EngagingConversationsbetween#EnergyManagerand #CXOMobilized by EnView !

CXO > >

HOW HAS OUR ENERGYPERFORMANCE BEEN FOR Q1 ?

ROUND 1

GTG SEC 25% BELOW BASEL INE SEC AND 1 3% BELOW TARGET

SEC .

HAD R ING FRAME AND TFO SEC NOT I NCREASED WRT BASEL INE

LEVELS , GTG SEC WOULD HAVE BEEN EVEN LOWER .

ENERGY MANAGER > >

CXO > >

WHAT I S THE I S SUE WITH R INGFRAME SECT ION ?

ROUND 2

CAPAC I TY UT I L I ZAT ION I S DOWN BY 1 0% WRT BASEL INE LEVELS .

I N ADD I T ION TO THAT PRODUCT IV I TY LEVELS ARE ALSO LOW

WRT H ISTOR ICAL PERFORMANCE .

RF SEC I S AROUND 1 7% H IGHER I N COMPAR ISON TO THE

BASEL INE VALUE .

ENERGY MANAGER > >

CXO > >

HOW BAD HAS PRODUCT IV I TYBEEN ? WHAT ABOUT OTHERIND ICATORS ?

ROUND 3

CONS I STENCY I NDEX OF PRODUCT IV I TY I S AT AROUND 50% ,

WHEREAS ALL OTHER I ND ICATORS HAVE AN AVERAGE

CONS I STENCY I NDEX OF AROUND 80%

7% -8% LOWER PRODUCT IV I TY I N RESPECT TO H ISTOR ICAL

PERFORMANCE .

ENERGY MANAGER > >

CXO > >

D ID THE SYSTEM FLAG TH IS ? WASTHE IR ANY CALL TO ACT ION .

ROUND 4

SYSTEM GENERATED FLAGS ON CALL TO ACT ION WERE I S SUED

AT CONS I STENCY I NDEX LEVELS OF 85% AND 75% .

CURRENTLY WE HAVE MARKED I T "UNDER OBSERVAT ION " AND

WORK ING WITH THE PRODUCT ION TEAM TO RESOLVE I T ASAP .

ENERGY MANAGER > >

ENV IEW HELPS ENERGYMANAGERS AND #CXOS HAVE THER IGHT K IND OF ENGAGEMENT ON

ENERGY PERFORMANCEMANAGEMENT , SOMETH ING THATI S DATA DR IVEN AND PREC I SE !

H O W   A R EY O U

E N G A G I N G ?