73
NREL RESEARCH SUPPORT FACILITY Tom Hootman, AIA, LEED AP BD+C RNL, Director of Sustainability

NREL case study 010512

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Here is my updated presentation on the NREL Research Support Facility including slides on NREL's energy performance data from it's first year of operation.

Citation preview

Page 1: NREL case study 010512

NREL RESEARCH SUPPORT FACILITY

Tom Hootman, AIA, LEED AP BD+CRNL, Director of Sustainability

Page 2: NREL case study 010512

OperationDesign +

ConstructionProcurement

AGENDA

Page 3: NREL case study 010512

TEAMDOE / NREL: Client

Haselden Construction: General Contractor

RNL: Architecture, Interiors, Landscape, Lighting

Stantec: MEP Engineering, Energy Modeling

KL&A: Structural Engineering

Martin/Martin: Civil Engineering

AEC: LEED, Daylight Modeling, Commissioning

Namaste Solar: Solar Consultant

Page 4: NREL case study 010512

DATAFederal Office Building222,000 SF822 Occupants

$64M Firm Fixed Price$57.4M ConstructionComplete June 2010

Page 5: NREL case study 010512

SITE

Page 6: NREL case study 010512

PLAN

Page 7: NREL case study 010512

ProcessPerformance-

Based Design-build

Substantiation

Energy Target / Project

Objectives

Incentive Award Fees

PROCUREMENT

Page 8: NREL case study 010512

Safety

LEED Platinum

Energy Star

1. Mission CriticalOBJECTIVES

Page 9: NREL case study 010512

2. Highly Desirable800 staff Capacity

25kBTU/sf/year

Architectural integrity

Honor future staff needs

Measurable ASHRAE 90.1

Support culture and amenities

Expandable building

Ergonomics

Flexible workspace

Support future technologies

“How to” manual

Real-time PR” campaign

Secure collaboration with outsiders

Building information modeling

Substantial Completion by 2010

OBJECTIVES

Page 10: NREL case study 010512

3. If PossibleNet zero design approach

Most energy efficient building in the world

LEED Platinum Plus

ASHRAE 90.1 + 50%

Visual displays of current energy efficiency

Support public tours

National and global recognition and awards

Support personnel turnover

OBJECTIVES

Page 11: NREL case study 010512
Page 12: NREL case study 010512
Page 13: NREL case study 010512

GOAL SETTINGI want a green building

Design a LEED <rating> building

Design a building to use 30% less energy than ASHRAE 90.1-2004

Design a building to use less than 25,000 BTU/sqft

Design a net zero energy building

Page 14: NREL case study 010512

LEED

Page 15: NREL case study 010512

NZEB

Page 16: NREL case study 010512

ProcessPerformanceObjective /

Energy Target

Cost Control / Risk Management

Front Loaded + Energy Driven

Design

Bridge the Gap Between Design +

Occupancy

INTEGRATED DELIVERY

Page 17: NREL case study 010512

RiskDesign competition50% of Phase 1 fee at riskEnergy performance requirementLEED Platinum requirementGuaranteed maximum price

RewardHigh profile projectDesign fees (within GMP)Award Incentive Fee

Risk ManagementDesign-Build partnershipShare risksAbility to control decisions

RISK+REWARD

Page 18: NREL case study 010512

CHARRETTE

Page 19: NREL case study 010512

CONCEPT DESIGN

Page 20: NREL case study 010512

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

Page 21: NREL case study 010512

COMPLETED BUILDING

Page 22: NREL case study 010512

MODELING

COMPETITION DESIGNCONSTRUCTI

ON OPERATIONS1 2 3 4CHARRETTE MODEL AS-DESIGNED MODEL

LEED MODEL + BASELINE AS-BUILT MODEL

M&V MODEL

Page 23: NREL case study 010512

MODELING CRAWLSPAC

ETHERMALMODEL

DATA CENTERENERGYMODEL

TRANSPIRED SOLAR

COLLECTORMODEL

NATURAL VENTILATIO

NMODEL

PVMODEL

LIGHTING + DAYLIGHTIN

GMODEL

WHOLE BUILDING ENERGY MODEL

THERMAL BRIDGING

MODEL

Page 24: NREL case study 010512

NZEB

Page 25: NREL case study 010512

Net Zero Site Energy Building

Net Zero Source Energy Building

Net Zero Energy Emissions Building

Net Zero Energy Cost Building

NZEB DEFINITION

Page 26: NREL case study 010512

P+E+R =

IPassive Design

Integrated Delivery

Efficient Systems Renewable Energy

ZER

O

Page 27: NREL case study 010512

Passive Design Reduced Energy Use Baseline Energy Use P

Page 28: NREL case study 010512

Efficient SystemsE Dramatically Reduced Energy Use Renewable EnergyR

ZER

O

Page 29: NREL case study 010512

INTEGRATED

Page 30: NREL case study 010512

Pre-cast Concrete

Transpired Collector

SOUTH

Page 31: NREL case study 010512

Zinc

NORTHDelta Studs

Page 32: NREL case study 010512

WEST

Page 33: NREL case study 010512
Page 34: NREL case study 010512
Page 35: NREL case study 010512

ELECTROCHOMIC

Page 36: NREL case study 010512

60 FEET

Page 37: NREL case study 010512

OPEN

Page 38: NREL case study 010512

DAYLIGHT

Page 39: NREL case study 010512

LIGHTLOUVER

Page 40: NREL case study 010512

Energy Code: – 1.0 W/SF – 220 KWNREL Baseline: – 0.61 W/SF – 134 KWActual Usage: – 0.15 W/SF – 35 KW

NUMBERS

Page 41: NREL case study 010512

NATURALVENTILATION

Page 42: NREL case study 010512

NIGHT PURGE

Page 43: NREL case study 010512

TRANSPIRED SOLAR

Page 44: NREL case study 010512

INTEGRATED HEATING

Page 45: NREL case study 010512

THERMALLABYRINTH

Page 46: NREL case study 010512

HOT AISLES

Page 47: NREL case study 010512

RADIANT SLABS

Page 48: NREL case study 010512

DECOUPLEDVENTILATION

Page 49: NREL case study 010512

PHOTOVOLTAICROOF

Page 50: NREL case study 010512

NET ZEROBOUNDARY

RSF Staff Parking

RSF Visitor Parking

RSF

RSF II

Page 51: NREL case study 010512

REPLICABLE?

Page 52: NREL case study 010512

RSF II138,000 SF525 OccupantsExpansion of RSF

$39M Firm Fixed Price$34M ConstructionComplete Fall 2011

Page 53: NREL case study 010512

RSF II-11% & -$13/SF

Page 54: NREL case study 010512

Hei

fer I

nter

natio

nal C

ente

r

NVC

I Can

cer R

esea

rch

Kits

ap C

ount

y Ad

min

Bui

ldin

g

The

Sign

atur

e C

entre

Gre

at R

iver

Ene

rgy

Hea

dqua

rters

Ft. C

arso

n Br

igad

e/Ba

ttalio

n H

Q

NR

EL R

esea

rch

Supp

ort F

acilit

y

Inte

rnat

iona

l Fun

d fo

r Ani

mal

Wel

fare

Om

ega

Cen

ter

Che

vron

Offi

ce

Brem

erto

n BE

Q

Uni

vers

ity o

f Den

ver S

turm

Col

lege

Nav

al F

acilit

ies

Ft. L

ewis

Bar

rack

s an

d D

inni

ng

Dilla

rd U

nive

rsity

EPA

Reg

ion

8 H

eadq

uarte

rs

Fern

ald

Visi

tors

Cen

ter

Com

mer

ce C

ity C

ivic

Cen

ter

Leo

Trom

bato

re O

ffice

ASU

Sch

ool o

f Jou

rnal

ism

ASU

Col

lege

of N

ursi

ng &

Hea

lth

Fede

ral R

eser

ve B

ank

of K

ansa

s C

ity

Lepr

ino

Build

ing

San

Joaq

uin

Adm

in B

uild

ing

Las

Cru

ces

Cou

rthou

se

NAS

A Su

stai

nabi

lity

Base

Appl

ied

Res

earc

h &

Dev

elop

men

t

Airc

raft

RSF

Nat

iona

l Ass

ocia

tion

of R

ealto

rs

Ore

gon

Sust

aina

bilit

y

Fort

Brag

g Fo

rces

Com

man

d H

Q

San

Joaq

uin

Com

m. C

olle

ge

DC

Fed

eral

Bui

ldin

g

$-

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

OtherCertifiedSilverGoldPlatinum Source: DBIA Project Database

Average Cost: $334/SFRSF Cost: $259/SF

Cos

t per

Squ

are

Foo

tCOST

Page 55: NREL case study 010512

COST TRANSFER

Page 56: NREL case study 010512

MODULAR

Page 57: NREL case study 010512

MODULAR

Page 58: NREL case study 010512

Building Owner Solar Developer Utility Company

POWER PURCHASEAGREEMENT

REC

REC

Net Metering

Page 59: NREL case study 010512

ENEGY VALUENew Building = 35 kBtu/SF/year

Leased Building = 133 kBtu/SF/yearAnnual Energy Savings = $275,590

Page 60: NREL case study 010512

ENEGY VALUE20 Year NPV = $4.4M or $20/SF30 Year NPV = $6.0M or $27/SF

Page 61: NREL case study 010512

Net Zero Energy Building (After PV):

Site ZEB

0kBtu/SF/year

Source ZEB

-20kBtu/SF/year

Emissions ZEB

-5LB CO2e/SF/year

BClassification

BClassification

BClassification

2030 Baseline

137kBtu/SF/year

LEED Baseline

55kBtu/SF/year

Design/Actual

35kBtu/SF/year

Energy Use Intensity:ENERGY

Page 62: NREL case study 010512

END USE35

kBtu/SF/Year

Page 63: NREL case study 010512

PERFORMANCE

First day of Net zero – June 23, 2011

Page 64: NREL case study 010512
Page 65: NREL case study 010512

Innovation for Our Energy Future

Energy Efficiency Design Requirements

66

• 25 kBtu/ft2/yr for standard office space occupant density and data center loads

• Demand side energy use goal, not including renewables• Normalized up to 35.1 kBtu/ft2/yr for better space efficiency and to account for full data

center load

• On site renewables sized to offset site energy use to reach net zero annual use

Cre

dit:

Cha

d Lo

bato

/NR

EL

Old NREL/DOELeased Office

Building

Typical Denver Office Building

ENERGY STAR 75

Office Building

Average LEED Office Building

ENERGY STAR 90

Office Building

EPA Region 8 Of-fice

Denver, CO

RSF RSF Renewable Production

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Site Mounted PVRoof Mounted PVData CenterWhole Building

An

nu

al

EU

I (k

Btu

/ft2

)

References:https://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=new_bldg_design.bus_target_finderhttp://eere.buildinggreen.com/mtxview.cfm?CFID=46438782&CFTOKEN=31996638http://femp.buildinggreen.com/overview.cfm?ProjectID=864

Page 66: NREL case study 010512

Innovation for Our Energy Future

Measured Versus Modeled Monthly and Cumulative EUI

67

Cre

dit:

Cha

d Lo

bato

/NR

EL

Mo

de

l

RS

F

PV

Mo

de

l

RS

F

PV

Mo

de

l

RS

F

PV

Mo

de

l

RS

F

PV

Mo

de

l

RS

F

PV

Mo

de

l

RS

F

PV

Mo

de

l

RS

F

PV

Mo

de

l

RS

F

PV

Mo

de

l

RS

F

PV

Mo

de

l

RS

F

PV

Mo

de

l

RS

F

PV

Mo

de

l

RS

F

PV

October2010

November2010

December2010

January2011

February2011

March2011

April2011

May2011

June2011

July2011

August2011

September2011

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

32

36

PV

Data Center

Mechanical Systems

Plug Loads

Lighting

Heating

Cooling

Model Annual EUI

RSF Annual EUI

Mo

nth

ly E

UI

(kB

tu/f

t2)

An

nu

al E

UI

(kB

tu/f

t2)

The PV system is sized for an annual EUI of 35.1 kBtu/ft2.

Note: The annual EUI values are demand side values and do not include the PV generation.

Page 67: NREL case study 010512

Innovation for Our Energy Future

October 2010 – September 2011 Lighting Power Density

Credit: Chad Lobato/NREL

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 240.00

0.03

0.05

0.08

0.10

0.13

0.15

0.18

0.20

0.23

0.25

0.28

0.30

0.33

0.35

Model Average

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

Time of Day

Po

wer

Den

sity

(W

/ft2

)

Page 68: NREL case study 010512

Innovation for Our Energy Future

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 240.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

0.55

0.60

0.65

Model Av-erageOctober 2010November 2010December 2010January 2011February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011

Time of Day

Po

wer

Den

sity

(W

/ft2

)October 2010 – September 2011 Plug Load Power Density

Note: The elevators are included in the plug loads

Credit: Matthew Luckwitz/NREL

Credit: Chad Lobato/NREL

Page 69: NREL case study 010512

Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data Center PUE

10/1/10 11/30/10 1/29/11 3/30/11 5/29/11 7/28/11 9/26/110.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

1.10

1.20

1.30

1.40

1.50

-20

-5

10

25

40

55

70

85

100

RSF Data Center PUE

Outdoor Temperature

PU

E

Ou

tdo

or

Tem

per

atu

re (

°F)

Page 70: NREL case study 010512

Innovation for Our Energy Future

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 240.00

0.03

0.05

0.08

0.10

0.13

0.15

0.18

0.20

0.23

0.25

Model Average

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

Time of Day

Po

wer

Den

sity

(W

/ft2

)October 2010 – September 2011 Mechanical System Power Density

Note: The mechanical load is comprised of only fans and pumps

Note: Control of the VFDs was optimized in late October 2010, resulting in energy savings

Credit: Chad Lobato/NREL

Note: Control of the dampers was optimized in April 2011, resulting in energy savings

Page 71: NREL case study 010512

Innovation for Our Energy Future

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 240

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Model Average 449kW

Model Average 973kW

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

Time of Day

Po

wer

(kW

)October 2010 – September 2011 PV System Power Output

72

Note: 1156 kW Parking Garage PV system yet to be installed.Credit: Chad Lobato/NREL

Testing and commissioning of the 524 kW Visitors Parking Lot PV system occurred in June. The system became fully operational in July, giving a total system size of 973 kW.

Page 72: NREL case study 010512

IN-HOUSE EXPERTISE?

SAVE A SEAT FOR

YOUR DESIGN-BUILD TEAM?

Page 73: NREL case study 010512

ZERO