Upload
dave-mcclure
View
33.000
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Tim O'Reilly presents his perspectives & an in-depth report on the State of the Facebook Application Market, from his presentation at the Graphing Social Patterns conference on 10/08/07.
Citation preview
The Facebook Application Market
Tim O’Reilly
O’Reilly Media, Inc.www.oreilly.com
Graphing Social NetworksOctober 9, 2007
2
We’re best known as a book publisher
3
What We Really Do At O'Reilly
Change the world by spreading the knowledge of innovators
4
How we do it
•Find interesting technologies and people innovating from the edge
•Amplify their effectiveness by spreading the information needed for others to follow them.
•Books
5
How we do it
•Find interesting technologies and people innovating from the edge
•Amplify their effectiveness by spreading the information needed for others to follow them.
•Books, Conferences
6
How we do it
•Find interesting technologies and people innovating from the edge
•Amplify their effectiveness by spreading the information needed for others to follow them.
•Books, Conferences, Online
7
Watch the Alpha Geeks
Rob Flickenger and his potato chip can antenna
• New technologies first exploited by hackers, then entrepreneurs, then platform players
• Three examples– Wireless community networks
predict universal Wi-Fi– Screen scraping predicts web services and the internet as platform– “The pedal powered internet” predicts new focus on energy
Facebook is the new frontier
What is it telling us?
8
Data from O’Reilly Research
• http://radar.oreilly.com/research/reports/facebook.html
• Prepared by Tim O’Reilly, Roger Magoulas, Ben Lorica, Jimmy Guterman, with contributions from Dave McClure, Niall Kennedy, Max Levchin, and Ali Partovi
9
Methodology
• Spidered Facebook stats weekly from 7/29 to 9/2
• On 9/4, Facebook started reporting engagement. Switched spidering to daily.
• After 9/4, total installs per app is inferred from percentage
• Total installs used for historical and rate of change data, active user data for application ranking
10
Facebook growing by 1.14% per day (on average)
11
Facebook Daily Active Users
0
5
10
15
20
25
9/4/07
9/5/07
9/6/07
9/7/07
9/8/07
9/9/07
9/10/07
9/11/07
9/12/07
9/13/07
9/14/07
9/15/07
9/16/07
9/17/07
9/18/07
9/19/07
9/20/07
9/21/07
Millio
ns
Applications Growing Even Faster - 1.9% per day
12
Facebook Application Count (by week)
0
1,500
3,000
4,500
7/29/07 8/5/07 8/12/07 8/19/07 8/26/07 9/2/07 9/9/07 9/16/07
87% of Usage Goes to 2% of Apps
13
The Top 50 Developers by Usage
14
Here’s the graph against all 5000+ apps
15
Scatter Plot of Active users and Rank-Ordered Applications - as of 10/05/2007- no header version
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000
Safari Views vs. Bookscan Unit Sales
Additional demand from the long tail effect
A Power Law Distribution
17
Facebook Application Usage
18
Loglog or Power Law graphThe same graph as on the previous page with linear regression used to fit a line to the data. As you can see, the linear regression line does not line up to the data. The equation for the linear regression line is shown on the graph: the Y-axis intercept is 11.33 and the slope is -3.2924. Most importantly, the R-squared shows a poor fit of .658.
R-squared is a measure of how well a line fits the data that ranges from 0 to 1. The higher the R-squared value, the better the line fits the data. For a power law distribution, an R-squared of .85 or better is expected. The Facebook app distribution with R-squared = .658 doesn’t show a Power Law distribution. The distribution isn’t linear.
Active Users / True Rank (loglog)
w/ linear regression
y = -3.2924x +
11.33
R2 = 0.658
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 2 3 4log (true rank)
log
(acti
ve u
sers)
Many Applications Competing for the Same User
19
Application Adoption and Application Counts by Category (9/21/2007)
Just for Fun
Dating
Messaging
Chat
Video
GamingAlerts
Photo
Utility
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
Application Count by Category
Avera
ge A
pp
lica
tio
n A
do
pti
on
0%
1%
Categories with the most active users per application (average)
20
Avg % Active Users by Category
0% 5% 10% 15%
All
Classified
Money
Politics
Business
Education
Alerts
File Sharing
Utility
Video
Events
Mobile
Music
Messaging
Food and Drink
Dating
Travel
Photo
Just for Fun
Fashion
Chat
Gaming
Sports
Most Active Categories, by Number of Applications > 100,000 users
21
Applications by Category > 100K Active Users
0 10 20 30 40 50
AllBusiness
ClassifiedFile Sharing
MoneySportsEvents
FashionFood and Drink
MobileMusic
PoliticsEducation
TravelUtilityPhotoAlerts
ChatDatingVideo
GamingMessaging
Just for Fun
Most Active Categories, Percentage of Applications > 100,000 users
22
Proportion of Application w/ >100K Active Users
0% 2% 4% 6%
AllBusiness
ClassifiedFile Sharing
MoneySportsUtilityMusic
EventsPolitics
EducationFood and Drink
FashionMobilePhotoTravelAlerts
ChatJust for Fun
VideoGamingDating
Messaging
Most Active Categories, by Number of Applications > 25,000 users
23
Applications by Category > 25K Active Users
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
AllClassified
SportsBusiness
MoneyPoliticsFashion
File SharingMusic
EducationMobileTravelEvents
Food and DrinkUtilityVideoAlerts
ChatPhoto
DatingMessaging
GamingJust for Fun
Most Active Categories, Percentage of Applications > 25,000 users
24
Proportion of Application w/ >25K Active Users
0% 2% 4% 6% 8%
AllClassified
SportsBusiness
PoliticsUtilityMoneyMusic
EducationVideo
FashionTravelAlerts
EventsFile Sharing
ChatMobilePhoto
Food and DrinkJust for Fun
GamingDating
Messaging
The Top 40 - Week Ending October 5
25
Application Vendor Review Count % Active Installs Active Users Active Last WoW ROC1 Top Friends Slide 2,708 16% 18,187,625 2,746,678 2,673,050 3%2 FunWall Slide 682 22% 8,998,329 1,911,298 1,383,276 38%3 Super Wall RockYou! 1,155 11% 10,183,200 1,083,079 820,878 32%4 SuperPoke! Slide 3,601 10% 10,143,845 950,640 879,749 8%5 Video Facebook 1,584 9% 10,771,730 936,327 905,353 3%6 X Me RockYou! 2,263 10% 8,918,763 814,035 550,285 48%7 iLike iLike 3,791 8% 9,396,575 730,953 736,549 -1%8 Movies Flixster 1,520 7% 9,158,657 580,201 705,972 -18%9 Graffiti Mark Kantor;;Tim Suzman;;Ted Suzman 5,469 7% 8,028,517 514,692 528,802 -3%
10 Likeness RockYou! 1,339 6% 9,418,350 499,705 429,721 16%11 My Questions Slide 1,105 5% 9,783,925 417,009 441,958 -6%12 Quizzes Eric Diep;;Joe Winterhalter 1,459 9% 4,402,856 363,478 286,168 27%13 Mobile Facebook 755 16% 2,268,627 345,282 349,442 -1%14 Free Gifts Zachary Allia 5,132 5% 7,342,580 338,662 373,674 -9%15 Booze Mail Renkoo 1,840 8% 4,257,171 330,494 352,483 -6%16 Compare People Ivko Maksimovic 7,252 4% 7,939,500 319,212 383,516 -17%17 Honesty Box Dan Peguine;;Erik Giberti 4,402 9% 3,445,614 279,311 285,829 -2%18 (fluff)Friends Mike Sego 22,938 13% 2,221,192 278,794 266,123 5%19 Vampires Blake Commagere;;AJ Olson 2,013 8% 3,535,325 274,808 293,658 -6%20 Scrabulous Rajat Agarwalla;;Jayant Agarwalla 3,363 33% 869,706 270,175 237,862 14%21 Moods Drew Lustro;;Amit Matani 871 5% 5,825,860 265,452 272,839 -3%22 Causes Tam Vo;;Blake Commagere 1,302 5% 5,426,880 251,224 251,402 0%23 Superlatives Jamal Ashraf;;Suleman Ali 511 5% 5,511,900 249,760 261,705 -5%24 My Aquarium Greg Thomson 3,072 6% 3,771,780 219,672 216,450 1%25 Grow-a-Gift Mike Mangino;;Keith Schacht 1,616 9% 2,316,100 207,010 181,518 14%26 Naughty Gifts Going 1,498 6% 3,633,500 200,999 255,536 -21%27 Hatching Eggs Mike Mangino;;Keith Schacht 596 13% 1,691,536 200,470 170,227 18%28 Zombies Blake Commagere;;AJ Olson 2,500 5% 4,259,220 197,133 220,217 -10%29 Sticky Notes J-Squared Media 1,175 5% 4,055,860 195,330 211,012 -7%30 Entourage Chris Osburne;;Vito Nonni 61 10% 2,117,190 194,763 199,172 -2%31 Nicknames Adam Gries;;Wayne Mak 171 7% 3,091,120 184,524 202,380 -9%32 Are YOU Interested? eTwine Holdings 442 10% 1,891,900 172,649 155,868 11%33 Fortune Cookie Slide 1,293 3% 5,869,067 162,215 169,517 -4%34 Texas HoldEm Poker Eric Schiermeyer;;Mark Pincus 2,262 6% 2,915,200 150,093 154,107 -3%35 WereWolves Blake Commagere;;AJ Olson 968 8% 1,873,263 147,828 156,196 -5%36 Bumper Sticker Harris Tsim;;Samuel Adams 595 11% 1,323,182 135,241 114,634 18%37 Fight Club Wayne Ellis 471 32% 493,188 133,017 103,231 29%38 Advanced Wall Phil Gibbons 152 4% 3,671,233 131,657 110,102 20%39 PacMan thewurld 804 12% 1,219,564 129,955 120,910 7%40 Favorite Peeps! Slide 2,511 5% 2,755,620 126,193 135,339 -7%
A Web 2.0 Refresher Tim O’Reilly
O’Reilly Media, Inc.www.oreilly.com
Graphing Social NetworksOctober 9, 2007
27
Social Networks
Blogs
Sharing
Wikis
User Generated ContentOpenness
28
Social Networks
Blogs
Sharing
Wikis
User Generated ContentOpenness
LovePeace
29
What Really Distinguishes Web 2.0
Systems that harness network effects to get better the more people use them.
30
31
Building a Collective Database• Building on top of open source, Yahoo! pays
people to build its directory
• Learning from open source, Wikipedia uses volunteers
• P2P file sharing users build song swapping network as a byproduct of their own self-interest
• (Google works this way, and so does Facebook)
Harnessing Collective Intelligence
Every true Web 2.0 company is building a database whose value grows in proportion to the number of participants -- that is, a network-effect-driven data lock-in -- with accelerating returns to the winners.
32
“Red Shift”
33
34
35
The opportunity was in finding new meaning in user-generated data,
and turning that meaning into real-time user-facing services
36
37
38
39
40
41
Why Should I Have To Confirm?
• geni.com already knows that Sean is my brother
• My company directory already knows who works at O’Reilly
• Google knows that I worked with Danese Cooper on open source Java and that she has spoken at many of my conferences
• Amazon knows who’s written books for me
42
How Ridiculous Is This?
• Dialed calls (last 10)• Received calls (last 10)• Missed calls (last 10)
My phone and my email already know who my friends are?
Social Networking has a long way to go till it’s the Web 2.0 address book
43
How Ridiculous Is This?
• “Are you my friend?”
(Anyone with a communications network - email, phone, or IM - already knows who my friends are!)
Where is the Web 2.0 address book?
44
45
The Internet Operating System
The subsystems will be data subsystems– Location– Identity– Time– Products– Media types– Relationships– Price– Tags– ???
46
47
A Platform Beats an Application Every Time
•Lotus 1-2-3•WordPerfect•Netscape Navigator
47
A Platform Beats an Application Every Time
•Lotus 1-2-3•WordPerfect•Netscape Navigator
Microsoft ExcelMicrosoft WordMicrosoft Internet Explorer
47
A Platform Beats an Application Every Time
Microsoft ExcelMicrosoft WordMicrosoft Internet Explorer
48
Two Types of Platform• One Ring to Rule Them All
• Small Pieces Loosely Joined
49
50
51
Questions You Should Be Asking
• Am I doing everything I can to build applications that learn from my users?
• Does my application get better with more users, or just more busy and more crowded?
• If “Data is the Intel Inside” of Web 2.0, what data do I own?
• What user-facing services can I build against it?
• Does my platform give me and my users control, or take it away from us?
52
What I Want From the Social Graph
Tim O’Reilly
O’Reilly Media, Inc.www.oreilly.com
Graphing Social NetworksOctober 9, 2007
Some Things I Want From Social Networking• I want it to reflect my REAL social relationships (mine my phone and email)
• I want it to help me manage those contacts (how to reach them, updated status)
• I want to manage groups of people• I want it to recognize asymmetry in relationships
• I want fine grained control over what I see and what I ignore
• I want to discover interesting people
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
Doesn’t Fit My Relationships...
63
64
65
66
67
Smart Presence on the Phone
68
69
“I’m an inventor. I became interested in long term trends because an invention has to make sense in the world in which it is finished, not the world in which it is started.”
-Ray Kurzweil
For More Information
• What is Web 2.0? http://www.oreillynet.com/go/web2 • http://tim.oreilly.com• http://radar.oreilly.com• http://labs.oreilly.com
70