14

6 bright ideas for the future of energy

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

By Erik Sofge Jul 30, 2009

6 Bright Ideas for the Future of EnergyTo find innovative new solutions to the world's toughest technical challenges, wecalled some of America's smartest engineers and scientists for their quick fixes andlong-term plans. Here, we look at six bright ideas to make a cleaner, more efficient,safer energy future using fusion, CO2 as fuel, trash as power and super-efficienthomes.

Sequester Carbon in Limestone

SUBSCRIBE CARS HOW TO ADVENTURE TECH FLIGHT

Geologist Peter Kelemen, photographed for Popular Mechanics on April 1, 2009, holding a chunk of

peridotite, a rock that could hold the key to mineral carbon sequestration.

More than a decade ago, when geologist Peter Kelemen first saw bleached­white rock

formations in Oman, he wasn't happy. The normally dark­hued rocks were peridotite whose

composition he was trying to investigate. But every time Kelemen found an exposed

surface, it had reacted with carbon dioxide in the air to form a carbonate similar to

limestone. Goodbye, samples. "I ran in the other direction as fast as I could," he says. That

outlook changed in 2004, when Kelemen had a eureka moment while talking with

colleagues at Columbia University's Lamont­Doherty Earth Observatory about ways to

sequester CO2 underground and slow the pace of global warming. Most sequestration plans

risk creating a carbon­dioxide time bomb, with the greenhouse gas stored underground and

always threatening to bubble out. Kelemen thought the peridotite might provide a longer­

 lasting solution. His idea is to drill into massive rock formations, heat them and then

pump in CO2­enriched water. The rock would then turn to carbonate, trapping the gas in

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

enduring, solid form. Kelemen stresses that the real­world practicality of his plan still needs

to be proven. But field observations in Oman, which has more than 3000 cubic miles of

peridotite, have been promising. Next up: investigating the idea in the United States.

Use Fusion to Zap Nuclear Waste

A new hybrid fission­fusion reactor design was developed by this University of Texas team: Erich

Schneider of the mechanical engineering department (second from right) and (from left) Michael

Kotschenreuther, Swadesh Mahajan and Prashant Valanju, all from the school's Institute for Fusion

Studies.

The quest for controlled fusion power, that most future­topian of engineering feats,

requires patience and enduring faith. Progress is being made, but workable reactors are

decades off. While we wait, fusion may as well make itself useful. Researchers at the

University of Texas recently unveiled a design for a hybrid fission­fusion reactor, a best­of­

both­worlds device that would dispose of the deadliest waste from traditional nuclear

power plants while generating power along the way. Most nuclear waste can be reprocessed

for use as fuel in standard fission reactors, although that's not currently the practice in the

United States. The hybrid reactor would be a next step. It would employ fusion reactions to

flood the remaining, highly dangerous transuranic waste with neutrons, allowing it to be

burned in a fission process. One­third of the resulting energy would be fed back into the

fusion process and the remaining 700 megawatts would be fed into the grid. According to

senior research scientist Swadesh Mahajan, at the end of the process, about 99 percent of

all nuclear waste could be eliminated. "What we really want to do is to tell the world, Please

allow the expansion of nuclear energy, through standard light­water reactors," Mahajan

says. "It's the only thing that can be ramped up quickly enough to replace coal. Do not

worry about the waste. Because we're going to give you the solution in 20 years. We will

make it in time."

Build Homes that Don't Need Furnaces

(Illustration by Nathan Fariss)

Heat exchanger (left): Airflow in and out of the house is carefully controlled. Fresh air is routedthrough a heat exchanger; it is warmed by air being vented outside.

Continuous insulation (top right): Loft insulation is used between studs. An unbroken layer ofinsulation on the outside wall ensures that the studs don't act as thermal bridges, conducting heat

outside.

Triple­pane windows (bottom right): Window frames are surrounded by multiple layers offoam; gaskets have some flexibility, ensuring a tight, enduring fit.

The conventional American home bleeds heat from under doors and around window

sashes—and right through underinsulated walls. While wind turbines and solar panels are

impressive green technologies, the way to really slash one's bills and environmental impact

is to live in a hyperefficient house—and it doesn't get more hyper than the "passive houses"

now being developed. These are essentially maximum­security prisons for thermal energy,

with thick insulation that leaves no unprotected studs to conduct heat to the outdoors,

triple­pane windows and an overall approach to airtightness that lunar colonies could

aspire to. In Europe, as many as 6000 homes have been passive­house­certified in the past

decade, with thousands more approaching, though not quite meeting, the rigorous

requirements. According to energy­efficiency consultant David White, a passive house in

the northeastern United States could consume 90 percent less heat than equivalent homes.

"Passive houses have been shown to be among the most reliable and cost­effective

approaches to efficiency," White says. In Germany, off­the­shelf windows, gaskets and

other passive­house­certified products have brought construction costs to within 5 percent

of those for conventional homes. In the United States, that price premium can be 11 percent

or more. White sees that number coming down. Since quitting his job at a green design firm

to concentrate on passive housing projects, he's been working 18­hour days to keep up with

an influx of new customers. The housing market may have crashed, but passive houses are

on the rise.

Keep Working on Fusion Energy

The National Ignition Facility will be fully operational in 2010.

After decades spent watching short­lived bursts of plasma sputter in research­oriented

magnetic tokamak reactors, it would be easy to abandon the dream of fusion power. But the

ultimate clean­energy technology may be getting closer. ITER (the letters don't stand for

anything, but the word means "the way" in Latin) is expected to be the world's biggest

tokamak when it's completed in southern France in 2018, and it could lead to efficient

prototype power plants. Next year, the array of 192 lasers that form the heart of the

National Ignition Facility (NIF) at California's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

will begin firing at a tiny hydrogen target, testing a magnet­free fusion scheme. NIF

director Ed Moses hopes that within a few years, the machine will release 20 times more

energy than it consumes. "If this works, over the next couple of decades we can change the

geopolitical story," he says.

Turn Trash Into Power

The Green Energy Machine, or GEM, is an unlikely alt­fuel hero. Yet the dumpster­size

cargo container jutting from a building in Waltham, Mass., can heat and power 200,000

square feet of space on a daily diet of 3 tons of garbage. The $850,000 system, which

incorporates a Rube Goldberg­like array of devices, can pay for itself in three years,

according to Michael Cushman, vice president of IST Energy, which makes GEMs. It can

save some 540 tons of greenhouse gas emissions annually and—unlike much alt­energy

tech—it's ready now. "We welcome revolutionary technology, but this is an evolutionary

solution with substantial potential for high impact," Cushman says. "We don't need a 10­

year­off solution, we need a today solution."

Conjure Fuel from CO

Nanotube arrays can increase the surface area of a catalyst, and thus are one of the

many "next big things" in energy research, especially for batteries. But Craig Grimes, an

electrical engineer at Penn State, has another use for them. In combination with sunlight,

his nanotube membrane converts water and carbon dioxide into liquid fuel, such as butane

2

MORE FROM POPULAR MECHANICS:

and methane. If the technology were integrated into power plants, Grimes says, "it would

basically be a closed loop—you have a fuel, you burn it, you collect the reactants, convert

them back into fuel, and then feed that right back into the plant." He calculates that 4

square inches of the current version of the membrane could yield more than 130 gallons of

fuel daily, squeezing a second act out of hydrocarbons before they enter the atmosphere.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

21 Photos of Hurricane Matthew's Destruction

More From

ENERGY

NASA's Two New Space Missions Will Study Asteroids

MORE FROM AROUND THE WEB

What A MillionDollars Can Buy YouAround the World

Sponsored by Mansion

Global by Dow Jones

Standing in ATMqueues is super funwith this app!

Sponsored by

RummyCircle

Don’t just invest.Invest wisely

Sponsored by ABM

MyUniverse®

The Most OriginalBaby Names for EveryZodiac Sign

Sponsored by

MooseRoots | By Graphiq

Recommended by

Cleaner Robot Pulled From Fukushima Reactor Due toImmense Radiation

9 Weird Ways We Can Harness the Wind's Energy

*T&C apply.

Replay

Wind Turbines Break Energy Records A DIY Volta Hailstorm Puts Shocking Weather Right InYour Hands

New York to Build America's Largest Offshore WindFarm

Tesla's New Gigafactory Will Have the World's LargestRooftop Solar Farm

Vera Rubin, the Mother of Dark Matter, Dies at 88 Japan Is Scrapping Its $9 Billion Experimental Reactor

SCIENCE ENERGY SCIENCE NEXT-GEN ENERGY NUCLEAR HEATING WASTE CARBON DIOXIDE

COOLING FUEL ALTERNATIVE ENERGY INVENTIONS INSULATION ENERGY

HEATING AND COOLING : TOP 5 ENERGY SAVING (AND BILL CUTTING) TIPS

CRUNCHING THE NUMBERS ON ALTERNATIVE FUELS A CASTLE IS BEING BUILT FROM STYROFOAM

THE TOP 50 INVENTIONS OF THE PAST 50 YEARS 8 ALTERNATIVE FUELS THAT COULD REPLACE OIL

HOW A MANMADE GREENHOUSE GAS CAN BE 7100 TIMES WORSE THAN CO2

Las Vegas' City Government Is Now Powered Entirely byRenewable Energy

The Cheapest Way to Generate Power, County by County

MORE FROM ENERGY

Newsletter Digital Editions About UsMedia Kit Press Room Contact UsCommunity Guidelines Advertise Online About Our AdsCustomer Service Subscribe Other Hearst SubscriptionsGive a Gift Events & Promotions GiveawaysBeing Green Why Did I Get This Ad? BestProducts

©2017 Hearst Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy Your California Privacy Rights Terms of Use Site Map

A PART OF HEARST DIGITAL MEDIA