77
Ergonomics R.W. Marklin, Ph.D., CPE Professor, Mechanical Engineering Oct. 3, 2012

Ergonomics for senior design 10 3-12

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Ergonomics for senior design, Dr. Richard Marklin

Citation preview

Page 1: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Ergonomics

R.W. Marklin, Ph.D., CPE

Professor, Mechanical Engineering

Oct. 3, 2012

Page 2: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

What is ErgonomicsA Primer

R.W. Marklin, Ph.D, CPECertified Professional Ergonomist

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering

Marquette University

Page 3: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Etymology of Ergonomics

Ergo: work from GreekNomos: laws, customsErgonomics is etymologically laws or

customs of workBut we need a less abstruse definition in

order to understand ergonomics in the contemporary world

Page 4: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Definition of Ergonomics

Ergonomics is the science of evaluating and designing products and work environments around the strengths and limitations of the human user in order to:Maximize occupational healthMaximize ease of use Maintain productivity of user

Page 5: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

PsychoSocialWork OrganizationWorker SatisfactionMgmt-Worker Rel.

Compensation.

Cognitive FactorsMental workload

Physical FactorsTools and Equipment

Methods of TaskMeasure external

and internal forces (EMG)

Human Operator

Industrial HygieneNoise

Heat/ColdChemicals R.W. Marklin is a

Physical Ergonomist

Three Spheres of Ergonomics

Page 6: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Truck Cab Dimensions

Page 7: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Cab Design

Seat Travel- Forward and RearSeat to Bulkhead DistanceSteering Wheel HeightCab Ceiling HeightPedal LocationHeight between Cab Floor and IP

7

Page 8: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Insufficient Rear Travel

Site Visit vehicle 95th percentile male

modeling by Siemens Jack

Worker’s legs rotated outward

Safety hazard and postural discomfort

8

Page 9: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Insufficient Forward Seat Travelavel

Site Visit vehicle 5th percentile female

modeling by Siemens Jack

Worker does have full support from seat back

9

Page 10: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Calculating Seat Travel

Accelerator to Seat Ref Point (SRP)

SAE J4004 method for calculating forward and rear seat travel

EPRI 2010 utility workers’ male anthropometry

Gen. pop female anthropometry

10

Page 11: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Seat Travel Recommendations:AV / DD Cab

11

Page 12: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Seat Travel Recommendations:Pickup Cab

12

Page 13: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Seat to Bulkhead Distance

Insufficient distance may not allow driver to recline seatback sufficiently

13

Page 14: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Recommendation

Recommended minimum seat to bulkhead distance is 15.7 in.

Seat dimensions taken from database of 27 site visit vehicles

14

Page 15: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Recommendation

At least 42 in. height from Seat Ref. Point to cab ceiling

Ht from cab floor to SRP can vary – reason to use SRP

Based on 99th percentile male utility workers

15

Page 16: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Pedal Location

Insufficient distance between brake and accelerator Toe stuck under pedal Boot overlaps both

pedals Workers have larger

feet than gen. pop Some workers drive

vehicles without boots

16

This cab has sufficient distance between brake and accelerator but not between accelerator and hump.

Page 17: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Recommendation

EPRI 2010 anthropometry study: 99th percentile shoe size was 14D

2 in. clearance added to ½ of boot width

Center of accelerator used to accommodate big boots (overlap with big boots and narrow accelerator)

17

Page 18: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Recommendation

99th percentile boot size

Vehicle database used for dimensions and angle of accelerator

18

Page 19: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Computer Keyboards

Page 20: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Computer Keyboard Designs

Page 21: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Computer Keyboard Designs

Conventional keyboardSplit keyboardSloped keyboardTilted keyboard

Page 22: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12
Page 23: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Epidemiology & Keyboards

Tittirandonda, Burastero, and Rempel (1999) summaryConsistent relationship between

computer-related risk factors and MSDs, specifically sustained awkward postures of wrist

This presentation will address how alternative keyboard designs can reduce awkward postures risk factor

Page 24: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

How Do MSDs’ Risk Factors Relate to Conventional Computer Keyboards? Posture

Extended wrist Ulnarly deviated wrist

Repetition 3 key strokes per second Up to 50,000 to 100 000 key strokes

per day

Force Minimal forces but exerted many times

Page 25: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Wrist Deviation and Tendons

Page 26: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Cross-Section of Wrist

Trapezium

Flexor digitorum

superficialis tendon

Flexor digitorum

profundus tendon

Pisiform

Flexor pollicis longus tendon

Flexor carpi radialis tendon

Flexor retinaculum Median nerve

(Saidoff & McDonough, 2002)

Page 27: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Biomechanical Consequences of a Deviated Wrist Position

Friction of tendons across the carpal tunnel Requires more muscular effort due to friction and contact forces May lead to tenosynovitis (friction causes irritation of tendons,

leading to inflammation, pain and swelling) May lead to carpal tunnel

syndrome (swelling in the carpal tunnel leads to increased carpal tunnel pressure)

Page 28: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Carpal Tunnel Pressure

Pressure against median nerve in carpal tunnel could cause carpal tunnel syndrome

Pressure against tendons and their sheaths could cause tenosynovitis

Page 29: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Carpal Pressure (mm Hg) = f (wrist flex/ext)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60

Flexion * Extension

(Rempel et al., 1997)

Page 30: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Split Keyboard

Slant angle of a keyboard Split fixed-angle Split adjustable-angle

10.5° slant

12.5° slant

The slant angle is half the opening angle

Page 31: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Sloped Keyboard

Slope angle of a keyboard Positive slope keyboard Negative slope keyboard

15° slope

-15° slope

Page 32: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Tilted Keyboard

Tilt angle of a keyboard Vertically inclined keyboard

20° tilt

Page 33: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Conventional Keyboard Wrist Deviation

Left hand Wrist Ulnar Dev.

15.0 ± 7.7°

Wrist Extension 21.2 ± 8.8°

Pronation 62.2 ± 10.6°

Right hand Wrist Ulnar Dev.

10.1 ± 7.2°

Wrist Extension 17.0 ± 7.4°

Pronation 65.6 ± 8.3°

Simoneau et al. (1999)

N = 90 touch typists (approx. 60 wpm)Age = 37.8 ± 9.3 yearsExperience = 14.4 ± 8.8 years

Page 34: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Fixed-Angle Split Keyboard

Page 35: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Adjustable-Angle Split Keyboard

Page 36: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Right Wrist Ulnar Deviation

Marklin et al. (2000)

Page 37: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Wrist Extension

Marklin et al., 2000

Page 38: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Summary of Split Keyboards

Split keyboards with opening angle of 20˚ to 25˚reduced ulnar deviation by >10˚Within 2˚ of neutral for rightWithin 5˚ of neutral for left

Reduced wrist factor of ulnar deviationNo decrease in typing speed or accuracy

Page 39: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Recommended Keyboards

Page 40: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Electric Power Industry

Ergonomics Handbooks

Page 41: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

EPRI Document #1005199

November 2001

Page 42: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

EPRI Document #1005430

March 2004

Page 43: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

EPRI Document #1005574

March 2005

Page 44: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

EPRI Document #101042

January 2008

Page 45: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

EPRI Document #1014942

March 2008

Page 46: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Manhole Covers

Page 47: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Removing and Replacing Manhole Covers: Current Work Practice

Manholes provide access to underground vaults and utility corridors

Square: up to 3 ft x 4 ftRound: up to 4 ft in diameter123 to 209 lbs

Page 48: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Removing and Replacing Manhole Covers: Current Work Practice

Hook and chainSteel lifting hook

Page 49: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Removing and Replacing Manhole Covers: Current Work Practice

1st class lever with a magnet

Page 50: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Removing and Replacing Manhole Covers: Current Work Practice

1st class lever with a magnet

Page 51: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Removing and Replacing Manhole Covers: Current Work Practice

2nd class lever

Page 52: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Removing and Replacing Manhole Covers: Problems

High forces on shoulder and trunk muscles – particularly using the hook and chain and steel lifting hook

Page 53: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Removing and Replacing Manhole Covers: Recommended Ergonomic Recommendations

1st class lever with magnet

2nd class lever

Page 54: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Removing and Replacing Manhole Covers: Benefits of 1st class lever with magnet

Based on field study with 32.5 inch 175 lbs coverPeak force with handle attached to 175 lbs

cover: 177 lbfPeak force with 1st class lever: 68 lbf

Page 55: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12
Page 56: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Removing and Replacing Manhole Covers: Benefits of 1st class lever with magnet

University of Michigan 3D SPPP based on field study with 32.5 in. 175 lb cover:Spinal compression with hook and chain:

over 2800 lbfSpinal compression with 1st class lever and

magnet: < 433 lbfNIOSH safe limit = 770 lbf

Page 57: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Mobile Computers

Page 58: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Laptops in Utility Vehicles

Page 59: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Mobile Computer Laboratory Study

Investigate the effects of different laptop PC locations in a utility vehicle cabBiomechanical effectsPerformance and safety effectsSubjective assessment

amystone
i asked rich and kyle for photos.
Page 60: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

60

Page 61: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Location on Passenger Seat

On top and in front of passenger seat

Page 62: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Location – Driver Side

Page 63: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Goniometers and EMG

Page 64: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Shoulder Angle

Page 65: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Laboratory Study: Dependent Variables

BiomechanicalBody segment angles

Neck angle (rotation and flexion)Shoulder (abduction and flexion)Elbow (flexion)Wrist (radial/ulnar deviation and flexion/extension)Trunk (rotation and flexion)

Muscle force: EMG activity of major trunk, shoulder and arm muscles

65

Page 66: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Laboratory Study: Dependent Variables

Comfort and effortAssessed using ordinal subjective

assessment formsPerformance

Time to complete tasks on PCAccuracy of tasks

PreferenceRank order of placement from worst to bestSelection of best placement

66

Page 67: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Left Erector Spinae EMG

67

Laptop on and in front of passenger seat (A & B) increases left back muscle force substantially for both tasks

Left Erector SpinaeN=7

L o ca ti o n *T a sk; We ig h te d M e a n s

V e rti ca l b a rs d e n o te 0 .9 5 co n fi d e n ce i n te rva l s

K e yb o a rd

T o u ch scre e n

0 .1 7 5 2

0 .1 0 3

0 .0 4 0 40 .0 6 0 1

0 .1 7 5 2

0 .1 0 3

0 .0 4 0 40 .0 6 0 1

0 .1 8 2 6

0 .1 4 5 8

0 .0 8 8 0 .0 8 7 9

0 .1 8 2 6

0 .1 4 5 8

0 .0 8 8 0 .0 8 7 9

A B C D

L o ca ti o n

0 .0 0

0 .0 5

0 .1 0

0 .1 5

0 .2 0

0 .2 5

0 .3 0

Me

an 0 .1 7 5 2

0 .1 0 3

0 .0 4 0 40 .0 6 0 1

0 .1 8 2 6

0 .1 4 5 8

0 .0 8 8 0 .0 8 7 9

Page 68: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Right Deltoid EMG

68

Laptop on and in front of passenger seat (A & B) increases right shoulder force substantially for touchscreen tasks

R ight D eltoidN=22

L o ca ti o n *T a sk; We ig h te d M e a n s

V e rti ca l b a rs d e n o te 0 .9 5 co n fi d e n ce i n te rva l s

K e yb o a rd

T o u ch scre e n

A B C D

L o ca ti o n

0 .0 0

0 .0 5

0 .1 0

0 .1 5

0 .2 0

0 .2 5

0 .3 0

Me

an

Page 69: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Recommended Location of Laptop

Page 70: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Subjective Assessment

Subjects overwhelmingly liked the locations near driver seat

Disliked the locations near passenger seat

Question 3: Median R esponseN=22

4 .0

5 .0

5 .5

2 .0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

BC

D A

4 .0

5 .0

5 .5

2 .0

Page 71: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Wind Turbines

Page 72: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Wind Turbines – Enormous, Plentiful (>15,000 in US), and Growing

Page 73: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Lakeshore Technical College

135 ft. wind turbine 24 new students each

year 100% placement 1 hour drive from

Milwaukee

73

Page 74: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Wind Power Maintenance Tasks

Inspection and maintenanceOil exchange and filtersCheck torque on boltsParts removal and replacement

74

Page 75: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Wind Turbine Site Visit

Texas site

Page 76: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Wind Turbine Site Visit

Tasks in Nacelle (box on top to tower)8 ft tall, 8 ft wide, 20 ft long

Page 77: Ergonomics for senior design  10 3-12

Muchas Gracias