Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
the Danish Key Data Programme
Citation preview
The Past – a few highlights
• Long history of key registries mandated by law with high level of correctness and completeness
• Strong collaboration on digitisation between state, regional and municipality levels since 2001
• Cross-government eGov strategies since 2001• Data reuse previously high on the agenda; however, put on the
backburner in later years • eGovernment-rankings used to place Denmark in Top 3, but
position seems to be sliding back
The Present - key data challenges in Denmark
• The key registries developed over 30 years• Overlapping and non-authoritative registries developed• Cross-government and cross-sector processes impeded by lack
of coherence and gaps in key data• Insufficient quality in some key data• Insufficient technical availability of some key data• Charging and licensing schemes inhibit full and efficient reuse
of some key data• Limited cross-government governance of key data• Coherent, complete and readily available key data is a
requirement for an efficient and fully digitised public sector
Increase in use of data – increasing demands
Use of National Survey & Cadastre's Map Service
368
663
1159
23 44 64
106 24
50
200
400
600
800
1.000
1.200
1.400
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Million
Year
Req
uest
s
Current models for access to key data
Model A: Public Sector Institutions and Private Sector Companies buys access
Height Model, Census (persons), Company Data, Accounting Data
Model B: Free Access for Public Sector Institutions - Private Sector Companies buys access
Topographic Data, Cadastre, Owner Registration, Business Registry, Income Data
Model C: Free Access for Public Institutions and for Private Sector Companies
Administrative Geographic Subdivision, Buildings and Dwellings
http://bit.ly/eGov2012
Key Data – part of the new eGov Strategy
Right Now - defining the ’Key Data Programme’
• Cross-government ‘Key Data Programme’ established• Programme is mandated to prepare series of initiatives for June 2012:
• Improve quality and coherence of all key data (i.e. remove redundant data and registries and improve workflows across public sector)
• Designate key data as ‘Authoritative Data’
• Improve technical availability of key data
• Improve accessibility by adjusting charging and licensing
• Propose governance model for key data
• All proposals must be supported by positive business case
Outline of key data proposals (‘packages’)
1. Effective property management and reuse of property data2. Common addresses, place names and administrative
geographic subdivision3. Common basis for climate adaptation and water management4. Free and efficient access to geographic data5. Common key registration of persons6. Effective reuse and sharing of corporate data7. Common infrastructure for key data distribution
Efficiency gains from the ’Key Data Programme’
More efficient distribution of key data
More efficient production of key data
More efficient reuse of key data
Business Cases and Financing
• Business Case challenges
• The Good: One entity makes investment, same entity reaps benefits
• The Bad: One entity makes investment, other entities reap benefits
• The Ugly: Several entities make investments, several other entities reap benefits
• Financing challenges
• Redistributing gains in the public sector from reduced cost (administrative, ICT, charges)
• Redistributing gains in the public sector from more efficient processes
Our question to you …
How can we measure the effect of our Key Data Programme?
• How to establish a baseline, i.e. the ’before’ scenario?• How to measure effect of improvements, i.e. the ’after’ scenario?
