VS.

Case 1:09-cv-00791-UNA ( October 22, 2009)

Click Here

6:00Tuesday, October 11

PRESENTATION NAME

Click Here

6:00Tuesday, October 11

Issues

Rule

Analysis

Conclusion

Click Here

6:00Tuesday, October 11

Issues

CORE TERMS from Case: counterclaim, reexamination, patent, judicial estoppel, discovery, patent infringement, scheduled, citations omitted, injunctive relief, pari delicto, infringed, trial date, prior proceeding, irreconcilably, repudiation, simpl-ify, estopped, survive, court, reasons stated, answered

Click Here

6:00Tuesday, October 11

RulingSettled Out of Court.

Nokia and Apple signed a patent license agreement. Whereby, Apple agrees to pay some undisclosed upfront sum as well as “on-going royalties to be paid by Apple to Nokia for the term of the agreement.  The specific terms of the contract are confidential” (Nokia Corporation, 2011, para. 2).

Click Here

6:00Tuesday, October 11

AnalysisNokia says, isn't asking for money damages beyond interest on past due royalties, it just wants a fair license rate for its patents. 

Click Here

6:00Tuesday, October 11

Conclusion• The original conflict

wasn’t really about patent infringement, but always about what rate Apple would pay for Nokia’s patents on various “essential” GSM and WiFi-related technologies.

Happy 2nd Birthday Mac!

NAME Click

Here

6:00Tuesday, October 11