Upload
rms
View
453
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Rouslan KOUMAKHOV - RMS
Perception processesPart 1
Rouslan KOUMAKHOV - RMS
Perception: cognitive process of interpreting one’s environment
Rouslan KOUMAKHOV - RMS
Hofstede’s experiences: What do you see?
Rouslan KOUMAKHOV - RMS
Hofstede’s experiences
Rouslan KOUMAKHOV - RMS
Implications for perception
Perception is selective (filtering)
Our past experience conditions our way of understanding the situation
Recency: We tend to remember recent information
Perception is culturally determined
Rouslan KOUMAKHOV - RMS
Suppression of ambiguity
We try to suppress ambiguity and uncertainty in our intuitive judgment and conscious perception
Other Perceptual Biases
Suppression of ambiguity
Contrast errors
=>objects and people are perceived in a certain context
Halo effect : one trait forms a general impression – “attractiveness” increases the likehood of the poor CV being
asked for the interview
– vs Horn effect: giving someone a poor appraisal on one quality
First impression error– “I knew as soon as she walked through the door her face would
fit the job”
Rouslan KOUMAKHOV - RMS
Insentivity to Sample Size
Most people choose C Simple statistics: it is much more likely
to observe 60% of male babies in a smaller sample than in a larger sample – a large sample is less likely deviated from the mean
Rouslan KOUMAKHOV - RMS
What do you think about this?
Advertizing strategy:
“ Four out of five dentists surveyed recommended sugarless gum for their patients who chewed gum! “
Other Perceptual Biases (cont)
Hindsight biais - People tend to surestimate what they really knew about the
result – when the result is later learned
Similarity (“same as me” or “different from me”)- being positively predisposed toward people who seem similar
to you and negatively against people who are unlike you (=> “procterization”)
Latest behavior- basing an appraisal on the person’s recent behavior, rather
than on how the person behaved through the appraisal period
Status effect– giving those in a higher level positions consistently better
appraisal, rather than on person’s characteristics
Rouslan KOUMAKHOV - RMS
Why job applicants are not hired(survey of 153 US HRmanagers)
1. Poor personal appearance 2. Overaggressiveness 3. Inability to express information clearly 4. Lack of interest and enthusiasm 5. Lack of career planning; no purpose 6. Nervous; lack of confidence 7. Overemphasis on money 8. Makes excuses 10. Lack of tact and courtesy 11. Immaturity 12. Condemns past employers 13. No genuine interest in company or job 14. Fails to look interviewer in the eye 15. Sloppy application form 16. Little sense of humour 17. Arrives late at the interview 18. Fails to express appreciation for interviewer’s time 19. Fails to ask questions about the company and job
Rouslan KOUMAKHOV - RMS
Which option would you choose?
Situation 1 1/ Take 100 euros with certainty
or 2/ The gamble:
50% chance to win 200 euros
50% chance to lose 250 euros
Rouslan KOUMAKHOV - RMS
Which option would you choose?
Situation 2 1/ Lose 100 euros with certainty
or 2/ The gamble:
50% chance to win 200 euros
50% chance to lose 250 euros
Rouslan KOUMAKHOV - RMS
Perception bias
Dominant preferences:
– Situation 1: 100 euros, not to gamble
– Situation 2: gamble, take a risk,
… While the objectives probabilities of gains and losses are indetical
People are risk-seeking in a situation in which they focus on loss
People are risk-averse in a situation in which they focus on the gain in the stable situation (”bird in hand”)
=> Our rationality is bounded !