54
Earthquakes and Seismic Design By Dr. N. Subramanian 3 rd Nov. 2012

Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Details earthquakes and their effect on Structures

Citation preview

Page 1: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Earthquakes and Seismic Design

By Dr. N. Subramanian3rd Nov. 2012

Page 2: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Cross-section of Earth

Though we have explored Space above ground extensively, we could go only about 7.6 miles below ground! Russian geologists started drilling into the Kola Peninsula, near Finland, in 1970 and after 22 years could not proceed further.

Page 3: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Plate tectonics- Alfred Wegener , 1912

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 4: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Plate tectonics (PT)Earlier theories assume gradual shrinking (contraction) or

gradual expansion of the globe. PT is based on continental drift & developed in early 20th

centuryLithosphere is broken up into 7-8 major tectonic plates, and

numerous smaller platesTectonic plates move – because lithosphere has a higher

strength and lower density than the underlying asthenosphere- Dissipation of heat from the mantle is the source of energy

Lateral relative movement of the plates- 0 to 100 mm annually

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 5: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Three types of plate boundaries exist

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 6: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Global earthquake epicenters, 1963–1998

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 7: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Aerial view of San Andreas Fault in the Carrizo Plain, northwest of Los Angeles

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 8: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Earthquakes

• Around 500,000 earthquakes occur each year, detectable with current instrumentation. About 100,000 of these can be felt.

• Human activities that produce minor earthquakes: – Storage of large water behind a dam, – Injecting liquid under high pressure into wells (fracking

to extract natural gas), – Coal mining– Oil drilling

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 9: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Recurrence of Earthquakes

• Average recurrence of Earthquakes are:– Earthquake of M3.7–4.6 every year, – Earthquake of M4.7–5.5 every 10 years,– Earthquake of 5.6 or larger every 100 years.

• The United States Geological Survey estimates that, since 1900, there have been an average of 18 major earthquakes (M 7.0–7.9) and one great earthquake (M 8.0 or greater) per year.

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 10: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

AftershocksAn aftershock is an earthquake that occurs after a previous

earthquake, the mainshock. It occurs in the same region of the main shock but always of a

smaller magnitude. If it is larger than the main shock, the aftershock is

redesignated as the main shock and the original main shock is redesignated as a foreshock.

Formed as the crust around the displaced fault plane adjusts to the effects of the main shock

They are dangerous - usually unpredictable, can be of a large magnitude, and can collapse buildings that are damaged from the main shock

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 11: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Earthquakes-Epicenter

Dr. N. Subramanian

Epicenter is the point on the Earth's surface that is directly above the hypocenter (where the Strain energy stored in the rock is first released)

Page 12: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

EARTHQUAKES

Dr.N.Subramanian 12

Page 13: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Earthquake Prediction Instrument... from ancient China

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 14: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Seismograph is used to measure wave amplitude

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 15: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Can we predict earthquakes correctly?

• Long ago, Catholic Church in Rome condemned Galileo Galilei and put him under house arrest for teaching ‘Earth revolves around the sun’!

• Now, (Oct 22, 2012) an Italian court convicted seven scientists and experts for 6 years in prison for failing to adequately warn citizens before an earthquake struck central Italy in 2009, killing more than 300 people.

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 16: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Can we predict earthquakes correctly?

• Scientists generally cannot predict the time, location and magnitude of EQ - But they did it once!

• On Feb. 4, 1975, seismologists issued a warning to residents of Haicheng in northeastern China, prompting people to seek safety outdoors.– A M7.3- EQ struck that evening, killing more than 2,000

people and destroying more than 90 percent of the city. – Without the warning, about 150,000 people would have

died!

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 17: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Characteristics of an Earthquake

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 18: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

As the “quality” of the sediment decreases,the amplitude of the waves increases

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 19: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Magnitude: Richter scale- Californian seismologist Charles F. Richter, in 1930s

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 20: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

P and S waves and Magnitude

• P waves are the first to arrive due to their high displacement speed,

• Followed by the S waves. Two parameters that determine magnitude: • The time delay between the arrival of the first P

waves and S waves(proportional to the distance between the seismograph and the hypocentre of the earthquake), and

• Their amplitude.

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 21: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

P and S waves

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 22: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Graphical solution of the mathematical formula for determining magnitude on the Richter scale

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 23: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Intensity of earthquakes

• Modified Mercalli Intensity scale (MMI) and MSK scale (Appendix D of Draft IS 1893)

• Initially developed early last century by Giuseppe Mercalli.

• Both have twelve levels of intensity– Level I – least perceptive – Level XII – most severe

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 24: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Factors Influencing Seismic Damage

Dr.N.Subramanian 24

Damage to a Steel building in Mexico City, 1985

The following factors influence the seismic damage: Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) Amplitude, Duration and frequency of ground

vibration, Magnitude, Distance from epicenter Geographical conditions between

the epicenter and the site, Soil properties at the site and

foundation type Building type and characteristics.

Page 25: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Lateral Force Resisting Systems

Dr.N.Subramanian 25

Page 26: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Better Performance in Earthquakes

Dr.N.Subramanian 26

Have simple and regular Plans

Page 27: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Collapse of L-shaped building in Ahmedabad, 2001

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 28: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Avoid Irregular Configurations

Dr.N.Subramanian 28

Page 29: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Avoid Novel Structural Features(If their EQ behavior is not known)

Dr.N.Subramanian 29

Page 30: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Geometric vulnerabilities- CCTV Tower, China

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 31: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Response Spectra for Different Strong Earthquakes

Dr.N.Subramanian 31

Page 32: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Response Acceleration coefficient as given in IS 1893 (Part 1)-2002

Dr.N.Subramanian 32

Smoothened Elastic Design Acceleration Response Spectrum (SEDRS) for 5% damping.For Steel structures use 2% damping

Page 33: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

SEISMIC ZONES OF INDIA

Dr.N.Subramanian 33

Page 34: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Map (PSHM) of India

• The National Disaster Management Authority, Govt. Of India, New Delhi has also developed a Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Map (PSHM) of India

•http://ndma.gov.in/ndma/disaster/earthquake/India-psha-finalreport.pdf

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 35: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Equivalent Lateral Base Shear Force Procedure

Equivalent Lateral Base Shear Force :

Dr.N.Subramanian 35

Where Z= zone factor, I = importance factor, and R= Response reduction Factor

I = 1.5 for largely crowded and imp. Buildings, and equal to 1.0 for other buildings.

Page 36: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Approximate Fundamental Period

Dr.N.Subramanian 36

The approximate fundamental natural period of vibration for a moment resisting frame without brick infill panels is : Ta = 0.085 h0.75 in seconds

where h = height of the building in m  For all other buildings, including moment resisting frame buildings with brick in-fill,

Ta = 0.09h / √d in seconds

where d = base dimension of the building at the plinth level, along the considered direction of the lateral force, in meters.

Page 37: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Equivalent Static Method (seismic coefficient method)

Dr.N.Subramanian 37

Total design seismic base shear if determined by

VB = Ah W

Ah = Design horizontal acceleration spectrum value W = Seismic weight of the building

Page 38: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Fundamental natural periods ofstructures differ over a large range

Dr. N. Subramanian

Adapted from: Newmark, (1970), Current trends in the Seismic Analysis and Design of High Rise Structures, Chapter 16, in Wiegel, (1970), Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, USA.

Page 39: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Distribution of Base Shear to Different Levels of the Building

After the base shear force VB is determined it should be distributed along the height of the building (to the various floor levels) using the following expression:

Dr.N.Subramanian 39

After the Base shear is distributed, the frames may be analyzed by any standard computer program to get the internal forces!

Page 40: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Dynamic AnalysisThe dynamic analysis methods are grouped into: Response spectrum method (multistory buildings,

irregular buildings, overhead water ranks and bridge piers are often designed using this method)

Time-history response analysis (most important structures such as nuclear reactors, large span structures or very tall buildings are designed using this method).

Dr.N.Subramanian 40

Page 41: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

EARTHQUAKE DESIGN PHILOSOPHYThe seismic design philosophy as per IS 1893(part 1) is: Minor and frequent earthquakes should not cause any damage to the

structureModerate earthquakes should not cause significant structural damage

but could have some non-structural damageMajor and infrequent earthquakes should not cause collapse

Hence design is done for much smaller forces than actual seismic loads. Note that this approach is different than that adopted in the case of

wind, dead, live and other loads, where the structure is designed for the actual loads.

Dr.N.Subramanian 41

Page 42: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Earthquake design philosophy

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 43: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Seismic Design Philosophy

Dr.N.Subramanian 43

Though the structure is designed for reduced earthquake loads, the following contributing factors will prevent the collapse of the structure:

Over-strength, Redundancy, Ductility

Page 44: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Ductile and Brittle performance

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 45: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

CURRENT DESIGN CODES

Expected Performance:

Dr.N.Subramanian 45

The design requirements primarily are intended to safeguard against major failures and loss of life, NOT to limit damage, maintain functions, or provide for easy repairs.

Page 46: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Performance Based Design (PBD)Future (PBD) Codes will be based on:Desired performance chosen by owner.Reduced business interruptionReduced damage costs

Current Performance based design documents:Vision 2000FEMA 356/273ATC 40FEMA 310

Dr.N.Subramanian 46

Page 47: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Load CombinationsIn general consider the 8- load combinations: (1) 1.5 (DL + IL) + 1.05(CL or SL)(2) 1.2 (DL + IL) + 1.05(CL or SL) ± 0.6(WL or EL)(3) 1.2 (DL + IL ± WL or EL) + 0.53 (CL or SL)(4) 1.5(DL ± WL or EL)(5) 0.9 DL ± 1.5 (WL or EL)(6) 1.2 (DL + ER)(7) 0.9DL + 1.2 ER(8) DL + 0.35(IL + CL or SL) + AL

Where, DL = Dead load, IL = imposed load (live load), WL = wind load, SL = snow load, CL = crane load (vertical / horizontal), AL = accidental load, ER = erection load and EL = earthquake load.

Dr.N.Subramanian 47

Page 48: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Loading Combination for Non-orthogonal buildings

Eight additional possibilities should also be considered.

(1) ELx + 0.3 ELy

(2) 0.3ELx + ELy

(3) ELx – 0.3ELy

(4) 0.3ELx - ELy

(5) – (ELx + 0.3ELy

(6) (0.3ELx + ELy)

(7) – (ELx – 0.3ELy)

(8) – (0.3ELx – ELy)

Dr.N.Subramanian 48

Page 49: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 50: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 51: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Seismically Active regions in India

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 52: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Past Earthquakes in India

Dr. N. Subramanian

Four Great earthquakes (M>8) occurred in a span of 53 years from 1897 to 1950; the January 2001 Bhuj earthquake (M7.7) is almost as large

Page 53: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Past Earthquakes in India

Dr. N. Subramanian

Page 54: Slides Earthquake Resistant design part1

Dr. N. Subramanian