43
Almost 20% of accidents on major roads are sleep-related, and are 50% more likely to cause fatality. —Royal society for the prevention of accidents

Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation for the Design Practice module. MSc HCI-E at UCL 2013.

Citation preview

Page 1: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Almost 20% of accidents on major roads are sleep-related, and are 50% more likely to cause fatality.

—Royal society for the prevention of accidents

Page 2: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

High anger drivers are likely to drive faster and are twice as likely to crash.

—Deffenbacher,2002

Page 3: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Design Practice Drive HappyGroup 1

: )

Page 4: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Agenda

• Problem Situation

• “The Big Idea”

• Design Process

• Demo

• Extensions / Future Work

Page 5: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Agenda

• Problem Situation

• “The Big Idea”

• Design Process

• Demo

• Extensions / Future Work

Page 6: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Problem Situation

● Studies have shown emotions can affect driving performance and behaviour. !

● Almost 20% of accidents on major roads are sleep-related, and are 50% more likely to cause fatality.!

● Men under 30 have the highest risk of falling asleep at the wheel.

Page 7: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Literature Review• Jackson et al (2013): Drivers deprived of sleep for 24

hours had significant cognitive impairment and more incidents whilst driving compared to awake drivers.!

• Blazejewski et al (2012): Drowsy driving increases your chances of being involved in an accident almost as much as drunk driving. !

• National Sleep Foundation (2005): 60% of American drivers admit to driving drowsy within the past year, also 37% have fallen asleep at the wheel at least once (and 13% of those admit to doing it at least once a month).

Page 8: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Literature Review!

● Zillman (1971) : High anger drivers are more likely to be in an angry state when getting in the car and react badly to provocative events.!

● Deffenbacher (2002) : High anger drivers are likely to drive faster and are twice as likely to crash.!

● Underwood (1999) : Trait driving anger correlates with amount of traffic violations.

Page 9: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Agenda

• Problem Situation

• “The Big Idea”

• Design Process

• Demo

• Extensions / Future Work

Page 10: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

“The Big Idea”: Drive Happy

!

Part 1: Steering Wheel Cover with sensors to monitor !

● Heart Rate

● Pressure

● Facial Expressions

!

Page 11: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

“The Big Idea”: Drive Happy

!

Part 2: Smartphone/Web App !

● Map of local area with “happy” / “stressful” routes

● User Statistics

● Plug-in to Google Maps

!

Page 12: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

“The Big Idea”: Drive Happy

!

Part 3: Billboard at Petrol / Service Stations !

● Map of local area with “happy” / “stressful” routes

Page 13: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Agenda

• Problem Situation

• “The Big Idea”

• Design Process

• Demo

• Extensions / Future Work

Page 14: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Design Process: Initial Sketches

Page 15: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Design Process: Initial Sketches

Page 16: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Design Process: Research

Sleepiness !

● 95% want to be made aware.!

● 71% prefer light and audio feedback.!

● 29% prefer audio feedback.

Page 17: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Design Process: Research

Anger / Stress !

● 24% want to be made aware.!

● 69% prefer light, 6% prefer audio, 25% prefer light and sound.!

● Calming strategies: 56% prefer music or breathing exercises.

Page 18: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Design Process: Physical Prototype

Page 19: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Design Process: Physical Prototype

Page 20: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Design Process: Physical Prototype

Page 21: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Design Process: User Testing

Page 22: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Design Process: User Testing

Page 23: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Interfaces: Web app

Page 24: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Interfaces: Mobile app

Page 25: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Interfaces: Billboard Mockup

Page 26: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Agenda

• Problem Situation

• “The Big Idea”

• Design Process

• Demo

• Extensions / Future Work

Page 27: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Scenario 1: Sleepy Driver

Page 28: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving
Page 29: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving
Page 30: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving
Page 31: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving
Page 32: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving
Page 33: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Scenario 2: Angry Driver

Page 34: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving
Page 35: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving
Page 36: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving
Page 37: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Agenda

• Problem Situation

• “The Big Idea”

• Design Process

• Demo

• Extensions / Future Work

Page 38: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Further Work

● Further user testing – in-car testing !

● Higher fidelity prototypes - skin conductance !

● In-app navigation / overlay to Google Maps !

● Further research into security / privacy issues

Page 39: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

Questions?

Page 40: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

: )

Page 41: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

References

• Blazejewski, S., Girodet, P.-O., Orriols, L., Capelli, A., Moore, N. (2012); "Factors associated with serious traffic crashes: a prospective study in southwest France"; Archives of internal medicine, 2012, Vol.172(13), pp.1039-41!!

• Deffenbacher J. L., Deffenbacher D. M., Lynch R.S., Richards T. L. (2003); "Anger, aggression, and risky behavior: a comparison of high and low anger drivers"; Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2003, Vol.41(6), pp.701-718!!

• DePasquale, J. P., Geller, E. S., Clarke, S. W., Littleton, L. C. (2001); "Measuring road rage: development of the Propensity for Angry Driving Scale"; Journal of Safety Research, 2001, Vol.32(1), pp.1-16!!

• Dukes, R. L., Clayton, S. L., Jenkins, L. T., Miller, T. L., Rodgers, S. E. (2001); "Effects of aggressive driving and driver characteristics on road rage"; The Social Science Journal, 2001, Vol.38(2), pp.323-331!!

• Galovski, T. E., Blanchard, E. B. (2004); "Road rage: a domain for psychological intervention?"; Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2004, Vol.9(2), pp.105-127!!

• Glenn Gunzelmann , L. Richard Moore Jr. , Dario D. Salvucci , Kevin A. Gluck (2010); “Sleep loss and driver performance: Quantitative predictions with zero free parameters”; Cognitive Systems Research 12 (2011) 154–163

Page 42: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

References

!• Gulian E., Glendon A. I., Matthews G., Davies D. R., Debney L. M. (1990); "The stress of driving: A diary

study"; Work & Stress: An International Journal of Work,Health & Organisations, 4:1, 7-16!!

• Healey, J., Picard, R. (2000); "SmartCar: detecting driver stress"; Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Sept. 2000, Vol.4, pp.218-221!!

• Jackson, M. L., Croft, R. J., Kennedy, G. A., Owens, K., Howard, M. E. (2013); "Cognitive components of simulated driving performance: Sleep loss effects and predictors"; Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2013, Vol.50, pp.438-444!!

• Jeff Robbins(2010);”GPS Navigation...But What is it Doing To Us?”;IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society!!

• Krajewski, J., Golz, M., Schnieder, S., Schnupp, T., Heinze, C., Sommer, D. (2010); “Detecting Fatigue from Steering Behaviour Applying Continuous Wavelet Transform”; ACM 2010 ISBN: 978-1-60558-926-8/10/08!!

• Michael Biermann, M., Hoppe,T., Dittmann,J., Vielhauer, C. (2008); “Vehicle Systems: Comfort & Security Enhancement of Face/Speech Fusion with Compensational Biometric Modalities”; ACM 978-1-60558-058-6/08/9!

Page 43: Drive Happy: Quantified self technology for driving

References

• National Sleep Foundation (2005) "Sleep in America Poll, Summary of Findings”!!

• Novaco, R., Stokols, D., Campbell, J., Stokols, J. (1979); "Transportation, Stress, and Community Psychology"; American Journal of Community Psychology, 1979, Vol.7(4), pp.361-380!!

• The World Bank. (2013). The World Bank. Retrieved October 25, 2013, from The World Bank Web Site: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IS.VEH.NVEH.P3/countr ies/1W-GB?display=default!!

• Underwood, G., Chapman, P., Wright, S., Crundall, D. (1999); "Anger While Driving”; Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 1999, Vol.2(1), pp.55-68 !!

• Zillmann, D. (1971); "Excitation transfer in communication-mediated aggressive behavior"; Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1971, Vol.7(4), pp.419-434!

!• Driver Fatigue and Road Accidents. (n.d.). The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents. Retrieved

November 20, 2013 from the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents Web Site: http://www.rospa.com/roadsafety/adviceandinformation/driving/driverfatigue/factsheet.aspx!!

• Think Direct. (n.d); Retrieved November 20, 2013, from The Think Direct Web Site: http://think.direct.gov.uk/fatigue.html