40
SI ASB Internship at Library of Congress February 28 to March 04, 2011 Shi Chen Evan Kerrigan cc flickr user vpickering

Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

  • Upload
    evan

  • View
    109

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

SI ASB Internship atLibrary of Congress

February 28 toMarch 04, 2011

Shi ChenEvan Kerrigan

cc flickr user vpickering

Page 2: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

So, who are we?

Page 3: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Evan Kerrigan

Page 4: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Shi Chen

Page 5: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

AlternativeSpring Break

Page 6: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Usability Evaluation

cc flickr user purecaffeine

Page 7: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Usability Goals• Improve ease of learning• Increase productivity• Minimize errors• Improve user confidence

Page 8: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Competitive Analysis

cc flickr user tomvu

Page 9: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Goals

Process

Caveats

Page 10: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Dimensions• Organization of media types for preservation

• Presentation of available tools and formats for preservation

• Availability of simple, takeaway guides

Page 11: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

“Competition”• JISC Digital Media

• National Library of New Zealand

• Canadian Heritage

• Preserving Digital History (GMU)

Page 12: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Finding #1• DP.gov does well using images and iconography to reinforce content

• DP.gov does well separating and identifying media types to help users find the desired information

• Other sites do well offering question-based lists or ranking by user interest

• Other sites offer stage-based information

Page 13: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Recommendation #1Consider how content might be organized and presented to match user interests and expectations. This may include providing information based on their current status in the preservation process

Analytics can help

Page 14: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Finding #2• DP.gov does well getting people to think about digital preservation, but it focuses more on “Why?” than “How?”

• Some other sites offer advice on equipment, tools, and formats to consider as solutions

Page 15: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Recommendation #2Consider helping to answer the “How?” questions by adding such advisory information or link to other resources—particularly JISC for audio and video

There are more such resources already in your wiki

Page 16: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Finding #3

DP.gov does well providing easy to locate guides that are clear, concise, and well-designed

Page 17: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Recommendation #3Thumbs up! digitalpreservation.gov is leading the way!

Page 18: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Heuristic Evaluation

cc flickr user delilah021

Page 19: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Goals

Process

Caveats

Page 20: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

• Visibility of system status

• Match between system and the real world

• User control and freedom

• Consistency and standards

• Error prevention

• Recognition rather than recall

• Flexibility and efficiency of use

• Aesthetic and minimalist design

• Help recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors

• Help and documentation

The Ten Heuristics

Page 21: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Finding #1Use of language that is likely unfamiliar to the user

• Metadata: Definition not provided or evident

• Open formats: Which are these? Can I turn my files into these formats?What tools are available to facilitate this process?

• “Export as linked files”: Not clear what this means or how to do this

• What are archival quality discs? What should I look for when seeking them and where are they available?

Page 22: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Recommendation #1

• Consider defining potentially unclear terms

• Consider linking to lists of open formats and tools to create them

• Add or link to information to describe processes

Page 23: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Finding #2Valuable information is not always given prominence

Page 24: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation
Page 25: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Recommendation #2

Consider giving this section more visibility, perhaps adding visual cues for each entry like the thumbnails in the previous section to help draw attention—the text might otherwise be passed over

Page 26: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Finding #3

Thumbs up!

Perfect score on 4/10 dimensions

• Error prevention

• Recognition rather than recall

• Flexibility and efficiency of use

• Help and documentation

Page 27: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Recommendation #3

Keep up the good work!

Page 28: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Nitpicks

Non-critical nitpicking is available upon request

Page 29: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

MiscellaneousFindings

cc flickr user onepointzero

Page 30: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Caveat

cc flickr user yanivg

Page 31: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Accessibility

cc flickr user catatronic

Page 32: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Accessibility FindingsFinding 01: Lack of Closed Captioning

Finding 02: Lack of podcast transcripts

Page 33: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

AccessibilityRecommendationsRecommendation 01: Consider adding CC to videos

Recommendation 02: Consider making podcast transcripts available

Page 34: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Media Finding

Information about media length (i.e., time for audio and video) is not provided to use before clicking a link to start them

Page 35: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Media Recommendation

Consider adding information such as media length to help users decide whether to commit to viewing or listening to media on the site

Page 36: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Looking to the Future

Page 37: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Usability TestProtocols

Page 38: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Further Help

cc flickr user kelsey6

Page 39: Library of Congress – Usability Presentation

Questions?