Upload
statscommunications
View
71
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SOCIAL IMPACT INVESTMENT: NEW INVESTMENT APPROACHES FOR
ADDRESSING SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC
CHALLENGES
OECD, Paris, France
November 7, 2014
Karen Wilson
Science, Technology & Industry Directorate
What is Social impact Investment?
• Social impact investment is the provision of finance with the explicit
expectation of a social, as well as financial, return.
– This could be provided through a range of financial products, from debt
to equity.
– Social impact investment instrument and markets are developing in
parallel to the mainstream financial markets.
• Critical areas in which social enterprises and investors engage
include
– Health, “at risk” populations, education, housing and other areas of
public private sector partnerships.
2
Why does it matter?
• New models of public and private partnership are needed to fund, deliver and scale innovative solutions to social and economic challenges.
• Social investment is increasingly relevant as social challenges have mounted and public funds have been under pressure in many countries
• Innovative new ways to address social issues more efficiently are needed
• Capital providers are increasingly interested in social investment as a way to pursue social as well as financial goals.
5
The Social Impact Investment Market is
Evolving Rapidly
The increased need for social services:
trends in social outcomes
6
The juxtaposition of the figures in Panel A, read alongside the evidence in Panel B, gives the strongest message for the need for innovative social enterprise in these countries. First, although LTC provision varies widely, the demand for these provisions is likely to be very similar across countries – and so there is unmet demand. Second, as the scale of dependency increases, demand for care will increase substantially relative to the working-age population in the coming decades.
Panel A: Population aged 65 years and over receiving long-term care, 2011 (or nearest year) and prevalence of dementia among
the population aged 60 years and over, 2009
Panel B: Over 65 population as a ratio of working age population (15-64)
7
Prisons in a number of countries are
over-capacity
Note: Prison occupancy rates United Kingdom data is for England and Wales only, data for Australia, England & Wales, France, Germany, and Italy are from 2013; 2012 in Japan and the United States, and 2009 in Canada. Source: Author’s calculations of national informant data (available on request).
Evolution of total public social
expenditure
8
Evolution of total public social expenditure As a percentage of GDP 1980-2013
Source: OECD (2012), Social Expenditure (SOCX) via www.oecd.org/els/social/expenditure
10
15
20
25
30
35
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Canada France Germany Italy United Kingdom United States Australia
Social protection, health, housing and
education cover 60%+ of total spending
Structure of general government expenditures by function (2011)
Source: OECD Government at a Glance, 2013.
– Taskforce established at G8 Social Impact Investment Summit in London in June 2013
• Chaired by Sir Ronald Cohen, 2 representatives per country (public + private)
• Initial mandate for one year, meeting every two months: – US: October 2013, UK: December 2013, Germany: February 2014,
France: April 2014, UK: June 2014, Italy: October 2014
• Four taskforce working groups
• G7 (+ Australia) National Advisory Boards
• Set of Taskforce reports published on September 15, 2014
– OECD Phase I report (to be published in December 2014) • Social Impact Investment expert meetings (March and June
2014)
• Overview paper published in July 2014 “New Investment Approaches to Addressing Social and Economic Challenges”
10
Social Impact Investment Taskforce and
the OECD Report
1. Executive Summary
2. Overview on Social Impact Investment
3. Social Impact Investment Framework
4. Characteristics and Attributes of Social Impact Investment
5. Context Setting: Differences in social needs and service delivery across selected countries
6. Social Impact Investment Market Data: Initial Findings
7. Policy Actions and Implications
8. Conclusions and Next Steps 11
OECD Phase I Report
• Work across various OECD Directorates
– Innovation, entrepreneurship, financing, inclusive innovation and health (Science, Technology and Innovation Directorate)
– Social entrepreneurship (Centre for Entrepreneurship)
– Health, employment, labour and social policy (Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs)
– Entrepreneurship indicators and better life initiative (Statistics Directorate)
– Financing for development (Development Cooperation Directorate) and the role of foundations in development (Development Centre)
– Long term investment, finance (Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs)
• Major cross-OECD initiatives (led by SG’s Office)
– New approaches to economic challenges (NAEC)
– Inclusive growth 12
Internal Meetings Linking to Related
Work Across the OECD
• Public and private aggregated data (top-down) – Identify key aggregates (e.g. National Accounts; investors’ assets)
Key caveat: Strong assumptions required due to aggregation level
• Legal form and register data (bottom-up) – Identify legal types associated with SII (e.g. Community Interest Company)
Key caveat: Far from perfect match between legal form and SII
• Surveys – Sampling frames and appropriate reporting incentives are needed to ensure
representativeness and data quality.
Key caveat: Extremely resource intensive, difficult to identify appropriate samples
• Other strategies such as polls, community feedback mechanisms and open source data
Key caveat: Challenging to control data quality
15
Approaches to SII data collection
Data requirements vary depending on who is seeking the data (market players, academics, policy makers).
• Should policy makers intervene in the market?
– Existence of market failures
• Information asymmetries (moral hazard), imperfect market competition, externalities, absence of public goods
– Is SII a better or additional solution?
• Is it more efficient and/or effective in meeting social needs?
• What is the appropriate role of policy?
– Indirect (addressing legal and regulatory issues)
– Direct (providing support through tax incentives, guarantees or subsidies)
• The critical next step is to build the evidence base:
– Developing common definitions
– Building the necessary data infrastructure and coordinated data collection processes
– Furthering efforts on the measurement of primary social outcomes
– Evaluation of polices and broader social outcomes
16
Policy Issues and Questions
For further information see July 2014 publication:
http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/new-investment-approaches-for-addressing-social-and-
economic-challenges_5jz2bz8g00jj-en
New publication forthcoming in December
2014 or January 2015
For further questions contact: