Upload
robin-sargent
View
4.331
Download
6
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
VS.
Case 1:09-cv-00791-UNA ( October 22, 2009)
Click Here
6:00Tuesday, October 11
PRESENTATION NAME
Click Here
6:00Tuesday, October 11
Issues
Rule
Analysis
Conclusion
Click Here
6:00Tuesday, October 11
Issues
CORE TERMS from Case: counterclaim, reexamination, patent, judicial estoppel, discovery, patent infringement, scheduled, citations omitted, injunctive relief, pari delicto, infringed, trial date, prior proceeding, irreconcilably, repudiation, simpl-ify, estopped, survive, court, reasons stated, answered
Click Here
6:00Tuesday, October 11
RulingSettled Out of Court.
Nokia and Apple signed a patent license agreement. Whereby, Apple agrees to pay some undisclosed upfront sum as well as “on-going royalties to be paid by Apple to Nokia for the term of the agreement. The specific terms of the contract are confidential” (Nokia Corporation, 2011, para. 2).
Click Here
6:00Tuesday, October 11
AnalysisNokia says, isn't asking for money damages beyond interest on past due royalties, it just wants a fair license rate for its patents.
Click Here
6:00Tuesday, October 11
Conclusion• The original conflict
wasn’t really about patent infringement, but always about what rate Apple would pay for Nokia’s patents on various “essential” GSM and WiFi-related technologies.
Happy 2nd Birthday Mac!
NAME Click
Here
6:00Tuesday, October 11