35
Seismic Structural Considerations JCC Training Seismic Structural Considerations JCC Training by Paul W. McMullin, SE, PhD October 15, 2009

Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Training provided for Jacobsen Construction Company Superintendent, Project Engineer, and Project manager training. Covers history of steel moment frames, Northridge and subsequent changes, moment connections, and potential challenges.

Citation preview

Page 1: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

Seismic Structural

ConsiderationsJCC Training

Seismic Structural

ConsiderationsJCC Training

byPaul W. McMullin, SE, PhD

October 15, 2009

Page 2: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

The Paper Clip Test

Page 3: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Concept of Selected Deformation

Page 4: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Early Use of Moment Connections

Flatiron Building, NYC• One of the first steel frame

buildings

• Portal frame moment connections at all wind girders.

Early Steel Frames- all moment connected

Flatiron Building, NYC• One of the first steel frame

buildings

• Portal frame moment connections at all wind girders.

Early Steel Frames- all moment connected

Page 5: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Construction Changes that led to

Northridge Failures

Fewer, but larger moment frames• Heavier connections

Changed from Riveted to Welded construction

Used lower toughness welding rod• Welds went down fast

• Not permitted in pipelines

Quality control problems

Fewer, but larger moment frames• Heavier connections

Changed from Riveted to Welded construction

Used lower toughness welding rod• Welds went down fast

• Not permitted in pipelines

Quality control problems

Page 6: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Acceleration Record from Northridge

From the Strong Motion Database (SMDB, 2000a)

Page 7: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Northridge Earthquake

Magnitude 6.7• Estimated Economic

• Loss = $49.3 billion

Magnitude 6.7• Estimated Economic

• Loss = $49.3 billion

Building Inventory Damage• 100 buildings with minor

fractures

• 100 buildings with major fractures

• 30 buildings with major fractures in 90% of all connections

Building Inventory Damage• 100 buildings with minor

fractures

• 100 buildings with major fractures

• 30 buildings with major fractures in 90% of all connections

Page 8: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Fracture Causes

Welding• Low Toughness Weld Metal

• Slag Inclusions

• Lack of fusion

Mismatched Yield Strengths

Erroneous Joint Detailing

Weld Constraint by Heavy Sections

Slab Interaction with Column

Welding• Low Toughness Weld Metal

• Slag Inclusions

• Lack of fusion

Mismatched Yield Strengths

Erroneous Joint Detailing

Weld Constraint by Heavy Sections

Slab Interaction with Column

Page 9: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Changes: Code

Code limited approved filler metals

Inspection requirements tightened

Limited connection types

Quality control significantly increased

Code limited approved filler metals

Inspection requirements tightened

Limited connection types

Quality control significantly increased

Page 10: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Changes: Weld Access Hole

Page 11: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Connections: WUF-W

Page 12: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Connections: Extended Flange

Page 13: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Connections: Flange Cover Plate

Page 14: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Connections: Reduced Beam

Section

Page 15: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Connections: Bolted End Plate

Page 16: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Connections: SidePlate

Page 17: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Protected Zone Requirements

No discontinuities in protected zone• Arc Strikes• Erection Aids• Air-arc Gouging• Thermal Cutting

Not permitted• Welded studs• Shot pins• Screws• Welds• Holes

No discontinuities in protected zone• Arc Strikes• Erection Aids• Air-arc Gouging• Thermal Cutting

Not permitted• Welded studs• Shot pins• Screws• Welds• Holes

Get protected zone from drawings or engineer

Mark protected zones with bright paint after erection and after fire coating

Get protected zone from drawings or engineer

Mark protected zones with bright paint after erection and after fire coating

Page 18: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Protected Zones: Dog Bone

Page 19: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Protected Zones: Concentric Braced Frame

Page 20: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Protected Zones: Concentric Braced Frame

Page 21: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Protected Zones:Eccentric Braced Frame

Page 22: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Protected Zones:Eccentric Braced Frame

Page 23: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Connections

Bolted End Plate

Reduced Beam Section (“Dog Bone”)

SidePlate™

Bolted End Plate

Reduced Beam Section (“Dog Bone”)

SidePlate™

Page 24: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Reduced Beam Section Connection

Advantages• Approved

• Reduces column-beam weld stresses

Disadvantages• Milling of beam flange

• 80%-90% reliable

• Looks odd

Advantages• Approved

• Reduces column-beam weld stresses

Disadvantages• Milling of beam flange

• 80%-90% reliable

• Looks odd

Page 25: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Reduced Beam Section Connection

Watch for:• Protected Zone (nicks, arc

strikes, shot pins, welds)

• Smoothness of Cut

• Bracing just outside cut

Watch for:• Protected Zone (nicks, arc

strikes, shot pins, welds)

• Smoothness of Cut

• Bracing just outside cut

Page 26: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

SidePlate Connection

Advantages• Approved- seismic &

progressive collapse

• Eliminates beam-column weld

• High reliability

• Looks strong

Disadvantages• Licensing fee

• Flip columns in shop

Advantages• Approved- seismic &

progressive collapse

• Eliminates beam-column weld

• High reliability

• Looks strong

Disadvantages• Licensing fee

• Flip columns in shop

Page 27: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Begin with Column Sub-Assembly

Step 1: Column Tree Assembly

Bring in Side Plates, Tack Weld into PositionBring in Horizontal Shear Plates, Tack, Check Alignment, Apply Welds 1 and 3Rotate Column into Position to Apply Other PlatesBring in Side Plates and Horiz. Shear Plates, Tack into PlaceApply Welds 1 and 3, Bring in Temporary DogsApply Weld 2, NS/FS. Rotate Column to Apply Weld 2 to Other Side Plates (Not Shown Here). After that, Column Sub-Assembly Complete.

Page 28: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Begin Full-Length Beam Assembly (Beam Inverted As Shown)

Step 2: Full-Length Beam Assembly

Bring in Cover Plates, Tack into PositionRotate Full-Length Beam and Apply Weld 5Full-Length Beam Assembly Complete Bring in Erection Angle, Tack & Weld into Position

Page 29: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Step 3: Erect Column Trees & Full-Length Beams with six 7/8” A325 Bolts Each End

Page 30: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

SidePlate Connection

Page 31: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

SidePlate Connection

Watch for:1) Joint Gap

2) Protected Zone (nicks, arc strikes, shot pins, welds)

3) SidePlate attachments

Watch for:1) Joint Gap

2) Protected Zone (nicks, arc strikes, shot pins, welds)

3) SidePlate attachments

1

3 2

Page 32: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

SidePlate Protected Zone

Page 33: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

SidePlate: WELDING OK

Page 34: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

What keeps us from backtracking?

Special Inspection• Ensure done well• Ultrasonic• Mag Particle ends

Shop Drawings• Complete• Well detailed• Contractor review

Shop vs Field Welds• Define up-front• Shop welds- faster, higher

quality• Field welds- some pieces too

big for shop

Special Inspection• Ensure done well• Ultrasonic• Mag Particle ends

Shop Drawings• Complete• Well detailed• Contractor review

Shop vs Field Welds• Define up-front• Shop welds- faster, higher

quality• Field welds- some pieces too

big for shop

Good Communication• RFIs that are researched &

propose solutions• Notify us ahead of certain

activities (pours, fire coating)• Tell us about problems as soon

as you know (even your screw-ups)

Think/Plan Ahead• Catch problems• Give us time to determine a

solution

Good Communication• RFIs that are researched &

propose solutions• Notify us ahead of certain

activities (pours, fire coating)• Tell us about problems as soon

as you know (even your screw-ups)

Think/Plan Ahead• Catch problems• Give us time to determine a

solution

Page 35: Seismic Structural Considerations in Steel

© Dunn Associates Inc, 2009

Our Liability

STRUCTURAL ENGINEER

Becomes liable when:• Omit information

• Don’t follow the State of the

Art (code is minimum)

STRUCTURAL ENGINEER

Becomes liable when:• Omit information

• Don’t follow the State of the

Art (code is minimum)

CONTRACTOR

Becomes liable when:• Deviate from approved plans

and specs

• Material/workmanship/Quality problems

CONTRACTOR

Becomes liable when:• Deviate from approved plans

and specs

• Material/workmanship/Quality problems

Regardless of who is liable, if there is a problem, we all get

dragged into the mess