View
1.697
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ERE Webinar from 2/2/11, presented by Dr. John Sullivan and Master Burnett.
Citation preview
NARROWCASTING: Targeting Top Talent Through Social Networks
& Campaigns
ERE.Net Webinar Wednesday, February 2, 2011
© Dr. John Sullivan and Master Burnett www.DrJohnSullivan.com
2
Six goals for today
1. To understand the common problems associated with most “broadcast” social media approaches
2. To demonstrate the differences between broadcasting and narrowcasting
3. To outline a convincing business case for attracting top talent on social media
4. To provide you with action steps and best practices 5. To identify the benchmark firms 6. To answer your questions
3
Part I
Common problems with most current social media recruiting approaches
4
Common socialrecruiting mistakes
Communication characteristics to avoid: 1. Generic job postings – may be inappropriate for
the channel and offend the audience (groups, consequences) 2. Spamming a channel – violates tenets of social
media, may hurt your employer brand, will result in increased filtering
3. Social stalking – sending a high volume or inappropriate messages can get you “de-friended”
4. Job only messaging – not likely to be even read by those who are not-looking (microcosm: 80/20)
5. Generic messages – simply have little impact
5
Common socialrecruiting mistakes
Communication characteristics to avoid: 6. Poor conversion process – handing a warm lead
to a cold process (traditional ATS/ERP) 7. No strategy – Lack of clear goals, accountability
and resource allocation result in ad hoc results 8. No metrics – no understanding/proof of what
works and what doesn’t or why to do something 9. High cost – applying socialrecruiting like peanut
butter (broadcasting) can be resource intensive and produce negligible results i.e. a low ROI
6
Part II
Side-by-side comparison of broadcast and narrowcast recruiting
Including: Definitions, Goals, Scope, Target, Volume, Timeframe, Channels used, Overreach %,
Tools and approaches used
7
Broadcasting vs. narrowcasting… a comparison
Definition of broadcast recruiting via social media An active candidate approach
Broadcast recruiting messages and campaigns are generalized, so that they “fit” almost everyone, i.e. communicate the lowest common element
Messaging consists almost entirely of job announcements and advertisements to a broad social media audience
8
Side-by-side comparison
Definition of narrowcasting via social media A direct sourcing approach It targets not-looking prospects Personalized messages are sent to a few The messaging begins with an attempt to build a
trust relationship, based on non-employment factors (i.e. learning, professional interests or personal interests)
Over time… employment opportunities are discussed
9
Note
Alternative names for “Narrowcasting”
Segmented marketing or campaigning
Personalized marketing
Mass customized marketing
Micro-casting
10
Side-by-side comparison
Goals Goals of broadcasting To get active candidates to apply
A low cost per hire
To minimize the recruiter time required, i.e. make it easy to say “we do it”
11
Side-by-side comparison
Goals of narrowcasting 1. Getting top talent to engage in conversation 2. Increasing interaction 3. Increasing relevance 4. Building a relationship (early adopters have found that
between 3-5 communications are needed prior to job talk) 5. Building trust 6. Finally, considering job opportunities
12
Side-by-side comparison
Scope Scope of broadcasting– broadcast recruiting
activities (i.e. job posting and recruiting messaging) are designed to reach the broadest possible talent pool
Scope of narrowcasting – recruiting activities that are designed to reach a “narrow “segment” of the talent pool
13
Side-by-side comparison
Target audience Target audience of broadcasting – broadcast
messaging is targeted at active job seekers who are already likely candidates
Target audience of narrowcasts – it targets top performers (high value targets) that are currently employed. They are only prospects… because they are not actively seeking a job when you contact them
14
Side-by-side comparison
Volume Volume from broadcasting – broadcast
recruiting attempts to reach a high volume of potential candidates
Volume for narrowcasts – it targets a small number (often less than 10% of hires) of prospects
15
Side-by-side comparison
Timeframe Timeframe of broadcasting – broadcast
recruiting targets immediate hires for current openings
Timeframe for narrowcasts – it utilizes a longer-term timeframe in order to gradually build relationships for future openings
16
Side-by-side comparison
Channels utilized Channels utilized – almost all social media
channels are utilized (i.e. Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn)
Channels for narrowcasts – it only utilizes the channels and the communications approaches that the targeted prospect prefers
17
Side-by-side comparison
Overreach % Overreach % of broadcasting – broadcast
recruiting reaches some qualified candidates… but it also “overreaches” a large percentage of unqualified or disinterested candidates simultaneously
Overreach for narrowcasts – because of its narrow focus, there is little or no overreach
18
Side-by-side comparison
Recruiting approaches used Broadcast recruiting approaches often include:
Job postings
Employment advertising and banner ads
Employer branding advertising
Job fair announcements
E-mail campaigns
19
Side-by-side comparison
Narrowcasting recruiting approaches include: Talent communities in several subject areas Comments on their activities (work or social) Asking for their opinions or for feedback Notifying them about learning opportunities
(i.e. technical articles, news or best practices) CRM type reminders (i.e. birthdays & anniversaries)
Requests for referrals from their contact list Open house and seminar invitations
20
Part III
Business case factors
21
Making the business case Business case elements 1. Social media may be the only way to reach
“hidden” high quality non-lookers and college students (other than referrals)
2. The quality of hire (innovators and game changers) may result in a positive ROI
3. Being effective on social media may be seen as a requirement for a strong employer brand
4. Learning from business social media efforts may increase the learning curve for recruiting
22
Making the business case Business case elements 5. Offer acceptance rates may be higher… as a
result of stronger relationships 6. A narrowcasting approach may improve
diversity and international hires 7. It doesn’t cost any more to do it “the right way”
with narrowcasting and a segmented approach 8. Because narrowcasting utilizes the mobile
platform, it provides 24/7 access
23
Part IV
Action steps to consider
24
Action step
First, learn the potential problems with narrowcasting It requires expertise in crafting messages It consumes a good amount of recruiter time It has a relatively slow time to fill A high cost (but high ROI) It requires intelligence and metrics to identify…
where targets “hang out” and their individual job switch criteria
Aggressiveness and “rushing it” can lose prospects
Write “call to action” direct messages
Key message elements: Write from your target audience’s point of
view, not your own Be very clear on what action you want them to
take Make sure the message comes across as relevant
immediately, i.e. start out by answering why you are communicating, what you want done, why now, and how to proceed (Easily, quickly)
Let them take control of the message (Support) 25
DM Elements that add value
Priming questions/comments – as a recruiter you hopefully know where/how to find relevant people , your ee’s may not, so give guidance
Link to your story – provides short links to content that can be distributed via multiple channels, i.e.: – Externally hosted photo albums – Externally hosted videos – Blogs – Presentations
26
27
Action step
Use market research e-panels Convene electronic market research panels to determine: The perception of the employer in the targeted
domain Their willingness to work at the organization
compared to a market basket of talent competitors The relative importance of each of their job
consideration elements (job switch criteria)
28
Action step
When targeting an individual, try to learn: Their job switch criteria Factors that trigger a job search Their job search process Where they read/ hangout on the Internet Areas where they are an expert Areas where they are trying to learn/improve Individuals they admire/would listen to Their favorite communications channel(s) Do they write a blog?
29
Action step
Learn the available ways to segment your population. By current job title or level By skill or competency level By their level of experience By their education level By performance level By their pay level By location or region By their personal interests
30
Action step
Learn the available messaging & comm. tools
E-mail or Direct Message
Wall posts
Group posts
Status updates
Topic or firm landing pages
Videos/blogs/podcasts/text
31
10 additional action steps to consider
1. Learn the rules of online communities 2. Design, pretest and disseminate only “authentic”
messages (Based on the perception of the target)
3. Identify the most compelling things your firm can offer to each target segment
4. Provide employees with sample profiles and templates and offer to critique their profile (KPMG)
5. Ask questions, do a survey/poll to gain attention
32
10 additional action steps to consider
6. Build business “topic-based” pages or groups 7. Write a blog that your targets can RSS
subscribe to (Covering what it’s like to work at your firm) 8. Accept an online profile in lieu of an updated
resume (Passives may not have a updated resume) 9. Identify your target’s “influencers” and sell
those that are likely to influence their decision 10. Encourage them to announce their job
acceptance decision in their social groups, to help sway others to also come
33
Part V
Benchmark firms in narrowcasting
34
Major firms to learn from
Firms using narrowcasting on social networks Ernst & Young U.S. Army TiVo Deloitte Kodak Groupon Best Buy Zappos CIA Yum Brands Google Facebook PepsiCo Target Costco Cisco Ford GE Microsoft Accenture IBM PWC
35
Did we make you think?
Any further questions?
www.drjohnsullivan.com