View
209
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Part of the HDR Development Seminar Series, Professor Felix T. Mavondo presented the following lecture on: Guiding principles; Managing your PhD; Phases of a PhD; Conceptualisation phase; Development of Research Instruments; Survey Management; Analysing the data; Writing up; The Examination Process.
Citation preview
Department of Marketing
The PhD as A Project:
From Enrolment to Completion
Felix T. Mavondo
Department of Marketing
Doctoral Workshop
4th October 2012
Department of Marketing
My Guiding principles
Every doctoral student is a special project
Each brings their hopes, their personality
and sometimes their family
Each has special needs, working style and
level of motivation and sensitivity
Each brings a culture, previous experience
and hopefully a willingness and desire to
succeed.
Because of or in spite of these the PhD must
be completed!!
Department of Marketing
Managing Your PhD
Aims
Optimise time use and speed up project completion
Maximise exposure to the research process and engagement
Enhance critical analysis and synthesis
Develop collegiality with other research students and staff
Have some publications to gain a competitive advantage in the job market
Department of Marketing
What are the Phases of a PhD?
From Enrolment to Confirmation
Finding The Research Area
Literature Review Strategies
1. Identify 10 key articles in your domain of study
2. Find the latest publications in the area that
appeared in the top journals
3. Work your way backwards and forward from then
on
4. Learn effective literature review techniques
5. Some degree of wandering is acceptable in the
early stages
Department of Marketing
For each article you read
Establish the main findings
What was the sample size and unit of analysis
What research design and methodology were used
What scales (reliability and validity) were used
What do you like and not like about the article?
What future directions of research and limitations are suggested?
Department of Marketing
Conceptualisation Phase
Build a model of relationships identified in the literature
Establish the ―gap‖ that you want to contribute to closing-your contribution
Establish why closing these gaps is important (to academia, practitioners, policymakers or others).
Establish who should care about your research
Make explicit propositions/hypotheses
In part these issues are now addressed by the PhD course work ( I hope)
Department of Marketing
At this stage you should have
Some idea of how the main constructs are going to be operationalised
Well developed ideas about the research design, appropriate sample size, sampling unit and context of your study
some idea about data collection and analysis
A conceptual paper for publication
You should be ready for your confirmation. This should be about 12 months from enrolment
Department of Marketing
Development of Research Instrument
Use what exists!!-This is knowledge
accumulation for the discipline
Always be conscious of the trade off
between a long instrument and response rate
if you are doing a quantitative study.
There are advantages in pre-testing even on
a small sample. Academics and their
students are weird and should be avoided!
When pre-testing establish the time it takes,
the layout, the language and the clarity
Department of Marketing
Survey Management
Adopt a total design method 1. Minimise cost to respondent
2. Maximise benefits of participation
Well designed survey instruments offer significant benefits!!
A token of appreciation may work wonders
External (industry) support can work wonders
Data collection is the most hazardous part of the PhD. You do not have enough control.
Department of Marketing
Analyse the data Data analysis should be relatively straight
forward if prior work has been done
Students should be familiar with the data analysis approach—this could be taught in other departments than your own
Start with the simple methods that give an appreciation of the data and address the research questions.
In my opinion the most critical chapter in the thesis is Operationalisation of constructs- measure reliability and validity and generalisability.
Department of Marketing
Writing up In some sense my students never really
have a writing up phase.
They learn to write early and submit drafts of chapters for supervisor comments
The supervisor should read every word in the first drafts and make many comments
It is often desirable to submit of some chapters for publications—conference or journal
The advantage is the free feedback. It is great to know you are on the right track
Department of Marketing
Writing up (cont’d)
Effective project management suggests that by the
time data analyses begins you should probably
have completed three chapters
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Research Methodology and Operationalisation of
constructs
Ideally you should have a complete layout of the
thesis by this stage one must have fully developed
the hypotheses, be familiar with analyses to be
performed
Department of Marketing
Critical Chapters
Introduction
Methodology
Final Chapter
1. Main findings
2. Implications of study for
Academia
Managers
Policy Makers
Department of Marketing
The examination Process
1. The choice of examiners must potentially
be done during literature review but
definitely no latter than six months prior to
submission.
2. Candidates MUST be conversant with the
work of the examiners—failure to do so
may spell disaster
3. Avoid recently qualified PhD’s they are
over zealous and intolerant of differences!
Department of Marketing
Problems: My Personal Experience
Some students take very long to settle
down—they continue attempting to change the
topic or focus of study
Poor communication with the supervisor—in
some cultures saying NO is not encouraged
yet in our system it is strong encouraged
Failure to have frequent scheduled meetings—
this encourages drift. The rules say once a
fortnight!!
Inadequate feed back from supervisor and
provided late.
Department of Marketing
Problems (cont’d)
Supervisory Failure
The student –Supervisor relationship breaks
down—This is delicate but must be managed
Incomplete sharing of expectations
Supervisor is a mentor—the student has
responsibility for the work
Student doing to much work unrelated to the
PhD
Supervisor losses interest in the project and
does not provide adequate feed back on time