Upload
publab
View
886
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presented at the international conference at the TU Delft on the 17th of may, 2013. Hogeschool Utrecht, University of Applied Sciences, Research Group 'Crossmedia Communication in the Public Domain' (PubLab).
Citation preview
Danielle van Wallinga [email protected]
Hogeschool Utrecht, University of Applied SciencesResearch group ‘crossmedia communication in the public domain’
Conference: Using ICT, Social Media and Mobile Technologies to Foster Self-Organisation in Urban and Neighbourhood Governance
16-17th of May, 2013
@PubLab
Research purpose
Question raised in communication practice:
What lessons can be learned on effective use of social media?
Relevance
• Changing needs & dynamics in organizations/society (in interaction)
• Staying ‘connected’ and ‘in tune’ with (complex) social environment
• The government ≠ Big Brother watching over citizens
I-visie 2011-2015, Bekkers & Meijer, 2010, van Berlo, 2012, van Woerkum & Aarts, 2007 , I-vision 2011-2015
Social media benefits
Challenges
• Meaningful, interactive communication with citizens
• Realizing long term impact• Loosening control • Flexible planning• Strategy
Ernst & Young, 2011, Kok, 2011, Bekkers & Meijer, 2010
Research questions1. To what extent are the potential benefits of social
media realized in the public domain? 2. How are networks being used in government
communication via social media?3. What lessons can be learned on effective use of
social media?4. How do organizations face planning challenges? 5. To what degree is the public involved in social
media projects?
Method
Phase 1• Selection
cases
Phase 2• Interviews
Phase 3• Comparing &
Analyzing
Local and national governments
Objectives of social media @ governments (1)
• Co-creation of cultural policy (Leiden) or future vision (Borne)
• Self-organization of a picnic (regional community initiative Kromme Rijn)
• (Re) building trust in the (communication) process concerning the construction of the North-South Metro line
Objectives of social media @ governments (2)
• Stimulating prosocial behavior (donor registration)
• Sharing knowledge (public service ‘Rijkswaterstaat’)
• Strengthening the image of a residential town (pilot housing in the Hague)
• Informing citizens about police work (Twitter, Groningen)
• Information about detours (Eindhoven)
Social media benefits
Power of networks
• Functions:– Giving an impulse to citizens’ interaction– Creating internal (organization) or external
(society/target groups) support – Inspire citizens’ behavioural change
Networks are being used to bring everyday livability issues closer to target groups in an interactive,
personal way.
Citizens’ active involvement
• Various communication functions occur and are combined in social media in the public domain.
Informing, consulting, debating, co creating
I spend a lot of time travelling
Matching citizens’ needs
Detours affect my daily route
I feel connected with
my town
I want to share my opnion
I want to contribute in solving social issues
I want to stay informed
I don’t trust the governments’ (communicative) approach
Strategy?
Lessons learned
• Mix of various communication means– By combining specific characteristics of various
media, maximal impact can be realized.• Open, but flexible use of social media– Enabling unexpected results– Speed & amount of information
Organizational challenges
• Flexible and gradual planning• Evaluating actions constantly• Based on ‘trial and error’• Being accountable for decisions and
performances?
Communication method Van Ruler (2013)
For living happily ever after:
1. Be reciprocal and interactive2. Be flexible and adaptable 3. Be open and transparent 4. Anticipate actively on the (changing) needs of
your social environment.
Discussion
• Affords of online and active participation• Embedding user-generated content
structurally• Sustainability of social media• Strategy?
Questions?