2
Photoblocker Spray – Defeats Photo Radar & Red Light Cameras! All across the United States the studies and news reports in one city after another reveal a consistent result: red light cameras do not contribute to a fewer accident rate, and the system regularly gives tickets to innocent drivers. "The red-light cameras just don't work as advertised. Thousands of innocent drivers are getting tickets they do not deserve. "The red light cameras actually lead to an increase in rear-end accidents as drivers slam on their brakes to avoid citations. Speed cameras are inaccurate and regularly ticket drivers who were below the speed limit." Millions of people each year receive tickets from red light and speed cameras, and many complain that those tickets are sent in error. Most believe that the process of defending themselves is so challenging and expensive that it is easier to just pay the fine and move on with life. Many drivers use PhotoBlocker (tm), a very inexpensive, simple method to prevent most red light and speed camera tickets. A form of self-defense against imperfect technology. PhotoBlocker (tm) is a simple aerosol spray that when applied to a license plate does not in any way alter the appearance of the plate to the naked eye, but the flash picture from a red-light camera or speed camera makes the number on the plate unreadable. This spray used by more and more drivers as a form of protection against unjust tickets. Brisk sales of the spray indicate that a growing number of motorists are trying to protect themselves from a system that is unfair, and does not work. City officials claim the traffic enforcement cameras are needed to increase safety, and they also claim they are not motivated by the revenue the cameras produce. The evidence does not support those claims. Cities need money, and politicians often look to speed cameras and red light cameras as a great source of revenue. All around the country drivers are becoming victims, and thousands are getting tickets they do not deserve. When the yellow-light cycle is too short it doesn't allow drivers enough time to clear the intersection. Those drivers are law-abiding citizens who are victims of a system designed to maximize revenue, not reduce accidents. They did nothing wrong. So now they are using PhotoBlocker spray to prevent unjust tickets. One city was recently caught using a short yellow light to generate a high

Do License plate inhibitors red light cameras really work?

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Do License plate inhibitors red light cameras really work?

Photoblocker Spray – Defeats Photo Radar & Red Light Cameras!

All across the United States the studies and news reports in one city after another reveal a consistent result: red light cameras do not contribute to a fewer accident rate, and the system regularly gives tickets to innocent drivers. "The red-light cameras just don't work as advertised. Thousands of innocent drivers are getting tickets they do not deserve. "The red light cameras actually lead to an increase in rear-end accidents as drivers slam on their brakes to avoid citations. Speed cameras are inaccurate and regularly ticket drivers who were below the speed limit."

Millions of people each year receive tickets from red light and speed cameras, and many complain that those tickets are sent in error. Most believe that the process of defending themselves is so challenging and expensive that it is easier to just pay the fine and move on with life. Many drivers use PhotoBlocker (tm), a very inexpensive, simple method to prevent most red light and speed camera tickets. A form of self-defenseagainst imperfect technology.

PhotoBlocker (tm) is a simple aerosol spray that when applied to a license plate does not in any way alter the appearance of the plate to the naked eye, but the flash picture from a red-light camera or speed camera makes the number on the plate unreadable. This spray used by more and more drivers as a form of protection against unjust tickets. Brisk sales of the spray indicate that a growing number of motorists are trying to protect themselves from a system that is unfair, and does not work.

City officials claim the traffic enforcement cameras are needed to increase safety, and they also claim they are not motivated by the revenue the cameras produce. The evidence does not support those claims. Cities need money, and politicians often look to speed cameras and red light cameras as a great source of revenue. All around the country drivers are becoming victims, and thousands are getting tickets they do not deserve.

When the yellow-light cycle is too short it doesn't allow drivers enough time to clear the intersection. Those drivers are law-abiding citizens who are victims of a system designed to maximize revenue, not reduce accidents. They did nothing wrong. So now they are using PhotoBlocker spray to prevent unjust tickets.

One city was recently caught using a short yellow light to generate a high number of tickets. Union City, Calif. was forced to refund over $1 million in fines improperly collected from a red light camera at an intersection with a short yellow light. The short light was 1.3 seconds below the minimum time required by law, so it was trapping motorists who could not stop in time to avoid a ticket.

Drivers cannot help but wonder how many other cities use short yellow light times to boost the number of tickets generated by red light cameras. Use of the PhotoBlocker spray grows with every report in the news about enforcement camera problems. Drivers are not using the spray in order to violate the law. They are protecting themselves from greedy cities and a system that is not working as advertised. Drivers are tired of getting tickets they do not deserve. The cost in time and money to defend themselves is excessive, We want our roads to be safe, and we do not encourage anyone to break the law. But we know how frustrating it is to get a ticket you do not deserve.