Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSPPaul Meehan and Laura Wong
07/12/2016
2
Learning outcomes
»What are JR5 and JR2 reports?»How the JUSP community uses these reports»How the reports appear in JUSP
»Which publishers do we provide these reports for?
»“Real world” issues and case study»Next steps – developing additional reports07/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
3
Journal Report 5
07/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
4
What is the JR5 report?
“Number of Successful Full-text Article Requests by Year of Publication (YOP) and Journal”
Multiple entries possible for same journal, depending on publication year for articles downloaded / viewede.g. in April 2016, “Nature” titles published in 2015 had 11 views, whereas titles published in 2014 had 25 views. Overall totals should match JR1
COUNTER definition
07/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
How are libraries using the JR5?
» Evaluating current subscriptions and front file usage
» Evaluating archive or backfile purchases, subscriptions and freely available content
»Looking at usage from a subject/discipline view – do subjects have different downloading habits?
5
Journal Report 5 – usage by year of publication
07/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
6
JR5 in JUSP
07/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
7
JR5 in JUSP
07/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
8
JR5 in JUSP
Publication Year
0000 – none given9999 – in press
Supports ranges e.g. 1995-1999
07/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
9
Journal Report 2
07/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
What is the JR2 report?
“Access denied to full-text articles, by month and journal”
Number of turnaways for each title and reason directly from a selected publisher over a selected period of time
10
COUNTER definition
07/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
How are libraries using the JR2?
» Identifying and providing evidence for backfile purchases
» Identifying and providing evidence for substitutions
» Identifying and providing evidence for subscriptions
»Evaluating the potential value of publisher package offers
11
Journal Report 2 – access denials by month and year
07/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
12
JR2 in JUSP
07/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
13
JR2 in JUSP
07/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
14
JR2 in JUSP
The most common reason for access denied is due to "content item not licensed" and this is specified under "Metric Type" as "no_license".
Other possible types are "turnaway" due to simultaneous/concurrent user limit allowed by the licence, or "other" for any other reasons.
07/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
Which publishers supply JR2/5 to JUSP?
» IEEE, Karger
15
Journal Report 2 only (2)
Journal Report 5 only (1)» Annual ReviewsReports date to Jan 2015 where available, others have been tested and don’t currently conform to guidelines, some are “in progress”
Both reports (11)» ACS, BioOne, CUP, Elsevier, Emerald, ICE, MIT, Nature, OUP,
Springer, Wiley
07/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
Using reports in the real world …
16
Putting e-journal turnaway figures into context – Using theCOUNTER Journal Report 2 to make evidence-based decisionsLeon Perry, University of Portsmouth
http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/21_15.pdf
Raises some “real world” issues with regard to using theJR2 reports and data07/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
Using reports in the real world …
17
Report showed that 1 in 7 attempts to access articles resulted in a turnaway, but the reasons were very varied. In some cases, titlesreceived 1,000 or more turnaways!»Does Portsmouth have access to the titles?»Are users trying to access direct publisher content or going via a
different route?»Uncertainty over discovery platform that should be used»Helps inform purchasing decisions
› E.g. demand for older articles (can buy as one-off)› No access to current content, could be due to deal available› Titles changed platform or supplier
»Helps update local discovery service details / content07/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
Next steps - JUSP
»Continue to add JR2/5 reports from JUSP publishers»Work with publishers to resolve COUNTER / SUSHI
issues» Work with aggregators e.g. EBSCO, IngentaConnect»Additional reports› “JR2plus” and “JR5plus” type reports› Annual summary reports – is this needed (no SCONUL
requirement)
»What would YOU like to see? Email [email protected] with your ideas
1807/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
19
“JR2 plus”
07/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
Combines directpublisher JR2 data withdata from gatewaysand intermediaries
Sortable in usual ways
20
Any questions?
07/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
21
COMING SOON
“Quiz the JUSP team”
January 2017
07/12/2016JR5 and JR2 reports in JUSP
