6
Vodafone Group plc vs. Indian Tax Authorities Brought to you by Sagar.N 1 By Sagar & Godwin

Vodafone tax issue

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

Vodafone Group plcvs.

Indian Tax Authorities

Brought to you bySagar.N

By Sagar & Godwin

2

OVERVIEW

• In 2007 Vodafone International purchased the Indian mobile telephony

assets of Hong Kong-based Hutchison Whampoa Ltd.. The Indian Tax

court issued that Vodafone withhold a $2.2 billion liability for capital gains

tax to the Indian tax authorities.

• Hong Kong-based Hutchison sold its 66.98% shares in the Indian Telecom

Company Hutch Essar ltd trough a holding company based in an offshore

destination for $11.2 billion to Vodafone.

• Hutchison controlled its Indian telecom subsidiary through a Cayman

Island company called CGP. CGP’s shares were sold to Vodafone, which

consequently became majority owner of the Indian telecom firm.

3

ARGUMENTS

VODAFONE’S ARGUMENTS:

India does not have jurisdiction to

tax the Hutchison deal because it

was structured as a transaction

between two overseas entities.

INDIAN TAX AUTHORITY’S ARGUMENTS:

Although Vodafone and Hutchison

had conducted their transaction

offshore, the deal involved Indian

assets and was hence liable for

capital gains tax in India.

Under Indian laws, Vodafone was

responsible for withholding tax on

the transaction and playing it to the

Indian authorities.

4

SUPREME COURTS DECISION

• The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Vodafone in the $2 billion tax

case saying Indian tax authorities have no jurisdiction over

Vodafone’s 2007 purchase of the Indian mobile telephone assets of

Hong Kong-based Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. when neither company

is based in India.

5

IMPLICATIONS

• The verdict has implications for cross border M&A activity and

similar pending cases before various courts.

• The Vodafone tax case threw an interesting question on the

taxability of a non resident company acquiring shares of a resident

company through an indirect route. This is a landmark case, as it is

for the first time that the tax departments had sought to tax a

company through a mechanism of tracing the source of acquisition.

6

Click on the link for detailed case

http://www.business-standard.com/content/general_pdf/012012_01.pdf