Upload
kshitiz-anand
View
102
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
I conduct a workshop on Social Design & Design for Social Design at Design and Business Schools. This one was conducted at the India campus of Lécole de design Nantes Atlantique, in Bangalore, with the students of the Transcultural Design class.
Citation preview
SOCIAL DESIGN
Kshitiz ANAND @kshitiz
Design for the other 90%
90% of a designer’s time is spent on the richest 10% - Paul Polak
CAN DESIGNERS CHANGE (IMPROVE)
THE WORLD?
Y! "# $%&!
D!"'& ( f)r #*+ +,"#+ )&,-!
Design has become the most powerful tool with which man shapes his tools and environments (and, by extension, society and himself) - Victor J Papanek, Design for the Real world
WHAT IS COMMON?
WHAT IS SOCIAL DESIGN
The foremost intent of social design is the satisfaction of human needs. The broad objective of social design is to improve ‘social quality’. ������It is about designing new functioning to elevate individual and community capability and propose solutions that genuinely empower and extend the capability of the user. - Alastair Fuad-Luke on Social Design, in book ‘Design Activism: Beautiful strangeness for a sustainable world’
DESIGN for
WANT DESIGN for
NEED
THE NEED?
UN Millennium DEVELOPMENT GOALS
h"p://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/
WHAT AM I TALKING ABOUT ? 2.2 million people globally each year die due to _______?
WHAT AM I TALKING ABOUT ? 2.2 million people globally each year die due to Diarrhoea h"p://www.who.int/water_sanita6on_health/diseases/diarrhoea/en/
h"p://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/
EVIDENCES?
There are a lot of individuals, companies working on this now and they span across sectors
h"p://www.slideshare.net/kshi6z/design-‐u-‐turn-‐from-‐want-‐to-‐need
Human centered design IS AT THE HEART OF SOCIAL DESIGN
ARGUE Have ‘Design Thinking’ and ‘Social Innovation’ become permanently intertwined?
UNDERSTAND LIFEWORLDS - Edmund Husserl introduced the concept of the lifeworld in his ’Crisis of European Sciences’ (1936)
Lifeworld: (German Lebenswelt)
h"p://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifeworld
A state of affairs in which the world is experienced, the world is lived. A universe of what is self-evident or given. Cannot be understood in a purely static manner as all things appear as themselves and meaningful.
This collective inter-subjective pool of perceiving, is both universally present and, for humanity's purposes, capable of arriving at 'objective truth,' or at least as close to objectivity as possible.
Lifeworld: (German Lebenswelt)
Research perspectives
1. Phenomenological 2. Epistemological 3. Sociological
Phenomenological (- Husserl & Schütz)
- see the lifeworld to be the study of the structures of subjective experience and consciousness - to understand that we each individualistic,
“I-the-man” and all of us together, belong to the world as living with one another in the world
- the world is our world, valid for our consciousness as existing precisely through this 'living together.’
Phenomenological (- Husserl & Schütz)
- One has to place oneself in a context comprised of the various others and the collective shared experience of individuals and objects. - It is therefore not about the individual ego of the designer; rather we, in living together, that we understand the world.
WHAT IT MEANS
Individual (subjective) understanding of the lifeworld
Lifeworld
Sociological (- Habermas)
- Viewpoint of an objective reality of the society, taking account the social and material environmental conditions and their relevance -The view of the lifeworld is more or less the "background" environment of competences, practices, and attitudes representable in terms of one's cognitive horizon -lifeworld as consisting of socially and culturally sedimented linguistic meanings
Sociological (- Habermas)
WHAT IT MEANS - the focus here thus is not on the consciousness of the individual, but to understand the practical rationality that is being governed by the rules of that system - Social coordination and systemic regulation occur by means of shared practices, beliefs, values, superstitions, alternate and parallel governing bodies and structures
Individual (subjective) understanding of the lifeworld
Rules of governing
Practices Beliefs Superstitions Agreements
Lifeworld View from the rules of the system Towards an objective reality Of that what is agreed upon and governed by and followed
Epistemological - touches upon the notion of ‘life conditions’ as a further reference point to understanding the social space. - life conditions include material and immaterial living circumstances as for example employment situation, availability of material resources, housing conditions, social environment (friends, foes, relatives, etc.) as well as the persons physical condition.
WHAT IT MEANS - It is entrusted on top of the lifeworld and the Social and material environment conditions.
Epistemological
Individual (subjective) understanding of the
lifeworld
Understanding the life conditions that are a result of the rules and the individual’s positioning in the lifeworld
Viewing within and Of Life Conditions
Rules of governing
Practices Beliefs Superstitions Agreements
Life conditions
BELIEVE IN WHAT YOU SEE IN WHAT YOU HEAR IN WHAT YOU FEEL IN WHAT YOU EXPERIENCE
INSPIRE IDEATE IMPLEMENT
WICKED PROBLEMS - Rittel & Webber [ 1973]
With social design you would run into Wicked Problems
“Some problems are so complex that you have to be highly intelligent and well informed just to be undecided about them.” - Laurence J. Peter
It is a class of social system problems, which are • ill-formulated, • the information is confusing, • there are many clients and decision makers with
conflicting values, • the ramifications of the whole system are
thoroughly confusing, • it is messy, circular, and aggressive,
extraordinarily difficult to categorize or define.
CHARACTERISTICS
DEFINING WICKED PROBLEMS IS IN ITSELF A WICKED PROBLEM
ALL PROBLEMS ARE OPPORTUNITIES
IN DISGUISE
Multiple starting points and often no clear end mark the characteristics of wicked problems as the solution are intermingled with another problem within the same social space and share a causal relation to each other
Anand K, Haag J; “A framework for teaching Design for Social Impact , Feb 2013
COMMUNICATE COLLABORATE
CREATE
RESEARCH AGENDA
CONTEXT • Understand context properly • Talk to and study different stakeholders
IDENTIFY • Large problem space • Small problems in large
problem space and how they connect with each other
USER GROUPS • Identify different user
groups • Differentiate between
target group and affected group
Empathize • Remember cultural rules • Do not hurt sentiments
ANALYSIS
CREATE SOLUTIONS Do not make just some noise
CREATE SOLUTIONS Break patterns & set norms Change systems
INCLUSION Design with (not for) to create change
INCLUSION Design with input and involvement of beneficiaries
QUESTION How can things be better?
MEASURE The outcomes of the work done and not just rely on Outputs
h"p://www.slideshare.net/CharlesGYF/six-‐habits-‐of-‐social-‐entrepreneurs
h"p://www.slideshare.net/CharlesGYF/six-‐habits-‐of-‐social-‐entrepreneurs
IDEATION
Product
Product in
system
Anand K, Haag J; “A framework for teaching Design for Social Impact , Feb 2013
DCI: Divergence – Convergence - Integration
Anand K, Haag J; “A framework for teaching Design for Social Impact , Feb 2013
System-Product Harmonization
Anand K, Haag J; “A framework for teaching Design for Social Impact , Feb 2013
Social Design process
Anand K, Haag J; “A framework for teaching Design for Social Impact , Feb 2013
MEASURING IMPACT
a) Short term b) Long term
a) Tangible b) Intangible
THANK YOU Email: [email protected] Twitter: @kshitiz