27
AUTONOM3 COMPETITIVE WEBSITE ANALYSIS April Phuong, Irwin Simpelo, Melissa Wedeen COGS 187B, Spring 2013

Competitive analysis

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Competitive analysis

AU TO N O M 3C O M P E T I T I V E W E B S I T E A N A L Y S I S

April Phuong, Irwin Simpelo, Melissa WedeenCOGS 187B, Spring 2013

Page 2: Competitive analysis

Who is AUTONOM3?

Page 3: Competitive analysis

C L I E N T N E E D S A narrative of the product’s

benefits and experience

Ability to sell these productsto target users

Communicate with potential business partners

Page 4: Competitive analysis

C L I E N T N E E D S

Bringing the

KITCHEN into the

21ST CENTURY“

Page 5: Competitive analysis

U S E R N E E D S Secure, trustworthy

website

Multiple optionsfor purchasing products

Brief video to explain new technology

Page 6: Competitive analysis

We analyzed kitchen sites Nomiku, Gaggenau, and SousVide Supreme

with our client and users

In this analysis, we will focus on the functionality, architecture, and design

of edgy, high tech product sites

F O C U S

Page 7: Competitive analysis

LEAP MOTIONG E S T U R A L P E R I P H E R A L D E V I C E

Page 8: Competitive analysis

Text

Design: Leap Motion is fun and colorful with a clean, minimalist template. The color scheme is consistent with an emphasis on  green and white. Many of the images portray the use of the technology.

Page 9: Competitive analysis

Text

Functionality: Video playback explaining the technology is immediately available.

Page 10: Competitive analysis

“Devs” is not user-friendly. While short for “Developers,” non-tech users may not know what this means.

Navigation: Primary navigation is located at the top of the page, making it easy to access for a user. It is consistent throughout the site. Active pages are highlighted in gray.

Page 11: Competitive analysis

Content: Pre-order form has information on charging, shipping, package content, and costs

Functionality: Straightforward, single page pre-ordering

Page 12: Competitive analysis

Content: Site includes descriptions with images as backgrounds. Photographs engage the user and helps to visualize and explain the experience of the product.

Navigation: However, some informative image sliders are far below the fold, which can occlude good information

Page 13: Competitive analysis

FIT BITA C T I V I T Y T R A C K E R S

Page 14: Competitive analysis

Content: Introduces product line in the front page to address four common user needs

Functionality: The front page immediately describes needs and images related to those needs. A video is also available to elaborate. The video, however, should be more salient

Design: Analogous colors (turquoise, pink, orange, yellow) with emphasis on flat design. Complemented by photographs of healthy choices and athletics

Page 15: Competitive analysis

Brand: Active, athletic, fun, healthy, fit, stylish, engaging

Page 16: Competitive analysis

Functionality: Drop own of “Buy” gives users a choice in where they can go to buy the products

Drop down of “Products” gives a list of the types of devices Fitbit sells. These link to pages that explain the product in detail

Navigation: Fitbit website serves as a store front (left side bar) and service provider (log-in at the right)

Page 17: Competitive analysis

...logging in, however shows a new header, which adds inconsistency to the navigation

Inconsistent or no breadcrumbs. Some pages are missing breadcrumbs while others have completely different crumbing systems

Navigation ambiguity. Users may not know the difference between “Products” and “Store

Page 18: Competitive analysis

Content: Informative, colorful, and succinct reasons for buying on the main website

Functionality: Cart fragments key sections of purchase. “Secure transaction” is emphasized in Payment info and shipping prices are highlighted. However, two total prices are shown, which is redundant

Page 19: Competitive analysis

Content: Media and user responses can give the website and product credibility. (But too many positive reviews can also be a warning sign)

Page 20: Competitive analysis

NESTT H E R M O S T A T

Page 21: Competitive analysis

Content: An “About Us” page with the name of crucial company members. Adds trust to the company and gives a face behind the product

Brand: Friendly, approachable, professional, environmentalist, engaging, responsible

Page 22: Competitive analysis

Top and bottom navigation bars are consistent throughout the site

Buy buttons are tastefully highlighted

Navigation: Active links are highlighted

Page 23: Competitive analysis

Content: Video “tour” can be a little more prominent

Navigation: “Our Thermostat” is inconsistent. It’s the only option with a drop down menu and the only option that cannot be clicked

“Support” and “Community” can be ambiguous titles

Page 24: Competitive analysis

Functionality: Informative blog with topic categorization

System compatibility check at the checkout page with video instructions and customer support

Page 25: Competitive analysis

Design: Great visuals, balance of image and text make the site easy on the eyes. Color scheme is green, turquoise, and orange

Page 26: Competitive analysis

S U M M A R Y

Tastefully highlighted shopping cartand small eCommerce functionality

Prominent, visible video that quickly explains our product(s)

Engaging photographs and text thatfocuses on solving user needs

Company “About Us” page with names and images of head employees

Page 27: Competitive analysis

O T H E R I D E A S

Media presence and user input

Informative blog to highlightnews about our products

Strong customer support service