Upload
avick-sil
View
543
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This was presented in
Citation preview
SCOPE for SCOPE for Improvement:Improvement: Drilling FluidsDrilling Fluids
GuidelinesGuidelines of Indiaof India
Environment Policy and Research India (EPRI)
219, Gopi Cine Mall, Nana Shankar Sheth Road, Dombivli (W) – 421202
Ph: 0251 – 3192839; Website: www.eprindia.com; Email: [email protected]
Avick Sil and Kanchan Avick Sil and Kanchan WakadikarWakadikar
What is Drilling What is Drilling FluidsFluids
Drilling fluids are suspension of finely divided heavy materials such as bentonite and barite
Uses Drilling natural gas, oil and water wells
WhyReduces friction and torqueIncreases drill rig performance and lifeControl water lossStabilizes bore holes
Sil, A., Wakadikar, K., Kumar, S., Tandon, S., Sivagami, S. P. M., Kumar, R., Hettiartchi, J. P. 2010. Toxicity characteristics of drilling mud and its effect on aquatic fish populations. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste (doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.000009).
Types Types
Oil Based Fluids (OBFs)Oil Based Fluids (OBFs)
Water Based Fluids (WBFs)Water Based Fluids (WBFs)
Synthetic Based Fluids (SBFs)Synthetic Based Fluids (SBFs)
Best performance
Poor environmental performance and eco-toxicity
Do not provide optimal performance
Best environmental performance in terms of their non-toxic
nature and biodegradation
Drilling performance - OBFs
Eco-toxicity and biodegradation - WBFs
Composition Composition
Emulsifiers - Aid in forming and maintaining the emulsion
Gellants/Wetting agents - Ensures the solids in the mud are
in wet phase
Bentonite - Aid in suspending drill cuttings in the mud
Barite - Increases the weight of the drilling mud
SBFs
Bentonite 18%
WBFs
Sil, A., Wakadikar, K., Kumar, S., Tandon, S., Sivagami, S. P. M., Kumar, R., Hettiartchi, J. P. 2010. Toxicity characteristics of drilling mud and its effect on aquatic fish populations. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste (doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.000009).
Facts & Facts & FiguresFiguresYear Place Quantity
1967 Scily Island 38 million gallon
1977 North Sea 81 million gallon
1978 France 66 million gallon
1979 Gulf of Mexico 140 million gallon
1979 Tobago 46 million gallon
1983 Iran 80 million gallon
1983 South Africa 78 million gallon
1988 North Sea 43 million gallon
1989 Alaska 10 million gallon
1989 Canary Island 19 million gallon
1991 Kuwait 460 million gallon
1991 Italy 42 million gallon
1992 Uzbekisthan 88 million gallon
1994 Russia 2 million barrel
1996 Welses 70,000 tonnes
1999 Atlantic Coast 3 million barrel
2000 Rio de Jeneiro 343,200 gallon
2002 Spain 20 million gallon
2003 Pakistan 28,000 tonnes
2004 Alaska 337,000 gallon
Year Place Quantity
2005 Louisiana 7 million gallon
2006 Louisiana 71,000 barrel
2006 Philipines 530,000 gallon
2007 South Korea 2.8 million gallon
2008 Louisiana 419,000 million gallon
2009 Australia 52,000 million gallon
2010 Texas 462,000 gallon
2010 Louisiana 60,000 barrel 1 barrel – 117 litres
1 gallon – 3.8 litres
Mumbai 2010 – Approx. 1200 tonnes2011 – Approx. 400 tonnes
ThreatsThreats
Threat to aquatic life
Indirect impact on terrestrial organisms
Flora and fauna
Indirect impact on humans
MoEF Notification……….MoEF Notification……….
The Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF), India, Notification G.S.R. 546 (E) states that LC50 (96 h) must be greater than 30000 mg/L (MoEF, 2005)
Missing link.. .. … …..
No toxicity range
Nothing mentioned about
biodegradability
No risk assessment
No mentioned about test
organisms
Testing criteria
MoEF, 2005. Ministry of Environment and Forests notification, New Delhi, India, G.S.R.546 (E)
Thus it has a benchmark concentration of 30000 mg/L
Where World Where World StandsStandsToxicity Rating LC 50 (mg/L)
Very toxic 1Toxic 1-100
Moderately toxic 100-1000Slightly toxic 1000-10,000
Almost non-toxic 10,000-100,000Non-toxic 100,000
Toxicity Grades for Drilling Fluids
Biodegradability: > 60%
Specifies test organisms
Different test at every
level
Specific Toxicity gradingOECD, 1992. OECD Guideline for testing of chemicals, acute toxicity test for fishOSPAR, 2006. Protocols on methods for testing of chemicals used in offshore oil industry, OSPAR commissionUSEPA, 1996. Ecological effects test guidelines, OPPTS 850.1075, fish acute toxicity test, freshwater and marine
What They Have – Eco-What They Have – Eco-toxicology toxicology
Title Adopted in
LastUpdated
Alga, Growth Inhibition Test 1981 2006
Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test
1981 2004
Fish, Acute Toxicity Test 1981 1992
Fish, Prolonged Toxicity Test: 14-Day Study
1984 -
Avian Dietary Toxicity Test 1984 -
Avian Reproduction Test 1984 -
Earthworm, Acute Toxicity Tests
1984 -
Terrestrial Plants, Growth Test 1984 2006
Terrestrial Plants, Growth Test 1984 -
Fish, Early-Life Stage Toxicity Test
1992 -
Daphnia magna Reproduction Test
1998 -
Fish, Short- term Toxicity Test on Embryo and Sac-fry Stages
1998 -
Honeybees, Acute Oral Toxicity Test
1998 -
Title Adopted in
Last Updated
Honeybees, Acute Contact Toxicity Test
1998 -
Fish, Juvenile Growth Test 2000 -
Soil Microorganisms: Nitrogen Transformation Test
2000 -
Soil Microorganisms: Carbon Transformation Test
2000 -
Enchytraeid Reproduction Test
2004 -
Earthworm Reproduction Test (Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei)
2004 -
Sediment-Water Chironomid Toxicity Using Spiked Sediment
2004 -
Terrestrial Plant Test: VegetativeVigour Test
2006 -
Determination of the activity of anaerobic bacteria - reduction of gas production from anaerobically sewage sludge
2007 -
Source: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/9/11/33663321.pdf
What They Have – What They Have – Degradation and Degradation and
AccumulationAccumulationTitle Adopted in Last Updated
Ready Biodegradability 1981 1992
Inherent Biodegradability: ModifiedSCAS Test
1981 -
Inherent Biodegradability: Zahn-Wellens/EMPA Test
1981 1992
Inherent Biodegradability: ModifiedMITI Test (II)
1981 -
Simulation Test – Aerobic SewageTreatment
1981 2001
Inherent Biodegradability in Soil 1981 -
Bioconcentration: Flow-Through Fish Test 1981 1996
Biodegradability in Seawater 1992 -
Aerobic and Anaerobic Transformation in Soil 2002 -
Aerobic and Anaerobic Transformation in Aquatic Sediment Systems 2002 -
Aerobic Mineralisation in Surface Water – Simulation Biodegradation Test
2004 -
Ready Biodegradability - CO2 in sealed vessels (Headspace Test) 2006 -
Anaerobic Biodegradability of Organic Compounds in Digested Sludge: byMeasurement of Gas Production
2006 -
Leaching in Soil Columns 2004 -
So where we areSo where we are…………….….…..…..
Become OECD Member
Others…...
Better Guideline
Oil spill modeling
system
Risk assessment
criteria
Mapping eco sensitive
areas
Making data bases
Biodegradability
Toxicity
gradation/rating
[email protected] (Avick Sil)[email protected] (Avick Sil)[email protected] (Kanchan [email protected] (Kanchan wakadikar)wakadikar)