process bydelineating protection zones and developing manage,ment guidelines for these and adjacentareas.

3.20 Also in Jamnbi Province, the project would strengthen management of BerbakNational Park and promote compatible land uses in adjacent areas. First, the projectwould strengthen Park management through activities such as: (a) surveying and markingof Park boundaries; (b) upgrading office and transport facilities in the Provincial NationalParks Service (SSKSDA); (c) staff development and training including patrollingtechniques, wildlife observation, record-keeping, etc.; and (d) completion of the BerbakNational Park Management Plan. Second, the project would promote socio-economicdevelopment in areas adjacent to the Park by undertaking a series of activities which wouldbe identified through a community consultation process in villages surrounding the Park,including: (a) Park boundary marking using plants which villagers would otherwise poachfrom the Park; (b) rehabilitation of coastal land by planting mangroves; (c) agriculturaldevelopment, mainly horticulture; and (d) land title/certification in about 6,000 ha. of landaround the Park to increase security of tenure. The project would finance technicalassistance, civil works construction, and procurement of vehicles, equipment and materials.

3.21 In the Province of West Kalbmantan the project would support thepreparation of an Environmental Profile covering all of the coastal wetlands. The Profilewould be a comprehensive account of physical/natural, environmental and relevant socio-economic conditions to provide a basis for future planning (a similar profile was preparedfor Jambi Province in 1990, with the assistance of the Asian Wetland Bureau, and anotherone is currently being prepared for Riau with UNDP assistance). In addition, inter-departmental coordination and implementing committees would be established in theprovince to promote better information exchanges between provincial agencies. Trainingprograms on integrated environmental planning also would be provided (see Annex 8 forfurther details).

Technical Assistance

3.22 Consultants would be employed to assist the central and provincialgovernment agencies with planning, detailed design, and implementation of the project.Total requirements are estimated at 1,331 person-months (pm), of which 47 percent forinstitutional capacity building, 50 percent for implementation support, and 3 percent forstudies. Five main contracts are envisaged: (a) for work planning, design, constructionsupervision, and coordination and monitoring of drainage and rural infrastructure(DGWRD); (b) for community and agriculture development (DGFCH); (c) for agriculturalresearch (AARD); (d) for Berbak National Park (DGPHPA); and (e) for preparation of anEnvironmental Profile for West Kalimantan (DGPHPA). Person-months for theseconsultancies are sunumarized in Table 3.1 below, and further details are given in Table 1of Annex 9. In order to expedite the start of project activities after project approval, allconsultants would be employed by January 15, 1995. An assurance to this effect has beenobtained from GOI during negotiations. The project would also provide for studies for the

- 18 -

preparation of proposed future projects in swamp development and of options forintroduction of a drainage fee.

Table 3.1: TI NCAL ASSISTANCE REQuIREmENIS(in person-months)

Inter-C.onsultancy Agency national National Total

Planning, Design, ConstructionSupervision, Coordinationand Monitoring DGWRD 171 685 856

Community and AgricultureDevelopment DGFCH 36 223 259

Agricultural Research AARD 6 72 78

Berbak National Park DGPHPA 56 46 102

Environmental Profile DGPHPA 12 24 36

Total 281 1,050 1,331

E. STAus OF PRPARATION AD IMLEmENTATION SCHEuLE

3.23 Status of Preparation. The project has been prepared by the line agenciesat the national level in consultation with the provinces and with assistance of consultantsemployed by DGWRD. The preparation report was submitted in December 1991. Duringpreappraisal the scope of the project was reduced substantially from 38 schemes proposedin the preparation report to about 20 schemes. The deleted schemes were considered notfeasible on technical and/or economic grounds. Also, the environmental assessment of theproject fell short of requirements. Following discussions between the Bank and GOIduring pre-appraisal, an expanded and improved environmental assessment, together withan environmental management plan, was submitted in December 1992. Additionalconsulants inputs were provided from April through August 1993 in order to review thehydraulic designs for the first four schemes and to assist GOI with the preparation of the1994/95 work program.

3.24 Implemetaon Schedule. Project implementation is scheduled to start inOctober 1995 and would be completed in March 2000. All civil works for drainage, roadsand navigation facilities would be completed by March 1998, leaving a full two-yearperiod until March 2000 to continue project activities aimed at introducing better watermanagement practices and intensifying the production of food crops. Similarly, theplanting of tree crops would be completed during the first four project years and follow-up

1 19 -

support for the new plantings would be available during the remaining two project years.Installation of potable water supply systems would start in July 1995, following one yearof tesdng, and continue until the end of the project period. Support for the BerbakNational Park would be provided from 1995/96 for four years. The Environmental Profilefor West Kaliinmtan would be prepared by September 1995. The project implementationschedule is attached at Annex 14.

F. ENvIRONMENTAL ASPECrs

3.25 Environmental Impact Assessment. The project as originally proposedwas the subject of a comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) which wasprepared on behalf of DOS by the Asian Wetland Bureau (AWB), a leading authority onIndonesian swamp ecology. The EIA identified a range of key environmental managementissues, the most significant of which related to the potentially deleterious short term effectsof exposure of potential acid sulphate soils (PASS) due to poorly planed or executed civilworks. This potential problem has been reduced significantly following the decision todelete schemes with excessive PASS and to reduce the scope of civil works in terenaining schemes.

3.26 Most of the other issues identified by AWB are amenable to control throughmonitoring and management, particularly during construction. A recurring problem withall agriculural developments in remote areas is the tendency for scheme dwellers to usesurrounding forests to collect firewood. AWB identified this as a problem for the ISDPschemes and suggested establishment of on-scheme woodlots as a possible solution. Theproblem would be addressed by the PRAS in all three provinces (assisted by the PHPA),through the establishment for field trials of firewood species on abandoned land withinscheme boundaries.

3.27 During preparation of the EIA, two separate local consultation programswere undertaken (one by the project preparation consultants and one by AWB) to gatherinformation on problems being experienced by scheme inhabitants, environmental issuesas seen from the inhabitants point of view, and wildlife sightings. Verbatim transcriptsof the first round of consultations were provided to the Bank and the results of the secondround are referenced frequently in the EIA report. An Indonesian language version of theEA Summary has been prepared and copies circulated to provincial and relevant districtoffices of DGWRD. Copies also have been made available to the public.

3.28 The EIA and the associated public consultation activities were in fullcompliance with the Bank's requirements. Simultaneously, the EIA has been reviewed bythe AMDAL Technical Team of the Ministry of Public Works. The AMDAL CentralCommission of the Ministry has approved the project in July 1993.

3.29 Environmental Monitoring and Management. A comprehensiveenvironmental monitoring and management plan has been prepared covering developmentsin al three provinces. The plans are designed to maximize utilization of existig staffresources and tchnical capabilities within provincial sectoral agencies and environmental

- 20 -

studies centers. lhe project provides for employment of a local environmenal consultantfor one year to: (a) implement the environmental management and monitoring plan, datedDecember 21, 1992; (b) establish liaison between the project and relevant provincialagencies and DGWRD's subdirectorate of Inter-Sectoral Coordination on EnvironmentalManagement Mate; (c) ensure that environmental protection measures are included inconstruction contract documentation as required and that compliance monitoring proceduresare observed; (d) contract (through DOS) the services of environmental study centersand/or NGOs to undertake specific monitoring activities; and (e) agree and intituteappropriate envirornental monitoring procedures with relevant BAPPEDAs and sectoralagencies.

- 21 -

4. PROJECT COSTS AND FINANCING

Projec Costs

4.1 Total project cost including contingencies is estimated at US$106.0 millonof which US$27.5 million would be foreign exchange and US$7.1 million duties and taxes.Base costs are expressed in June 1993 values. Physical coningencies are esdmaed at15 percent for civil works and 10 percent for equipment and materials. Pricecontingencies are based on an estmated annual local inflation rate of 5.5 percent and aforeign inflation rate of 2.5 percent from FY94. No price contingency allowance has beenadded to cover the eventual increase in fertlizer prices due to the anticipated phasig outof ferdlizer subsidies during the project period. Project cost is summarized in Table 4.1below and detiled in Annex 10.

Table 4.1: PfoJECT Cosr SUMMARY

% S%TOWR illion USS million ForPe am

m La FPoi Total Locad Foin Total Baba Ce

A. Waru Coasd Inhafiasucu 45,016 22,494 67,S10 21.4 10.7 32.1 33 37B. FoWodCrop Poducdto 20,428 2,690 23,118 9.7 13 11.0 12 13C. Agdciodml ied Rlsueub 5,987 794 6,781 2.8 0.4 32 12 4D. Tern. Crop Dvdopdnm

Cocona3t Handzg 29,.05 S,S43 34,598 13.8 2.6 16.4 16 19LeAnd ldlqg 1,767 422 2,189 0.8 O0. 1.0 19 1Subtotd 30,R22 5,965 36,787 14A 2.8 17.4 16 26

Roes adm EBdges 8,976 6,066 15,042 4.3 2.9 7.2 40 8Potbe Waer Supply 12,690 4,215 16,90S 6.0 2.0 8.0 2S 9

Subtotd 21,666 10,281 31,947 103 4.9 15.2 32 17

P. Camtl 2.. Mmagm.tBDe.kPakand Bufer Zoos 3,240 2,463 5,703 1.5 1.2 2.7 43 3Ivirronm Isa Pcofile 373 430 803 0.2 0.2 0.4 S4 1

Subioes 4,613 2,893 6,506 1.7 L4 3.1 44 4

0. Projet ManageMntm 4,879 3,543 8,422 2.3 1.7 4.0 42 5

TOW Basdue C#dus 132,411 48,660 181,071 62.8 23.2 86.0 27 100lhysal Cotdoiniesi 10,126 4,647 14,773 4.8 2.2 7.0 31 8

Psie Conkingencie 22,94S 4,342 27.287 10.9 2.1 13.0 16 15

Toel Ptojecd Cotsh 165,482 57,649 223,131 78.5 275 106.0 26 123

- 22 -

Financing Plan

4.2 The proposed Bank loan of US$65.0 million equivalent would finance about61 percent of total project cost, or 69 percent of project cost exclusive of taxes and dutiesand vehicles, and fertilizers which would be purchased by GOI. GOI would finance aboutUS$35.8 million equivalent (34 percent of project cost) and the balance of US$5.2 millionequivalent (5 percent of project cost) would be fnanced by the beneficiaries contributingtheir labor for tree crop planting and potable water supply components. The projectfinancing plan is summarized in Table 4.2 below and detailed in Annex 11.

Table 4.2: PRoJECT FINANcING PLAN

Local Foreign TotalFunding Source Cost Cost Cost Percentage

US$ million

Beneficiaries 5.2 - 5.2 5%Government 33.5 2.3 35.8 34%Bank 39.8 25.2 65.0 61 %La

Total 78.5 27.5 106.0 100%

La About 69 percent of project costs, exclusive of taxes and duties and vehicles andfertilizers which GOI would finance.

Fnanbdng of Proposed Development Activities

4.3 Food Crops. As the majority of prospective participating farmers are poor,and in view of the difficulties experienced in previous operations in establishing a feasiblemechanism for providing farners with credit, the proposed introduction of technologicalpackages for food crops is likely to be inhibited by farmers' lack of funds to financeessential inputs (seeds, fertilizers, agro-chemicals, agricultural tools and mechanized landpreparation services). The required initial financing for adoption of the recommendedtechnological packages would be made available to the farmer groups as a grant.Fmancing requirements are estimated at Rp 256,000 (US$125 equivalent) per farm familyor a total of about Rp 7.7 billion (US$3.7 million) to meet the needs of about 30,000families Which would be assisted under the project. Grants would be provided on a one-time basis to each firnly established farmers' group as seed capital for one crop seasonon the basis of one ha per farmer after completion of the improved drainage infrastructureand would constitute a revolving fund to be administered by group members. Funds wouldbe lent by the farmers' groups to individual members mainly for the purpose of purchasingseasonal inputs and hiring draft animals or hand tractors for land preparation. Farmerswould repay the borrowed funds to group revolving funds following the harvest and saleof their crops. The proceeds would again be lent to the group members to financerequirements for the next crop season.

- 23 -

4.4 Tree Crops. The funding and cost recovery mechanisms for tree cropdevelopment for small farmers have not worked satisfactorily in the past due to thereluctance of banks to provide long-term loans to poor small farmers, due to theirunderstandable perception of high risks. The Government has discontinued theunsatisfactory system of risk-shared credit for smallholders through the state commercialbanks. In place of the failed banking system credit used in earlier projects, thesnmalholder program under the Tree Crops Smallholder Development Project (TCSDP,Loan 3464-IND) approved in 1992 is being financed through the development budget.Targeted poor participants receive a grant for the first year's inputs, and government creditfor maintenance costs in the subsequent immature period. The credit is to be administeredby the PMUs. After a major review of possible alternatives in early 1993, GOI hasconfirmed that it wishes to continue this cost recovery system, and review experienceduring 1996/97. The Loan Agreement for TCSDP provides hat the Borrower is toprovide credit for maintenance costs, for a maximum period of 12 years from treematurity, through the relevant unit of DGE in accordance with procedures detailed in theagreement (see Annex 6). Land titles are not required prior to granting credit, but whenland titles are issued, they are not to be released to the farmer until all credit obligationsare met. Further, the Borrower has established standardized amortization schedules forSmallholder Cost Recovery Agreements; procedures for a simplified system of accountingfor interest on such credits; records of amounts outstanding and due under SmallholderCost Recovery agreements; and modified procedures for cost recovery under prior loans,acceptable to the Bank. As under the TCSDP Loan, an assurance has been obtained fromGOI during negotiations that for the project's coconut development component, theGovernment, through the PMUs, would provide credit to farm families and administersmallholder cost recovery arrangements in accordance with the procedures agreed with theBank.

Procurement

4.5 General. Procurement under the project would be undertaken by terespective project implementing units under the guidance and control of their parentagencies at the national or provincial levels. Bulking or grouping of contacts acrossagencies would not be practical or possible, and has not been adopted. GOI would fundpurchases of vehicles and fertilizer (urea, TSP and MOP) from its own resources becauseunder GOI rules these items are not open for international compedtive bidding. Theseitems would be procured by GOI under its own rules in accordance with schedules agreedwith the Bank. An assurance to this effect has been obtained from GOI duringnegodations. Provision of vehicles and fertilizer required for the first project year wouldbe condWons of dibursement against civil works and agricultural inputs, respectively.

4.6 Civil Works. A total of 15 contracts (total cost US$36.5 million includingcontingencies) are envisaged for construction of drainage infrastructure, rural roads,bridges and jetties in 20 project schemes (Annex 2, Table 2). Of these, five contracts arein excess of Rp 5.0 billion (US$2.4 million), nine vary from Rp 1.2 billion (US$0.6million) to Rp 4.5 billion (US$2.2 million), and one is only Rp 0.4 billion (US$0.2million). Since the project schemes are widely dispersed, and civil works in each schemeconsist of a large number of small structures to be built by labor-intensive methods, the

- 24 -

proposed contracts are not expected to be of interest to international contractors, and wouldbe procured by local competitive bidding (LCB) procedures acceptable to the Bank. Thefive contracts, each larger than Rp 5.0 billion with aggregate base cost of Rp 31.3 billion(US$15.1 million or 53 percent of total) would be bid among contractors prequalified forthis purpose. Any international contractors interested in bidding for these contracts, wouldbe included if they meet the prequalification criteria. A standard bidding document,prepared by DGWRD on the lines of the Bank's Standard Bidding Document and agreedto by the Bank, would be used for all civil works procurement. The remaining civil worbpertaining to rural water supply (about US$10.2 million), houses, offices, hydrologicalstations and field research stations (about US$0.8 million) are minor in nature and widelydispersed. These works would be suitably packaged, usually on annual basis, andprocured in accordance with LCB procedures acceptable to the Bank.

4.7 Equipment and Agricultural Facilities. Hydrological equipment, officeequipment, and equipment and materials for agricultural research and extension, and treecrop development would be suitably packaged by each project implementing unit, generallyon an annal basis, and discussed and agreed with the Bank at the time of review of annualwork programs. Packages estimated to cost US$200,000 or more, except for coconut seednuts, would be procured following ICB procedures in accordance with Bank guidelines,and those costing less than US$200,000 would be procured after following LCBprocedures acceptable to the Bank to an aggregate value of US$8.9 million. Packagescosting less than US$50,000 each for minor equipment and materials with an aggregate.cost not to exceed US$500,000 could be purchased by local shopping. Coconut seed nuts(US$2.0 million) would be procured following LCB procedures. Labor for coconutplang (US$8.2 million) would be contracted directly. Land surveying and titling(US$1.0 million) would be undertaken by Government on force account. The Bank'sstandard bidding documents would be used for ICB and as a model for LCB. For bidcomparisons under ICB, local manufacturers would be allowed a 15 percent (of the c.i.f.price) margin of preference or the applicable customs duty, whichever is lower.

4.8 Training and Consulfing Services. All training activities would be carriedout by direct contracting, or within existing Government training facilities. Consultantproviding technical assistance (para. 3.22) would be selected after inviting proposals fromnational and international fms which would be short-listed by GOI, and acceptable to theBank. International firms would be required to associate with domestic firms of theirchoice. Other consulting services related to surveys and agricultural support are relativelysmall in size, or scheme specific, and would be suitable for national consultants. Allconsultants would be selected in accordance with the Bank's Guidelines, and engagedaccording to the Bank's Standard Conditions of Contract for Consultants; an assurce tothis effect has been obtained from GOI during negotiations.

4.9 Review of Procurement. The Bank would make a prior review of alldocuments related to the award of (a) civil works contracts, whose cost is estimated atUS$1.0 million or more; (b) all ICB contracts for equipment and materials estimated atUS$200,000 or more; and (c) all contracts for consultant firms valued at US$100,000 ormore and for individual consultants at US$50,000 or more. Prior review is expected tocover about 75 percent of aUl civil works and about 50 percent of equipment by value. For

- 25 -

consltants contracts, te review would include terms of reference, short list, letter ofinvitation, recommendation for award and fnal contract. TIe Bank would review all otherprocurment ex-post and at random.

4.10 Ihe procurement arrangements are summarized in Table 4.3.

Table 43: PROCURENT ARRANGEmE(US$ millon)

int'l LocalItem Competidve Competitive

Bidding Bidding Other N.B.F. Total

Civil Works 47.5 47.5(28.8) (28.8)

Vehicles l.Ua 1.1(0.0) (0-0)

Equipment 0.7 0.7 1.4(0.6) (0.6) (1.2)

Agricultural Facilities 10.2 9.7 S.Ua 25.0and Inputs (9.3) (5.7)k (0.0 (15.0)

Consultimg Services and Studies(a) plemenion Support 7.7 7.7

(7.7)Ld ~~(7.7Ib) sttion Cap. Building l0.5o (10.5)minel. Tranin} (10.5A Ld (10.0

(c) Studies 1.8 1.8(1.8)Ld (1.8)

Incr. Admin. Costs 5 OLa 5.0(0.0) (0.0)

Iner. O&M Costs 6.OLa 6.0(0.0) (0.0)

Toal 0.7 58.4 29.7 17.2 106.0(0.6) (38.7) (25.7) (0.0) (65.0)

Note: Figures in parenthesis are the respective amounts financed by Intenational Bank forReconstruction and Development.

/a Vehicles, fertlizer and administation and O&M costs will be financed by 001.a Includes labor for coconut planting to be contracted direcdy; purchase through local

shopping of plantig mtenals andhandtools (but excluding fertilizer); and ilsurveying and titling by Government agencies on force account.

/c Training activities (US$2.7 million) would be carried out by direct contracting orwithin existing Government training facilides.

d Consul would be selected after inviting proposals rom national and intemationalfirms which would be short-listed by GOI and acceptable to the Bank. Selection wfllbe in accordance with Bank guidelines.

- 26 -

Disbursements

4.11 All activities under the project are expected to be completed by March 31,2000, and the Loan closing date would be September 30, 2000. Disbursements from theLoan would be made for:

(a) 60 percent of expenditures on civil works;

(b) 100 percent of foreign expenditures (CIF) for directly imported equipmentand materials, 100 percent of local expenditures (ex-factory) for locallymanufactured equipment and materials, and 65 percent of expendiures onlocally procured items;

(c) 50 percent of expenditures on agricultural labor for coconut planting;

(d) 91 percent of expenditures on agricultural inputs (except for fertilizers); and

(e) 100 percent of expenditures on land titling, engineering and consultantsservices, studies and training.

4.12 Disbursements under the project would be made against Statement ofExpenditures (SOE) for contracts for works valued at less than US$1.0 million, goods andequipment valued at less than US$200,000, consultants services valued at less thanUS$100,000 for fms and US$50,000 for individuals, agricultural labor for coconutplanting, training, and for services for land titling, surveys, designs and supervision ofconstruction. Contracts disbursed under SOEs would be based on bid documents approvedby the Bank and disbursement for all other expenditures would be on the basis of fulldocumentation. Documentation for SOE expenditures would be retained by projectimplementing agencies and the Directorate General of Budget (Ministry of Finance) andbe made available for inspection by Bank supervision missions. Disbursement conditionsagainst expenditures on civil works, agricultural inputs and agricultural labor for coconutplandng, are detailed in paras. 3.16 and 4.5.

4.13 Special Account. To facilitate disbursements, a Special Account would beestablished in Bank Indonesia to be maintained by the Director General Budget in theMinistry of Finance (MOF). The Special Account would be maintained in US dollars withan initial deposit of US$2.0 million (equivalent to the average disbursements during a fourmonth period), and would be increased later, as necessary. The Special Account wouldbe for withdrawals, in all categories, relating to all foreign and local currency expendituresas long as the withdrawals do not substantially deplete the balance in the Special Account.The Government would request once per month replenishment of the Special Account orif its balance falls below 80 percent of the initial deposit, whichever occurs first.

Accounts and Audits

4.14 Project accounting and auditing arrangements under the proposed projectwould be similar to those established under the ongoing Provincial Irrigated Agriculture

-27 -

Developmen Project, Loan 3302-ID. Each project executng agency would establish andmainin adequate and separate acwunts from the beginning of project imple tion,

gInudn accounts relating to smaliholder credit. To failitate audit of project accounts,DGWRD, the project lead agency, would collect and consolidate account records of allImplementn agencies it a single document Assn ces have been obtained from GOIduring negotiaons that (a) all project accounts including schedules of expendituresclaimed under SOE procedures and usage of the Special Account would be audiedannually by the Government Audi Agency (BPKP), or other suitably qualified auditorsacceptable to the Bank; and (b) audit reports of project accourts, SOE and Special Accountwould be submitted to the Bank within nine moDnts of each Government fiscal year.

4.15 The implemg agencies, i.e., DGWRD, DGFCH, DGE and AARD,would carry out technical audits of project invesments. The terms of reference for theseadi would be prepared, and o ional ange s proposed, by GOI not latertm June 1, 1995. The tecical dts, acceptable to the Bank, would be carried outevery twelve months duriAg the implemeion of the project, commencing not later thanApril 1, 1996, and copies of the audit reports would be fuumished to the Bank forcomments not later than October 1, 1996. Assrnces to this effect have been obtainedfrom 001 during negotaons.

- 28 -

S. ORGANIZATION, MANAGEMENTAN IMPLEM[ENTAION

Project Organization and Management

5.1 The Directorate General of Water Resource Development (DGWRD) in theMinistry of Public Works, through its Directorate of Swamps (DOS), would be the projectlead agency and would be responsible for the development/rehabilitation of drainagesystems and fur the improvement of water supply and rural infrastructure. Within theMinistry of Agriculture, the Directorate General of Food Crops and Horticulture (DGFCH)would be responsible for the introduction of new technological packages and extensionservices, the Agency for Agricultural Research and Development (AARD) for adaptiveresearch activities and the Directorate General of Estates (DGE) for coconut development.The National Land Agency (BPN) would be responsible for land survey and certificationactivities while the Directorate General of Forestry Protection and Nature Conservation(DGPHPA), in the Ministry of Forestry, would be responsible for implementation of theCoastal Land Use Management component. These agencies, except for DGE, would carryout their responsibilities through their respective existing services at the provincial level(Dinas). The Tidal Land Irrigation Project (P3S) and the Swamp Area DevelopmentProject (P2DR)-representatives of DOS at the provincial level for the development oftdal and non-tidal swamps, respectively-would be responsible for the development/rehailitation of drainage systems and for the improvement of roads and jetties, andpotable water supply facilities (the latter with technical support from Cipta Karya and localNGOs). The Provincial Agriculture Services (PRAS) would be responsible for food cropdevelopment; PHPA in Jambi for the Coastal Land Use Management activities; theprovincial offices of BPN for land survey and certification; and Provincial WaterResources Services (PWRS) for O&M of drainage infrastructure. Liaison Officesestablished by DGE in each of the three provinces would manage tree crop developmentactivities. Each agency would appoint a Project Manager (PIMPRO) at the provincial levelto manage the project activities for which it would be responsible.

5.2 Each agency would be responsible for the planning, design andimplementation of its work program. To ensure successful project implementation,however, project activities would be coordinated at two levels. At the provincial level,the BAPPEDA would coordinate all project activities. BAPPEDA would be responsiblefor the preparation of coordinated annual work programs combining the activities of thevarious agencies. The coordinated work programs would form the basis for preparationof the project's annual budgets by respective agencies. A project coordination secretaiwould be established under BAPPEDA in each province to provide logistic support and

- 29 -

to manage day-to-day project coordination activities. Each secretariat would comprise twoto three experienced BAPPEDA staff and one or two consultants with proven experiencein the execution of multi-sectoral projects.

5.3 At the central Government level BAPPENAS would coordinate the activitiesof central GOI agencies and oversee the implementation of project activities in the threeprovinces. BAPPENAS would be supported by a coordination secretariat based inDGWRD. The secretariat would comprise two regular staff, seconded full-time byDGWRD and DGFCH, and two consultants (one international and one national). Thesecretariat would (a) consolidate agency and provincial work plans into one overall workplan; (b) ensure consistency in work planning, budgeting and reporting across agencies andprovinces; and (c) monitor the project's implementation progress on the basis of progressreports provided by the respective provinces and agencies.

Project Monitoring

5.4 Repordng. The project coordination units at the provincial level wouldprepare semi-annual implementation performance reports on all project activities in eachprovince. These reports would be based on the progress reports produced by the variousagencies on their respective components. BAPPENAS would process the provincialprogress reports into single semi-annual progress reports ending March and Septembereach year which would be submitted to the Bark within six weeks after the end of the.reporting period. Each report would include a brief description of actual achievements ofthe various components compared with the work plan, expenditures incurred, status ofprocurement actions, etc., and reasons for differences between actual achievements andthe work plan. Reports related to the coconut credit component would be in the formatagreed, giving particular emphasis to credit recovery performance.

5.5 Annual Implementation Review. Project implementation would bereviewed annually so that findings can be reflected in the Government's budgetary process.The review would take place concurrent with the Bank's regular supervision mission. Thisarrangement would provide the flexibility to: (a) amend provincial programs to reflectperformance during the previous year; (b) amend individual work programs reflectingchanges in priorities between components; and (c) incorporate any lessons learned in thecourse of the previous year. The first annual implementation review would take placearound October 1994 to review progress of the project's start-up activities and discuss adraft work program for the following year. A supervision plan for the project is at Annex13.

Budget Prucedures

5.6 Project activities would be financed in accordance with existing GOIprocedures for financing Bank-assisted projects. While funds for project activities wouldbe provided under the budgets of concerned sector ministries/agencies at the national level,budget allocations for project activities would be based on coordinated annual workprograms agreed among project implementation agencies and BAPPEDA at the provinciallevel. The budgeting process under the proposed project would comprise the following

- 30 -

steps: (a) PIMPROs appointed by each agency would prepare in June of each year, draftwork programs detailing project activities to be carried out during the following fiscalyear; (b) the BAPPEDAs would review the proposed work programs and preparecoordinated work plans and draft budgets; (c) the coordinated work plans and draft budgetswould be submitted to BAPPENAS and the concerned ministries/agencies at the nationallevel in August for incorporation in their annual budget proposals; (d) the coordinatedwork plans and cost estimates would be forwarded to the Bank by September 30 of eachyear for review; and (e) the final budget proposals based on the agreed work plan wouldbe forwarded to the Bank before December 31 of each project year. The work plans andcost estimates to be sent to the Bank for review would include, among others, (i) thedesigns and total cost estimates for schemes where construction is scheduled to start duringthe year, and (ii) proposed budget allocations for O&M of all water control works in theschemes included in the project. To ensure that adequate funds would be provided forplanned project activities, assurances have been obtained from GOI at negotiations that(a) GOI would submit to the Bank for its review and comments: (i) not later thanSeptember 30 each year, a coordinated work program and cost estimates for the followingfiscal year; and (ii) by December 31 each year, coordinated budget proposals for theprovincial work programs agreed with the Bank; and (b) not later than July 1 in each year,commencing July 1, 1995, satisfactory evidence would be submitted to the Bank eiat thebudgetary allocations for O&M of existing water control works in the project schemes forthe prior fiscal year have been substantially expended.

- 31 -

6. PRODUCTION, TING,FAM INCOM AN COST RECOVERY

Agricultural Production

6.1 Cropping Intensities. The project consists of about twenty discrete schemesspread over three provinces with substantial differences in climatic, soil and hydrologicalconditions. The investments and other actions by the project would contribute to increasedagricultural production. Land use, cropping patterns and intensities, crop yields andproduction for the present situation and the 'future without' and 'future with projectimplementation' have been estimated for each scheme. Future with project croppingintensities are expected to average about 120 percent - 140 percent over the total cultivedara, as opposed to 65 percent -120 percent at present. Cropping patterns would inchldeincreased dry season cropping, including rice and secondary crops like soybeans. Iheincreased cropping intensities and introduction of technologies would be achieved assuinga considerable expansion of the use of mechanized power, including animal traction andtwo-wheel tractors.

6.2 Crop Yields. Average present yields of wetland rice, the dominant cropin the swamps, are only about 1.0 ton/ha. Without change in technology ("fiture withoutproject") paddy yields may increase to about 1.4 ton/ha due to better farm husbadrypractices. "With project" paddy yields are expected to increase substanially due to theproject interventions, i.e. better water control and improved agricultural support services.Depending on soil and hydrological site conditions, future wet season paddy yields areexpected to range from 2.5 ton/ha to 3.5 ton/ha. In schemes where good qualiy tidalwater is available in the dry season, a yield of 2.5 ton/ha has been assumed for a dryseason wetand rice crop. Soybean yields are projected to increase from between 0.6ton/ha and 0.8 ton/ha at present to about 1.2 ton/ha with the project. Traditional purestand coconuts yield at present about 0.4 ton/ha of copra. The copra yield is expected toincrease to about 1.5 ton/ha as a result of improved water management and fertilizerapplications and to about 3.4 ton/ha when using hybrid varieties.

Marksq

6.3 The incremental production generated by the project is not expected to causeany marketing problems. A significant portion of the increased food crop productionwould be consumed by the producers or in the vicinity of fte scheme areas, dtusimproving nutrtional standards. Marketable surplus is expected to be sold to privae

- 32 -

traders or millers which operate in all the villages. The incremental production of frehnuts or copra, would be sold to private traders.

Farm Incomes

6.4 Crop Models. The financial analysis was carried out on the basis of one-hectare crop models representing changes in production resulting from the projectinvestments and agricultura follow-up services. It also has been assumed that over timethe famers themselves would adopt mechanized cropping practices (aimal traction, smalltractors) to relieve existing or pending labor shortages that constrain expansion of thecropped area. The results of the analysis, summarized in Table 6.1 below, show ta thetechnical changes are financially attractive.

Table 6.1: NET CROP INCOME PER HA (after labor costs)

Future FutureWithout With

Present Project Project IncreaseCrop Rp 'OOOh X

Wet-season rice:Fully-hand operated:

High potal 35 170 375 120Medim potential 35 170 340 100Low potenta 35 170 275 65Using animal traction:High potential - - 575 240

Medium poteti - - 482 18SLow pot - - 395 135

Dry-season rice:Using animal traction - - 385

Dry-seaon soybean:

Fully-hand operated 30 105 415 295Using animal taion - - 460 340

Traditonal pure coconut 135 140 405 165Hybrid coconut - - 780 -

6.5 Farm Budgets. On the basis of the one-ha crop models, indicatie farmmodels were prepared for six represenaive schemes in order to examine the pooetl

- 33 -

impact of the project on farm incomes and family labor use. Farm sizes have been takenas the average for each area. Cropping patterns are based on land use patterns for rice,secondary food crops (palawija) and coconut in each area. The results, sunmarized inTable 6.2 below, indicate that overall family and labor incomes would increasesignificantly as a result of farmers adopting the changes in land use and cropping practices.Another important indication of the strong financial incentives provided by the project arethe high incomes for incremental family labor, compared with the existing casual wage ofRp 3,500/day and the current average famnily income of about Rp 4,000/day.

Table 6.2: SUmmARY INDICATORS FOR FARm BuDGETs(Rp '000/ha for value data)

Netlawme per nmew Prem

_____ _ FainilY Day of Income per Valus ofltv7%} a~Fmilvlcm laor Inreenal_I

Future Future P ui1o FPy DmlayFarm Prsn With Present W6ith Pnt it of abor Incom

Rantau Ruau (2 ha) 95 130 525 2,185 4.1 7.6 9.0 10,820

KualaCinakul(2 ha) 100 125 525 1,625 4.8 9.7 16.6 6,570

Rasau Jaya (2 ha) 115 140 570 2,145 4.6 9.0 11.9 9,925

KapuasKecHl(2 ha) 103 130 570 1,940 4.1 8.1 11.3 8,725

Kapuasecil m (2 ha) 120 130 600 1,630 4.6 8.2 12.1 5,650

SiakKii (2.25 ha) 65 129 415 2,100 3.9 8.9 11.3 11,260

6.6 Labor Use. For all six farm models requirements and availability of laborwere analyzed on a monthly and gender basis. Although total days of labor available perannum exceeds total annual labor requirements, seasonal peaks in requirements and genderspecificity for labor activities result in short-term shortages of family labor. About 26days of the average 100 incremental days of labor requirement would have to be met fromhired labor. Most of this additional hired labor requirement would be for female labor forcrop maintenance. Growth in demand for female labor would probably help reduce thecurrent disparity of about Rp 500 per day paid to women.

Cost Recovery

6.7 Drainage Infsructure. The Government's policy regarding irrigationO&M funding and cost recovery has been developed to ensure continuous operation andmaintenance of the schemes through fair and equitable contributions by the beneficiaries.The principles underlying this policy also apply to swamp schemes. However, extensionof the policy to swamp schemes should be planned very carefully, taking into account thefollowing two factors. First, the Irrigation Service Fee (ISF) collection system is still inits infancy and more experience is needed before a similar system can be introducedconfidently in the swamp schemes. Second, farmers in the swamp schemes are among thecountry's poorest and it therefore is advisable to proceed cautiously. An asswuwe hasbeen obtained from GOI during negotiations that a study of options for the introduction of

-34-

a drabiage fee in swamp schemes would be completed by June 30, 1998. The study wouldtake into account further experiences with the implementation of the 1SF system as wellas improvements in fann incomes of the swamp scheme beneficiaries due to the projectinvestments.

6.8 In the project schemes located in Jambi and Riau Provinces the coLectionof the land and property tax (PBB), at present imposed at the rate of 0.1 percent of thevalue of the land, is over 50 percent of the assessed amounts. However, in the WestKalimantan schemes the PBB has as yet not been collected. As all land owners in theproject schemes stand to benefit by the project, an assurance has been obtained from GOIduring negotiations that the PBB would be collected in all project schemes from April 1,1996.

6.9 Tree Crop Plantaions. Cost recovery arrangements for coconut plantaionsunder this project would be the same as under TCSDP (Loan 3464-IND). An asswncehas been obtained from GOI during negotiations that it would in consultation with theBank, review from time to time the level of credit repayments to be made by smalholdersunder the project, taking into account the cash flows of such smallholders; and, thereafter,make adjusments to such payments as agreed with the Bank.

- 35 -

7. PROJECT BENEFI AND JUSTIFICATION

Bweneits

7.1 At full development, incremental production from the project would reachabout 65,000 tons of paddy, 30,000 tons of cassava, 6,000 tons of soybeans, 1,500 tonsof maize and 48,000 tons of copra. Incremental production is based on assumptionsdiscussed in Chapter 6. The project would benefit some 32,000 families with averageincomes below Rp 600,000 (US$300) per annum. As a result of the project, averageincomes from farming would increase to about Rp 1.6 million to Rp 2.2 million (aboutUS$780 to US$1,070) per family. As such, the project would represent an important stepin implementing GOI's strategy for al'. -'iating rural poverty in previously settled swampareas. Also, the project would assist GOI in developing new approaches for managing itscoastal zones and ensuring an environmentally sound approach to further development insettled swamp areas.

Economic Analysis

7.2 Costs. Project costs were adjusted to exclude allowances for pricecontingencies, taxes and duties. Costs for the agricultural research, potable water supply,and coastal zone land use management components were excluded because theseexpenditures would generate benefits beyond those directly attributable to agriculturalproduction. Incremental O&M costs have been limited to those that can be direcdyattributed to project activities, i.e. flushing of drains and incremental terary canalmaintenance.

7.3 Benefits. Project benefits are based on six average area crop models, asdiscussed in Chapter 6. In the "without project" situation, paddy yields are assumed togrow at 1.5 percent per annum for another ten years. The yields of other crops areassumed to remain constant without the project. The project investment period has beentaken as five years, with land assumed to transfer from existing to new technologies theyear after drainage and investment works in the scheme have been completed. Farmersare assumed to require five years to reach full project development after they havetransferred to the new technology. The project analysis was carried over a 30 year period.With improved water control the cultivated area in the selected schemes increases fromabout 46,000 ha to 55,000 ha. For the purpose of this analysis it has been assumedconservatively that improved, more intensive cropping practices would be adopted on about45,000 of the 55,000 ha. In addition the project would support planting of about 8,000ha of hybrid coconut in areas bordering the selected schemes.

- 36 -

7.4 Prices. Economic farmgate prices for traded outputs and fertilizers werecalculated on the basis of Bank's February 1993 commodity price forecasts. Financialprices were assumed to represent opportunity costs for the other commodities. Becauseof labor scarcity reported in all project areas, incremental labor use was valued at thefinancial wage rates which differ by gender and time of the year.

7.5 Results of the Analysis. The proposed project is expected to yield aninternal economic rate of return (ERR) of 15 percent. Sensitivity analysis, on the basisof switching values, shows that the result is relatively sensitive to changes in benefits andcosts, as shown in the following switching values (assumed opportnity cost of capital is10 percent):

Table 7.1: SENvrrITY ANALYSIS

Component Switching Value

ARl benefits - 22%Production costs + 50%Variable investment cost +126%Project-level investment cost +172%All costs + 28%

7.6 A separate economic analysis was made for each swamp scheme and for thecoconut developments in each of the three provinces. On the cost side the analysis doesnot include the project overhead costs, including consultancies, in view of the conceptualdifficulty of allocating such costs between schemes. For the swamp schemes the ERRsrange between 8 percent and 48 percent. For the coconut schemes the range is 13 percentto 15 percent (see Annex 12 for details).

Project Risks and Uncertainties

7.7 The main potential project risks include: (a) lack of integration ofinfrastructure improvements with agricultural development activities, causing delays inachieving the project's benefits; (b) slow progress in the farmers' adoption of the proposedtechnological improvements, resulting in lower incremental benefits and therefore a lowerERR; and (c) lapses in O&M of water management infrastructure, compromising itssustainability. With a focus on inter-agency coordination, provision of improvedagricultural support services (adaptive research, extension and input financing), promotingfarmer groups' participation in project activities and O&M, and improved O&M of thewater control inftrasucture, the project has been designed to minimize these risks.

- 37 -

B. AGREEMIENTS REACHED AND RECOAON

Assurances

8.1 During negotiations assurances have been obtained from Govenfment that:

(a) the schemes to be supported by the project would be selected in accordancewith criteria agreed with the Bank (para. 3.6 and Annex 1);

(b) in all scheme areas farmer groups would be formed, and the ability of thosegroups to manage a revolving fund ascertained, before the input packagesare made available to the farmers in those areas (para. 3.12);

(c) agreed criteria (Annex 6, Attachment 1) for screening participants in thecoconut planting program would be followed, and records kept of thescreening process and of the selected participants (para. 3.14);

(d) project management units (PMU) would be established in the project areasfor the planting of coconuts (para. 3.15);

(e) the cadastral and land use surveys would be completed during the year priorto planting and the titles issued to the participating coconut growers duringthe year of planting (para. 3.16);

(t) guidelines for the construction of the roads would be prepared by DGWRDin consulation with Bina Marga and sent to the Bank for comment byMarch 31, 1995 (para. 3.17);

(g) potable water supply facilities would be constructed using a communitybased approach, and the beneficiaries of tiese facilities would contribute atleast 10 percent of the value of the facilities in the form of labor, or anyother muually agreeable form of contribution, and fully cover the O&Mcosts of the facilities (para. 3.18);

(h) the consultants would be employed by January 15, 1995 (para. 3.22);

(i) for the tree crop development component the PMUs would provide creditto farm families and administer smallholder cost recovery arrangements inaccordamce with the procedures agreed with the Bank (para 4.4);

- 38 -

() vehicles and fertilizer required for the project would be provided by GOIunder a schedule agreed with the Bank (para. 4.5);

(k) all consultants would be selected in accordance with the Bank's Guidelines,and engaged according to the Banks's Standard Conditions of Contract forConsultants (para. 4.8);

(1) GOI and its agencies would comply with the reporting and auditingrequirements as specified in para. 4.14;

(m) GOI would carry out, every twelve months starting April 1, 1996, technicalaudits acceptable to the Bank, and send copies of the audit reports to fteBank for comments, commencing not later than October 1, 1996; to thatend GOI would submit to the Bank for review and comments not later taJune 1, 1995, draft terms of reference and proposed organizationalarrangements for the performance of technical audits (para. 4.15);

(n) GOI would submit to the Bank for its review and comments: (i) not laterthan September 30 each year, a coordinated work program and costestimates for the project for the following fiscal year; and (ii) by December31 each year, coordinated budget proposals for the agreed provincial workprograms (para. 5.6);

(o) satisfactory evidence would be submitted by July 1 of each year,commencing July 1, 1995, that the budgetary allocations for O&M ofexsting water control works in the project schemes for the prior fiscal yearhave been substatally expended (para. 5.6);

(p) a study of options for the introduction of a drainage fee in swamp schemeswould be completed by June 30, 1998 (para. 6.7);

(q) land and property tax (PBB) would be collected in all project schemes fromApril 1, 1996 (pam. 6.8); and

(r) the level of credit repayments to be made by the coconut growers under fteproject would be reviewed and adjusted from time to time, in consultationwith the Bank (para. 6.9).

Coditions of Disbursement

8.2 During negotiations Government's agreement has been obtained to thefollowing disbursement conditions:

(a) completion of the previous year's cadastral surveys would be a condition ofdisbursemet during the following year against expenditures on agriculturallabor for coconut planting (para. 3.16); and

-39 -

(b) provision of vehicles and fertilizer required for the first project year wouldbe conditions of disbursement against civil works ad agricultural inputs,respectively (para. 4.5).

8.3 Subject to the above reemn and conditions, tie project woud besuiable for a loan of US$65.0 million equivalent to the Republic of Indoesia for 20years, including a grace period of 5 years, at the Bank's standard variable inres ro.

-41- ANNEX I

INEGRATE SW DEVELO PROJECT

CRIEIA FOR SELECION OF SWAMP SCHEMES

1. All swamp schemes to be improved under the project must satsfy tbefollowing criteria:

(a) the schemes must be existing settled schemes as the project would not providefor development of new land and settlement of additional people;

(b) the technical, environnental and economic aspects of the proposed works forali schemes have been reviewed and found to be sound, in particular withregard to hydro-topography and suitability of soils for cropping;

(c) all proposed improvement works are necessary and have been endorsed by thecommunity of intended beneficiaries and the local authorities;

(d) the average estmated cost (in 1993 prices) of civil works for drainage,irrigation and flood control would not exceed Rp 1.5 million (US$723equivalent) per cultivable ha for each individual scheme, unless the ERR ofthe direct investment for works for such individual scheme is estimated at12 percent or more; and

(e) beneficiaries would be willing to organize themselves in water usersassociations to facilite O&M of tertiary canals and of field channels.

- 42 - ANNEX 1Table 1

iNrTEGRATED SWA DEVELOP PROJECT

PME AREA

Cultivated CulitivatedGross Area Area Without Area With Houholds

Province/Scheme (ha) Project (ha) Project (ha) (Number)

JAMBI

1. RantauRasau 6,800 ) 8,100 ) 8,200 4,4702. SimpangPuding 2,300 ) ) 747

3. Pamusian 4,100 ) 7,865 ) 10,240 1,4374. Lambur 6,440 ) ) 536

5. Dendag I& H 6,500 3,290 4,900 1,936

Subtotad 26,140 19,255 23,340 9,126

RTAU

1. Siak Kri A, B, C, & D 8,000 3,600 4,400 2,0522. Kisla Cinakul 2,715 395 1,115 7563. TelukKiambang 1,390 1,200 1,200 9064. Delta Reteh 7,000 1,524 3,974 1,487

Subtotal 19,105 6,719 10,689 5.201

WVES KMAT

1. Kaops Kecil m&M 6,700 4,600 4,700 7,OOLA2. Pinag Luar 2,200 700 700 4543. Rsau Jaya 7,520 4,640 4,640 2,7264. Sei Kakp 3,300 1,980 2,250 /b5. Sei Bulan 1,390 590 590 3116. Olak Olak Kubu 2,350 1,750 1,750 6457. Air Putih 2,420 1,900 1,900 3918. Jangka I 1,960 858 1,170 2929. Arus Deas 635 300 300 14310. Sei Nipah 2,600 2,200 2,200 92611. Dess Kubu 1,750 875 875 259

Subtotd 32,825 20,393 21,075 13,197

TOTAL 78,070 46,367 S5,104 27,524

La Including Sei Kakp./b Included in Kapuas Kecil 11 and m.

-43 - ANNEX 2

ENNESIA

INTEGRTED SWAMPS DEVELOPMT PROJECT

DRAINAGE S mucl s, ROAD6 AmD JE S

Gmeral

1. 'Me project's civil works would consist of improving and upgrading drainageand other rural Inatructre in 20 exisng swamp development schemes, covering a grossarea of about 78,000 ha, in the Provinces of Jambi (5 schemes), Riau (4), and WestKalnntn (11). Drainage infrastructure % )rks would include: (a) strengtn ofexistig and contruction of new flood protection dikes, (b) improvement of navigation,primary and secondary drainage canals; and (c) repair of existing and construction of newwaer control structures. Other rural inftucture works would consist of: (a) asphaltingof exit rural trs and roads, and construction of new roads; (b) rehabilitation ofexisting and construction of new bridges on nrual roads; and (c) rehabilitation of existingand constuction of new jetties. Gross area under these schemes, cultivated area (withoutand with project), and household numbers are given in Annex 1, Table 1. Details onexisting status of infrastuctre in the schemes, and proposed project works are givenbelow.

Drai Infscture

2. Est Siuation. ITe five schmes in Jambi Province are located about80 km north east of Jambi city, in the delta of Berbak and Batanghari rivers. In almostall scheme areas, amnua flooding of low-lying areas persists. Flooding of some parts ofthe Rantau Rasau, Simpang Puding and Pamusiran schemes is severe. In these threeschemes capacity of the exisdng drainage infrastructure is satisfactory. In Lambur andDendang I and II schemes the drainage canals are generally narrow and shallow and cannotcarry additional dbcharges. In Simpang Puding, Pamusiran and Dendang I and I nowater control strucues exist in the canals. In Rantau Rasau a few timber flap gates andconcrete sluice gate structures exist, and on some of the secondary canals a small mmberof tidmber stoplog strucures have been built. Generally, the existing structures have notbeen properly used and, as a result, reduced water circulation has caused acidity problemsin this area. Some of the timber strucres have developed leaks due to piping.

3. The schemes in RIau Province are located in two different areas: Siak, about90 km north from Pekanbaru, and Indragiri, about 210 kn south east of Pekanbaru. TheSiak Kiri scheme, blocks A,B,C, and D, is located on the left bank of the Siak river. Partof this area gets flooded annually and most drainage canals in Block A are clogged withvegetation. A small nm ber of concrete stoplogs and sluice gate structures exist but theseare not in proper working order due to design deficiencies or maintenance problems. TheIndragiri area, located on both banks of the Indragiri river, contains several schemes of

- 44 - ANNEX 2

which three (Kuala Cinaku II, Teluk Kiambang, and Delta Reteh) are included in theproject. Parts c. Kuala Cinku II and Teluk Kiambang are flooded annually. Mostdrainage canals are in good condition with sufficient capacity. In Delta Reteh thenavigation canal is clogged. There are no control structures in Kuala Cinaku II and DeltaReteh. In Teluk Kiambang a few concrete sluice gate structures exist but these are not inworking order.

4. West Kalmantan schemes are located in two areas: the western area, locatedwest of Pontianak, and the southern area, which lies to the south east of Pontianak. Thewestrn area consists of inland swamps and includes Kapuas Kecil II and III and Sei Kakap(consisting of Betutu and Kalinas) schemes. The southern area, consisting of tidalswamps, contains nine schemes (Pinang Luar, Rasau Jaya, Sei Bulan, Olak Olak Kubu,Air Putih, Jangkang I, Arus Deras, Sei Nipah, and Desa Kubu). In Kapuas Kecil II andIII, Sei Kakap, Pinmg Luar, Arus Deras, and Desa Kubu flood protection dikes exist butpart of these areas still are flooded, either because the dikes are breached at severallocations, or because they are not high enough. In Sei Bulan, Olak Olak Kubu, and SeiNipah substantial flooding is experienced every year. In Air Putih and Jangkang I noflooding is reported. In all schemes the condition of the drainage canals is generallysatisfactory and their capacity is adequate. In Rasau Jaya, Olak Olak Kubu and ArusDeras timber stoplog strucures exist but some are not in working order due to badmaintenance and piping/leakage problems. In Kapuas Kecil, Rasau Jaya and Sei Nipahthere are a few flap gate and sluice gate structures, some of which are not in working.order. In Pinang Luar, Sei Bulan, Air Putih, Jangkang I, and Desa Kubu there are nocotrol structures at all.

5. Proposed Project Works. In the Rantau Rasau, Simpang Puding andDendang I and II schemes in Jambi Province, new dikes would be constructed to protectthe flood affected areas. In Pamusiran and Lambur schemes flooding would be relievedby clearing a clogged stretch of Simbur Naik river. In Lambur and Dendang I and IIdrainage canals would be widened and deepened to increase their capacity. In Panusirana new main drain would be excavated and main canals extended to outfall into this drain.The existing timber stoplog structures in Rantau Rasau and Lambur schemes would berehabilkated, where feasible, or replaced. New stoplog structures would be constructedin those parts of the schemes where they do not exist. In all five schemes new sluice gateand flap gate structures would be added at strategic locations to provide adequate waterlevel control capability in the drainage canals serving the scheme areas.

6. In Siak Kiri, Kuala Cinaku II and Teluk Kiambang schemes of Riau Provincenew dikes would be constructed to protect flood affected lands. In Siak Kiri a new maindrain would be added to relieve the area of flood spills from the surrounding rivers andthe drainage canals would be cleaned. Most existing drainage canals in the four schemeshave adequate capacity and are in good condition. A few canals need to be extended orimproved. In Delta Reteh the Enok river channel would be declogged and improved. Newstoplog structures would be added on the secondary canals of Delta Reteh and KualaCinaku I schemes. In Siak Kiri and Teluk Kiambang schemes the existing stoplogstructures would be rehabilitated, where feasible, and new structures would be added. Inall four schemes sluice gate or flap gate structures would be added, where necessary, to

-45- ANNEX 2

provide adequate water level control capability in the drainage canals serving the schemeareas.

7. In Kapuas Kecil, Sel Kakap and Arus Deras schemes in West Kal tan theextng dikes would be strengthened and raised where necessary. in Sei Bulan, Olak OlakKubu and Sei Nipah new dikes would be constructed to protect the scheme areas fromextrnal flooding. In Pinang Luar, Olak Olak Kubu, Jangkang I, Sei Nipah, and DesaKubu either the existing canals would be extended or some new canals would beexcavated. Existing water control structures would be rehabilitated where feasible, andnew ones constructed at suitable locations, to adequately control water levels in thedrainage canals serving the scheme areas.

Hydrological Network

8. In Jambi project area there are eight daily rainfall stations, six automaticrainfall recorder stations and six automatic water level recorder (AWLR) stations.Mainteance of these stations is not satisfactory and the reliability of data collected fromhese stations is questionable. To supplement the existing network for purposes of theproject, two new daily rainfall stations, two additional rainfall gauges and five newAWLRs would be provided under the project.

9. In Riau project area only one rainfall station is operating in the Siak area andere are no AWLRs. In the Indragiri area there are no AWLRs although three sheters

for AWLRS exist. Some piezometers also exist in this area for observing ground waterlevels. Under the project four new daily rainfall stations, one new automatic rainfallrecorder and five new AWLRs would be added.

10. In West KaClam project area there are fourteen rainfall stations, fourautomaic rainfall recorders and eight AWLRs. The climatological station at Pondanakairport also serves the project area. Under the project, two new daily rainfall stations, oneautomatic rainfall recorder, and five new AWLRs would be provided.

11. For more reliable data collection and improved maintenance of the network,the project would provide, in all three provinces, transport facilities and training for dataobservers and their supervising officials (Jurus and Pengamats). Details of civil works andequipment to be provided under the project are in Table 1 of this Annex.

Rural Roads and Navigation Facaities

12. General. The scheme areas within each province are generally well-connected with each other and with the hinterland through the river navigation system.Within each scheme a number of single-lane earth roads exist but these become impassableduring the wet season. In some areas a few asphalted single-lane roads or motorcycletracks also exist, some of which need rehabilitation. Most bridges in the scheme areas arewooden; some of ese need rehabilitation or reconstruction. Because of the importanceof river navigation, jeties play a prominent role. Several existing jettes needreabilitation, and a few need to be added.

-46 - ANNEX 2

13. Rural Roads and Bridges. Rantau Rasau, Simpang Puding, Pamusiran, andLambur scheme areas in Jambi are already equipped with an acceptable asphalted and earthroad network and do not require additional ro.ds. However, there are no asphalted roadsin Dendang I and II area and only a few internal earth roads exist. Under the project,15.1 km of intemal roads (width 3.0 m) would be asphalted and five exisdng woodenbridges would be rehabilitated in this area.

14. In Siak Kiri area in Riau Province a number of earth roads exist which servethe intenal needs. The project would asphalt the main earth road from Buatan (in BlockC), in the south, to the proposed jetty on Siak river in Block A, to the north. It wouldalso comect with the existing jetty in Block C. Total length of this 3.0 m wide roadwould be 25.5 kn. Two existing wooden bridges on this road would be replaced byconcrete bridges for carrying heavier loads. In dragiri area the main connectng road(length 10.0 kIn) between Blocks C and D of Kuala Cinaku II would be asphalted and onebridge in this reach would be rehabilitated.

15. The western area (Kapuas Kecil and Sei Kakap schemes) in West Kalmatanis well served by asphalted roads including the Pontianak-Kakap road; no improvementsare needed. In the southern area a number of new roads would be constructed and theexisting earth roads would be asphalted with a view to interconnect the scheme areas:(a) the Rasu Jaya and Sei Bulan schemes, both on the northern bank of the Punggur Besarriver, would be connected through a 14.7 km asphalted road; and (b) a loop road.(58.2 kin) along the southern bank of the river would interconnect Sei Nipah, Arus Deras,Pinang Luar, Phnang Dalam (not included in this project) and Air Putih schemes. Inaddition, existing internal roads would be improved or new roads constructed in Jangkang1, Olak Olak Kubu, and Desa Kubu schemes. Four bridges would be rehabiltated orconstucted in connection with these roads.

16. Navigaion Facities. In Simpang Puding scheme in Jambi the jetty atPuding (connected to the asphalted road network) is in an almost collapsed state due toriver soour; this jetty (length 50 m) would be reconstructed under the project. A new jetty(about 16.0 m by 6.5 m) would be constructed on Batanghari river in Dendang I area, ascufrently no jetties exist to serve Dendang I and II areas.

17. In Siak Kirl scheme in Riau the existng jetty at Block C would be extendedso that it can handle increased traffic after the project. A new jetty would be added on theSiak river in Block A, at the end of the south-north asphalted road. No additional facilitiesare needed in the Indragiri area.

18. In the western area of West Kalmanan the Kakap jetty would be extendedto a length of 50 m; this jetty is the main transfer point between land and water transportin this area. The banks of the Jeruju river would be protected against erosion. In thesouthern area, a new jetty would be constructed in Sei Nipah area to replace the existngjetty, which is nearly collapsed. No other facilities are envisaged in other schemes of ftisarea, except for minor repairs to the jetties at Sei Bulan, Arus Deras, Air Putih, and DesaKubu for which a lump sum provision has been made.

-47- ANNE 2

Procurement Of Civi works

19. Table 2 lists 15 procurement contracts proposed for drainage infratructure,roads and jetties for the project schemes. Of these, four contracts would be in Jambi, fourin Riau and seven in West Kalimantan.

-48- ANNEX 2Table 1

ADONESIA

INTREGATED SWAM DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

HYDROLGJCAL CVIL WORKS AND EQUIMENT

Province/ Number UnitType of Works and Equipment Reqd. Cost Total Cost(Rp million) (lp million)

Jambi1. Civil Works

AWLR platform 5 10.0 50.02. Equipment

AWLR equipment S 10.0 15.0Discharg!e kit 1 15.0 15.0Rainfall gauge 4 0.7 2.8Miscellaneous - amount 17.0

Subtotal Equipment 84.8Riau1. Civil Works

AWLR platform 6 8.0 48.02. Equipment

AwLR equpment 5 10.0 50.0Discharge kit 1 15.0 15.0RainhilM gauge 4 0.7 2.8Auto. rainfall recorder 1 5.0 5.0Miscellaneous - amount 19.2Subtotal Equipment 92.0

West Kalimantan1. Civil Works

AWLR platform 5 10.0 50.02. Equipment

AWLR equipment 5 10.0 50.0Discharge kit 1 15.0 15.0Rainfall gauge 2 0.7 1.4Auto. raifall recorder 1 5.0 5.0Miscellaneous - amount 18.6

Subtotal Equipment 90.0Total Civil Works 148.0Total Equipment 266.8

-49- ANNEX 2Table 2

INDONESIA

I1EG1RATED SWAMPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PROCUREMENT PACKAGES FOR CIL WOPK

Package GrossAea Ghoss Aea Base Cost DBseCost ConstrucionNo. Scheme Scheme Pacge Scheme Packa Schedule

-(ba) - - (Rp milion) - (mo/yea)

Jambi

1.1 Lwmur (1) 1,800 1,800 365.0 365.0 11/94-7/95

J.2 Lambur (2) 4,640 940.3PamusirD 4,100 2,225.0

Subtotal J.2 8,740 3,165.3 11/95-7/97

J.3 Dadlang I & n 6,500 6,500 6,946.0 6,946.0 11/95-7/97

1.4 Rsntau REsau 6,800 1,939.1Simpmag Puding 2,300 2,547.6

Subtotd J.4 9,100 4,486.7 7/96-3/98

Total Jambi 26,140 26,140 14,963.0

Riau

RL IDela Retch (1) 2,300 2,300 1,219.0 1,219.0 11/94-7/96

R.2 Siak Kid 8,000 8,000 8,243.6 8,243.6 11/95-7/98

R.3 KialacinakulR 2,715 2,561.2Teluk Kambang 1,390 2,495.2

Subtotal R3 4,105 5,056.4 11/95-7/97

R.4 Delta Reteh (2) 4,700 4,700 2,492.0 2,492.0 7/96-3/98

Totd Riau 19,105 19,105 17,011.0

-50- ANNEX 2Table 2

Table 2 (cont'd)

Package Gross Area Gross Area Base Cost Base Cost ConstructionNo. Scheme Scheme Package Scheme Package Schedule

(ha)- (pmillion)- (mo/year)

West Kali_mtan

K.1 Kapuas Kecil I & HI 6,700 3,644.0Sei Kakap 3,300 1,794.6

Subtotal K.1 10,000 5,438.6 11195-7/97

K.2 Rasau Jaya 7,520 2,267.2Arus Deras 635 1,506.4

Subtotal K.2 8,155 3,773.6 11/95-7/97

K.3 Sei Nipah 2,600 2,600 5,639.6 5,639.6 7/96-3/98

K.4 Pinang Luar 2,200 2,200 1,787.6 1,787.6 11/94-7/96

K.5 Sei Bulan 1,390 1,507.6Jangkang I 1,960 1,324.8

Subtotal K.5 3,350 2,832.4 7/96-3/98

K.6 Air Putih 2,420 1,507.0Roads 2,084.4

Subtotal K.6 2,420 3,591.4 11/95-7/97

K.7 Olak Olak Kubu 2,350 2,398.8Desa Kubu 1,750 1,518.0

Subtotal K.7 4,100 3,916.8 7/96-3/98

Total West Kaliuantan 32,825 32,825 26,980.0

Total ftoject 78,070 78,070 58,954.0

-51- ANNEX 3

WDON)lESIA

GINGRATED SWAPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

OPEATN AND MNTNANCE

re8ent Situation

1. The responsibility for operation and maintenance (O&M) of the swampschemes at the main and secondary systems level lies with the Provincial Water ResourcesServices (PWRS). Aragements, however, vary between provinces: (a) in Jambi O&Mis undertaken by two provincial O&M units which have developed out of the previouslycenally funded P2JP; (b) in Riau this function is carried out by three O&M units dealingwith water resources planning, supervision and control projects covering swamps, rivesand irrigation systems, which have developed from the former P2JP (no longer active);and (c) in West Kalimantan O&M is undertaken by a single swamps O&M unit which hasdeveloped out of P2JP.

2. At present, there is uncertainty about O&M, both in terms of duration andbudget. Although recent budget allocations have considerably increased over previousyears, fundig is stil insufficient to implement proper O&M. The FY93/94 budget underAPBD fumding amounts to about Rp 18,000/ha/year in Janibi, Rp 14,000/ha/year in Riauand about Rp 19,000/ha/year in West Kalimantan. In addition, shortages of O&M fieldstaff (Jurus and Pengamats), lack of transportaion, communications and other equipment,combined with the fact that most Jurus are assigned to schemes away from their place ofresidence, severely limits the effectiveness of O&M.

3. At the tertiary unit and on-farm levels, O&M is the responsibility of thefarmers. At the tertiary level O&M is carried out by their joint efforts through P3A, thelocal form of Water Users Organizations/Drainage Associations (WUA) ; at the field levelthe responsibility is with the individual farmer. However, there are at present nofunctional WUAs, although a standard pattern has been established for their formation andorganizaion (Regulation number 12/1992 of Ministry of Home Affairs). Formation ofWUAs is constrained by: (a) lack of clear defuition of a teriary canal-most tertiarieare called secondaries and consequently considered the responsibility of the provincialauthorities; (b) lack of coordination between PPLs, Juru and village head (Kepala Desa);and (c) lack of resources to support the formation of functional WUAs. In addition, thefrmers most of whom are Javanese transmigrants, not used to swanp agriculture, lackappropriate on-farm water management skills.

Proposed Development

4. The proposed project would support the strengthening and improvement ofO&M of emistig, rehabilitated and new water management infrastructure to ensureoptnim levels of: (a) operation required for removal, supply and circulation of water at

- 52 - ANNEX 3

the right tme so as to maximize crop production in the project areas; and (b) regular andperiodic maintenance to keep the system facilities and equipment in good workingcondition. In this context, the project would support: (a) financing of incremental O&Mcosts after construction; (b) adequate staffing levels and O&M facilities, system proceduresand practices; and (c) formation and strengthening of WUAs.

5. Immediately following the rehabilitation of the schemes, O&M would beimproved. To ensure optimal water control for agriculture, operational guidelines wouldbe prepared for each scheme and each water control structure. These would be based onthe design concepts adopted which, in turn, would mainly depend on the hydro-topographyof the area. In general there would be two alternative methods for water managementimnprovement, inter alia, the "dry option" and the "wet option". The first method involvesdrainage to 0.40 to 0.60 m depth so that the topsoil is leached by rainfall thus creating afavorable root zone. The second method involves enhanced leaching thus reducing theconcentration of organic acids to subcritical levels. In this case the drainage base remainshigh and sufficient supply of fresh water is needed for percolation.

6. The matenance program would be need based and well-balanced taking intoaccount the functioning and maintenance conditions of the infrastructure and allocatedfunds. Maintenance activities would include: (a) routine maintenance such as grass andweed control of drainage canals and embankments and lubrication, cleaning, tarring andpainting of gates; and (b) periodic maintenance, including desilting of canals and repairingor replacement of worn down or damaged parts of structures, offices and housing.

7. Water management would be implemented at two levels: (a) at the schemelevel-main and secondary systems-by staff of the PWRS responsible for O&M; and (b)at the field level-tertiary and on-farm-by WUAs and individual farmers. The operationof main and secondary system structures would be directly linked to on-farm waternumagement. Staff requirements would be assessed based on the number andsophistication of the structures built or rehabilitated under the project. O&M staff (JuruPengairan) would not only be responsible for the operation of the structures (task concept)but would actively provide extension to farmers on recommended water managementtechniques (assistance concept).

8. At the tertiary level, the WUAs would be strengthened under the project andprovide the organizational infrastructure for improving water management. The WUAswould, inter alla: (a) serve as communication link between PWRS and the farmers;(b) channel the needs and desires of farmers to the various government agencies; and(c) promote collective action of individual farmers in taking care of water management andmaintenance of the tertiary system. Preferably the tertiary water management unit wouldcoincide with the agricultural extension units in order to also disseminate information andassistance on agricultural practices and technologies.

9. Each WUA would appoint a spokesperson, the ulu-ulu, who would beresponsible for day-t-day operation at the tertiary level. The main tasks of the ulu-uluwould include: (a) communication with provincial O&M staff on behalf of the farmers;(b) coordination of on-farm water management and water control in tertiary drainage

- 53 - ANNEX 3

canals; (c) coordination of maintenance of repair works of the tertiary drainage canals,embankments and structures (gotong royong); and (d) guidance and instructions to thefarmers on recommended water management techniques and agricultural practices. Toachieve the above objectives, the project would implement training programs for extensionofficers and for WUAs; and support the implementation of on-farm water managementdemonstration plots to be established within hydrological units (see Annex 4).

10. The cost of O&M for the main and secondary systems would be schemespecific and mainly depend on: (a) the size and number of structures and drainage canals;and (O) the incidence of sedimentation in the drainage canals and rivers. A breakdown ofaverage anmal O&M cost for appraisal purposes is given below:

Table 1: PER HA Cosr OF O&M

Cost Item Cost perha (Rp)

O&M Section Staff 2,500

Tansportation, office supplies and labor costs 3,000

Routine maintenance 10,000* grass and weed control canals and embankments (Rp 6,000/ha)* structures and buildings (Rp 4,000/ha)

Periodic maintenance (desilting main, secondary canals and rivers) 20,000

Other, incl. emergency maintenance 4,500

Total 40,000

11. Maintenance of the teriary drainage canals and inlets would be theresponsibility of the WUAs. Most of the routine maintenance works would consist ofgrass slashing and weed removal from the tertiary canals by the beneficiaries themselves.Labor output for grass slashing is estimated at 450 mn/labor day, and for weed removalat 200 m2/labor day. Grass slashing would be required once per three months and weedremoval twice a year. Depending on the size of the tertiary drainage canals, which varyfrom about 2 to 10 m in top width (largest in West Kalimantan), this would amount to alabor input of about one half to one day per month for each farm. Periodic maintenance,mainly desiling, would be required once every three years, based on an average siltdeposition of 0.1 m per year and it would take (on average) the equivalent of one laborday per month to remove it. In addition, an incidental cash contribution would be requiredfor tertiary structure maintenance.

-54- ANNEX 4

EqDONESIA

INEGRATED SWAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

AGRICULTMAL EXTNON FOR SWAM AREAS

Eisti Situation

1. Agricultural extension in tihe project area is the responsibility of the ProvincialAgriculral Services (PRAS) with technical guidance of the National level DirectorateGeneral of Food Crops and Horticulture (DGFCH). Focal points for extension activiesare the Rural Extension Centers (REC), of which there are four in Jambi, five in Riau andsix in West Kalimantan. Project areas represent some 50 percent of the area covered bythe existing RECs. While a few of these RECs are not located in the most favorableposition in relation to project areas, they generally cover the areas adequately and theis no need for additional construction. However, most of the RECs and associated staffhousing need to be rehabilitated, and fully equipped to provide effective extension services.

2. Until recently there was a problem to attract and retain extension staff in thearea, but this appears to have been overcome. At least quantitatively, present staffing isadequate and well within the ratios of field extension workers to farm households deemedappropriate even for the more difficult and remote areas. Most of the field extensionworkers (PPLs) are recent appointees, however, who lack experience and needconsiderable training and supervision to become fully effective. There is still a shortageof more experienced, senior extension workers (PPUPs) although the number ofestablished positions appears adequate. Adequate provision of transport, equipment andmaterials, as well as operational funds to conduct demonstrations, workshops, trainingsessions and farmers field days, are needed to strengthen the existing extension services.

3. Strong farmer involvement in all facets of extension activities and an effectivelinkage between research and extension (which hitherto has been elusive), are essentilcomponents to a viable extension program. The involvement of farmers, although nothighy developed in many areas, is mainly through farmers groups (KT), of which some600 exist in the project area in various stages of formation and active implementation.Such groups are commonly based on the village or tertiary units and are formed fordifferent purposes, including mutual aid, women's activities and, more recently, watermanagement (WUA). These groups need considerable strengthening but provide the basisfor strong comnmnity and agricultiral development with the help of extension services.

Proposed Developments

4. Extension activities under the project would be considerably intensified underthe responsibility of PRAS with technical support and supervision from DGFCH and DGEstaff. Under the ongoing reorganization of the extension services, which emphasizes

-55 - ANNEX 4

decentralization of extension activities, responsibility for planning and implementationwould progressively shift from the provincial and national level to Kabupaten andKecamatan staff, but considerable strengthening is required at these levels.

5. Present staff levels are adequate although experience is lacking. GOI wouldensure that all available positions, particularly those of senior, more experienced staff(PPUPs) would be kept filled with suitably qualified people during the project and beyond.The existing number of RECs would also be sufficient to cover the project schemes.However, 10 of the existing RECs and associated staff accommodation would berehabilitated.

6. The main elements (and hence largest investments) in the proposed programfor increasing the effectiveness of existing extension services would be: (a) training ofboth staff and farmers (including special programs for women); (b) the formation andincreasing the cohesiveness and capability of farmer groups (which would to the extentpossible coincide with WUAs in tertiary units) as the basic unit for focussing andchanmelling extension and other support activities; and (c) close communication and linkageof extension staff with research staff through carefully planned and executed trainingprograms and mutual involvement in planing and implementing the FSTA and tertiaryhydraulic management units.

7. In addition to providing extension workers width the required training,supervision and specialist support, the project would support the more intensive programby providing equipment, materials and operating funds for conducting meetings,workshops, training programs, field days and other extension activities; as well astransport, travel and associated expenses for extension workers, trainers and supervisingstaff from provincial and national level and farmers. Trainers and specialists would berecruited from different institutes within AARD, the different DGs in MOA, universitiesand consultants and private sector where appropriate. Senior, experienced officers fromthe Ministries of Agriculture and Home Affairs, universities and the Provincial Serviceswould provide the required guidance and supervision.

8. A major instrument for demonstrating and extending improved technology andintroducing new technology developed by research would be the tertiary hydraulicmanagement unit, of which 30 would be established along the same lines as the FSTAimplemented by AARD (see Annex 5, para 3). These would be implemented in developedschemes through established farmers groups with sufficient experience to manage theprogram of improved farm management, including the revolving fund created from onetime grants to individual farmers for seasonal inputs. After an original survey of the areaand farmer group interest and capability, an overall plan followed by individual farm planswould be implemented emphasizing improvements in soil and water management,agronomic practices and pest control. Results would be closely monitored and the unitswould be focal points for training activities.

9. Using the experience and demonstration effect of these tertiary hydraulicunits, the program would be extended to other tertiary units covering about 600 farmiergroups, and about 30,000 farmers who would all receive the one tme grant during the

-56- ANNEX 4

project period. By means of the revolving fund, to be managed by the farmers group, thetotal area covered would ultimately expand to at least 45,000 ha, and possibly the full55,000 ha of cultivated land. The basic approach in extension would be the training andvisit (TV) system which would be progressively modified to give farmers more initiativeand participation in the decision making process, as farmer knowledge and experienceincreases. Emphasis would be on practical, hands-on training in the field. The conceptof farmers field schools, so effective in training farmers in Integrated Pest Management(IPM) techniques, would be gradually introduced.

10. Training for both staff and farmers would encompass project management,implementation and management of farmer group activities, water management (inconjunction with PRIS and WUA), agronomic practices, seed production, pig and ratcontrol, farm mechanization, and post-harvest handling and marketing (including specialcourses on agro-processing for women). AAET, in conjunction with other agencies, ismaking a start in preparing a detailed, overall flexible framework for project relatedtraining based on estimated requirements and available resources. This will be arefmement of the training proposals reviewed at appraisal. The overall framework willidentify and give quantitative estimates of the different types of training required at alllevels, their content and sequencing, and also identify the institutions or individuals capableof planning, organizing and implementing such training. This would form the basis fordetailed annual training plan to be prepared for each subproject.

11. The implementation schedule and sequencing of training, group formation andextension activities would roughly follow the physical works schedule although there wouldbe a lot of overlap since activides such as group organization and formation would proceedbefore or during construction activities, and the start of other activities would depend onstage of development of a particular scheme, the amount and timing of the required worksand the size of their expected impact, and the existence of experienced farmers groups.The projections given in the tables are the best estimates of how the agricultural activitieswould be integrated with the physical works schedule. This would be refined duringproject implementation.

- 57 - ANNEX 5

INONESIA

TPGRATED SWAP DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

AGMCULTAL RESEARCH FOR SWAMW AREAS

Exsting Situton

1. Agricultural research for tidal swamp areas is the responsibility of Agency forAgricultural Research and Development (AARD). Research is carried out at KarangAgung in South Sumatra, with outlying research sites in South Sumatra and South andCentral Kalimantan. Research is aimed at developing improved soil and watermanagement and improved agronomy for different commodities. New technologies arentegrated in ongoing fam systems research which is conducted in four stages: (a) land

type identification and characterization; (b) design and testing of alternative farmingsystems; (c) refinement of adapted farming systems; and (d) development research. Theler comprises final tests ard verification of the integrated farming system under fairlylarge scale conditions on furmers fields, involving farmers' groups, cooperative andextension staff as well as field-research workers. The process is guided by senior researchworkers from different instiuons in a coordinated swamps research program.

2. Little systematic research has been conducted in the project areas.Preliminary observaions have indicated that most schemes are dominated by potential andpeat/peaty soil typologies and have not been brought fully under cultivation. Immediateimprovements with existing technologies developed at Karang Agung are possible,particularly on the potential and shallow peat soils, with improved water control. On-siteresearch is required, however, particularly of the type in categories (a) and (d) above, inthe project area to determine, in conjunction with farmers, extension workers and otheragencies, the key factors for improving agricultural production and productivity in eachland typology. In addition to introducing technological improvements, such on-farmresearch should also point the way to overcoming problems of non-availability of inputsand labor and power shortages during peak periods. On-farn research also should explorepossibilities of diversification, such as the introduction of livestock and aquaculture.

Proposed Developments

3. The project would provide continuing support for the ongoing swampsresearch program at Karang Agung and would extend field level research into the projectarea in 10 selected Farming Systems Technology Adaptation sites (PSTA). Research inKarang Agung would concentrate on technology component research on acid sulphate sois,especially ta related to soil and water management changes of soil charac s,environmental impacts, and improvemen of the crop and animal management in integratedfarming systems. Component research would include varietal improvement, ferlizer use,livestcfish cultre, and modification and utilization of simple farm machnery and

-58 - ANNEX S

equipment (soil tillage, planting, weeding, harvesting and processing). Field level researchin project areas would entail: (a) land characterization of the project areas generally, andmore detailed site characterization of the 10 research and 30 intensive teriary unitlocations in terms of: (1) water regime; (2) topography; (3) thickness and ripening ofpeats; (4) depth and potential acidity of pyritic layers and type of acid sulphate soils; (5)tidal types of the land; (6) soil fertility status; and (7) water quality of the areas; and(b) development research in the 10 selected tertiary units for farming systems technologyadaptation, which would include the introduction of supplementary power (tractors anddraft animals) under different types of management at selected sites.

4. Land and site characterization would include soil surveys, mapping and agro-socio-economic profile studies. Data collection would include information on farmergroups and group dynamics in improved technology adaption, capital management and thedevelopment of groups facilities. Investigations would also include farming systemsinput/output relationships and the performance of external support systems such as inputsupply, credit, extension, and marketing.

5. Results from these investigations would form the basis for the design of anadaptive research program on farming systems technology development in relation to areaand regional development. The approach would be as follows:

(a) at each of the 10 sites, a farmers group would be selected in a tertiary unitrepresentative of a certain land (swamp) typology and water managementregime. Selection would be done in consultation with local government andother agencies. After initial data gathering, a site plan and individual farmplans would be developed with the farmers;

(b) selected technology packages would be gradually introduced considering landand farm heterogeneity, farmers' knowledge and absorptive capacity, andlimited funds and labor;

(c) farmers would be given a one-time grant in the form of a complete inputpackage for one season which after harvest would be deposited in a revolvingfund to be managed by the fanner group for providing further working capitalfor its farmer members. Continuous training, monitoring and regularmeetings and field days of farmers, extension staff and other conceneddistrict staff to discuss progress and find solutions to problems encounteredwould be an integral part of the adaptive research.

6. At some selected FSTA sites, the research would include aquaauture and atothers an assessment of the potential for tractor hire service on a sustaining basis in aprogram involving farmer groups, extension workers, cooperatives, artians and privateentrepreners. This would entail a critical assessment of farm tractors and machiry fordifferent conditions as well as supporting workshop requirements, and would lead to theestablishment of the system components to be managed on a sound commercial bass.Tractors and machinery would be leased to private entrepreneurs to provide a hire serviceto fme who would pay for the service out of the revolving fimds. The provision and

59- ANNEX 5

use of draft animal power to overcome labor shortages would also be investigated atseveral sites.

7. The research program would be implemented by a group of interdisciplinryresearchers from different research centers and institutes within AARD under the overallguidance and management of a full-time coordinator of swamp research, who wouldcoordinate research activities at Karang Agung and all field locations. Theinterdisciplnary team would include specialists in agronomy, soil and water management,pest management, livestock, aquaculture, farm mechanization and socio-economics andwould also be able to draw on AARD scientists in other disciplines when necessary. Eachfield site would be staffed with a minimum of one graduate field researcher and two fieldtechnicians. An administrative officer would be located in each of the three provinces.Impierentation would be in accordance with detailed annual work plans prepared forKarang Agung and each of the research sites by September 30 of each year starting inSeptember 1994, and reviewed by the Bank. A system of regular reporting of the researchresults would be set up and the program would be assisted by expatriate and local technicalassistance as specified in Annex 9.

-60- ANNEX 6

DMDNESLS

IN EGRATED SWAMP DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

TRE CROP DEVEO3PMNT

Present Situation

1. Although rice predominates in all project schemes, coconuts are the secondmost important crop and the most mportant perennial crop in the faming system. Thelargest proportion of coconuts is found in mixed cropping systems with rice and othercrops. They are grown on individual mounds in rice fields, on raised beds with rice inthe sunken part (surjan), or in hedges on bunds surrounding rice fields. Pure stands arefound, to a lesser extent, on deeper peat soils which are unsuitable for annual cropproduction.

2. Coconuts frequently replace rice in newly cleared land when weeds imvade inthe third or fourth year of cropping and rice yields decline drastically. They are tolerantto high water tables and can stand short periods of flooding provided drainage is adequate.Ihey also tolerate saline conditions and can be reasonably productive on deeper peat soils.

3. Like other crops, coconuts are not very productve under smallholder swmpconditions, with yields of 40-50 nuts per tree or 800 to 900 kg of copra per ha, mostly ofvery low quality. However, their cultivation requires little labor and they provide stlerswith a low but dependable income. They frequently represent the most important sourceof cash and also contribute significantly to the daily diet. The fact that coconuts tend togradually replace rice as conditions for sustainable cultivation of the latter under a lowinput-output system deteriorate over time is evident from the much higher proportion ofcocomnts found in the older schemes.

4. In Jambi, mixed rice-oconuts cropping systems are found on some 60 percentof the project area, with pure coconut stands on less than one percent, but increasing. InRiau, with a higher proportion of deep peat soils, coconuts are much more important andabout 30 percent of the project area is estimated to be under pure stands and another 50percent under mixed rice-coconuts. Rice mono-cropping is pr.acticed much less frequentlythan in Jambi or West Kal=antan. In the project areas in West Kalimantan pure standsof cocomnts only occur in one scheme, Kapuas Kecil, while mixed rice-coconut cultivationcovers about 35 percent of the project area.

5. Ihere is considerable scope for increasing coconut cultivation in the projectareas in al three provinces and, if grown in pure stands under estate-like conditons, toincrease yields, quality and profitability. In addition, there air large areas adjoiningproject schemes, that are suitable for coconut development which, when developedsbmltaneously with the project schemes would permit the establishment of "economic

- 61- ANNEX 6

units" large enough to attract private sector interest to establish processing, storage andmarketing facilities.

6. Various projects have been implemented by GOI, including the Bank-supported Smallholder Coconut Development (SCDP) and Nucleus Estates andSmallholders (NES) projects and, more recently the Tree Crops Smallholders DevelopmentProject (rSCDP). These projects depend on the use of high-yielding hybrid palms orimproved agronomic practices for existing or replanted tall palms. The most successfulapproach has been through the establishment of smallholder plantations by ProjectManagement Units (PMU) of the Directorate General of Estate Crops (DGE). Theplantations are maintained by the smallholders until they start bearing and then turned overto them. However, these are intensive efforts and there are only limited opportunities forthe majority of smallholders to participate.

Proposed Developments

7. Since coconuts are an important integral part of the farming systems in theproject areas, are well adapted to swamp conditions, and are an important part of thesettlers' cash income, measures would be introduced to improve the yield, quality andproduction of coconuts in the project schemes. Emphasis would be on the establishmentof pure stands on soils that are less suitable for rice and secondary food-crop production.However, smallholders in mixed cropping areas would also be provided with extensionand seed nuts of high yielding hybrid varieties.

8. To ensure the establishment of "economic units" for collection, processing andmarketing of coconuts (and also to counteract a certain resentment of local smallholdersoutside the schemes for not being given the same oppormnity to participate as settlerswithin the schemes), suitable areas both inside and outside the swamp schemes would beincluded. DGE would be responsible for implementing the component through PMUsusing the same approach as under the ongoing TSCDP. The PMU approach has beeneffective in building a strong management and extension services and in financingagricultural inputs, enabling both transmigrants and non-transmigrant smallholders toestablish good quality tree crops on their land.

9. Although drains would be established by the PMU in developing land forcoconuts, most of the tree crop development would be carried out independently from thephysical works program under the project. A total of 12,500 ha, of which about 4,200ha would be within the project schemes and 8,300 ha in land adjoining the schemes, wouldbe planted with high yielding hybrid varieties. Approximately 8,000 smallholders wouldbe involved and they would manage their plantations using improved agronomic practices(Table 1).

10. As in TCSDP, smallholders would receive a grant to cover all expendituresfor the first year's establishment of the trees. They would be responsible for themaintenance of the stand from the second year onwards until bearing, using commercialcredit if necessary. To enable smallholders to obtain credit, BPN would issue land ilesto those who do not already possess them, particularly local farmers outside the project

- 62 - ANNEX 6

schemes, one year prior to planting, in accordance with the phasing as shown in Table 2.BPN would furnish the Bank with a detailed implementation plan for titling, which wouldalso include neighboring farmers not participating in the coconut planting scheme, beforenegotiations.

11. To implement the program a Project Manager's Office would be establishedin DGE Head Office with a small administrative staff. Liaison Offices would beestablished at provincial level and existing PMUs would be strengthened or new PMUsestablished at Rantau Rasau in Jambi, Kubu in West Kalimantan, and Sei Salak II in Riau,with PMU sub-units at four locations in Jambi, four in West Kalimantan and three in Riau.The organization would require a total of 191 staff. The project would finance civil worksfor establishing facilities; vehicles and transport costs; equipment and materials, trainingand TA; and operational costs.

12. Coconut farmers would be selected in accordance with the criteria listed inAttachment 1. They would be supplied with selected polybagged seedlings, produced inproject nurseries, and would receive fertilizers and other necessary inputs, as well asadvice from specialized extension staff. The hybrids would be selected to provide goodyield potential and resistance to Phyopthora disease. Farmers in adjoining mixed rice-coconut areas would also receive improved hybrid seed-nuts and specialized extension.Under recommended field management practices, yields would be expected to be in therange of 3 to 4 tons of copra equivalent at a moisture content of 15 percent. Coconutswould provide the farmers with a year-round income since there is unsatisfied demand forcoconut products at all the project sites where they would be grown. Depending on theirlocation and circumstances, farmers would sell whole nuts or fresh coconut meat, orproduce copra or coconut sugar. The first three have a low demand for labor but anattractive return per day of work, while sugar production is labor intensive and gives ahigh income. To enhance their income generation capacity, women would be trained byPMUs in the manufacture of coconut sugar and oil.

13. Proposed participant farmers in each PMU/sub-unit are given in Table 1. Atotal of about 7,950 farmers are likely to benefit; of these 3,020 would be in Jambi, 1,810in Riau, and 3,120 in West Kalimantan. Phasing of planting of coconut seedlings is givenin Table 2.

- 63 - ANNEX6

EDNESIA

INTEGRATED SWA PS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

CRIE FOR SCREENNG OF COCONUT FARMUS

Selected Applicants Would:

(a) be willing to sign a Smallholder Credit Agreement;

(b) own the land to be developed, with clear ownership status;

(c) belong to the low-income group of farmers;

(d) be bona fide farmers, with available family labor of at least two members;

(e) be willing to abide by all the Project regulations and guidelines, and tomaintain cultivation standards established by the project;

(t) be physically fit and between 18 and 45 years of age at the time of acceptnas participant, or with legal heir(s) if over 45 years of age; and

(g) reside permanently within the Project area.

Responsibility for verifying all items other than (a) and (e), would rest withthe Provincial Govemment officials, in particular, the village and sub-village chiefs inconsultation with the Village Development Committee (LKMD). These officials wouldalso ensure that preference is given to the poorer of the eligible participants.

The Smallholder Credit Agreement is to be signed by both spouses, whereavailable.

Women would be fully eligible to participate.

- 64 - ANNEX 6Table 1

llESGRATED SW DEVELOP PROJECT

ftoPOSM PARCIPAU FOIR CocoNur DEVELOPMENr

Province Scheme Pan Local Farms J91aPMU/sub-unit Ha. No. of Ha No. of Ha No. of

Farmers Farmers Farmers

IAmbi

Rlantau Rasau

- RanMau Rsau 965 625 235 140 1,200 765- Puding 1,000 585 1,000 585- Nipah Panjaqg 1,800 1,145 1,800 1,145- Dendaqg 290 145 710 380 1,000 525

Total Jambi 2,255 1,355 2,745 1,665 5,000 3,020

IWest Kaln

-Kubu 800 800 400 269 1,200 1,069- Selamat 1,300 680 1,300 680-Serua i 1,100 550 1,100 550- Padang Tikar 1,400 820 1,400 820

Toud West Kal. 800 800 4,200 2,319 5,000 3,119

Sei Sialk

-Tempuling 600 600 200 100 800 700-Sei Salak 800 410 800 410-Delta Reteh S00 500 400 200 900 700

Tota Riau 1,100 1,100 1,400 710 2,500 1,810

Grand Total 4,155 3,255 8,345 4,694 12,500 7,949

-65 - ANNEX 6Table 2

INDONESIA

INTEGRATED SWA1[ DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PLANTG PMAING FOR COCONUT DEVELOPENT(in ha)

Province Year of PlantinePMU/sub-unit

Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4

Rana Ra

- Rantau Rasau 200 400 400 200 1,200- Puding 200 300 300 200 1,000- Nipah Panjang 200 600 600 400 1,800- Dendang 200 300 300 200 1,000

Total Jamnbi 800 1,600 1,600 1,000 5,000

LUW

- Kubu 300 300 300 300 1,200- Selamat 300 400 400 200 1,300- Seruat II 200 400 300 200 1,100- Padang Tikar 200 500 500 200 1,400

Total West Kal. 1,000 1,600 1,500 900 5,000

Sei Salak II

- Tempuling 200 300 300 - 800- Sei Salak 200 300 300 - 800- Delta Reteh 300 300 300 - 900

Total Riau 700 900 900 - 2,500

Grand Total 2,500,4, 40|Grand Total 2,500 4100 4,000 1,900 12,500

-66- ANNEX 7

UNDONESIA

INTEGRATED SWA DEVELOPMEN PROJECT

POABLE WATER SUPPLY

Preseut Sitouaon

1. Ihe existing potable water supply facilities in the Jambi and Riau project areasare critically deficient. Although there is potental for deep groundwater development,high conten in sulfates and chlorides (Jambi) and iron (Riau) mak treatment necessary.The situation in West Kalimantan is worse as there is no potentW for deep groundwaterdevelopment while the surface water (river and canal) and shallow groundwater in theschemes located near the sea suffer from salt intrusion in the dry season.

2. Rainwater is the main source of potable water presentiy used by the peopleduring the rainy season. Rainwater is collected from the roofs of the houses but sincethere are no gutters and storage fcilities, no water is available during the dry season. Thepeople then have to rely on allow groundwater or canal water (Jambi and Riau) whichoften is polluted and high in orgaic matter contents. It causes health problems evenalthough they boil it a few minutes. In cridcal dry periods, farmers in the West Kaimantanschemes sometimes have to buy water from people living near the mountains or they maybe supplied from the Pontianak water supply system.

Proposed Development

3. The project would support: (a) potable waer supply facilities for about27,000 households and 55 village centers; (b) geo-hydrological surveys and test boringsin Jambi province, similar to the program implemented in Riau under the Second SwampsDevelopment Project (2431-IND); (c) evaluation of river and canal water qualty todetneine the potential for use after treatment; and (d) training of local masons andbeneficiaries in the construction and O&M of household and village water supply facilities.

4. In order to reduce the cost of the individual household water supply systems,their design capacity has been based on the use for drinking and cooking purposes only.For other domestic requirements bhing and washing) the people would continue to useriver and canal water. Based on this hypothesis, the daily requirement of potable waterwould be 50 liters per day for a family of five. To meet this design standard, rainwaterstorage tanks with a capacity of about 2.5 mn would be required. Because of severelimtations on suitable surface water during the dry season, the capaciy of the tanks inWest Kalim would be larger to ensure year-round availability of potable water.

5. The design of the rainwater system would be based on: (a) the type andprice of locally available materials; and (b) the willingness of the beneficiaries to

-67- ANNEX 7

participate in and contribute to the program. Unless other viable alternatives can be found,ferrocement water storage tanks would be favored over the less durable bamboocement andexpensive fiberglass tanks. The construction method would be simple and the systemswould be implemented by local masons with labor provided by the beneficiaries. Theconstruction cost of the storage tanks would differ from place to place and mainly dependon the availability of materials and the adopted implementation approach. For appraisalpurposes, the cost of the individual household water supply systems has been estimated atRp 500,000. A detailed cost estimate for a 2.5 m3 ferrocement tank is given below.

Table 1: COST OF A 2.5 M3 FtRROCEmENT TANK LaNo. Type of Maerial Unit Quantity Unit cost

Price (Rp)(Rp)

Dimension: Diam. 1.60 m; Height 1.35 mWall thickness: 3 cm

1. Sand for landfill 1.7 m x l.7 m x O.2 m 0.6 10,000 6,0002. Concrete sand s 0.5 30,000 15,0003. Iron bar diam. 6 mm (15 cm x 1S cm) it 17 3,000 51,0004. Iron string kg 2 2,500 5,0005. Chicken wire m 13 3,000 39,0006. Cement bags 8 8,000 64,0007. Wooden struts for scaffolding pcs 10 2,000 2,000

(usage: 10 tanks)8. Nails kg 0.5 1,500 7509. Welded iron mould (usage SO tnks) pcs 1 65,000 1,30010. Plywood 2.40 x 1.2 m n 4 mm pcs 3 12,500 3,750

(usage: 10 tanks)(bamboo mat could be used if available)

11. Labor md 12 3,500 42,00012. Skilled labor mnd 4 7,500 30,00013. PVC Gutter in 16 5,000 80,00014. PVC Downspout m 5 2,500 12,50015. Water/drain tap pcs 2 5,000 10

Total 362,30025% for general cost and overhead 90

Total (rounded) 4_3_Q_

La Based on CARE model.

6. In areas where river and canal water contain organic nmer a promisigoption for providing clean water would be a simple individual household water treatmentunit developed by the Agency for Research and Development of the Ministry of PublicWorks. The advantage of this option is that it uses cheap local materials and can be easilyconstructed. Its main elements are a local coagulant which is clay (halotricite) and a filterconsisting of local sand with a high grade of quartz, calcium and magnesium and of 0.3to 1.2 mm in diameter. The cost of the individual household water treatment unit isestmated at Rp 250,000.

-68 - ANNEX 7

7. In addition to the individual household supply, provisions would be madeunder the project to provide potable water at central locations (village centers, healthclinics and schools) for communal use. This would ensure normal year-round supply atsuch locations as well as provide emergency drinking water supply for the surroundingarea in case of extreme drought. Depending on the outcome of geo-hydrologicalinvestigations, both groundwater and surface water would be considered as sources ofsupply. Deep tubewelis and water treatment plants would be planned accordingly. InWest Kalimantan province no suitable water resources are available for this purpose; herethe project scope would be limited to the rainwater option only (para 4).

8. nplemenation of the potable water supply component would follow theCommunity Management approach which is an important part of the development process.People's awareness would be the focal point of the program and beneficiaries would beinvolved in the whole development cycle from preparation and construction to O&M ofthe systems. This approach would ensure project sustainability by stimulating thebeneficiaries to be independent in the O&M of the water supply systems.

9. The potable water supply component would be implemented by DOS withtechnical support from Cipta Karya and NGOs. The main input of Cipta Karya would beto recommend design criteria for different conditions, whereby the choice of materials andsystems would be geared towards low cost solutions. NGOs would assist in theconstruction and O&M of the systems. Construction of the individual household systemswould preferably be done by properly trained local masons with the assistance of thebeneficiaries. Village center systems would mainly be implemented by DOS on contract.As a prereqsite for sustainable O&M, beneficiaries would contribute at least 10 percentin cash or kind to the construction costs and pay the cost of O&M of the systems to ensuretheir sustainable use.

10. O&M of the individual household systems would be the responsibility of thefamilies involved. O&M of the village center systems would need technical support fromCipta Karya and possibly NGOs familiar with water supply systems. O&M cost sharingarrangements would be worked out once the type of system has been established.

11. Training plays an important role in the implementation and O&M ofcomnmnity based water supply. Men and women would be mobilized to receiveappropriate training to become technicians capable of implementing and operating thesystems. Local technicians must be employed during construction in order to have theexpertise available locally if repair is needed later on. This also would reduce the cost.Training in management of daily water use is required as otherwise the water tanks wouldgenerally be empty before the end of the dry season, which is unpredictable. In addition,training is needed in the O&M of water treaunent plants. PKK and Dinas KES (Health)activities would cover the training of women in the correct treatment and use of the wateras well as hygiene and sanitation.

- 69 - ANNEX 8

E4OESU

INTEGRATED SWAN DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

COASrAL ZONE LAND USE MANAGEMENT

A. AK NATIONAL PARK - INTEGRATED BUFF ZONE MANAGEMENT

In trodc

1. The Government of Indonesia (GOI) and Government of Jambi Provincepropose to strengthen the management and protection of the recently established BerbakNational Park, within Jambi Province. To this end, the Provincial government proposesto implement a project which would: (a) strengthen the managernent of the Park;(b) improve social and economic conditions in villages surrounding the Park; and,(c) assist BAPPEDA, Jambi in its on-going spatial planning activities in connection withthe coastal parts of the Province. These draft TOR specify the required consultancyservices to assist in implemeraion of the program.

2. The project concept was developed by BAPPEDA Jambi, in consultation witha mnber of provincial agencies, most notably the Provincial Office of the DirectorateGeneral for Forest Protection and Nature Conservation (Sub-Balai Konservasi SumberDaya Alam - SBKSDA), which is directly responsible for management of Berbak NationalPark. BAPPEDA Jambi was assisted in preparation of the project proposal by technicalexperts from the Asian Wetland Bureau, Bogor.

3. The project forms part of a larger project, entitled Integrated SwampsDevelopment Project (ISDP), which is being joindy finded by the GOI and the WorldBank. ISDP involves a range of investments in existing swamp development schemes inthe Provinces of Jambi, Riau and West Kalimantan. Some of the schemes in JambiProvince are located near Berbak National Park, although separated from it by the BatangHari River. Overall responsibility for implementation of ISDP lies with the Directorateof Swamps within the DG Water Resources Development of the Ministry of Public Works.Procuement of consultancy services for the Berbak National Park Management componentwiU be the responsibility of the DG of Forest Protection and Nature Conservation(Perlindungan Hutan dan Pelestarian Alam - PHPA) within the Ministry of Forests. Dueto the cr-sectoral nature of activities proposed within the Berbak National ParkManagement component, overall coordination at the Provincial level will be theresponsibility of BAPPEDA Jambi.

- 70 - ANNEX 8

Background

4. Berbak National Park is located on the eastern coastal plain of JambiProvince, in Central Sumata. It is the most extensive protected swamp forest in S.E.Asia, containing over 150,000 ha of pristine freshwater swvamp forest and peat swampforest. The area has long been recognized as a significant nature conservation resource.In 1935, the Dutch Colonial Government designated a large part of Berbak as a wildlifereserve. In 1991, the GOI nominated Berbak for inclusion in the RAMSAR Convention,which provides for protection of wetlands of international importance. Indonesia is thefirst ASEAN nation to protect an area under RAMSAR. In February, 1992, DecreeNo.285 KPIS-II of the Minister for Forests declared an area of 162,700 ha of the Berbakarea to be a National Park.

5. Park Management. Management of the National Park is the responsibilityof the DG PHPA which is represented in Jambi by the SBKSDA. SBKSDA is locatedadministratively within the Regional Forestry office (Kanwil Kehutanan). SBKSDA isrepresented locally in the Berbak area (i.e. in Tanjung Jabung Regency) by a Sub-Section(SSKSDA) which is located in the town of Nipah Panjang, near the mouth of the BerbakRiver. With the change of status from wildlife reserve to National Park, it is expected thatn the near future, management responsibility at the local level will be taken over by aNational Park Office.

6. The Park management presently suffers from a number of constraints to itseffectiveness including: (a) shortage of staff; (b) inadequate office facilities anddistribution of offices and outstations (Resorts); (c) inadequate land and water transportfacilities; and, (d) inadequate field and communications equipment. The main managementproblems being faced include: (i) inadequate cadastral and physical definition of the Parkboundaries; (ii) illegal exploitation of forest products and poaching of animals within thePark; (iii) illegal setlements within the Park; and, (iv) conflicts with logging activities insome adjacent forest concession areas.

7. Role of the Provincial Government. For several years, the Government ofJambi Province, through the Provincial Planning Agency (BAPPEDA), has beencoordinating efforts to rationalize land use planning and management in the coastal areasof the Province. As part of the associated activities, the Province has compiled anenvironmental profile of the coastal zone and prepared a draft Spatial Plan of the samearea which has the objective of balancing competing demands for forestry and agriculturaldevelopment and for nature conservation. The Government has also commissionedeconomic studies to evaluate the potetitial economic effects of growth and development inthe nearby Johor-Riau-Singapore growth triangle. On the basis of these activities, theGovernment has identified nature conservation and associated activities, such as tourism,as worthwhile activities to be supported as part of overall development planning for theProvince. Berbak National Park was seen as playing a central role in nature conservationactivities because of its international significance.

8. In 1992, BAPPEDA Jambi prepared a draft proposal for an investmentprogram to strengthen management and protection of the Park for consideration for

- 71- ANNEX S

funding by the Government of Indonesia and the World Bank. The program involvedinvestments h social and economic development of a series of villages surundi thePark, with the objective of creatng an economically and socially stable buffer zonebetween stictly conservation land uses witiin the Park, and extensively commercial landuses beyond the villages. This plan was accepted in principle but dte Govenment wasrequested to do additional work on project design. This work was done, in associationwith te Asian Wetand Bureau, and the resulting plan was outlined in a comprehensiveproject preparation report. This report formed the basis of these TOR although the scopeof work proposed has been reduced to lower costs.

rojec Components

9. The project as proposed by BAPPEDA-Jambi has three main activities:

(a) strengthening Park Mnement;

(b) socio-econoinc development in areas surrounding the Park; and,

(c) further development of coastal zone and weand planning and managementcapability within the BAPPEDA.

10. theing Park Management. The activities proposed include:

(a) improving the physical definition of the Park boundaries by cadastral surveyand insallaion of durable (plastic) markers and signs to clearly identify theboundary;

(b) officially defining Buffer Zoras around the Park thrugh inter-departmenalconsultation and negotiation with local timber concessionaires and otherrelevant parties;

(c) upgrading office and transport facilities in the SSKSDA, including provisionof some simple tourist facilities in or near the Park;

(d) staff development and training including patrolling techniques, wildlifeobservation, record-keeping, etc.; and

(e) completion of the Berbak National Park Management Plan, presendy in draftform.

11. Sodo-Economlc Development. Most of the activities in this component wereformulaed through discussions between relevant Provincial agencies and local villagers.Slgnct local involvement Is seen as essendal to success. The proposed activitiesinclude:

(a) Park boundary marking using useful plants (e.g. bamboo). Previous analysishas shown that many local people go into the Park to extract various plant

-72 - ANNEX 8

resources of value to them. The idea of this component is to plant some ofthese resources along the boundary so that villagers will not have to go intothe Park;

(b) feasibility/pilot studies of various small-scale industries using locallyoccurring species (e.g. frog husbandry);

(c) rehabilitation of coastal land on the eastern boundaries of the Park throughmangrove planting;

(d) various agricultural developments in villages surrounding the Park. The mainactivity would be establishment of horticultural developments, which villagershave identified as an opportuity; and

(e) land titling/certification of about 6,000 ha. of land around the Park toincrease the security of tenure of local people.

12. Panning Assistance to DAPPEDA. 'his involves contnuation of pasttechnical assistance to BAPPEDA to further develop coastal land use planning capability.

Project Organization and Management

13. At the Central Goverunent level, the overall responsibility for theimplementation of the project would be with the Ministry of Forestry, through the DGPHPA. As the project entails both National Park Management as well as socio-economicdevelopment aspects, within BAPPENAS' two divisions would be involved in overallsupervision, i.e., the Bureau Regional Development Sumatra, and the Bureau NaturalResources Management.

14. At the Provincial level, the Govemor is responsible for interdepartmentlcoordination through BAPPEDA. Responsibility for National Park Management fallsunder the Regional Forestry Office (Kanwil Kehutanan), through the SBKSDA and, in theTanjung Jabung Regency, a SSKSDA. Because of the integrated character of the Project,overall Project Management and Coordination would be the responsibility of BAPPEDA,which would chair a Project Steering Committee consisting of all major sectoral agenciesinvolved in the implementation aspects of the project, in particular, Forestry (includingSBKSDA), Agriculture, BPN, and Public Works.

Co _ Sevie Requhments

1S. Both international and national consultants would be required to assist inimplementation of various aspects of the National Park Management and assist BAPPEDAdevelop its planning and management capability. The socio-economic developmentactivities can be implemented mainly by staff of the relevant local line agencies of theMinities of Agriculture, Forestry and BPN. Some short term, local technical assistancewould be required for aspects such as engineering designs and/or feasibility studies.

- 73 - ANNEX 8

16. The required consultants positions are:

e Team Leader/National Park Management Specialist 36 person monthse Traing/Community Development Specialist 20 person months

56

National* Foresters 34 person months* Miscellaneous local consultants 9 person months* Architect 3 person monhis

46

17. Draft Terms of Reference of the long-term technical experts, and a descriptionof feir required qualifications, are given in the Attachment to this Annex.

B. EN0ONMmrAL PRoms

Bacgound

18. The objective of this component is to extend to West Kalimantan, technicalassistance on coast land use planning and management. A similar study already has beensuccessflly undertaken in Jambi and another study is currently underway in Riau withassistance from UNDP.

19. In 1990/91, the Asian Wetland Bureau supplied a resident coastal land usemanagement specialist to BAPPEDA - Jambi to assist in preparation of a coastal resourcesinventory. Ibis resuked in publication of a report on coastal wetand resources in theProvince and generated considerable interest within the Provincial Government in spatialplanning for the coastal zone. After completion of the technical assistance, BAPPEDA -Jambi continued the work that had been stared, leading to production of a spatial plan forthe coastl zone. They also commissioned supplementary economic studies by satitutPertanin, Bogor to evaluate the implications of growth in the Johor-Riau-Singaporegrowth triangle on Jambi Province in general, and the coastal zone in particular. Thisexperience indicates that strategic technical assistance to promote the concept of coastalzone management within a Provincial planming agency can create a sustainable interest inthe subject extending beyond completion of the technical assistance.

Poect Description

20. Tbe component provides for a three-person consultants team to be fielded inWest Kalimantan over an elapsed time of 12 months. The team would comprise anexpatae Team Leader/Environmental Planner, a local Senior Conservation Specialist anda local Assistant Planner. Field surveyors from relevant Provincial Government agencies

- 74- ANNEX 8

would be associated with the consultants team for carrying out the technical aspects of tework.

21. The main objectives are:

(a) to create in the Province a semi-permanent forum for inter-agencycooperation on environmentally sound planning and development of wetlandareas;

(b) create awareness on environmental aspects of coastal development;

(c) strengthen the environmental planning process for wetland areas; and,

(d) establish a cross-sectoral regional development policy for wetland areas.

22. The main tasks are:

(a) establish a working organization at the Provincial level to provide a planningforum;

(b) identify a study area comprising contiguous kecamatans covering as much ofthe coastal wetlands resource as is practicable;

(c) collate and analyze relevant environmental and social data covering the studyarea;

(d) undertake supplementary data collection and analysis as required;

(e) identify opporunities for coastal land use and conservation;

(f) develop a strategy for sustainable use of natural resources in the area; and

(g) prepare an Environmental Profile of the Wetland Area to provide a referencedocument for relevant planning and land management agencies.

Consultants Services Requirements

23. The team would comprise three persons as follows:

(a) Team Leader (international) - 12 month assignment. Post-graduate degreein Natural Resources Management or a related field plus a minimum of tenyears relevant professional experience of which a substnial proportionshould have been in developing countries, preferably Indonesia. The TeamLeader will be fluent in English and desirably also fluent in wriuten andspoken Indonesian. The Team Leader will be resident in Pontdanak for theduration of the project;

- 75 - ANNEX 8

(b) Senior Environmental Conservation ag t Spedalist (nonal) -12 month assignment. Post graduate degree in Natural ResourcesManagement or a related field (e.g. plant ecology) with at least five, andpreferably ten years experience in related fields witiin Indonesia. Priorexpeience in wnservaion and management of wedand ecologies would behighly desirable; and

(c) lAnd Use Specalst (natonal) - 12 month assignment. Graduate degree inSocial geography, Resource Economics or Agronomy with a minimum of twoyears experience in Indonesia.

- 76 - ANNEX 8Att acshmenl t

INDONESIA

INTEGRATED SWAMPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECF

BERBAK NAnONAL PARK INTEGRATED BuFFER ZoNE MANAGEmew

Draft Terms of Reference and Qualificationsfor Long-Term Technical Specialists

Company Badckground and Experience

1. The company(ies) and/or organization(s) (hereafter, company) tendering forthe work, will provide the long-term staff and the short-term consultants. The companyshould have a proven record in management of technical assistance projects withexperience of working and operating in Indonesia.

2. The company should also have a permanent, established local office to assistwith procurement, travel arrangements, and provide local support as required for theefficient and effective execution of the project.

3. The company should have major experience in wetland conservation projectsand be able to demonstrate that they have the capability to provide technical support andadvise Government field staff working on the project. The company should preferably beable to show prior involvement in international nature conservation and wetlandconservation and should be well acquainted with the global network of wetlandconservation oriented organizations and programs, in particular the RAMSAR Bureau ofthe Convention on Wetlands of International Importance.

4. The company must be capable of organizing and delivering training coursesas provided for in the project design including:

(a) specialized short training courses in wetland conservation management;

(b) field procedures for national park rangers including map reading, tracking,wildlife observation and recording, plant and animal identification; and

(c) study tours and in-service training for Indonesian counterpart staff.

Personnel Requirements

5. The assignment details, proposed terms of reference and professionalqualifications/experience requirements for each long term position are as follows:

- 77 - ANNEX 8Attachment

A. Team Leader/National Park Management Specialist:

Duty station - Jambi and Nipah Panjang

Qualifications - MSc or higher degree in natural sciences or equivalentprofessional working experience. At least 10 years experience in land-use planning/spatialplanning and wetland/coastal resource management. Experience in SE Asia of particularrelevEaice. Experience in project management/administration, particularly in Indonesia.Fluent in English and proficient in Indonesian.

Terms of Reference - the Team Leader will be responsible for the overallmanagerial, scientific, and technical aspects of the project. In collaboration with PHPAand others, implement the activities as oudined in the project proposal. Advise PHPA onthe ecological conditions in the National Park and its surroundings, environmentalmanagement needs, and opportunities for participation of the local communities inconservation oriented activities. Specific tasks will include:

As Team Leader:

(a) assist BAPPEDA-Jambi in management and supervision of the project, andbe responsible for the scientific, technical, and financial aspects;

(b) coordinate and manage all consultancy staff and ensure effective supervisionof counterpart staff;

(c) develop detailed workplans for all activities in conjunction with other projectstaff and in close cooperation and consultation with the relevant IndonesianGovermment agencies;

(d) be responsible for the coordination and organization of workshops andtraining programs as described in the project proposal;

As Park Management Specialist:

(e) development of a detailed Management Plan for the Berbak National Park;

(f) contribute to the planned workshop entitled "Towards compatibility of BerbakNational Park management and community development";

(g) assist in the preparation of five-year forward plans and annual budgets for theNational Park, and improve administration of the National Park offices;

(h) coordinate and supervise infrastructure improvements, including offices,guest-houses and transport facilities of the National Park;

- 78 - ANNEX 8Attachment

(i) actively guide and speed-up processing of recommendations regardingextensions to the National Park, or any other relevant recommendationsrelated to the National Park's management;

(I) assist in resolving disputes on the location of National Park boundaries; and

(k) develop with PHPA staff an intensive patrolling program of the NationalPark, and assist in the supervision of its implementation and draw upguidelines for law-enforcement and appropriate law-enforcement techniques.

B. Trainig/Community Development Spedalist

Duty station - Jambi

Qualifcations - MSc or higher degree in communication/information scienceand/or anthropology/social sciences. Knowledge of tropical agriculture/forestry systemsand at least 5 years experience in natural resources projects (preferably in Indonesia or SEAsia). Fluency in English, and proficiency in Indonesian language is essential. (Note:The position may require two people, one with major experience in the field of training,the other in the field of community development.)

Terms of Reference - In collaboration with BAPPEDA, PHPA, and othersbe responsible for the implementation of the activities as outlined in the project proposal.Assist on identification of training and awareness needs pertaining to natural resourcesmanagement, forestry and agricultural practices in the Berbak National Park and itssurroundings. Assist in the institutional strengthening aspects of the project in relation tothe social and administrative structures of the villages surrounding the National ParkSpecific duties will include:

(a) development and implementation of an information and extension programabout the importance of the Berbak National Park catered to the localcommunities, teachers, local and provincial government staff and officials;

(b) identify training needs and possibilities for PHPA staff, BAPPEDA staff, etc.and develop a training program and implement training activities;

(c) assist in design of notice/sign boards to be placed at all important locationsof access to the National Park;

(d) assist in implementation of all proposed activities which are related to thesocio-economic development activities;

(e) organize community meetings to increase community awareness regarding theNational Park;

(f) assist in the design of a detailed plan for land-tiding and certification in theNational Park buffer zones, and assist in the initial phases of implementaton;

- 79 - ANNEX 8Attachment

(g) assist in the identification of the most appropriate location of buffer zoneareas in the north-west of the National Park, and provide advise on posibleneeds for redefinition or reflning of boundary location of present proposedbuffer zone areas in the east and north of the National Park.

-80- ANNEX 9

INEGRATED SWAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

CONSULTAN SERVICES

This Annex describes the proposed responsibilities and qualifications for theconsultants to be employed under the project, except for the Coastal Zone Land UseManagement component, which is in Annex 8. Table 1, showing person months andestimated cost for all experts included in this consultancy, is attached at the end of thisAnnex.

A. WORK PLANNNG, COORDINATION AND MONITORING

1. Central Project Team Leader/Institutional Expert (1 international)

Specialist with at least 15 years of experience in implementing integrated ruraldevelopment projects, with strong background in management and planning. The specialistwould have led a consultancy team in Indonesia and have extensive experience ofIndonesia, preferably of schemes similar to those under the project. He would also haveextensive experience of Indonesian institutions involved in (irrigated) agriculturaldevelopment and would have to operate at senior level of government. Mainresponsibilities of the central project team leader would be: (a) to have overallresponsibility for the consulting services and management of the consultant's central andprovincial teams; (b) ensure, at central level, full coordination and close cooperationbetween the consultant and Government agencies for the smooth implementation of theproject; (c) assist in the preparation of a detailed schedule for each project year for allactivities to be undertaken by the agencies involved in ISDP; (d) assist in the preparation,by September of each year, of cost estimates associated with the project activities of theannual work plan (AWP), complete with breakdown per government department and perprovince; and (e) assist in the preparation, by September 30 of each year, and inconsultation with all executing agencies, of a detailed realistic integrated AWP and budgetrequest for each project year including the activities required for the procurement ofcontracts for services, supplies and civil works, and if, coordinate monitoring of projectprogress and the preparation of progress reports.

2. Deputy Central Project Team Leader (I national)

Specialist with at least 12 years oe :xperience in implementing integrated ruraldevelopment projects, with strong background in management and planning. The specialistwould have led a consultancy team in rural development, preferably on projects similar toISDP. He would also have extensive experience of Indonesian institutions involved in(irrigated) agricultural development. Main responsibilities of the deputy central projectteam leader would be: (a) to assist the central project team leader in all aspects ofmanagement including project monitoring and progress reporting; (b) ensure, at central

- 81- ANNEX 9

level, full coordination and close cooperation between the consultant and Governmentagencies for the smooth implementation of the project; (c) closely work with the agenciesinvolved in the preparation of a detailed schedule for each project year for all activities tobe undertaken; (d) assist in the preparation, by September of each year, of cost estimatesassociated with the project activities of the AWP, complete with breakdown pergovernment departnent and per province; and (e) assist in the preparation, by Decemberof each year, and in consultation with all involved executing agencies a detailed realisticintegrated AWP and budget request for each project year including the activities requiredfor the procurement of contracts for services, supplies and civil works.

3. Provincial Project Team Leader/Insitutional Expert (2 international)

Specialists with at least 10 years of experience in coordinating andimplementing integrated swamp development projects, with strong background inmanagement and planning. Ihe specialists would have extensive experience of Indonesia,preferably of schemes similar to those under the project. Main responsibilities of theprovincial project team leaders would be: (a) to have overall responsibility for theconsulting services and management of the consultant's provincial teams; (b) ensure, atprovincial level, full coordination and close cooperation between the consultant andprovincial agencies for the smooth implementation of the project; (c) assist in thepreparation of a detailed schedule for each project year for all activities to be undertakenby the provincial agencies involved in ISDP; (d) assist in the preparation, by August ofeach year, of cost estimates associated with the project activities of the AWP; (e) assist inthe preparation, by November of each year, and in consultation with provincial agenciesinvolved, of a detailed realistic integrated AWP and budget request for each project yearincluding the activities required for the procurement of contracts for services, supplies andcivil works; and (f) assist where necessary, the agencies with the implementation of theirwork plans.

4. Deputy Provincial Project Team Leader (3 national)

Specialists with at least 8 years of experience in coordinating andimplementing integrated swamp development projects, with strong background inmanagement and planning. The specialists would have extensive experience of Indonesia,preferably of projects similar to ISDP. Main responsibilities of the deputy provincialproject team leaders would be: (a) to assist the provincial project team leader on all aspectsof the consultant services including project monitoring and progress reporting; b) ensure,at provincial level, full coordination and close cooperation between the consultant andprovincial agencies for the smooth implementation of the project; (c) assist in thepreparation of a detailed schedule for each project year for all activities to be undertakenby the provincial agencies involved in ISDP; (d) assist in the preparation, by August ofeach year, of cost estimates associated with the project activities of the AWP; (e) assist inthe preparation, by November of each year, and in consultation with provincial agenciesinvolved, of a detailed realistic integrated AWP and budget request for each project yearincluding the activities required for the procurement of contracts for services, supplies andcivil works; and (f) assist where necessary, the agencies with the implementation of theirwork plans.

- 82 - ANNEX 9

5. Monitoring and Evaluation Expert (1 international)

Specialist, preferably an agricultural economist, with at least 10 years ofexperience in monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of projects in agriculture, irrigation orarea development. The specialist would have a good, up-to-date working knowledge ofrelevant computer software applications. The specialist's main responsibility would be toassist the National Project Secretariat and the three Bappedas with (a) preparation ofoperational guidelines for the implementation of an agreed M&E system in the projectswamp schemes; (b) planning and directing of implementation of M&E during the firstproject year; (c) preparation of the base-line M&E report for the first year; and (d)assistance to the Bappedas for their M&E activities during the following years and reviewof their M&E reports.

6. Monitoring and Evaluation Expert (1 national)

Specialist preferably an agricultural economist, with at least 8 years ofexperience in monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of projects in agriculture, irrigation, orarea development. The specialist would have a good up-to-date working knowledge ofrelevant computer software applications. The specialist would work together with theinternational M&E experts in assisting the National Project Secretariat and the threeBappedas, as specified above.

B. Ci WORKS

1. Design Specalist (1 international)

Engineer with at least 10 years of experience in the design and constructionof hydraulic infrastructure preferably in tidal and non-tidal swamp development projects.He would have special knowledge of the hydrological aspects of water management toensure optimal water control for agriculture. He would, based on the areas' hydro-topography, decide whether the "wet or dry" water management option would be appliedin each scheme, or part of it. The first option would involve drainage to 0.40 to 0.60 mdepth so that the topsoil is leached by rainfall to create a favorable root zone. Ihe secondoption would apply where tidal irrigation is feasible thus enhancing leaching of the topsoil. Main responsibilities of the design specialist would be to: (a) based on fte above,review the conceptual basis on which the existing detailed scheme design was done andevaluate in particular its economic viability; (b) assist in the preparation of TOR, andTender evaluation for detailed design works to be done by local furms; (c) review thedetailed design and adapt the existing detailed design to the modified/improved conceptualdesign; and (d) review the Bill of Quantities and assist in the preparation of contractpackaging and Tender Documents.

2. Design Spedalist (2 national)

Engineers with at least 8 years of experience in the design and constructionof hydraulic infrastructure in ddal and non-tidal swamp development projects. One

- 83 - ANNEX 9

engineer would have special knowledge of the hydrological aspects of water management(wet and dry option) and one would have experience in the design calculation andstandardization of water control structures in swamp areas. He would also haveexperience in the assessment of soil bearing capacity especially in swamps. Mainresponsibilities of the design specialists would be to: a) evaluate, in consultation with thevillage chief, extension workers and farmers living in the schemes concerned, theconceptual basis on which the existing detailed design was done; b) review the detaileddesign and adapt the existing detailed design to the modified/improved conceptual design;and c) review the Bill of Quantities and Tender Documents.

3. O&M Specialist (1 international)

Engineer with at least 10 years of experience in planning, design andimplementation of water resources and swamp development projects, including operationand maintenance. Previous experience in Indonesia and knowledge of Bahasa Indonesiapreferred. The basic function of this position is to ensure optimum operation andmaintenance (O&M) in the rehabilitated schemes under changing hydro-topographicconditions. Main responsibilities of the O&M specialist would be to assist PRIS staffresponsible for O&M to: (a) prepare operational guidelines for each scheme andoperational manuals for individual structure; (b) develop a consistent approach to O&Mprocedures, budgeting and staffing; (c) strengthen the WUAs; and (d) implement (50)water management unit pilot schemes at farm level.

4. O&M Spedalist (3 national)

Engineer with at least 8 years of experience in operation and maintenance ofdrainage systems and with background knowledge of improved procedures, watermanagement and maintenance. Must also be familiar with the work of Government O&MStaff, their organization, job specifications and duties and with introduction of newprocedures and eventually training. Main responsibilities of the O&M specialist would beto: (a) assist in the preparation of Tender and its evaluation; (b) assist in the preparationof operational guidelines for each scheme and individual structure; (c) review budgetingproposals made at section level for expenditure on O&M; (d) make recommendations onstaffing, facilities, organization and implementation of O&M; (e) assist in the organizationof field meetings with village chief, agriculture extension workers and field O&M staff;(e) train the ulu-ulu in day-to-day operation at the teriary level; (f) assist PRIS staff indeveloping or adjusting general O&M procedures and guidelines, and developing systemmonitoring; and (g) assist in implementing pilot scheme water management systems at farmlevel.

5. Construction Engineer (1 international and 3 nadonal)

Engineers with at least 10 years of experience in technical and administrativesupervision of irrigation and drainage infrastructure construction including earthworks,strucures, quantity calculations, quality control and preparation of tender docunents, andcontracts. Experience in implementation of swamp projects is essential for these posts.Main responsibilities of the construction engineers would be to: (a) assist in the preparationof Tender and its evaluation; (b) assist in supervision of construction including construction

- 84 - ANNEX 9

management, planning and scheduling; (c) assist in establishing the project supervisionOrganization including technical administration; (d) assist in quality control including: (i)selection of materials; (ii) soil moisture content and compaction; (iii) mixing, placing andcuring of concrete and reinforcement placement; (iv) pile foundations and other types offoundation; (v) masonry placement; (vi) erection and installation of gates and othermechanical and movable items; and (e) ensure the quality of any completed works or partsof works through appropriate sampling and testing. The internationally recruitedconstruction engineer would guide and supervise the locally recruited constructionengieers.

6. Roads Engineer (1 national)

Engineer with at least 8 years of experience in the design and construction ofrural roads including appurtenant structures, jetties and navigation channels. Previousexperience in swamp development projects preferred. Main responsibilities of the roadsengineer would be to: (a) review the road designs and ensure that the criteria adopted areadequate under unstable soil conditions; (b) assist in Tender preparation and its evaluation;(c) supervise the quality of construction and ensure (on a daily basis) that the works areconstructed in accordance with the specifications. Su:h works would include: (a)asphalting of single lane roads and motorcycle tracks; (b, mixing, placing and curing ofconcrete and reinforcement placement; (c) pile foundations and other types of foundations;(d) earthworks including selection of borrow pits, and ensuring optimum soil moisturecontent and compaction.

7. Water Supply Engineer (1 national)

Engineer with at least 8 years of experience working with community-leveldrinking water and sanitation technologies. The basic function of this position is to ensureexcellence in the areas of water and sanitation technology introduced by the project. Thisis primarily accomplished through (a) increasing the ability of project staff to help

select, construct, and maintain the most appropriate water and santationsystems, and (b) ensuring that the quality of these systems are sound. Mainresponsibilities of the water supply engineer would be to assist projectlNGO staff: (a) toassess hydrological situations in communities; match the most appropriate and costeffective water technologies to these situadons, and conduct cost estimates for differenttechnology options; (b) to assess geographical conditions and cultural beliefs and practices,and select the most appropriate water technologies based on this information; (c) in ftedesign and construction of innovative water supply technologies; (d) to ensure qualitycontrol of water supply systems designed by the project; (e) to up-date, research, andproduce technical manuals related to the technologies being promoted by the project; (t)to collect, analyze, and disseminate information to project staff about innovative andcreative chnologies other organizations are applying; (g) ensure project guidelinesconcerning commiees formation and negotiations are followed; and h) assist withmantni relationship with he government and NGO's at the central and local levels.

- 85 - ANNEX9

8. Environmental Engineer (1 national)

Civil engineering graduates with minimum 5 years experience at least someof which should be in construction management. Main responsibilities of theenvironmental engineers would be to: (a) implement the environmental management andmonitoring plan; (b) establish liaison between the project and relevant provincial agenciesand DGWRD's sub-directorate Ier-sectoral Coordination on Environmental ManagementMatters; (c) ensure that environmental protection measures are included in constructioncontract documentation as required and that compliance monitoring procedures areobserved; (d) agree and institute appropriate environmental monitoring procedures withrelevant Bappedas (BKLH) and sectoral agencies.

C. COmmUNiy AND AGRICuLuJRAL DEVELOPMENT

1. Irrgation Agronomist (2 international and 3 national)

Suitably qualified specialist in agricultural research and development with atleast 10 years experience in soil and water management in tropical farming systms,including preferably at least three years in tidal and non-tidal swamp conditions simila tothose found in the project area. The irrigation agronomist would liaise closely with AARDand PU engineering staff and consultants in fornulating and introducing improved,sustainable crop, soil and water management practices most appropriate to the particulahydro-topography of the different schemes. Main responsibilities would be to: (a) reviewexisting crop, soil and water management practices and relate them to fanming systemdevelopment in project schemes; (b) assist in carrying out surveys to obtain data forplanning and implementation of improved crop, soil and water management-practices; (c)assist in developing detailed annual work plans for research, extension, pest control andseed production and distribution in project schemes; (d) assist in preparation andimplementation of detailed plans and work schedules for establishing FSTAs and hydrmlicmanagement units; (e) assist in conducting workshops and training of project staff inplaning and implementation of crop soil and water management activities in projectschemes; (t) assist in the design and implementation of a system to monitor and analyzethe results; (g) assist in drafting a soil and water management guide for use in the projectarea; and (h) prepare and submit periodic progress reports and a final report.

2. Agricultural Economist (1 national)

Suitably qualified specialist with at least 10 years experience in aspects ofagricultural marketing. The specialist would, in close collaboration with project staff,assess marketing conditions in the project area and recommend actions to improve them.Main responsibilities would be to: (a) review and analyze the existing markets andopporunities for agricultural produce in the project schemes; (b) assist in the identificationand promotion of potentially new markets; (c) advise on the marketing prospects ofpotentially new agricultural commodities suited to the project area; (d) assist in estabishingprocedures for improved quality control, processing, packaging and transportaton ofprocedure from the project area; (e) assist with establishing liaison with the Departmen

- 86- ANNEX 9

of Trade on all marketing aspects; and (t) submit a final report with detailed findings andrecommendations.

3. Community Organization and Training Specialist (3 national)

Suitably qualified specialist with at least 10 years experience in ruralsociology, awareness creation, community development and extension. The specialistswould, in close collaboration with AARD research staff, DGFCA/PRAS staff and fairmerrepresentatives take the lead in developing all human resource development and technologytransfer aspects of the project and, in particular, initiate a methodology for theimplementation of farmer participatory technology adaptation and dissemination. Mainresponsibilities would be to: (a) assist AARD and extension staff in organizing andsensitizing farmer groups and preparing farmer participatory programs for theinvestigation, adaptation and introduction of new practices based on improved watercontrol in the FSTA, tertiary units and project area generally; (b) assist in the continueddevelopment of training programs for staff (at all levels) and farmers, and the preparationof communication materials and approaches to create awareness and support forthe varioustenets of the agricultural development program within the affected farmer communities andwithin concerned government/private agencies, including NMOs; (c) in support of theabove, assist in the development of training activities and materials for the various trainingprograms, follow-up in-service training tor field staff, workshops at Kabupaten andKecamatan level, and farmers field schools and field days at the level of FSTA and tertiaryunits in individual scheemes; (d) assist in the implementation and monitoring of FSTA andtertiary units programs by AARD and DGFCAIPRAS staff and the preparation of annialwork programs, activity schedules and financial budgets of such programs; (e) assist inpreparation of technical and progress reports analyzing the approach strategy at village,scheme and farmer group level with emphasis on extent of community participation,horizontal spread effects, sustainability of individual activities and of theorganizational/institutional approach, and effective dissemination of improved farming,water management and pest control practices; and (f) assist in producing periodic progressreports and prepare and submit a final consultant report with recommendation for follow-up activties to strengthen and further develop the community participatory approach.

4. Pest Control Specialist (2 national)

Suitably qualified specialist with at least 10 years experience in pest ecologyand population dynamics, integrated pest management and organization of pest controlprograms, campaigns and drives, with hands-on experience and knowledge of the mosteffective approaches in wild pig and rat control. The pest control specialists would workclosely with AARD and DGFCA/PRAS staff and farmer groups in identification andquantification of pest problems, devising the most effective strategies for their control, andorganizing and training pest control brigades within farmer groups to carry out thosestrategies. Main responsibilities would be to: (a) assist in the design and implementationof investigation of pest ecology in different habitat locations, including farm fields and alsoexploration of the role of surrounding habitats in providing refuge to pests; (b) train localstaff and firmer representatives in pest identification and dynamics, appLied ecology, anddesigning and implementing community-based, integrated pest control programs, based onthe latest effecdve methods, with particular emphasis on pig and rat control; (c) determine

- 87 - ANNEX 9

the magnitude and location of major pests in different parts of the project area and aasistlocal staff in training activities and the development of extension materials for farmer fieldschools and organizing and supervising farmers pest control brigades; (d) liaise closelywith AARD field research staff in developing more effective pest control techniques; (e)assist in the preparation of regular work plans and activity budgets; and (f) prepareperiodic technical progress reports and a final consultants report.

5. Women in Development (WID) Community Organizer (3 national)

Suitably qualified specialist with at least 10 years experience in ruralsociology with particular emphasis on women's affairs in the practical application ofcommunity development activities. The terms of reference for this Specialist would beidentical to those of the Extension/Training/Community participation specialist but withparticular emphasis on the following: (a) development in target areas for the increase inwomen's participation in development activities at all levels; (b) evaluation andrevision/adaptation of training prograirs/formats to incorporate gender issues and meetwomen's needs; (c) orientation of local government and staff at all levels towards theintegration of women into developmental activities; (d) investigations and case studies toidentify factors determining female participation rates in various activities; (e) monitorgender related issues; and (f) reconunendation on improving women's access to, and rolein development activities.

D. AGRICuLmuRAL RESEARCH

1. Irrigation Agronomist (Research) (1 national)

This specialist would have similar qualifications and experience as theinternational and local irrigation agronomists recruited by DGFCA but with emphasis onresearch, as evidenced by recent participation and publications in relevant swamps relatedresearch. While his/her main responsibility would be to work closely with AARDscientists in the identification of the most pressing research needs and the design andimplementation of the required research at Karang Agung, other appropriate AARDinstitutes and at field sites (FSTA) in the project area, the irrigation agronomist (resewch)would also be expected to liaise with the DGFCA irrigation agronomists in theirinvestigations and the design of their work programs to ensure those are based on the latestresearch results and also to obtain feed-back from the field to give direction to the ongoingresearch. The irrigation agronomist would participate in preparing technical and researchpublications, progress reports and would also produce a final consultant's report.

2. Crop Pest Speiaist (Research) (I national)

This specialist would be a scientist of international, standing with at least 10years ewerience in pest-related research relevant to the pests found in the project area.He would work closely with AARD scientists and the local pest control specialist todetrmine the severity distribution and ecology of the major pests in the project area anddevising effective control measures to contain them. Main responsibilities would be to:

- 88 - ANNEX 9

(a) assist in the design, implementation and analysis of surveys of pest occurrence;(b) assist AARD staff in the design implementation and analysis of a field orientedresearch program in the 10 FSTA sites to investigate pest population dynamics in relationto host plant populations, natural predators, and the application of physical, culturalbiological and chemical control measures; (c) identify and advise AARD on more basicresearch needs and outline research programs to support and backstop the applied fieldresearch; (d) assist the local pest control specialists and extension staff in devising pestcontrol strategies and programs utilizing the latest and most effective measures developedby research; and (e) prepare periodic technical progress reports and a final consultant'sreport.

3. Agricultural Economist (1 national)

Suitably qualified professional with at least 10 years experience in practicalaspects of rural economics and sociology. The socio-economist would work with AARDstaff in the FSTA sites, and collaborate closely with DGFCA staff and consultants in theproposed tertiary hydraulic management units to establish and review the current socio-economic charactristics in the project areas, to devise action plns for improvements, andto monior the effect and impact of project activities. Main responsibilities would be to:(a) assist in the preparaion, establishment and implementation of baseline surveys in theFSTA and tertary units, and more generally in the project schemes; (b) assist inestablishing procedures for monitoring farmers' incomes and any changes as a result ofproject activities; (c) assist in the analysis of results from base line surveys and monioringand evaluation activities, and in the preparation of further action programs to overcomeidentified constraints; (d) assist in the preparation of reports of the results of baselinesurveys, monitoring and evaluation activities and special studies, including farmmechanization, revolving fimds, and the incorporation of animals in the farming systemto provide draft power and other benefits; and (e) submit a fal consultant's report.

4. Communicato Speilist (1 inernational)

Suitably qualified specilist with at least 10 years experience in technicalcommunication or a related field, with practical experience in planning and developmentof audio-visual methods and materials for information, motivation and training. Workingclosely with research and extension staff, the specialist's major responsibilities would beto: (a) translate the results of research inuo popular language using different forms ofcommunication matched to different audiences; (b) assist in developing extension materialsand packages of audio-vistu materials for various purposes of awareness creation,motivation and extension; (c) assist in organizing and conducting training courses for fieldworkers in the development and utilization of audio-visual imaterials for extensionpurposes; and (d) submit a final consultant report with rewcommendation for a condnuedcommunication strategy.

5. Rural Sociologist (1 national)

Suitably qualified professional with at least 10 years experience in ruralsociology, awareness creation and adaptation of new cultivation pracdces. The specialistwould work closely with AARD research staff, DGFCH staff and farmer representatives.

-89a- ANNEX 9

He/she woulk take the lead in all technology transfer activities of the project, includingpreparadon of conmmunication materials and conducting workshop and training sessions.He/she would work closely together with the internationally recruited research andcomnunications specialist.

-89b- ANNEX 9Table I

IDONESIA

ETEGRATED SWAMPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

TECNCAL ASrSTANCE REQUIENTS

Implementing RequirementsExpertise Required Agency (Person/month)

A. Implementation SupportInernational Experts

1. Monitoring/Evaluation Expert (1) DGWRD 122. Design Specialist (1) DGWRD 303. Construction Engineer (1) DGWRD 244. Hydrology and Soils DGWRD 6

Subtotal

Local Experts

1. Deputy Central Team Leader (1) DGWRD 632. Deputy Provincial Coordinator (3) DGWRD 1803. Monitoring/Evaluation Specialist (1) DGWRD 634. Accountant DGWRD 255. Design Specialist (2) DGWRD 486. Construction Engineer (3) DGWRD 1447. Roads Engineer (1) DGWRD 308. Water Supply Engineer (1) DGWRD 369. Environmental Engineer (1) DGWRD 12

Subtotal ft

B. Institutional Capacity BuildingInternational Experts

1. Central Team Leader/Institutional Expert (1) DGWRD 272. Prov. Coordinator/Institutional Expert (2) DGWRD 603. O&M Specialist (1) DGWRD 124. Irrigation Agronomist (2) DGFCH 365. Research Comunnications Specialist (1) AARD 66. Park Management Specialist (1) DGPHPA 367. Training/Comm. Dev. Specialist (1) DGPHPA 20

Subtotal Z

-90- ANNEX9Table 1

Table 1 (cont'd)

Implementing RequirementsExpertise Required Agency (Person/month)

Local Experts

1. O&M Specialist (3) DGWRD 842. Irrigation Agronomist (3) DGFCH 483. Agricultural Economist (1) DGFCH 164. Training and Comm. Organizaton (3) DGFCH 485. Pest Control Specialist (2) DGFCH 666. Agricultural Machinery Specialist DGFCH 97. WID Community Organizer (3) DGFCH 368. Irrigation Research Agronomist (1) AARD 249. Agdculural Economist AARD 1210. Crop Pest Specialist (1) AARD 1211. Rural Sociologist (1) AARD 2412. Forester (1) DGPHPA 3413. Miscellaneous Local Experts DGPHPA 914. Architect (1) DGPHPA 3

Subtotal a

C. Policy Advice/Studies

Studies of Future Projects & Drainage Fee DGWRD TBD LaEnvirowmental Profiles for

Riau and West KalimantanProvinces:

1. International Exparts DGPHPA 122. Local Experts DGPHPA 24

Subtotal I

TOTAL

La To be determined.

May 6, 1994

IndonesiaIntegrated wasp Develont Project

table 101. Coordination of Ptovincial Activities17ambi

Dataile cotaip. Mlllon)

Prtes(in 8)

Ouantitiea BaseOCoat CoaP. Goo.tagoUnit 94/95 95/96 99719 979/99 99/00Total Unit o6 o" ct 9t0 Tota 1at Exob. Bate

2. Zwostint costsA. Offlee rehbilitation amnt 10.1 - - - - 10.1 15.0 40.3 10.0a. 1ps4t

fuiture set 1 - 1 .0 4.0 - - - - - 4.0 10.0 0.0 10.0NiaIellaneAus eqa t set - - - - - 1 6.0 6.0 - - - - - 6.0 o.0 *5.3 10.0Computer 1496/33) unit 2 - - - - - 2 6.0 12.1 - - - - - 12.1 10.0 35.3 10.0Motor car unit 1 - - - - - 1 20.2 26.2 - - - - - 26.2 10.0 35.3 10.0

Motorboat unit - 1 - - - - 1 3e .2 _ -2 0 10.0 35.3 1O.0

C. Gnral administrative expense per a_nnu 12 12 12 12 12 12 72 1.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 72.1 10.4 10.1 0.0feL za t _asts 72. 4 S0.2 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.110.1n. _oemm ogeto

o06 for oar 12 moath 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1.2/1onth 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 86.7 0.0 25.3 5.0Oa" for spee at 12 month - 1 1 1 1 1 5 4.0/month - 4e 49.1 46.1 40.1 40.1 240.4 0.0 10.1 5.0

etalm Doeisnst coats 14. 627 6256.56. 2. 2.

getal i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I"11. 74. !117 Yi-i -74.61 497.6

Te May 03 12:1itSS 1994

InoneslaIntegrated _wn Dvlopmet Protect

Table 102. CoordiaGtion of ProvWiial AetiVitiesRIUauI

Detailed Cnos(Fe.lip. Million)

Parmeters lln (ith. Gross

quantities Base Coat ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Coat. for, TaxUnit 9/ 9Is9P §i97 1 00 total Unit COst 949 9596 96/97 97/99 9/99 99/00 total Bte txch. Rate

2. Zin* H stA. Offlce tebablltation mnt 10.1 - - - - - 10.1 15.0 40.3 10.03. upst

rltur gt 1 1 4.0 4.0 - - 4.0 10.0 0.0 10.0

lsoellaeous uip t t I - - - - - .0 6.0 - - - - - 6.0 10.0 35.3 10.0

CO ter tU46/33) unit 2 - - - - - 2 6.0 12.1 - - - - - 12.1 10.0 J5.3 10.0

motor car uit 1 - - - - - 1 20.2 29.2 - - - - - 20.2 10.0 35.3 10.0Motorboat unit - 1 - - - - 1 9 3B.2 39.2 - 30.2 10.0 35.3 10.0

Dd*etal 30.2~~~~~~~~*UC 1: - - - - 090.5C. Geral adminlstrative expenses per anm 6 12 12 12 12 12 66 1.0 6.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 66.1 10.0 10.1 0.0

_ftal eetint Co-a. -"- -50.2 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 164.721. MInmIt eas t

043 feo cat 12 Moth 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1.2/moth 14.5 14.5 14.S 14.5 14.5 14.5 86.7 0.0 25.3 S.0043 for speedboat 12 month - 1 1 1 1 1 5 4.0/honth 49.1 40 .1 4. 44.1 240.4 0.0 10.1 5.0 S.

fetal Bainemt Casts ~~~~~~~~~~~~14. 62.5 62. 62.5 Uf 62-.5 327.100.6 112.6 74.6 74.6 14.6 74.6 491.6

u NWl 03 12:12:321994 -0

Ia tat _ Dsm et tojectable 103. Coordiation t ho l ktlvtlea

vast KImantan

lip. millicm$

CoanUti4l WaoM Coat Coat. Fto. Ta.Unit 91/95 95796 96/9t jfj 91193 !2SOO Total Umit Coat 94/95 95/96 96/97 91/98 91/99 2!99j*g00~tt Etch. Rate

. office zebbilitatiou _amt 10.1 - - - - - 10.1 15.0 40.3 10.0

ltu1 -tu* set 1 4.0 4.0 - - - - - 4.010.0 0.0 10.0lmgoelleua eipjmat set 1 - - - - - 1 6.0 6.0 - - - - - 6.0 10.0 35.3 10.0

Coter 1406/33) unit 2 2 6.0 12.1 - - - - - 12.1 10.0 35.3 10.0ato: eag unit 1 - - - - - 1 20.2 20.2 20.2 10.0 35.3 10.0Ibtotboct uvit - I - - - - 1 3.2 - 38.2 - - - - 38.2 10.0 35.3 10.0SM664 - - -- - - $C. Unauzl aMni.tatie e_pewe per aun 6 12 12 12 12 12 66 1.0 6.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 66.1 10.0 10.1 0.0

lintl - t -66.3 50.2 12.0 12.0 1.2.0 ¶12T 164.22. Ramuet Case

oem for am 12 mth 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1.2htr 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 66.7 0.0 25.3 5.0006 for apeeaet 12 moth - 1 1 1 1 1 5 4.OAontb - 40. 40.1 A 4A!1 40.1 40A 0.0 10.1 5.0

Sm. Hal 03 121tUT40 1-944~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

4i.'s~~~~~~~~~~'

'I" o o

4-1 cooUlastion of ftoicial AtlViteaVbat Kalmaatan

table 104. CoA99lflag $0.tt

4?. ilum$

0.15 f~~~fl ~ ~ Total Coovnt cootq 37 973 363 fL. o Rat. a. omt

A. Ctorn plmaesama0=9lm& smi ttestag

tor "oftfBWIa Is I ase poMot.) mah 32 6 3 a? 2 4*., 324 504.1 252.0 126.0 126.0 6.). 0.0 05.2 0.0suty o 2odoo 42aba.ta Math 3 l2 is 12 12 12 63 12.4 37.3 149.3 1.49.3 149.3 149.3 149.3 704.0 0.0 0,0 0.0

in.opti4a40liau math 3 12 6 6 3 - 30 42.0 126.0 504.1 252.60 252.0 124.0 - 2,260.2 0.0 65.2 0.0moath 3 12 l2 I12 12 9 a0 12.4 37.3 149.3 149.3 149.3 1.49.3 312.0 146.6 0.0 0.0 0.0

0astv5q VS!"$ 4~1 math 3 12 12 12 12a 9 40 12.4 37.2 149.) 149.3 149.3 149.3 112. 146.6 0.0 0.0 0.oupents - M.fouaatowl moatS 3 12 41 41 3 - 30 42. ISO.0 504.1 252.0 29.0 126.0 - 1.240.2 0.0 05.2 0.0

Mis-Dgt? 5 toeds" V. ffallrataa3 moa 3 12 12 12 12 9 s0 12.4 27. 149.3 149.3 149.) 149.3 11.2.0 744.6 0.0 0.0 0.0Roaltoeao sod oyolmtloo "Meot math 2 2 2 2 a 2 12 42.0 04.0 04.0 04.0 04.0 04.0 04.0 504.3 0.0 05.2 0.0Rhadttotam oh oajmtoo amp.e moatS I i2 12 12 12 22 a2 12.4 37. 149.) 149.3 240.3 140. 140.2 244.0 0.0 0.0 0.0ACOoiAtaat moth 3 4 6 4 4 4 25 12.4 H.± 49.0 74.7 49.0 49.0 .A3 21141 0.0 0.0 0.0

osadga epsol.UaO ~~~~~~moth 9 is 9 . . 30 42.0 30. 1 504.1 37M1I - I. 12.2 0.0 05.2 0.0boot,. apsotoltot ~~~~~meath 6 24 t0 . 40 12.4 74.1 29.7 224.0 . - 97.3 0.0 0.0 0.0640 apooloIhot m~~~~~~~oatS 4 2 a 2 2 12 42.0 140.0 04.0 04.0 04.0 04.0 50.1 0.0 05.2 0.0040 mpOolaUst ma~~~~~~~sot" 36 It0 l2 12 6 04 12.4 * 440. 22. 49.3 249.3 74.7 1,045.S . . .@Oaoteuottoa osgimot 0.50,0.1. mo"at 9 6 6 - 24 41.5 124. 3733 2,40. 2144.9 . 9.5 00 0. .

Ooaatoiloesop... liit)mt 3 1 2 2 9 * 01.4 3. .9. 14. 43 120 . 9. 0.S00,.OosmOt.mtlooeqS.... 4Mm math 3 12 12 12 9 * 40 12.4 27.3 149.3 149.3 149.3 s12.0 - 97.3 0.0 0.0 0.0CoasteastS. aagluoo. P KoSsaa math 3 12 1.2 12 9 . 40 12.4 27.3 149.3 149.3 149.3 112.0 - 97.3 0.0 0.0 0.0

boabnw eaglarnots moatt, 3 12 la 6a - . 0 12.4 37.3 149.3 112.0 749.1 1.0 373.3 0.0 0.0 0.0%Wotee o1 eSao .. mathb I 1s la 9 . - 36 12.4 37.3 149.3 149.3 112.0 . 440.0 0.0 0.0 0.0flinUbmWal *"o"go smath 3 6 2 - - 1.2 U2.4 37.2 74.7 37.3 . 149.3 0.0 0.0 0.0

" o*M h eaftl arfat mooth 2 .* I I 41. jj 15.5 5 - - 240.9 0.0 0.0 0.0

1.Btestloaall,.lg"ot ap amt Mat" 6 24 3 S * 6 42.0 252.0 1.099.2 120.0 126.0 1. 112.3 0.0 05.2 0.03. Raia0___

3veI9MIo. opoosotat ~ ~ ~~smat 6 E4 122 6 - 40 1.2.4 14.7 290.7 249.3 . 74.7 . 97.3 0.0 0.0 0.0W*gcSoal0.eoloomotos mo~~seth 3 1 6 * 6 - 16 22.4 27. 124 74.7 74.7 199.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 *

WA mtvoqsml.1ob mawth 6 24 12 - 6 - 40 12.4 74.7 29.7 149.3 74.7 . "5.) 0.0 0.0 0.0Agrie. mohawpoaStmthk - - 3 - 9 12.4 74.7 37.3 - 112.0 0.0 0.0 0.0lost .6.0.4l apoolt0i 1 Math 3 12 12 3 3 IS 12.4 37.2 149.3 149.3 37. 3 37.2 410.7 0.0 0.0 0.0lost osateot opooIVt. XAOi3uat. amath 3 1t 1s 3 3 - 3 12.4 37.3 149.3 149.3 37.3 37.3 410.7 0.0 0.0 0.0rI ol2 rasm low") Math S I 4 * 4 * 12 12.4 27.2 12.4 49.0 49.0 to14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0

010 oalty oo9soSIto""ea math 3 1 4 2 12.4 27.3 IZ2. 49.0 49.5 149.3 0.0 0.0 0.0010 oinafttp oogaa tor(. bluotmata math 3 I 4 . 122 12.4 37. 12A 9.0 * 49.0 - 14741 0.0 0.0 0.0

2..SgtSoa ooo.,h agomdau~t manth 2 12 5 24 12.4 37.3 149.3 122.0 . 299.7 0.0 0.0 0.0SesoagoS inaUatloi opoolalot maoth I I I I I 1 6 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 292.0 0.0 05.2 0.0

A#ti=tu,oI OOosAott math 3 2 4 - 4 - 22 12. 37. 12. 49.0 * 49.0 * 149.3 0.0 0.0 0.0cmo PMo = musllt Math 3 5 4 - - 12 12.4 37.3 62.2 49. 0 - . . 149.3 0.0 0.0 0.0%*atbooltOoSt mah 3 4 S 5 5 - 24 12.4 37.3 74.7 -6. .....,jj4 290.7 0.0 0.0 0.0

Toam lah"o.uatms. Posgot. apaoialtst math 12 12 4 6 - 6 42.0 $ 0. 04.1 252.0 2120 1,512.3 0.0 05.2 0.0

?eiatq"fmaatity Slw2wAt SpecoUsltt mah 5 5 20 42.0 * 1. 3099 210.0 210.0 * 0.1 0.0 05.2 0.0&AMO&Al 71TT1-- T7I41 1U13 -1UTcn.

2. attoso d tto..OtO,o smath - 12 22 6 4 * 34 12.4 - 149.3 1.49.3 74.7 49.0 . 423.1 0.0 0.0 0.0gise. 2.0.1 suetOt Math - 3 3 3 - 9 12.4 * 3.3 37.3 37.2 112.0 0.0 0.0 0.0AechItot mafth 3 . 3 12.4 * - 37.2 - 37.3 0.0 0.0 0.0

9*0.0.1 -94. -a _. -4 -

- in.I ~~~1D~ 14.14' 5 3 9V. ttuamaobal pooW*oa

oaoI goosowotloltmt 21. 41 7. *1 55 0 mhv1,oinoata Pisan", math 6 4 12 42.0 292.0 2S2.0 - 04.1 000. .

halo. lead wse please. math 6 4 12 12.4 Lf -SN2 ._149.1S2. 0.0 0.0 0.000

foe ISV 11 moUat - - ....~~~nI o -t1434,f 0.0 65.3 0.0 -

13NFU121 345 15 1994

2. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~rn -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a. geA. mr

I. 200141W oslo~4WA - I 20.60" 10.3 20.3 10.0 40.3 30.02. ?tot0~~~~ ,60 1 a .. a.. 1. 1 t.. 0.0 10.03* 00201 .0M634st 030051W - 20.0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~M 10.0 as.0 20.0 10.0 121.0 20.0 0.0 30.0

200 otsfl .40 WI .0S, 4: s 0. ..II: a

0 1004. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s-~~~~.

o .lOtsttmO @50 2 - 2 4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~".2" 0. to-001.0 0.0 10.0CujwtovI4W332 ~A.t 2 - 2 6.60 1. . -2. 10.0 30.3 10.0

Us.0 0 l 020 - 2. 10.3 10.0 0.0. 30.0Sps.no hel -." 3.1 - 0.1 23 * 114.0 - -114.0 10.0 40.3 10.0

_. -s sINW d93.taua 14. e -00 4 . -M- 07 10t l - _MA 10.0 10.3 10.0M."Muu;; C *U 2.4 2.4 4 0.0 0.0 - - - 800 3.0 40.0 20.00. b@109@ qt34st as - 0 3.9 . 0.3 20.0 10.3 20.0

0. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~rn born~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~: .1.0. 3m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.:

De" 2.0a 2.000 140.3 240.3 Mo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0. 40.3 10.0*M 610y0 -- 14.6 to -000 M3 - me0. 103.2 M 7 .1 122.0 M0.0 - - 404.2 10.0 40.3 30.03. 0in ~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- 2.6 3. - - 0. 11.0 40.S310.0

Urn SOIWbeSO maSSb ...W..J 38...403 .......WA. .... MA .4 14 3.0 40.3 20.0S. 06mg 0.6m AgauI "D W . 1612 I . S 03

,:= Mtit's 0 - - .0 .0 .7 -20 - too . 100.310.0 0. 2 0.0S. 0now

2. 00663 04

lo0..s

40601010 maht W"..~ .. 3j I~I . . . 3.JI0 10.0 40.3 10.01. 010ae t 00.4.6W.4 . . . . .00 .07 00.6 . . 3200. 10.0 10.3 10.0

0.~ ~~~~~~~~~, 1. 3m.S 0S. INO 1rne0 00000 00A22 . -. .07 1. 1 .0 3.03 20.0 40.3 10.0.9.

ass .0.0- 000 00. 20 30 - - - 40 200 ...340.4 MAg4.... .~ .J1 11.0 40.3 10.0

3. 00000 .1 g66WIa60 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 49" 001 34. . MA200262 .d13m ut In -o t to Sr2n1 0 23. .... 9jo ...... . MAI 30040. 10.0

comb2 1 0 . I o 0 x "C .40 . .. .240 0.-u 47. JAM . - 4?. 0 10.1 30.0S. 3m3 tma dGw4Ma 0.-

"A". 0. .

SR. coo" mass20&UObSinU S 2.0S 2 t4.2AM M. U. 4 40 9 -. 11.3 1.0 40.3 10.0 o3m ,.-an a0N"&00I0 2.31001 224A1. 1il.2 .46 U .JL2L 21.0 40.3 30.0

I. 020 00 4.0W.4.~~~~~~.0 40f k 2000 .7 343.0 - - W -A 14.0 10.0 11.1 0.00w41&rn-00.320 002 - 20 206 -.0 2e00 2.010 la..1 40. W- 711.0 1A0.0 40.3 10.0a.ulo-3.020 000.3 - 6 12~~~4. - -f -.0 10" 2.010 OL20 30& M1.4 20.0 40.3 10.0-ama

N .Uer obeasi WI

Ite9twted twaqv Deeopmesat 1prolactTable 202. oralelg and I rrL,atioat

Detailed c..r.

gave coot Coat. IPb? t. rowsOuatl9e Sasst coot Roate for,h tA"

Val t 94/95 95/96 96/97! _7lysS99/0 oa Oi oo 49 91/96 UP/9 97.91 9999 900 Total tePc.at

* . tmetCast.* ~~~~~A. UssaMeeOt 00I

1. Duildieg unbit I 006 1. 011. 031.

* ~~~~~~2. italalag oumrs tor otaff coorse 3 .5 1. . . 00 901.

5. ater saeagent StaslelS 6. . .010

* (~~~~~~ot staff I A WA members OWU$at - 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 200 100100 001.

* 4. S~~~~~igumeto"mt1 ::2"

tUt5St@16 561 . . 2 4.015~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2. - 9.01002. 00ao~te 0241331 unOit 2 - 2 .05 1. . - .120.1 10.0 104O .

RoorCar rAlt . 29. 25s1 . 9.3 . - - .2.3 10.0 90.4 0.

Speedboa ut . 3 - . .3 34,212 . 114.9 1. 1. 0)1.

flotorcyoloa unit ~~ ~~ ~~~2 2 . . - 4 3.011 6.i' 6.0 .. . - . 12.0 10.0 2S.3 60.

~~~~t.to1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~X1 1~~~~~~~~~-4-9.0 . . -, -

0. Uy*.loU 2

1. &N&A plattom unAit 2 10la 12 10.066 20.1 100.7 . . - . 1091. 031.

* ~~~~~~2. VISrololic equipmenat assent SO92. 0.0 - - 9.5 10.0 31.3 10.05. Staff treainag aecuat100 100 2. . 1001.0 .0 00

* 0.~~Stet&Slrt..* I~~~~~. M10 art 40 . .D.4.00 0.7 097 . "S30. 7 10.0 15.2 0.0

S. M artbe0es*a6 0.0

* 3ev~~~~2 dltbeer -. 3.6b 000 e3 . 106.75 170.9 149.41 421 2.919 . 300.9 491.4 421.2 -1,203.5 1I.0 40.3 10.0

* Sac~~~~~~wavattag PAd eAtdihg747 S*4031.

'cv ocoasin .- 17.9 km '000 03 . 62.5 t00 97.5 . . 21 2.919 - 176.2 291.9 246.6 - - 7471. 031.

bravatice of rivet -. 5,4 km '000 .3 .16.25 26 22.75 lA 1 .19 - 41.9 73.) 64.1 . 193.2 11.0 40.) 10.0

* Ccv~~~~S "at" ctureS cuun. 51.9 925.4 722.3 - -2 063 6 MD. 40.3 10.0

xmtetc1 3117T11E1T?US 1.45S4. 0.-

* ~~~~~~1. 910 ha 1.115 . . . - ,1 0.01 70.2 . . . . 762 00152 .0If

2.eot dbee- 59be'00a . 19.9 20.2 . 4. 2.919 s)1.0 19.1 . 132.S 15.0 40.) 10.0

bexavatiag mae eateediag 7. . 10 0 0.

meW canals -- 0.9 t beo 003 . 2.9 4.2 . 7 2.919 607.9 31.-9 .1. 1. 031.

S. Rotor eosatrl stzucter1s2 0 9OS31 S04031.

NeW atrmures aaoot. 732119 22993.11.04.) .

g4tatAl t7

1.1 ha 1.200 - . -1.200 0.07 94.2 . . . - - 9. 001. .

S. artbossata.2 13.* Rev~~~~~No dibe, -- 10.0 k. p000 *3 - 32 49 to . 5 2.919 0.2 1.3 251104.3 00

* ~~~~~~~xsacvatlag cad exteniding 1. s 031.

ccv canals -1.4 be '000 .t3 . 1.6 2.4 . - 4 2.919 4. 6.CS 1. 10 031.

Sobtatal 142. .1 . . 23.

D.evateruc"tur cacaos - 910.0 1 361.0 - ____2 Z7s 0 15.0 40.3 10.0

~ttl otcut Ruk 04! * lii.0') ts!5T 2,196.0. SdIto Catc

1. 98 ha 3.974 . 3.974 0.07 279.90 7. 001. .

2. Sartheorka&sc&vatlg cand outeadial g7I. 031.

saw conals -- 6.2Sk be '000 a) 4 28 - . 35 2.919 39.S 59.2 - - - 9.7104.)10

Rocavatlon of eavlgailca 3S 299 286 329$141. 031.eceals -- 5.0 km 1000 C) 74 MI . . . 91 2.1 2096 329 . - 1.4104.31.

Sobtotal ~iI 1~

S.hbew aotruuue aeut 246 2 1,069.3 - ,11s.6 15.0 10.3 10.0

Vowte 1i11 1711omh T'IN!I 4!69 3 -4 7 0

Tae%tal Zeoetrat costas1 1~i1i~V5 1it It. * eseerr eeCate

A. Intmoretal #"e.Wigton S. e. 4. 9. 2. . 01 S

048 for speedboat 12 ecath . 3 3 3 3 - 12 1.009/mooth a.103 19. 4.3 103 . 2. .01. .

0981 for car 12 coaktS I 4 1.202/soomth 14.4 14.4 34.4 24.4 . 57. 0.0 10.1 5.0 0

0981 for hydroloic equipobt 400ns 0.0 11.0 23.0 13.0 83.0 . 5.1 0.0 80.1 5.0

3. Sotla Ki .S o a . . . .440440990 00 176.3 176.3 352. 0.0 10.1 1.

C. peals Ciaaba II ha . . . 1.111 1~~~~~~~~~~~.110 4.110 3.400 0.04 .. 44.7 44.7 44.7 134.0 0.0 10.1 S.

0. Teluk Ulaoba;g1 ,200 1,200 1.200 3.600 0.04 - - 49.3 49.1 49.1 144.2 0.0 20.1 5.0

Rotela at% ha I ,30 1,30 3.974 3.974 10,549 0.04 - 52.1 52.1 119.2 159.2 422.6 0.0 10.1 1.

Total sostrosat Coeto I 15776W1 il 31: 440.2 1TTS4I1

the Way 12 M2UM95 1994

- 96Udootsaa ANUX 10

00_440�sogai."o a" WAS&"" Page 6 of 21V"t saussat,ma0.04,64.4 Gee"00.

Volt JILIL J?Lm nmL Um- _%Lgw_ -p-m- rsaelL a's-L.

A. peoloot -- gooooot "s

stoff aoKwot 1.4

tat, VUA ftft" 4SKMet 30.0 W.1 10.4 $0.8 30.0 154.0 WA *.4 30.4

I.- kmt *:* I I sel l:::4..V.t.r 1444/") "it a 3 4.4's u I 2: 3""Of to alm ! SdA 6 2 a I .0P"db" lu 124.6 314:4 1: : 1.1 Me"w."Ito MoA t 4 3411 -6.0 - - ----- 16.0 3S.S 30.0

4.4-2 =�R =0 ---M ---M ,11.0- .. Al 1 4 s 30 04 44 16.0 6.0 W*

otomeol, S3:ll s3l 10.4 11.,3: Scott t'".fts 4o-s ISo.! -44 -4Msopooo a-tz is 4 222

4.70 *A? M.? 14.0 16.2 0.0

.. d 1-4744%.* .. 39A t. '000 .3 Sp 2.019 144.4 219.9 364.4 0.6 40.3 10.00,49""

10.0 1. '000 .3 140 244 . . . 400 3-416 210 6 2 16 a3.

AlhH , -4, Lf 16.0 4C.3 10.6

V-.9SID ft. 49.1 41.1 10.6 14.1 0.4

oo� Ctoa%$ 1.7 t. .3 41.6 134 in SAIS 1374 M.2 243.9 11.0 44.3 nA3. � �l .�

X_ W.'etwes - .1 04 40.3 14.4

Aoo4,o 4-Y.ISID h. 4.644 4.446 6.47 3".s - USA 10.0 2612 0.0

wtoo,2014 422.6 2S.0 40.2 10.0.,�W,oo 16.0 40.3 20.0

Stbtoto,

S-kop 0.01 IS7.9 UIA $0.0 is's 0.0M h. 2.2" 2.202: S..tb .. to

steo-Itoo"ol .- d CU-t".... t'" ftt.. .060 S, 30.0 44.2 77 2.4st ".S 230.2 217.0 16.6 40.3 20.0

3. siotoo, -toolI*oe tllldu-. 25.6 40.3 10.06.1

6. S" S" 0. V. 41.4 41.4 14.0 U.2 0.0

-40a .3 42.4 93.0 1% 2AU 17S.0 "La 439.1 ISA 0.3 10.0t-Itr_-to_ Mooool .6 4`3 ""a

Isto ba 1.221 $25 0.01 M S 10.0 Isla 0.02: lmoolloooelko

u- 4LI. .. 4.9 t. -ON .3 M: 39.6 14.4 IS2.4 104 : is 3Cloo- s- o-OU 0. 0.4 4."? 1.4 Le 4: Is:: I 3 1,01uto,"" iostoo,sioq Soo, "mb 'ON .3 n 4s a's" ------ 4`3

J.X_ U.Mcoo 4-4 _--a 44.3 20.0sol.O."s1� At. Ptft

U3.3 133.2 20.0 16.2 0.0- --M .. M *---..-4" 16.0 40.2 nA

M 361 3.1,10 0.91 0.6 U.4 S&I 10.0 2162 6.02 M�44.9 " -toowtoeoo� to"I 36929 UL4 M.4 341.2 164 40.3 MO= -- 4.1 M -000 .2 . 4s.e 12.6

Udo, ottootozos � t 40'$K. A- DoMhoo

I tA 30 . . . . 30D 0.01 32.6 21.0 14.0 M& 4.02 St".1th.m.looo,!44KLmot dik- - ;!Vk. -on 23 9.2 13.0 . 33 SAM 26.9 30.9 64.4 15.0 411.3 MA".boo, .."'ol

MeI$,* S*'be no 3.466 - 2.3100 0.01 38.4 USA ISCS 20.0 -0.42: Unto .. "itw 41.6 t. 10441 .3 - 330.4 117.4 . us 4.419 331.1 S".6 OU.3 16.4 40.2 10.0

-on W - InA 214.2 . UT 2AU, ts.. 40.% WAadw.oollb*-

strogtar- -wi ---mi +R4 +WAU. o- to. W 30.1 28.1 . 41.4 10.0 U.2 0.01. SID tA WA 4".6 0.

2.

,oool. .. IM b. -ftO 03 14 Us us 3.4" M.6 smi . SUA 26.4 40.2 10.0e""" In.

Sob, t..etocoo soft - 16.0 &2 M*S."l, 9 ... t..% C.".

ft ..... CoWLoA. Sweooowtol IWS,,,Om SC "t 22 somb 2 a 2 a 0 24.9 30.9 21.0 U.$ 216.1 0.1 U.2 15Ais also 3 S 3 3 U 3."WMWA lQS.T m l t".7 434.1 0.0 40.3, 5.00.0 10A 6.0

a. I00.0 Xtecl, ti 4 tit 4.1016 4.1410 4.M 14.100 0.04 100.31 US 3 US.2 6444 0.4 MI 6.014; in M no &,Me 0.04 29.0 U:* ".0 15.3 0.0 ml 5.04.40 4.40 4.60 4.4a 14.640 4604 t USA 104 "s.9 143.4 0.0 UJ 6.6S.& 0% p U * am ZZ M 9.000 a. 90.! SC% 10.3 10.1 31404 0.4 YA. S SAUL Sol" 004 1. 0.40M, 21.4 23.4 41.3 0.4 16.1 5.0Out-Ol.k um UM" 10.1 10.1 144.2 0.0 Ws 6.0fte M&I, be 16M 11.940 3.90 S.10* 0.04 I&I 76.1 ?M MA 0. 19.31 6.01. 'IO La," M" 0.01 44.9 46.0 U., O.: tiL .G990 M UA 31LI 0.0 10.1 SAbe S.= 2.300 40 0.16M. sal 10114 SILS 0.0 14.1 6.0S= be M S" 1:1141 0.04 0.0 ml &*

OWA""T�l Sb.O..~ GootoTk. Koy 1; 13146.14 1994

IndonesiaIntqgratod swa Developct Projecttable M0. Iigricultural Dewelopent

Janbl

IVp. milion$

Phy!t Grole'

unit 94L9S gSX96 9679/98 98199 209S7iita Coat 96/95 97/96f97 7/918 9 /9 99/00 Tontal Rte wA Rate

S. _ *tmb howua. d "tw om nt

Preparatlon ofwork program unit 2.6 5.4 * 2.1 5.4 11.2 * - - - 16.6 10.0 IS.2 0.0

D"onstrations unit - 1.6 1.6 I.6 1.-6 1.6 *9 52.0 - 83.2 63.2 83.2 83.2 83.2 *16.0 10.0 20.2 0.0tansrer ot technology unit - 1 2 2 2 1 8 3.1 _ 3. 6.2 .2 9 jj 862 3.1 2. 10.0 IS.2 0.0

for gamw

Eretillser former 450 900 le ISO 1 800 2 250 2,250 9,000 0.1 58.3 116.7 175.0 233.3 291.7 291.7 1, 166.6 10.0 0.0 10.0Other Inputs farmer 450 900 1,350 1,800 2,250 2,250 9,000 0.1 Sq1. 3 116.7 175.0 233.3 291.7 291.7 41 16 10.0 0.0 10.0

B*t& 1 16. 7 233.3 350. f-56-0 -F3.a 58O.-3 2, 3-3. C. Rchabilatation of RECs

and staff housing amount 1.5 1.S - - - - 3 31.3 47.0 47.0 - - - - 94.0 15.0 40.3 10.0D. Extension materials

and equipmnt _lunit 3.5 10.4 17.9 25.4 33.0 40.5 130.7 10.0 35.3 10.0

Kiiansgs /a unit I 1 - - - - 2 31.4 31.4 31.4 - - - - 2. 10.0 60.3 10.0Notorcycics unit 10 30 - - - - 40 4.2 41.9 125.7 - - - -167.6 10.0 60.3 lO.OPrwbo ts unit I I 2 10.5 lOO.S .S - - - 20.9 10.0 60.3 10.0

i 167. - 251.

P. Additional seed equlnat amount 20.) - - - - - 20. 10.0 35.3 10.0 IG.Seed certification 'training nmmt 6.9 6.S IN - 1. 10.0 0.0 lO.O 0

and o5 thre pers set M 0.5O. _ _ _ _ 1 62. 31.3 31.3 - - _ _ 62.6 lo,:0 35.3 10.

Dmonstatr tons amount 0.5 0.5 - - - - 1 12.5 6.2 6.2 - - - - 12. l§. la. 0.0Supervision * per annus _ 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 13.0 10.0 0-0 0.0

211o4tal 37.S 40.1 2.6 2.6 2.6 -2.6 08.0I. training7 of

farmers groups amount 94.9 94.9 126.5 190.0 94.6 31.5 632.4 10.0 0.0 10.0J. ME and studios

beach mrk, midtermand impct study amount 124.4 36.1 141.2 62.2 34.2 ISS.6 553.S 0.0 0.0 0.0

tr. Production activitiesfor Waw amount - 31.2 31.1 31.1 32.1 31.1 155.6 10.0 O.0 10.0

tota inetment coff 5409 76S5 ?58.8 7.4 868.2 -9- 4,731.3nt. _ *ozm cemt

Seed prottuction operations amount 34.6 34.6 34.6 34.6 34.6 34.6 207.7 0.0 10.1 5.0motorcycle operations amount O.S 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 4.2 0.0 10.1 5.0Ttavel and allowances amount 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 15.6 0.0 10.1 S.OTrav /allowanc s fox

extension workers amount 20.0 27.7 27.7 27.7 27.7 27.7 159.3 0.0 10.1 5.0,REC operations amount S.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 36.4 0.0 10.1 S.OPost control amount 13.8 2?7._ 27.7 27.7 21.7 27.7 _152.3 0.0 10.1 5.0

Svta _esmt Coats 77.6 99.6 99.6 99_ 99.6 99.6 575.4to 618.5 86-4.5 S858S-.4 967.0 967.0 1,030.5 5,306.7 p

eo P\a 2-whecl drive passenger van. ~Tue Kay 03 12:31:44 1994 O O

1-1 Agricultural Developmeat\Janbi

IndonesiaIntegrated Swamp Development ProjectTable 302. Agricultural Development

RiauDetailed Cotat

(Fp. Million)

Parazeters (in %)Phy. Gross

Quantities unit Base Cost Cont. For. TaxUnit 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/9 98799 99/00 Total Cost 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 Total Rate. Exch. Rate

I. Iuoe COatsA. _ erta ' Em mits

Preparation ofwork program unit 3.4 6.6 - - - - 10 2.1 7.1 13.7 - - - - 20.8 10.0 15.2 0:0

Dmonstrations unit - 2 2 2 2 2 10 52.0 - 104.0 104.0 104.0 104.0 104.0 520.1 10.G 20.2 0.0Tansfer of technology unit - 2 2 2 2 2 10 3.1 - 6.2 t.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 31.2 10.0 15.2 0.0

Subtota 7.1 124.0 110.2 110.2 110.2 110.2 572.0a. ao.i~hl

for tafowtFertilizer farmer 300 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,500 6,000 0.1 38.9 77.8 116.7 155.6 194.4 194.4 777.8 10.0 0.0 10.0Other inputs farmer 300 600 900 1,2"0 1,500 1.500 6,000 0.1 38.9 77.8 116.7 155.6 194.4 194.4 777.8 10.0 0.0 10.0

subtotal 77.S 155.6 233.3 311.1 388.9 388.9 1,555.5C. Rebabilatation of RECs

and staff housing amount 2 2 - - - - 4 31.3 62.6 62.6 - - - - 125.3 15.0 40.3 10.0D. Extenslon materials

and equipment amount 3.5 10.4 17.9 25.4 33.0 40.5 130.7 10.0 35.3 10.03. Vebialee

Kiljangs /a unit 1 - - - - 2 31.4 31.4 31.4 - - - - 62.8 10.0 60.3 10.0motorcycles unit 5 35 - - - - 40 4.2 20.9 146.6 - - - - 167.6 10.0 60.3 10.0Powrboats unit 1 1 - - - - 2 10.5 10.5 10.5 - 20.9 10.0 60.3 10.0

Subtetl 62.8 188.5 - - - - 251.4P. Additional seed equlpment amount 20.9 - - - - - 20.9 10.0 35.3 10.0G. Seed certification training amount 6.9 6.9 - - - - 13.6 10.0 0.0 10.0 °S. Zarhtimo

moobnits.tlISet of S reapersand S thresheri set 1 1 - - - - 2 62.6 62.6 62.6 - - - - 125.2 10.0 35.3 10.0

Demonstrations amount 1 1 - - - - 2 12.5 12.5 12.5 - - - - 24.9 10.0 10.1 0.0Supervision per annum - 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 25.9 10.0 0.0 0.0

slubtotal 75.0 60.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 176.0I. Training of

farmers groups amount 142.3 142.3 189.8 285.0 141.9 47.3 948.5 10.0 0.0 10.0J. MaE and studies:

bench mark, midtermand impact study amount 124.4 36.1 141.2 62.2 34.2 155.6 553.8 0.0 0.0 0.0

K. Production activitiesfor "men amount - 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 155.6 10.0 0.0 10.0

1L. owlft pumpsfor pilot irrigation scheme /b unit - 30 - - - - 30 2.1 - 62.6 - - - - 62.6 10.0 35.3 10.0

total m_a~Mt Coats 583.4 728.8 830.3 744.5 778.7 4,566.0US. smeet Coats

Seed production operations amount 34.6 34.6 34.6 34.6 34.6 34.6 207.7 0.0 10.1 5.0M4otorcycle operations amount 0.8 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 6.2 0.0 10.1 5.0Travel and allaances amount 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 23.4 0.0 10.1 5.0Travel/allowances for

extension workers amunt 20.8 27.7 27.7 27.7 27.7 27.7 159.3 0.0 10.1 5.0REC operations amount 6.9 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 48.5 0.0 10.1 5.0Post control amount 13.8 27.7 27.7 27.7 27.7 27.7 152.3 0.0 10.1 5.0

tetal ae costs 8.8 103.3 -13.3 103.3 103.3 103.3 597.4 ° fetal 664.2 1,003.7 832.1 933.6 847.8 882.0 5 163.4 a P

\a 2-skeel drive passenfer van. lo\b 15-30 liter/second pumps

Tue May 03 12:32S10 1994

1-1 Agrilultural Development\Rlau

Interated _ Deelgnt ProjectTable 303. Agricultural Davelogmat

fest Ka.imantan

Pareters n athy. Gros

Q intities Unit lase Cost Cont. For. taxUnit 94/95 95796 94/97 97/96 06/99 ° fotal Cost 9495 95/4 969 S7798 9S/99 .99/00 Roaal ate Erch. Rate

:. 2o CastsI. iutta d um it

Pleparatio ofwork prram unit 4 8 12 2.1 8.3 16.6 - - - - 24.9 10.0 15.i 0.0

Dstrationa unit - 2 3 3 3 1 12 52.0 - 104.0 156.0 156.0 156.0 52.0 624.1 10.0 20.2 0.0tanaer Of tecnology unit - 2 3 3 3 1 12 3.1 - 6.2 9.4 9.4 9.4 3.& 37.4 10.0 15.2 0.0

IshOetal 6.3 126.9 165.4 165.4 165.4 55. 686.4s. Smelw*fer I

UertlIaer farmer 750 1,500 2,250 3,000 3.750 3.750 15,000 0.1 97.2 194.4 291.7 366.9 486.1 486.1 1,944.4 10.0 0.0 10.0Other lnaput farmr 750 1,500 2.250 3,000 S.750 3, 750 15.000 . 0.1 97.2 194.4 291.7 366.9 466.1 466.1 1 944 4 10.0 0.0 10.0tatnl 194.4 368.9 - i3.3 777.0 97i.2 972.2 3,686.9

C. Rahabilatation of 3rsand st boalng amout 2.5 2.5 - - _ 5 31.3 76.3 76.3 - - - - 156.6 15.0 40.3 10.0

0. Extealon materialsMA equimat amount 3.5 10.4 17.9 25.4 33.0 40.5 130.7 10.0 35.3 10.0

U9. ti1eKijags /a udit 1 1 - - - - 2 31.4 31.4 31.4 - - - - 62.8 10.0 40.3 10.0Sbtrcyoles unit 2 36 - - - - 40 4.2 6.4 159.2 - - - - 167.6 10.0 60.3 10.0

awaroata unit 1 1 - - _ _ 2 10.5 10.S 10_.25 20.9 10.0 60.3 10.050,3 201. I - 251.4

F. Additional saed equlimnt a-t 20.9 - - - - - 20.9 10.0 35.3 10.0 '0G. Seed certification traning amount 6.9 6.9 - _ _ _ 13.6 10.0 0.0 10.0

s. _tetsem de

Set of S reperaand 5 threshers set 0.5 0.5 - - - - 1 62.6 31.3 31.3 - - - - 62.6 10.0 35.3 10.0

Dnestration amout 0.5 0.5 - - - - 1 12.5 6.2 6.2 - - - - 12.5 10.0 10.1 0.0supervision per annum - 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 13.0 10.0 0.0 0.0oatn 3 40.1 2.6 - 2.6 2.6 88 66,0

S. Training offamrs groups amunt 237.2 231.2 316.3 474.9 236.4 78.6 1,560.9 10.0 0.0 10.0

J. Ma and studies:bench mrk, mddtormand impact study atmt 165.9 46.1 186.3 63.0 45.6 207.4 738.3 0.0 0.0 0.0

. Ptroduction activitiesfor wn amount - 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.S 41.5 207.4 10.0 0.0 10.0

got" 2mst_at Cats 1 03.i 1,179.4 1,315.3 1,5;0.5 1,496.7 1,396.1 7,763.2U. _ernont Cast

Seed production operations amunt 34.6 34.6 34.6 34.6 34.6 34.6 207.7 0.0 10.1 5.0motorcycle opertions amount 0.8 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 6.2 0.0 10.1 5.0trael and allowances atmt 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 23.4 0.0 10.1 5.0travel/allances forextension workers unt 20.8 27.7 27.7 27.7 27.7 27.7 159.3 0.0 10.1 5.0

RBC operations aount 6.9 8.3 8.3 8.3 6.3 6.3 46.5 0.0 10.1 5.0Pet control aiunt 13.6 27.7 27.7 27.7 27.7 27.7 152.3 0.0 10.1 5.0

feta _ Dernt costs 80.8 103.3 103.3 103.3 103.3 103.3 597.4884.1 1,262.7 1,416.6 1,673.9 1,600.0 1,S01.4 8,360.6

%f 2-1*a11 drive passener Van.

Tue May 03 12:32:35 19 o

1-1 Agricultural Davelopmant\Ubst Kalimantan

IndonesiaIntegrated Swap Development PtrojectTable 401. Agricultural Research

JambiDetale& 0..t5(Pi. illion)

Parameters (in B)phy. Gross

I ntitlo Unit Base Cost Coat. For. TaxUnit 94/95 95M96 96/91 919 96/ *700 Total Cost 94/95 I5/96 9_/97 917/98 98/99 99/00 Total Rate Exch. Rate

s. Z__mvet Osetsa. 3~pet*mg ilUtl

suilding rental amount 34.2 26.0 - 62.2 10.0 0.0 0.0miture am_unt 17.2 14.1 - - - - 31.3 10.0 35.3 10.0

VehbIlels aount 34.6 20.3 - - - - 62. 10.0 60.3 10.0Offle rental

at prolin capltol amount 17.1 14.0 - - - - 31.1 10.0 0.0 0.0Operatlon amont 25.7 21.0 - - 46.7 10.0 10.1 0.0

gabtete -T2- -iwi9. - - -

8. 3pi_field euipmet amount 51.1 40.7 10.4 2.1 - - 104.3 10.0 3S.3 10.0Office epment amot 10.2 8.1 2.1 0.4 - - 20.9 10.0 3S.3 10.0

61.S 2.3 -74v 17" 7 - - 125.2C. Research materials a supplies nt 158.7 158.7 150.7 158.7 158.7 140.0 933.3 10.0 0.0 10.00. Data collectioa and

aalysl maunt 64.9 70.7 49.5 49.5 49.5 49.5 353.6 10.0 20.2 0.0low U433.77 3T 220.7 i10. 7 208.2 -- T 1,646.3

Too My 03 12:33S25 1994

Indonesia Olategtrated swmp oelopet Project

Table 402. Agrlcultursl ReseachMen

Detaled COent(Pp. NilllonI

Partaters tia 6)Vh . Oro"5

Ouatittes, unit Sane Cost Coat. otr. TaxUnit 94795 95/56 96/97 9H9MO 96/99 99/00 Total Cost 996/97 971/9 9699 99/00 total Rate Each. Rate

A. _egata £aituldint rental amount 45.6 37.3 - - - - 03.0 10.0 0.0 0.0

1tniture aunt 17.2 14.1 - - - 31.3 10.0 35.3 10.0Vehclles amount 34.6 26.3 - - - - 62.0 10.0 60.3 10.0Offle rental

at polnce capltol amount 17.1 14.0 - - - - 31.1 10.0 0.0 0.0opetions asmunt 25.7 21.0 - - 46.7 10.0 10.1 0.0

9010botal ~~~~~~~~~140.2 147 - -254:15. Uqiaa

Field equipment amount 51.1 40.7 10.4 2.1 - - 104.3 10.0 35.3 10.0office equipment amount, 10.2 6.1 2.1 0.4 - - 20. 10.0 35.3 10.0Sabtfletalwent aaount61 3 4 .8 12 5 2 5 - - 125.2

C. _esearch materials a supplies amunt 156.7 156.7 156.7 156.7 150.7 140.0 933.3 10.0 0.0 10.0D. Data collection and X

analysis amount 64.9 70.7 49.5 49.5 49.5 49.5 353.6 10.0 20.2 0.0 O .fetal 445. 392-.9 220.7 210. 00.2 169.5 1,667.0

0bte Na 03 MU:M:3 194 o

PA

ladoocalaIntegrated swaw Deve1lont "o.ct

Table 403. AW7Cultural ercblbst alAImetan

(1P.tilliom

Wag. bagoIuaatlties unit Same Coo Ctet. Nut.

8. _ino@ t Orvl_e

A. I d.intal _t 84.2 28.0 62.2 10.0 0 .0 0 0Offg La t2t4tnsso gastals:

at pts,aescapitol Z uat * 17.1 14.0 - - - - 31.1 10.0 0.0 0.0

field ploomt meat t5.1 40.7 1.4 2.1 - - 104.8 10.0 U.3 10.0_fe -e _t2stat - 31a1 10.0 88 10.0

e. Rasmaxab astetialo 4 uutlepU _eat 15012.7 198.7 198.7 18.7 15.7 140.0 933.8 10.0 0.0 10.0D. Daa oll.otlam en110 83K 93 28140260 1994~~~119 -71e"b _e U tO. .4§.5 .49. G§.% I 1.t.0 20.2 10.0

-lBR0 an.7 a.s 2aBowlsSW 5.7 210.t JSeS? 1"7 t.? 4.093S 1. -0 0-

91"I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ioli fUi424iZ IM4

Zrnd.me.1alateatad _ Osmelaiit eetect

Table 404. Apicultutel Rnaezb90raa Agn-g

Dariled bte

o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Go(P. millie)

Omantitlos Univat fSe. Coat Cent. ifo. tasunit K4/IM n #/97 9O/9 §it 79 V_/0 Total Cat 94/95 95/96 nt97/N J _f 99/00 TOtal RAte Excb. Rate

A. VeClo ao_uat 17.8 14.1 - - - - 31.4 10.0 60.3 10.00. fteld equipment amonmt 25.6 20.3 5.2 1.0 - - 52.2 10.0 35.8 10.0C. Rteseoar mtarials a mapplies amount 52.9 52.9 52.9 52.9 52.9 46.7 311.1 10.0 0.0 10.0g. Dat colleclton *adanalsis omout 39.9 33.8 23.3 23.3 23.3 23.3 166.4 30.0 20.2 0.0L Trtaining amount 16.7 18.7 10.7 -t9.7 10.7 10.7 112.0 10.0 0.0 10.0btl 5.5 f l 1n 94.9 00.6 S63.I.

Tue Shy 03 2s421 1 994 --

t-

1*5.ft" 50M. oamt lmal"*I*

$K. COMM ±WaoM*1_^

A.~~~ wn 9 WlI WoBwnaWW _

0151. 1,10m *0 1 - - - - 1 15. .5. . -. .s - - 15 l.1 55.0 452 50.00.~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . n6.1m es ee

At *6 1.A- 1 -5 -5.5 - - - - - *. e 10.5 - 10.04 S madl S I _t . e *.e e. . e -, 10 te.0 e0.e 10.0

N le 1X2 s le le - I ee ale-e * e e.0 402 IL

e-IS1 mal I * - 5.0 e. e. e. - 2. 5.0 10.0 5 10.0

S. m 1-- 15. *0.0 e - k e: 224 . 0.0

*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I e. is. e IL: e 2

Oabup5.e. mai S - 2 1. . - 1e.5 0.025. 10.0>*8* 6|_ _ Z~~~ ~~ ~~et = sS _ = ue . .

ifefIat*tumaa lb iemS .5 57. . . .. 5.0.0 1. `0.0

. 1011 _ _b Fat 0*£5. ~4 ~ - - .. ~1. 551.

mail 5.0 0.0 5.0 0. .5 10.0 0.0 0.0b. = W"=" aiWIame. MLl 5.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 * .0 10. 0.0 0.0

a. CIOsiA*o aUMWIs. maiL 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 1. 10. 0.0 0.0_. _tt.Ia gmge .10.I 10. 10. 10.1 -- 52.7 10.0 1.2 10.0

o. 0ttlma.~~~~~~~1Am0 wMiAl 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 4.0 10.0 10.1. 0.04. ainalamtsao S.1511510 Mai 2.0 2.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 12. 10.0 10.1 0.0

b. 0.0 0.0t 0.0 0. - .4 4e0.0 5.1 0.0

1. 1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 - 1 .00. 10.5 0.00 2t o 0. * 0. 0o.* 0.0

t: :: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.4 Ol" U. 0 e1:.tele...., I*. e. o

56410 (1551 0.0 0.5 0.0 ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0.0 0.0 4.0 10.0 15.2 0.0c~~smm mali 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0t* 4.0 15.0 10.1 0.0

1*0 10 mal -41- .3 :-3 :-t.~ :-.'.j :~ i .:.0 1.50.0_- -, _" 1§. l.1 *.I -4

I. 0t1. adml,tla _0 WAO eLS 2.. a's8.. h .'41 10.0 0 2 e.0

1*00501 -I~-I~-~-~a i4 2 solhsou~~~~~~s. *01~~~~ou 6.L It. 010.06 IS 100 5. 40.2 10.0

m.smSm.o pelt I.- ~ -i .S =;...,Us~ 5.0 40. 50.0

A. *&t. 102.1* 0., L

e. e _01 _ 1e. mall I. 55 720. 1 .t . 2e - 5.e 10. 02 10.e0

_US_4 "O472X"1 e.t eev ou22te M

malt 10 5 - * - 105.5~~~~~It J% 40.0 5.0 U 5. IL: .00 is.0001005_.140 gal. . . . . . .10.1 O 0.5 .. 110.00.210.0

0 ,eco X _e a.Ie. -. e 55.1 - -I- 10.0 2 n0.0

S. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -Mtee IL:

V0I0.I~~~~~~ maIm 0.0 5.0 10.2 . . . . - 10.5 10.0 15.3 10.0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~S.tG 363 0.

C0~~~l0.i454V32 gait I.50.0 0.0 - . . . . 6.010.015.110.0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~M 3.8 0.

0(11.0 fwSlWI. S .q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~al owl ~~~~~~..-d L...: S.:- ... MN.. 10.0 15. .4. Omgwamt.lwa mawIa~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0.0. 0

4 *f U:..e.e a 0.0 0.4 0.: 0.0 0.5 . 2.0 10.0 10.0 0.0

.. a s u lAl.4. mai 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 . .0 10.0 50.1 0.0

0. of100 b6mm . .s o.s 0.? 0.? . .0 50.0 5.5 0.0

£55030.60 wall ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.0 *a sm 1.1 0. 0.0 5.1 0.0

spopowaw ll"ON" " 5 g - j j g ig -b

1. sp~~~~~~~~ mamams ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~mma 2.1 a~~~~~~~~~~.s 2.5 a.o 2.1 . 2. L1. 20.2 0.0opOsol 00.11 5.0 o~~~o *~o WA *. . 45. 10.0 10.3 0.0goloesvslo. wall~~~~~.1t 0.0 0.0 00 .0 . . 4.0 100I 02C.

WIMPte 45111 0.5 0. 0.5 0.5 .5 IL:. 10.0 105 .

0050.1051 wall .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~... .. .... .... ~4..4 ... 4 ... 60Z 10.0 10.2 0.0

1013 I*Oi waat 5~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~3142. 41.2)2 15,05. 1f.121 545. 0.3 50.1 $M 0.0 15.5 0.0=,U,= mome Ma~~~~~~~~~~~~~10. 0. 503.5 4,0. 400.4 300. 3,12. 0.0 15.2 10.0

Ift"~~~~~t

51.00 be I s4001000. 1..w 5,1 be1 is5 52551 4 of505 the pg"015.N

ima NW 12 1251381t iww ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tooN

10900 .e et 3006.. 11e_"

6.~ bw UfN7e 0o4

0.0.00106.2 aihm~~~oom am"=K ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~K

4.... dot. wi 1 - -- 1 36.4 30. - - - . - 364 0.0 0. W0.0

_-ah 4 i-4 i0 .'. . A

6. _pte .. 46903 0016 1 . * 0.0 0.0 - - - * - 0.0 10.0*36.3 20.0@03in11 wit~~~~~al 3 - - '300 4.0 - - -: - 400. 3 .30.0~~11.hapbo3eete. u01td I 1. 1.6s IoA-- - . 10.033 10.00011ev fegaltO.6 q . tt L. - . 0.0 3t.3 10.0lenOi.ltO lb wit S -6 0.1 .... 10.0 7303 120.

S. flom000061 000000 R . .0¶ - -e,o - it .0 0e.0 9.0 9.- -9. - .0 30.0 0.0 . 0.0b. g .. " t 1. 4 1.4!1., -* .0 I0.0 0. 0.0e. Olotag olee_ "Mt 02 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 - 1 0 0. 0.0d. tWvelmo eo.s %_ 3 0. 10. 10.1 W. 10.1 U.7 20.0 20.2 30.0*. 0101.. "U0. WAt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 - 4.0 .0 so I 0.t. COtleOaue 4 .UUt312 al 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 * 326 10.0 0.1 0.09. 1.140 Mi0m

Ot.eff _mw.. 0011 * 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 2.4 I0.0 1.1 0.03. 0p .98.05Mimttbin

4.0= 01 =VW110"t 2.0 2.0 *. 2.0 2.0 1.0 10.0 20.2 0.0mototqtl.. w~~~~~it 0.0 0. 0.0 0.U . 412. 20.120.

toil. 4666) twIt 0.0 ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~0.6 0.6 0.: 0.6 4.0 10.0 20.2 0.0_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4 -4 -e. -41..,,,,, wit q...4 e..4 .41 e. ..4 ...4 s...3 u0. *0.2 0.0

a. ottf . SWa*1 a#Att, GM 61 2.a 2.. 2M. 2.O 1 .1.- 10.0 u ,1 0.0

D. 6000 to"

^cm.e 1.11419 tI 0. -*0-- * .1 0. - - - - - <e. 20. 40. e0. e.0ff _m. wit .1 16 * * a.1 W.7 - - - * - 06.7 11.0 40.3 10.0 0

6000100.. l~~~~~vat I.126.4 ~ .~ 1.0 40.3 20.0 ..

4 _Wl dft_ _"t I I - - - . 3 3.4 364 - - - - MA4WUe 0 .3 10.0_0t003o20 WAt 6 - - - U 4 2.0 26.4 14.0 - - -4.0 0.0 0. 10.0

_b00t wit I t - s ; :" -21 u0.6 e0.3 1.0

3. _pmC 0 44 wit 1 ' 4 ' ' .- te.0 00 . * * - - 6.0 10.0 1.3 30.0600 69) wit . . . . . .1 6.0e 6.0 -* - . . - 1.t L0.0 91.3 30.00001.. fettdte.o 0 Oeg30.o.t OIl 3.4 - -t . .43.4 30.0 36.3 10.00100e31. set "At I. . . . . 6.0 1.0 . .0 20.0 20.2 20.0

Vftft VIA" "it 4. . . . 4 6

.O...0 ..... z:- 20.0 20.3 30.

4. 00300014--e0o. solety &w,e WAt 44.6 44.6 44.S 44.6 44.6 I 2 0.0 0.0 0.0b. bee m_ .mtletto m_t 6.4 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.4 43.0 t0.. 0.0 0.0

p. ClotMe, .111010.. wAt 0.6 0.: 0.9 0. 0.0 s4. 10. 0. 0.04. OtmIlle, .e,mwe. wit2 e 2. 2. 1.1 2. - 14. 20. 20.2 20.

0. 001mt10o 0A3114v. "Mt 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0. 10.1 0.0

0 m*fimb.. walt 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 - 2.3 10.0 6. 0.0taft how" e - t.0 1.0 .0 3.0 - 7.2 10.0 6.1 0.0

ct0k wlt .- ...4 .4 j .e 4 11 0 l.0 1.3 0.0e. 6p4_1 .910.0000 Mi MimOm

Olal-Ip 44-000.2 *2w) 0011 2.6 2.6 2.1 2.6 2.1 - 12.6 30.0 20.2 0.0600, 4669) Mit t0:: 0.0 0.e 00 0:: - 4.0 30 20". 0.0c. o.le _ P _ v _t 0.7 0.? 0.7 t 0.9 0.? 3.6 10.0 20.2 0.0Mat" but1 umt ...1 .. i .1 .4 .4 .. 20*. 0.0

~01. _twS O ruoeprO rtI01 14 _. 10.0 6.1 0.040166060-N =R=R .ZP

torn 1*1. 471.? 720.3 003.00aft 20. 0 M e64.0 243.6 .400. 0.0 31.2 0.01.33111,. M:%20. 31.0 447.1 104.2 *2.? 7 0. 3.404.1 0.0 11.2 30.0

01106~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ma 20.3 304.0 441.6 294.2 222.? 110.0 1,804.1 0.0 26.2 20.0=1= Ite. ~ i. 5 33 4Ud 31J--J22 ! 0.0 3.3 0.0

v~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~... 510. 1_9. 097.8 _. 42.

aaa u Xtu"z sV 4

2-1an ep

2" , to w.

ooec COVN

t.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o _luh

t.a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~aM* onsw-sre -~~~~~~~~~tit To-c at$l Rau$- 4- §

*a esoe asew 2 - - - - - .7 - - - - - .7 e. e s.

to_toa Jd - - - - - . .* - - - - . o.f.s.

c_4ns1eese- * " 4 ^ se ate. #. e.e4woo driv is - 0 -4 3 -- 30.4 to s -- to.s O .

etfsZ tane OWd_lWt *~~~~~.M t. *.e ....... e 1.e n.3 to.et~~~~~~~~~~~~ml b6 It :36e3 - 1 5 001§ - s.

e.~~~~~~aqi" Mt _ .0 141t 2 X. .0 36. v e

. tf lll* _ _~~~~~~~Vsit *§1X. ss 1. 0s - s.0 eoA 2e.0 e.0

t. C_"U_ & htl tt t.* t.$ t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .11 2.6 2.6 - 2.6 0.0 Ie.1 0.0

t. e =W- M...A.. "e e. O .f * O .f 2 .4 tn.o, .1 e.e"I _ pocUMne _*6 1.0 2.0 2.0.. . .2.0 - z.0 10.0 20.2 0.

_d* -4 -44 -k; -- 4 i-4 --A. t_b _" fgov e m"" *t-A3 .-- - .

t"_W e sX 7 . . - - t a.§ n.s" 16. - - t 0.0 s¢. 6 0.s & tX.bb""_n. e. v

J.d-O m

i; = t -~~~~~ut t - -- *e* ^ -*§* | t § _ . . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s. 36.3 6.0 e

w1Z * .s ".t * .s ".s * .s - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~M.Is 10.0 0. 0.o

e. WAtd * a . * . . *s - s ee . ¢

d. etet lat.: la,: e2.9 21 Ol - .1 110.3 2,,1 "O"O

_tt ', cut :1 1:- u. 1: 10 - ,

_ zdT a.s 2.s a. a.s a.s - aX.s seA~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2. 2O.S 0.0_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2 *I 21 .: .* U. . 4.t.0 2e.2 *.0

azz {ssz |4 . e.e o~~~#Mt . ... e. O' 4.e 1.0 2O.2 0.0Pesa"r mi 1. . . . . .6 to. et*

o_0 .g . . _ d oosr de 'f ful.6 2206c 2U.S .26e.4 7 a.3 11".11 S.M7.4 0.0 11.2 0. 0

%O t e r _ .00 . SAW m . 44s. 4,7s§mes, or2a s*M e.rojectd

dd- NW U g l;6; -- - -- -

Wnel_u- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~oeapot"

IndoesiaIntegrated SWae Developgmt Project

Table 504. Coconut DelopmentJakarta

Deald Cae(Ff. Million)

Parameters in Kly. Groan

atities Unit cba Cost Coat. fIr. tsnwit S45 7 997 97/ 9 0 al Cost 94/95 /96 91 9999/00 total Rate Esatc Rate

I. Zaee-t OetA. Whiele d et i

4-,dal drive unit 1 1 - - - 2 36.4 36.4 36.4 - - - 72.7 10.0 60.3 10.0Notorcyles unit 2 2 - - - - 4 2.9 5.9 5.9 - - 11.t 10 0 60.3 10.0C~utee (496/33) unlt 4 - - - -- 4 6.0 24.1 - - - - - 24 1 10.0 35.3 10.0furniture amount 20.1 20.1 10.0 35.3 10.0g*tetal. 0654.2 - - - -126.?*. trSnnProject ta amout 49.8 33.3 19.5 - - 100.6 10.0 0.0 10.0Famer ttaining mount - 5.0 10.0 14.6 9.6 - 39.2 10.0 0.0 10.0t*Ot1 i40.0 3.3 2tl.5 14.6 9.6 -139.6C. Bqpeav ota1. Salary a wages per anum 13.9 13.9 13.9 13.9 13.9 - 69.5 10.0 0.0 0.02. ttael anthousig allowancs per annum 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 - 12.5 10.0 0.0 0.03. Clothing alloance per _am 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 - 2.0 10.0 0.0 0.04. Travelling espencs per 5anum 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 1S.3 76.3 10.0 20.2 10.05. Ofttice suplies pet annim 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 - .12.5 10.0 10.1 0.06. CoinAnicationa a utilities per annu 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 - 25.0 10.0 10.1 0.07. Uwlinmmt qe.attgw m mem P

ntation wagons per annum 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 - 10.0 10.0 20.2 0.0comuter per annum 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 16.0 10.0 20.2 0.0 Ifurniture per annum 0.0 0.6 0.8 0.0 0.0 4.0 10.0 20.2 0.0 " -8dbtet1 6.0 -6.0 6.0 -6.0 6.0 -To0.1 3. Other adoinistrative expensa per annum 2.5 2.5 2-5 2.5 2.5 12.5 10.0 S. 0.0 .sttetal 46.148.1- 46.-1 40.-1 40.1 -240.4vowa 103.4 i-28i 7W6. 6-2.7 57.? 1-500.9

Tue May 03 12:45O22 1994

'tW00

0

1-1 Coconut Desveloyment\.Takarta

IndonesiaIntegrated waq Dev.loveut Prol-ctTable 601. Rural Roads and Bridges

7aabiPDaLled Ceet

MFp.tillion)

Paraeters (in *)Phy. Gross

Quantities unit Base cost Coant. Ib:. TaxUnit 94/95 95/ 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 Total Cost 94/95 95/96 - /97 27/9B 90/9 99/00 Total Rate -xcb. Radte

Z. Xeetat CentsA. eamds aind bx*dpma

DmA_ I & XIRehabilitation of road

and aspbalting 13.0 i) km 6.04 9.06 - - 15.1 50.3 - - 304.0 456.0 - - 760.0 15.0 40.3 10.0Rebabilitation of bridge$ (5) amount - - 76.5 114.9 - - 191.3 15.0 40.3 10.0otal- - 380.5 50.8 - - 951.3

*. RuIateNe jetty, Denkdang I aount - - 40.3 60.4 - - 100.1 15.0 40.3 10.0Racoostructlon of

Pudiag jetty amount - 120.8 101.2 - - - 302.0 15.0 40.3 10.0Total - 120.8 602.0 631.2 - - 1,353.9

Thu May 12 12:54204 1994

0

lt

I" R

1-1 Rura1 Roada and Bridges\Wambi

IhdoneaiaInteograted Swamp Development Project

Table 602. Rural Roads and BridgesRiau

oled Cots(Pp. Million)

Parameters (in 8)pby. GrossGuantities Unit Base Cost Cont. For. TaxUnit 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 Total Coat 94/95 95/96 96/9 7 91/98 98/99 9900 Total Rate Exch. Rate

I. meat,mmt CenotA. Sntk Kixi

1. s tridgeoAsphalt road (3.0 a) km - 10.2 15.3 - - - 25.5 120.8 - 1,232.1 1,848.2 - - - 3,000.3 15.0 40.3 10.0Bridge (2) a - 8 20 20 12 - 60 14.1 - 122.7 281.9 201.9 169.1 - 045.6 15.0 40.3 10.0SZtotax - 1,344.9 2,130.1 281.9 169.1 - 3,925.92. MavigatiExtension of

J*ty Block C 4mount - 29.0 43.5 - - - 72.5 15.0 40.3 10.0New lettyBlock A amount - 58.0 87.0 - - - 145.0 15.0 40.3 10.0Subotal

- 87.0 130.5 - - - 211.4Subtotal - 1,431.8 2,260.5 281.9 169.1 - 4,143.3a. RCU Cnaki IXUpgrading of road km - 4 6 - - - 10 40.3 - 161.1 241.6 - - - 402.7 15.0 40.3 10.0Rehabilitation of bridges amount - 16.1 24.2 - - - 40.3 15.0 40.3 10.0Total - 609.0 2,526.3 281.9 169.1 - 4,56.

Thu May 12 12:54:10 1994

00fl

-IP-

0

2-1 Rural Roads and Bridges\Riau

IrdoneslaIntegrated Samp Developmnt ProjectTable 603. Rural Roads and Bridges

West KalimantanDetall4 cooteIRp. Nillionl

Pararters (in 8)Ouantitios th~~~~~~~~~~~~~fy. Gos

Cuantities ~~~Unkit Base Cost Cont. For. TaxUnit 94/95 95/94 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 Total Cost 94/95 95l96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 Total Rate xch. Rat,

2. ?metim_ t costsA. beSM *a"^ a Sol Wsaft

Earth road (2.5.) km - 5.36 8.04 - - - 13.4 42.3 - 226.6 339.9 - - 566.5 15.0 40.3 10.0Asphalt road (2.5m) km - 8.88 13.32 - - - 22.2 84.6 - 750.9 1,126.3 - - - 1,877.2 15.0 40.3 10.0Asphalt road (3.0m) kt - 0.92 1.30 - - _ - 2.3 120.8 - 111.1 166.7 - - - 277.0 15.0 40.3 10.0bridge (4) m - 32 48 - - - 80 3.0 - 96.6 145.0 - - - 241.6 15.0 40.3 10.0Sel Bulan jetty amount - 8.1 12.1 - - - 20.1 15.0 40.3 10.0

S lbtota,. - 1,193.3 1,790.0 - - - 2,983.3B. 5d 1e, l . .S

and|g .asa, Bab te

1. Earth road (2.5) km - - 4 6 - - 10 42.3 - - 169.1 253.7 - - 422.8 15.0 40.3 10.02. Asphalt road (2.5. km - - 12.72 19.08 - - 31.8 84.6 - - 1,075.6 1,613.4 - - 2,688.9 15.0 40.3 10.03. Asphalt road (3.05) km _ - 7.76 11.64 - - 19.4 120.8 - - 931.4 1,406.1 - - 2,343.5 15.0 40.3 10.04. Bridge (4) m - - 40 60 - - 100 3.0 - - 120.8 181.2 - - 302.0 15.0 40.3 10.0S. Datz ad exitis lettas

Air Putih amount - - 8.1 12.1 - - 20.1 15.0 40.3 10.0Ams Deras amount - - 8.1 12.1 - - 20.1 15.0 40.3 10.0 IDes& Kubu aMount - - 8.1 12.1 - - 20.1 15.0 40.3 10.0

Sbtt - - 24.2 36.2 - - 60.4 o6. New jetty at Sei Nipab amunt - - 32.2 48.3 _ - 80.5 15.0 40.3 10.0 0

C. rAr Kw and Sa Rmtm - - 2,359.2 3,538.9 - - 5,898.1 1

Protection of canals km 1.2 1.8 - - - - 3 3.0 3.6 5.4 - - - - 9.1 15.0 40.3 10.0Dttension of Kakap jetty m 12 18 - - - - 30 7.0 84.6 126.0 - - - - 211.4 15.0 40.3 10.0

total 88.2 21,325.6 449.2 3,538.9 - - 9,101.9

Tu May 12 1252tS48 1994

0-8

1-1 ftral Roads and Or1dges\Wast Kalireatam

IndonesiaIntegrated Swamp Development ProjectTable 701. Household Water Supply

JamblDertaild abate

14. IllioaX

p tern t' Pay. Gross

ua"tlties Unit Base cost Coat. Fot. taxUnit _9S 95/96 96/91 97/90 9S/99 99700 Sotal Cost 94/95 95/96 95/97 97/98 9/99 n9Jo Total Rat- Bach. Rate

S. Investet ootA. Vltlage mutge

toees irDrilliag and testing amount 33.1 34.1 33.1 - - - 100.4 10.0 25.3 0.0Village syts village - - - 10 10 10 30 50.2 - - 502.1 502.1 502 .1 15062. 15.0 25.3 10.0Subtotal 33.1 34.1 33.1 502.1 502.1 502.1 1,606.B. _bmaebe4 wete eqlRRantau Rasau household - 670.5 894 1,117.5 1,112.5 670.5 4,470 0.5 - 336.6 449.9 561.1 561.1 336.6 2,244.3 IS.0 25.3 10.0Sluang Puding household - 112.05 149.4 106.75 166.7S 112.05 247 0.5 - 56.3 7S.0 93.0 93.S 56.3 375.1 15.0 25.3 10.0Laubur household - 80.4 107.2 134 134 60.4 536 O.S - 40.4 53.6 67.3 67.3 40.4 269.1 15.0 25.3 10.0Paeusiran household - 215.55 207.4 359.25 359.25 215.55 1,437 0.5 - 106.2 144.3 100.4 160.4 106.2 721.5 15.0 25.3 10.0Dendang I and II household - 290.4 387.2 484 464 290.4 1.936 0.5 - 145.8 194.4 243.0 243.0 145.6 972.0 15.0 25.3 10.08.teXl - 682.3 916.44 1,145.5 1,8145.5 6 .3 4,581.9

C. Training torlocal technicians amount - 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 100.0 10.0 0.0 10.0letow 33.1 741.4 969.5 1,667.6 1,667.6 1,209.4 6,260.5

Tu lOy 03 12t42t26 1994

C~'0

Indonesia Integrated Swa Developmnt ProjectTable 702. Household Water Supply

RlauDetailed CDt.(Rip., hIliIon5

Paraceters tin %IEby. Grossgantities unit Base cost Cankt. For. TaxUnit 94/95 95/96 96J97 97/90 98099 99/00total Cost 94/95 95/96 96/97 9/9 9099 9900 To t oRate brch. Rate

s. Zstet CentA. Villge centre water supply village - 5 5 5 5 5 25 50.2 - 251.0 251.0 251.0 251.0 251.0 1,255.2 15.0 25.3 10.0B. Reseod moter ewwl

Delta Retab household - 223.05 297.4 371.75 371.75 223.05 1,407 0.5 - 112.0 149.3 186.6 106.6 112.0 746.6 15.0 25.3 10.0Tluk Kiambaag housebold - 135.9 101.2 226.5 226.5 115. 906 0.5 - 63.2 91.0 113.7 113.7 68.2 454.9 15.0 25.3 10.0luala Cinaku It household - 113.4 151.2 169 189 113.4 756 0.5 - 56.9 75.9 94.9 94.9 56.9 379.6 IS.0 25.3 10.0Slat Kitt (Block Al houseold - 8.0S 26.0 49.75 74.75 93.85 254 O.S - 4.4 13.5 25.0 37.5 47.1 127.5 15.0 25.3 10.0Silt Kir (Block A, B, C and Dl household - 269.7 359.6 449.S 449.5 269.7 1,790 0.5 - 3 13S.4 160. 225.2 22.2 135.4 902.t 15.0 25.3 10.0Bobtotal - 322.0o 510.2 645.9 6C50.5 4 -19.2 2, 611. 3C. Training forlocal technicians amount - IS.0 1S.0 1S.0 15.0 15.0 75.0 10.0 0.0 10.0goaaj - 643.0 i76.2 912. 924.5 605.3 1,941.5 3

1u Ma 03 12:47$44 1994 lo

0

IndonesiaIntegrated Swamp DevelopmeDt Project

Table 703. Household Water SupplyWestern Kal imantan

SutrAled Costa(Rp. Million)

Parameters in IPhy. os

Quantities Unit Base Cost Cont. For. TaxUnit 94/9S 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 Total Cost 94/95 95/96 96/97 91/9e 98/99 99/00 Total Rate Exch. Rate

1. _ I Co"tnA. Nousehold syst_

Sei Kakap household - 1,057.5 1,410 1,762.5 1,762.5 1,057.5 7,050 0.5 - 530.9 707.9 804.9 884.9 530.9 3,539.6 15.0 25.3 10.0Pinang Luar household - 68.1 90.8 113.5 113.5 68.1 454 0.5 - 34.2 45.6 57.0 57.0 34.2 227.9 15.0 25.3 10.0Rasau Jaya household - 40e.9 S45.2 681.5 681.5 400.9 2,726 0.5 - 205.3 273.1 342.2 342.2 205.3 1,369.7 15.0 25.3 10.0Sei Rulan household - 46.65 62.2 77.75 71.75 46.65 311 0.5 - 23.4 31.2 39.0 39.0 23.4 156.1 15.0 25.3 10.0Alr Putih household - 58.65 78.2 97.75 97.75 58.65 391 0.5 - 29.4 39.3 49.1 49.1 29.4 196.3 15.0 25.3 10.0Sei Nipan household - 138.9 18S.2 231.5 231.5 138.9 926 0.5 69.7 93.0 116.2 116.2 69.7 464.9 1S.0 25.3 10.0Arus Derus household - 21.45 28.6 35.75 35.75 21.45 143 0.5 - 10.8 14.4 17.9 17.9 10.8 71.8 1S.0 25.3 10.0Desa Kubu household - 38.85 51.8 64.75 64.75 38.85 259 0.b - 19.5 26.0 32.5 32.5 19.5 130.0 15.0 25.3 10.0Olak-Olak Kubu household - 96.75 129 161.25 161.25 96.75 645 0.5 _ 48.6 64.0 81.0 S1.0 48.6 323.8 15.0 25.3 10.0Jangkang I household - 43.8 58.4 73 73 43.8 292 0.5 - 22.0 29.3 36.1 36.1 22.0 146.6 15.0 25.3 10.0

Subtotal - 993.9 1,325.2 1,656.5 1,656.5 993.9 6,625.9S. Training for

local technicians amount - - 3.8 S.9 1S.0 21.3 40.8 10.0 0.0 10.0Total - -993.9 1,328.9 1,665.21,6711.5 1,015.1 6,674.6

Tue May 03 12:48:01 1994

0F

, si

Ou

0

1-1 Household Water Supply\Mestern KCaliantan

IndonesiaIntegrated Swamp Development Project

Table 801. 8erbak Boundaries and Park ManagemetDataIe coot.(Rp. Million)

Parameters (i 82

Quantities Unit Blase Cost Cont; For. TaxUnit 94J95 SS/S6 96197 91/96 99/99 §9J00 Total Cost 94795 95/96 96/97 97/9 93/99 f9900 total Rate Exach. Ratez. Zm.ast costs

A. 3. _ah beemiattea W*Sp az t1. Extension ot boundaries

and buffer Zones mount - 16.5 16.5 - - - 33.1 15.0 40.3 10.02. Oezadq of off""

01n4 taamsopct t L*lltiClivl wrks amunt - 125.3 125.3 - - - 250.5 15.0 40.3 10.0Vebicles aount - 130.9 - - - - 130.9 10.0 60.3 10.0Equipment amount - 218. - - - - 18.0 10.0 35.3 10.0Gehtetal

MM7.2 153 389.53. Staff developmentand training -munt I 1562 15.2 15.2 1S.2 - 60.9 10.0 0.0 10.0aehtet3

306.0 157.5 -15.2 15.2 - 9.3. _et.-eosOa* dsvel_ntPark boundary marking

using usetul plants amount - 90.0 90.0 - - - 180.0 0.0 10.1 10.0Mangrove rehabilitation unt

- _ 46.7 - - - 46.7 10.0 S.1 0.0Agricultural developent amount - - 185.1 370.2 370.2 - 925.5 10.0 10.1 0.0LanA titling amount - 132.9 265.9 132.9 - - 531.7 10.0 10.1 0.0fubtetal - 223.0 5'8 7.7 503.1 37 0.2 T- 604.0C. ftals for _peeiA

a"aeleei Lew amplantiagaboademed ra

Riau amunt - 20.8 20.8 20.8 - - 62.4 10.0 15.2 0.0West Kalimantan amount * 20.e 42 0420. 8 62 10.0 15.2 0. 0lebtetal ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~-4.1.6 .6 .6 6 - 124.7and upport coats amount

- 207.9 859.4 9.4 09.4 - 476.0 10.0 15.2 0.0- 778.4 87. 49-.3 4j74-.8 2,778.3

Tue,Mny 03 12s48s28 1994

0

, e

N3

1-1 Berb k Boundaries and Park Managemenat

- 112 - ANNEX11Table I

INDONESIA

INTEGRATED SWAMPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PROPOSED AL1OCAnON OF LOAN

Percentage ofAmount Expenditures LA

Category (US$ million) to be Financed

1. Civil Works for: 60%(a) Parts A and D 25,650(b) Part B2 150(c) Part C1 200(d) Part E 100

2. Equipment and Materials L Ic for: 100%; 100%; 65%(a) Par A and D 300(b) Part B1 230(c) Parts B2, B3 and B4 340(d) Parts Cl and C2 210(e) Part C3 100(t) Part E 20

3. AgrI4lualuabor for: 3,700 50%Part Cl

4. AgrIcultual Inputs Id for: 91%(a) Part B1 1,450(b) Parts B2, B3 and B4 3,650(c) Part C1 3,600

S. Services for Land TtfIg for: 900 100%Part C3 and E1(c)(jii)

6. Studies 100%(a) Part Fl 700(b) Part F2 900(c) Part E 50

7. Training for: 100%(a) Parts A and D 550(b) Part B1 75(c) Parts B2, B3 and B4 1,750(d) Part C2 75

Continued

- 113 - ANNEX 11Table 1

Proposed Alocation of Loan (cont'd)

Percentage ofAmount Expenditures La

Category (US$ million) to be Financ

8. Engineering Srces for Surveys, 5,500 100%0D.gm, and Supervhlon of Constructionfor Pars A and D

9. Consultants Services for: 100%(a) Parts A, and F3 4,000(b) Part B1 600(c) Parts B2, B3 and B4 2,000(d) Part E 1,800

10. Unallocated 6,400

TOTAL 65,000

Key: Part A = Water Management (DGWRD)Bi = Food Crop Production - Agricultural Research (AARD)B2, B3, B4 = Food Crop Production - Extension (DGFCH)Cl, C2 = Tree Crop Development - Coconut Plantg (DGE)C3 = Tree Crop Development - Land Titing (BPN)D = Rural Infrastructure (DOWRD)E = Coastal Zone Land Use Management (DGPHPA)Fl, F3 = Studies (DGWRD)IP2 = Studies (DGPCH)

La Of approved expenditures.Lb Excluding vehicles which GOI will finance./c 100% of foreign expenditures for directly imported equipment, 100% of local

expenditures (ex-factory prices) for locally manufactured equipment and 65% forlocally procured items.

/d Excluding fertilizer which GOI will finance.

May 6, 1994

- 114 - ANNEX11Table 2

INDONESIA

INTEGRATED SWAMPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

EsTmATED DIStSmT ScEEDuLE

IBRD Fiscal DuringYear and Semester Profile La Semester Cumulative Cumulative

(%) (US$ million) (US$ million) (%)

1995 1st 3 2.0 2.0 32nd 6 2.8 4.8 7

1996 1st 10 3.2 8.0 122nd 18 6.5 14.5 22

1997 1st 30 6.5 21.0 322nd 38 7.7 28.7 44

1998 1st 46 7.7 36.4 562nd 50 7.7 44.1 68

1999 1st 58 7.6 51.7 802nd 66 4.4 56.1 86

2000 1st 74 3.7 59.8 922nd 82 2.8 62.6 96

2001 1st 90 2.4 65.0 100/12nd 94

2002 1st 982nd 100

La Standard disbursement profile for Indonesia, agriculture projects, by semester afterBoard approval, COMDO, August 2, 1993.

1k Loan effectiveness date assumed as September 1, 1994; Loan closing date asSeptember 30, 2000.

May 6, 1994.

- 115 - ANNEX 12Table 1

INTATw WMAS OE'JAEU PROJ=Financial and Econeece Prie.e

(in R '000)

Finnceial EconomicUnit 1Q94 S004 1/ 194 2000 1V

OutputeFielt crepe

Paddy ton S40.000 8o7.000Seyb-enp kg 0.es O.8B 0.621Coaava kg 0.0 0 0.080Maize kg 0.275 0.275Coffee kg 1.000 1.000Banana ke 0. 12 0. 12

Coconut producteCoconut nut 000 nut 80.000 64.000 68.000Copra (15) kg 0.886 0.388 0.404

InputeSeed- end planting material

Paddy need (HYV) kg 0.600 0.660Paddy (local) kg 0.500 0.550Paddy need kg 0.500 0.50Caeava eticke atick 0.080 0.00Maie neeod kg 0.800 0.880 0.890Soybean aecd kg 1.000 0.800 0.780

Ferti I imzreUrea 2/ kg 0.280 0.482 0.6S0 0.412TSP 2/ kg 0.350 0.499 0.455 0.499KCL 2/ kg 0.350 0.862 0.860 0.862Dolomite kg 0.200 0.200Borax kg 0.001 0.001Copper sulfate kg 1.100 1.800

Plant protectiontneecticide- litre 15.000 15.000Rodenticide litre 8.000 6.000Herbicide lItre 20.000 20.000Pesticidee litre 15.000 15.000Along 2/ chemical I itre 18.750 18. 70Oieael oil litre 0.450 0.450

NaterialeChainsaw rental hr 2.500 2.500Toole & equipment unit 1.000 1.000Fence not 82.000 S2.000Lining pege not 1.0OC 1 000Seedlinae unit 2.900 5.000Cover crop neeed kg 6.000

OtherAnimal trection 4-hr. day 5.000 5.000

LaborAnnual baeis

Monthly-flexibleunakilled labor day 3.500 8.500

Male LaborOctober mala labor Oct.od 4.000 4.000November male labor Nov.od 3.500 8.500December male day Dec.md 8.500 S.S00January ale labor Jan.ad 4.000 4.000February male labor Feb.ad 4.000 4.000March male labor Mbr.md 4.000 4.000April male labor Apr.od 8.600 8.600may male labor May.od 4.000 4.000June axle labor Jun.od a.000 8.000July sale labor Ju .ead 8.000 8.000Augut Male labor Aug.md 4.000 4.000September asle labor Sep.ad 4,000 4.000

Female LaborOctober female labor Oct.fd 8.000 8.000November female labor Nov.fd 2.700 2.700December female labor Oec.fd 2.700 2.700January female labor Jan.fd 8.000 8.000February femle labor Feb.fd 8.000 3.000March femalo labor Nmr.fd 8.000 8.000April female Iaor Apr.fd 2.700 2.700May female labor moy.fd 8.000 .000Jun. female labor Jun.fd 2.000 2.000July female day Jul.fd 2.000 2.000August femle labor Aug.fd a.000 8.000September femle labor Sop.fd 8.000 8.000

1/ Saoe e in 1994 unlee indicated otherwlie2/ Financial pricox of ferti iizere expected to Increase overtim due to

projected increaeee in world mrket pricee and elimination of subeidlee.

IndonesiaIntegrated Swamp DevelopmerA Project

Project Suvmary3oUWUC _ 4Msam)

(In np. million)

April -- marchIncrements

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 to 30

paddy -0.2 -0.5 131.7 2,323.5 0,367.7 14,617.6 20,199.2 22,910.8 23,463.4 23,240.1 23,240.1 23,240.1 23,240.1 23,240.1Soybeans - - - 136.3 702.2 1,882.2 3,079.7 3,753.3 3,909.0 3,909.0 3,909.0 3,909.0 3,909.0 3,909.0Cassava 152.1 630.1 1,260.4 1,907.2 2,282.3 2,376.7 2,376.7 2,376.7 2,376.7 2,376.7 2,376.7Maizc - - - 7.3 49.4 130.S 270.1 374.9 404.4 404.4 404.4 404.4 404.4 404.4Coffee 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.4 31.2 45.S 67.5 83.7 8s.4 80.4 88.4 88.4 88.4 88.4Banana - O . 63.8 316.3 412.2 522.8 574.6 582.0 582.0 582.0 502.0 562.0 502.0Coconut nut -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 193.0 717.5 1,264.6 1,908.5 2,260.7 2,331.6 2,331.6 2,331.6 2,331.6 2,331.6 2,331.6Copra (159) 1- - - 334.1 1,497.5 _3630.0 6 600 7 9,707.2 12,700.2 15,373.4 17,345.1 18,574.9 19,213.2 19,439.5

lob-total ObI%" Pzedootiou -0.3 -O.S 131.7 3,216.5 12,392.1 23,251:0 34,55:5. 41,947.4 45,663.8 48,305.6 50,277.3 51,507.1 -52,145.5 52,371.7.. ,dstie. coat

?mzebnsd ImputeFertilizers 295.1 091.9 1,485.4 2,007.2 1,796.2 1,286.4 592.2 ------Plant protection 113.0 281.9 368.7 338.7 140.3 57.8 - -- ----MAtteri1l 394.2 854.1 876.0 631.2 147.0 274.0 268.0 168.0-- ---

8*b-fetal. Pezebaos Iqmpte 802.3 2F,028.0 2,730.1 2,977.1 27,00-3.4 ,682 860.2 168.0-- --Sired labex

Monthly-flexibleUntskllled labor 1,026.9 2,716.4 3 7S62 3,904.3 2,403.1 1. 406.0O 551.6 29.4 ------ I.mb-total Znw.otm feet. 1892 4,744:3 6I,iiI3 6,81.4 4,486.5 3,024.1 1,411.8 197.4 - - ----

Perebased ImputeSeeds and planting material 0.0 0.0 0.0 118.5 412.3 724.2 1,069.8 1,263.4 1,307.7 1,307.7 1,307.7 1,307.7 1,307.1 1,207.?Feirtilizers - - - 69.8 728.9 2,009.0 3,398.0 4,304.6 4,369.4 4,337.3 4,316.5 4,294.6 4,294.6 4,294.6Plant protection 0.8 0.0 0.0 82.4 611.8 1,532.3 2,564.0 3,143.1 3,233.1 3,191.1 3,191.1 1,191.1 3,191.1 3,191.1

8mb-fetal Purchased Impout 0.8 0.0 0.8 -2 O"i 1-,-753.0 4255 7,031.8 0,711.2 8W,-910.3 8,836.2 8,815.4 8-, 79-3.5 8-, 79-3.5 8-,7193. 5

Monthly-flxilbleunskilled labor 0.0 0.0 0.5 545.2 2,325.S 4.129.9 6,188.0 7,709.9 8,34S.6 e,776.6 9,104.3 0,327.3 9,432.2 9,469.4

9mb-total Obeamtia Caste 0.0 0.0 0.5 815.0 4 07e.5 8.395 5 13 219.8 16,421.1 17,255.9 17,612.? 7 99. 10,120.8 18,22S.6 18,~262.9Bob-Tetal 9*040etiem Coat 1,829.2 4,744.4 6,486.e 7,697.2 8,5S65.0 11,'419:6 Ti1:6 16,618.5 17,255.9 17,612.7 17,919.7 18,10.8 18,225.6 18262.Otbox centsVatiable Investment costs 3,281.1 7,885.5 9242.4 9,453.6 1,347.3 -- -----Project-level overheads 9,762.2 9,541.6 10,086.8 8,934.5 3,606.0 2,406.1------ Incremmatal 04W costs - - 273.2 424.4 805.4 884.4 884.4 884.4 8184.4 884.4 884.4 684.4 884.4 884.4

6mb-fetal Otbe Imets 13,043.3 17,427.1 19,602.4 18,012.5 5,758.7 37,290".5 884.4 884.4 8804.4 884.4 8084.4 88e4.4 084.4 8894.4Otbaz 0.151maVarlable investfent COS)ES 2,142.6 9,592.0 14,005.5 3,800.0 - - - - - - - - - -Incremental 08K costs - - 258.4 540.9 874.4 1,099.4 1,099.4 1,099.4 1,099.4 1,099,4 1,099.4 1,099.4 1,099.4 1 099.4

lab-fetal Otbex OstSlen 2,142. 9,592.0 1.4,263.9 4,340.9 874.4 1 099.4 1,099.4 1,099.4 1,099.4 1,099.4 1,099.4 1,099.4 1,099.4 1,099.4ifIwAm 1 .. LI15 317,763.5 4 !I. 3 30,50. 15T19. 1 - *is so 1661. 18,602.3 19,239. 19,75096. 19,903.5 20,104.6 20, 20-9.4 20,246 7Sush Fleet-7,1. -31,763.9 -40,221.4 -7641-'2,806.1 7,4. 790223,345.1 26,624.1 2879. 0,7.93, 40-2.5 31,.936.0 32,'125:0

lOftR- 14.9St, WV - 64,5S13.25S4

Fri Apr 30 09:25:40 1993 ,

- 117- Abh3Tle 3

IN GRATED SWAMS DEVELOPMNOT PROJECT

EcoNoaNc ANALYSI BY SCMe

Puovincel CultivedScheme Arm tR NPV

(bi) (%) ( )

Jambi1. Rantau Raa and Simwg Pudl 8,200S- 29.6 12,4302. Pamusirn and Lambut 10,240 48.2 26,093. Dendang I and 11 4,900 22.5 9,3544. Jambi Coconut 5,000 15.3 7,333

Ri-u1. Siak Kiri 4,400 18.5 53822. Kuala Cinaku I 1,115 13.2 7293.TelukKWmbang 1,200 11.9 544. Delta Reteh 3,974 19.8 4,3415. Riau Cocont 5,000 14.4 3,007

West a1. Kpuas Kfcl I and 11 4,700 27.3 10,2312. Pnmg LAr 700 17.4 8,8653. Rasau Jaya 4,640 20.3 6,1934. Sei Kakap 2,250 22.2 2,6535. Se Bulan 590 20.6 6816. Olak Olak Kubu 1,750 21.2 2,4197. Air Puti 1,900 37.6 4,1278. Iangkang 1,170 27.4 2,2589. Arus Deras 300 8.8 (810. Sel Nipah 2,200 7.7 (811)II. DesaKubu 87S 9.5 (63)

12. Kdimanto ownut: 2,50012.6 .4,245

- 118 - 3ANNE13

DONESIA

NTEGRATED SW DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PROJECr SUPERVSON PLAN

The mix of specialties and frequency and duration of missions likely tobe needed to ensure adequate project supervision is as follows:

Mission Time Specialty/Duration Week) TotalNo. Mo/Yr Eng. A. TC AE Env. Soc. Staff Weeks

1 7/94 2 2 2 2 1 1 6 102 10/94 2 2 1 2 1 1 6 93 4/95 2 2 1 2 1 1 6 94 10/95 2 1 1 2 1 2 6 95 4/96 2 1 - 1 1 - 4 56 10/96 2 1 1 2 1 2 6 97 4/97 2 1 - 1 1 - 4 58 10/97 2 1 1 2 1 - 5 79 4/98 1 1 - 1 1 - 4 4

10 10/98 2 1 1 2 1 - 5 711 4/99 1 1 - 1 1 - 4 412 10/99 1 1 1 1 1 - 5 513 4/00 2 2 2 2 2 - 5 10

Eng. - Engineer AE - Agricultural EconomistA - Agriculturalist Env. - Environmental SpecialistTC - Tree Crop Specialist Soc. - Sociologist

- 119 - ANNEX 14

@ONESU

IEWGRATED SWAMPS DEVELO PROJECT

SELC DOCUMEN iN TE PROJECT Fa

1. Consulting Services for Integrated Swamps Development ProjectPreparation; Main Report, Technical Reports (in 24 Volumes), and Thematic Maps;BCEOM/RDC, September-December 1991.

2. Addendum to the Final Report; BCEOM/RDC, December 1991.

3. Environmental Impact Assessment Integrated Swamps Development Project(Riau, Jambi and West Kalimantan); Asian Wetland Bureau; November 1992.

4. Environmental Management Plan Integrated Swamps Development Project(Riau, Janbi and West Kalimantan); Asian Wetland Bureau, December 1992

5. Buffer Zones Development of the Berbak National Park; Asian WedandBureau, October 1992.

6. Teclhical Assistance to BAPPEDA of Riau and West Kalimantan:Environmental Profiles of the Coastal Wedand Areas of Riau, Sumatra and WestKalimanan, Kalimantan (two Volumes); Asian Wetand Bureau, November 1992.

7. Design Concept Report; EUROCONSULT/P.T. INDAH KARYA, May1993.

8. Preparatory Services Integrated Swamp Development Project (in 17vohmes), EUROCONSULT/P.T. INDAH KARYA, August 1993.

9. Hybrid Coconut Technology; World Bank, Working Paper, July 1992.

10. Research Proposal on Parming System Technology for btegrated SwampsDevelopment for Integrated Swamps Development Project (ISDP); Agency forAgricultural Research and Development, 1992.

11. Proposed Agriculural Component Under Integrated Swamp DevelopmentProject; Directorate General of Food Crops Agriculture, September 1992.

12. Consulting Services on Baseline Studies for ISDP in Jambi and WestKalimantan, October 1990.

13. Tidal Swap FParming Systems Development in Indonesia (with refenceto South Sumatra) Indexes/EUROCONSULT/ILRI-Jakarta, November 1991.

Indonesia - Integrated Swanem Development ProjectProject Implementation Schedule

1993 1994 1996 1996 1997 1998 1999 2iD Name Start FirAsh 2P31Q Q 1 h2|Q3P 01 21031Q Q1 1Q2103 1Q 210310 Q1 Q21 CIVIL WORKS: Drainage, and Irrigation Structures, & Roads 4/11/93 2/24198

2 GROUP 1 411193 8114196

3 Design Phase 411/93 4125194

4 Short term Consultant Mobilization 411193 411/93

5 Review Existing Studies and Designs 4/2/93 5113193

6 Draft Design Concept Paper 4130/93 5127193

7 Clear Design Concept with Bank 6/7/93 6111193

a Amend/Correct existing Designs 6/14193 7/12/93 39 Prepare Draft Tendar Docs 7/13193 8/2/93 9

10 Clear Designs/Tender Docs with Bank 10/1/93 4/25/94

11 Procurement Phase 6/1194 10/5/94

12 Issue Invitation to Bid 611/94 611194 o13 Preparation of Bids 612194 7115/94

14 Opening of Bids 8/1/94 8/1/94

15 Evaluation of Bide 812/94 9115194

16 Clear Recommendation with Bank 9/16194 9/26/94

17 Award Contract 1015/94 1015/94

18 Constructlon Phase 1016/94 6114198

19 Contractor Mobilization 1016/94 10/10/94

20 Construction in Progress 10/11/94 6/14196

21

22 GROUP 2 1115/94 6/13/9723 Design Phase 1/15/94 5/28/95

24 Long term Consultant Mobilization 1/15/94 1/17/94 -

o IJIProject: Indonesia - ISOP Critical Progress Summary 9 mDate: 5/ 11194 Noncritical i' Milestone * Rollod Up > U,

Page 1

Indonesia - Integrated Swamps Development ProjectProject Implementation Schedule

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 20ID Name Start Finish Q2|Q3|Q4 a2JQ3JQ4Q1Q2JQ3 Q41 Q 31Q4 Q 1Q2Q3 34 12|325 Review Existing Studies and Desgns 11/16194 2128195

26 Clear Schemes/Design Concepts with the Bank 3/1/95 3110/95

27 Amend Existing Designs & Prepare New Designs 3/11/95 3t1 S95

28 Prepare Draft I Tendar Docs 5/11/95 511 St95

29 Clear Designs/Tender Docs with Bank 5116/95 5J26/95

30 Procurement Phase 6/1/95 10/5/95

31 Issue Invitation to Bid 6/11/95 6/11/95

32 Preparation of Bids 6/2/95 7/14/95

33 Opening of Bids 811195 8/11/95

34 Evaluation of Bids 812/95 9/15/95 f

35 Clear Recommendation with Bank 9/16/95 9126/95

36 Award Contract 10/5/95 10/5/95

37 Construction Phase 10/6/95 6113/97

38 Contractor Mobilizadon 10/6/95 10/10/95

39 Construction in Progress 10/15195 6113197

40

41 GROUP 3 713/95 2124/98

42 Design Phase 7t3195 1112196

43 Review Existing Studies/Designs 7/3195 8/11195

44 Clear Schemes/Design Concepts with the Bank 8114/95 8/25/95

45 Amend Existing Designs and Prepare New Desig 8/28/95 12/29/95

46 Prepare Draft Tender Docs 12/11/95 12129/95

47 Clear Desgns/Tender Docs with Bank 1/1/196 1112/96

48 Procurement Phase 2/16/96 6118/96

o uiI-1%

Project: Indonesia - ISDP Crideal _ Progress i;tP 2SummaryDate: 5/111194 Noncriticafl * blilstone O Rolled UpO

Page 2

Indonesia - Integrated Swanmps Development ProjectProject ioplementation Schedule

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 20ID Name Start Finish 011230 Q 11 3 1Q23 123 1,2349 Issue Invitation to Bid 2116/96 2/16/96 150 Preparation of Bids 2119/96 4/12/98

51 Opening of Bids 4/15/96 4/15/96 f

52 Evaluation of Bids 4116/96 5/27/96 I

53 Clear Recornmendation with Bank 5/28/96 6/10/96

54 Award Contract 6/18/96 6/18/96

55 Construction Phase 6/26/96 2/24/98

58 Contractor Mobilization 6/26196 7/2/96

57 Construction in Progress 7/3/96 2/24/98

58

59 AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT 9/4194 3131/00

60 GROUP 1 (1,500 Farms) 914/94 3131195

61 Training of Farmers' Groups 914/94 12/30194 it

62 Distribution of Input Packages 10/1/94 3/31/95

63 GROUP 2 (3,000 Farms) 4/3/95 3131/96

64 Training of Farmers' Groups 4/3/95 12/31/95 165 Distribution of input Packages 7/3/95 3/31/96

66 GROUP 3 (4,500 Farms) 4/3/96 3/31/97

67 Training of Farmers' Groups 4/3/96 12/31/96

68 Distribution of Input Packages 7/2/96 3/31/97

69 GROUP 4 (6,000 Farms) 4/3/97 3/31/98

70 Training of Farmors' Groups 4/3/97 12/31/97

71 Distribution of Input Packages 7/2/97 3131/98

72 GROUP 5 17,500 Farrns) 4/3/98 3131/99 (D _

Project: Indonesia - ISDP |Critical _ _ Progress C _ SummaryDete: 5till94 | ~~Noncritical S r Milestone 6>Rolled Up

Page 3

Indonesia - Integrated Swamps Development ProjectProject Implementation Schedule

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2tID Name Start Finish a2JQ3JQ4 a I 3JQ4 iih2h314 a1J22jj3J4ja1202 1203 123 73 Traning of Farmers' Groups 413N98 12131198

74 Distribution of Input Packages 712198 3131199

75 GROUP 6 (7,500 Farns) 4/5/99 3131/00

76 Training of Farmers' Groups 4/5/99 12/31199

77 Distribution of Input Packages 7/6t99 3/31100

78

79 COCONUT PLANTING 4/1193 11/30/97

80 GROUP1 11,800 ha) 4/1193 11/30t94 zI -,

81 Ordering of Seed Nuts 411/93 4130t93

82 Land Surveys & Titling 911193 313194

83 Planting Nuts in Seed Garden 4/1194 5/30/94

84 Issuance Land Certificates 7/4194 9130194

85 Planting Seedlings In Field 10/3194 11130194

86 GROUP 213,900 ha) 4/1194 11130/95

87 Ordering of Seed Nuts 411194 4130194 f88 Land Surveys & Titaing 7/1194 3/31195

89 Planting Nuts in Seed Garden 413195 5130/95

90 Issuance Land Cenificates 713/95 9130195

91 Planting Sedlings In Field 1012195 11/30195

92 GROUP 3 (4.000 ha) 4/3196 11/30/96

93 Ordering of Seed Nuts 4/3195 4130195

94 Land Surveys & Titling 713195 3131196

95 Planting Nuts In Seed Garden 411/96 5/30196

98 Issuance Land Certificates 7/1196 9/30/96 8

Page 4. . .. .__ o bProject: Indonesia - ISDP CrdvUcal 0 u Pogres Surntnery _LaDate:5/111/94 Noncritical ibiiistone RotiedUp

Pege 4

Indonesia - Integaged Swamps Development ProjectProject Inifwnentation Schedule

1993 1994 199S 1996 1997 199 ¶999 20ID Name Start Finish ia2 1 3 103gN Q 141QlfaAQ134 1I Q210324 i97 Planting Seedlings in Field 1011190 11/30/96

98 GROUP 412,800 ha) 4/1/98 11/30/97

99 Ordedng of Seed Nuts 4/1/96 4130198 il100 Land Survey 1Tifing 7/1196 3131/97101 Planting Nuts in Seed Garden 411l97 5130/97102 Issuence Lend Certificate 7/11/97 9/30197103 Planting SedlingaIn Raid tO/1/97 11130/97 _

l Ia

normh" Logema RobdPageO@b:611flAF4 j N~~~~~~~~~opdi l_5Rb

INDONESIAINTEGRATED SWAMPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

Project Organization

MRD DG Estate DG FCH BAPPENAS DGWRD/DOS BPN DG PHPA

j - Codn. Consult - -2 J~I- - Nat. Secretariatl/ L.... I _1 I I I I

C I I I I PIMPRO PIMPRO j PIMPROResearch Agricult. Dev. Coordinaton &

Management Management CotrfucidonManagement

§ : : ~~~~~~~~~~~~~BAPPEDA |

8 ~ ~~~~~~~ - - -_r- --- -- - - Pr_ _ Sebretar __ __aV-

11 ~I I I If

PIMPRO PIMPRO PIMPRO PIMPRO PIMPRO PIMPRO PIMPRO Reserc Tree Crops Food Crops O &M Construction |Land Titling | |Coastal Zone|

--- = ProJect Coordination Provirncial StrucbLJre: Jambi, Riau & West KalimantanPM et Accourtability Line

PIMPRO PIProPect Manager sadsPMP4182

THAILAND 'to.

Bndo Aceh

BRUNEI PHILIPPINES

MALAYSIA

Medan @\ f d

| , ;, rj 6Frt / A

SUMATE MALAYSIA

Foe fredet "e iBRD 24870 a r-W .y ,>,lrvlt.' 1160511nb¢ Fr,edetoilsee IBRD 24871 i^I','' A AJ

IBARAT PAj /

PadlafgrigO F/ r debta see IBRD 24869 ° I. S .1. 2For detail see 18RD 24873 fw dnta,l see 1ER

t I^ltBl A -1 K<Al It,&V,.Q4P Ii 4:,AH n s LAWESIBfANGKA .

C ) 04JM rpr t M.IUNG A I.W47AN

Beokulu-) StE LATAN / Knc"

5' XltPUNGk,LA.E,i -TF.C.G:.RA

ujwv Pandang0Bo .d0t. JAKARTA

lmptng JhU^UtTA JAWA

JAWA f Sema ~JA MADURA NUSA TrN.ZGArP,,.

I N D O N E S I A Ya~ JAWA TIMUR / 1 SUVMAWAD I YOGYAKARTA )BAt/S (

INTEGRATED SWAMPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT D MtoromLOMSOK

PROJECr LOCATIONS ,l'A1 BA KUOOg0 ,

0 PROVINCE CAPITALS* NATIONAL CAPITAL

PRCMNCE BONDARIES

- INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARIES

Es o Soo 700 TCO To xorhis maop has beenf preparted bny T¢6^efOrwothads I6rtserb The Wod Bank. tff eor the covnec fraetadis far the internal "s of The Word gjSank Group. The denominotions used ond the boundories shown on th,s 6

* * , * * * * ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~map do not imply. on the port of The World Bank Group, ;any jdmn

tJt s 0S O 2TOO 400 60 I on tIhe ieg t of any territory or any endorement ot t

s_ch boondor.es. z20C

IBRD 24869

INDONESIA

INTEGRATED SWAMPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTJAMBI PROJECT AREA

PROJECT SCHEMES

TOWNS

ROADS

_CANALS

RVERS

-- -; / F--~- - -- BBe rhala Strait~Lamrnr( \~~~~~ -. �- arn-u r;'.. <\ 3>}

> -''X '** Teluki-ang~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Kjn

K'am> .- C t m\ 0 < \ \ 9 ;f- JNipahX- P-.ntng

-¾~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4

'K kepMup

.- \Lmu -¾-

NibOngputlh

Rantaurasau

pa t\gS

Culu

-t~~~~~~~~~~~~t

odow--- --ad~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'xa--

bx '0f -LMR

m d . mw d o w k-* , -N ,

o iX,fwtr'd s Sr0. .- ,A r

ond~~~~~~~s ~~~KILOMETERS tSEA

usdsrsscaeqane -. - - - -/

JUNE 1993

IBRD 24870

INDONESIAINTEGRATED SWAMPS Lubuk Muda*

DEVELOPMENT PROJECTRIAU - SIAK PROJECT AREA

PROJECT SCHEMES

VIUAGES -

* TOWNS Spo

ROADS Sepgtong* CAN~LALS *Tg. layang (P

RIVERS Lubukgaung*

0 lxtganTalam

4 Bonmeo

Langkot

> -o 0- ~'SungoiaDitSepucuk Tengah

Gz tungot -~~~~~~ Dar=

,'I

. -- -- TelukMasjid

^ +**9~Benuor .

0 1 2 3 4 5

A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~E % M11*| ,'<-~~~~~~~~~ Il i 4 ILOETER

mXt ofN The World; .- f '

u"of^Wcdd 'S\A S'' ~~~~~~~~~~~~ A,,, " ; .>~~~2 '

bowxb,im A,.." - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~OCEANsa o t . 6NN on

po0tdf.odwrld Grkco, Sungoi Berboi ..

m- mfio JKAnoT JUE1

JUNE 1993

IBRD 24871

INDONESIA

INTEGRATED SWAMPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTRIAU - INDRAGIRI PROJECT AREA

PROJEa SCHEMES

MUAAGES

ROADS

fIttllll CANALS ' \ S

Sungai

w i SE KwX 1

~~~~~~~~~~~~PAni

41 - <s 1u\\

. k4 ::_E-A'. k

t~~~~~~~~~~~~~Pn Ki,A a-l

0 1 2 3J 1

Jomb ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ TIns eqs 15~~~~~~~~~..*.,df05 enpqs

Q0nd Tdo 5m.5'ftslhonso

on des eq d se1 ey.ondpen Of ICo Wed V=kOss

JUNE 1993

IBRD 24872

INDONESIA

INTEGRATED SWAMPS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTKAlUMANTAN BARAT PROJECT AREA

Pontionak

PROJECT SCHEMES

VIUAGES

0 TOWNS

ROADS

I CANALS

- RVERS

OTeluk Palcdai

I '.,-NwAxE Ku"i0 5 10I I I

. . ~~~~~~~~~~~iAlOMEIERS 'wN

o.to of The WA S ),n ; 0G0R~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~h m v -- t

P < bi oioeAn l7b

JUNE 1993

IBRD 24873

*Lambur Simbur*Luar Naik

*TelukKijing eSung*itik

OSungailokan

Simpangdotuk$ Sungoijambate

Lambur Sungaisayong*DaOlam

0

Rantouindah 0 Rantomsou

KotosKandis 0Sungoirombut

*Airhitamiaut

Sungoipuar

Sungaicemara

INDONESIA

INTEGRATED SWAMPSDEVELOPMENT PROJECT

BERBAK NATIONAL PARK AREA

LobuanperingBERBAK NATIONa PAPK ^

* TOWNS

RIVERS

UWA'PNGAOR *I

X s bSdFc~~~ontak.

by The Worfd80As s*H

r,:>>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~mwo ;. i S 1 o 'hTwnoncompa6dxwq 0 I ~~~~~0ood n ,

KILOMETERS bondb e goe

D2 Pnse aAP,a,- at,r csaidreIes_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o pB map do not nk, A

-.. 555* 017 J 1993

JUNe 1993