20
Jacques Myburgh Existential Coach ThroughTheLine Coaching Oct 2013 Project Management South Africa Monitoring and Evaluating Projects and Programs: A Stakeholder Perspective

Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Monitoring and evaluation in project management from a stakeholder's perspective

Citation preview

Page 1: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

Jacques MyburghExistential CoachThroughTheLine Coaching

Oct 2013

Project Management South Africa

Monitoring and Evaluating Projects and Programs: A Stakeholder Perspective

Page 2: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

Science degree in Information Systems & Geology

Corporate IT environment

MBA (Oxford-Brookes, UK) in Strategic Marketing Management, with thesis in change facilitation

Organisational change management

Project, program & project office management, and served on PMSA Western Cape committee

Business intelligence – monitoring and reporting of corporate business performance

Coaching part-time for the last 5 years – management coaching, business coaching, midlife coaching, SLOW coaching

Current research in monitoring and evaluation of the strategy to professionalise the coaching industry in South Africa as part of an MPhil in Management Coaching (USB). Due date – Dec2013

Selling myself

Page 3: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

Monitoring and Evaluating Projects and Programs: A Stakeholder Perspective

Using a results-based evaluation framework to determine the efficiency and effectiveness of a project.

This workshop: Introduces the results-based evaluation framework, how it monitors efficiency and evaluates

effectiveness, Reviews stakeholder management, Describes the process of designing an impact-map to ensure stakeholder satisfaction, and Provides a practical opportunity to implement the framework on a current or planned project On completion of the workshop, you will be able to: Describe the difference between monitoring and evaluation, Distinguish between project stakeholders, in a wide and narrow sense, Map project activities through to results, and Document the relationships in your project between deliverables, project outcome, performance

indicators, and impact on stakeholders.

Page 4: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

RBM&E

Results-based monitoring & evaluation (RBM&E)

"Results-based monitoring and evaluation is a management tool to help track progress and demonstrate the impact of development projects, programs, and policies" (Morra Imas & Rist, 2009:105).

Results-based monitoring"Continuous process of collecting and analysing information on key indicators in order to measure progress toward goals" (Morra Imas & Rist, 2009:108).

Results-based evaluation Assessment of a planned, ongoing, or completed intervention to determine its relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability" (Morra Imas & Rist, 2009:108).

Page 5: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

Monitor implementationMeasure progress

Measuring efficiencyAre we doing things right?

Are we using resources economically?

Formative evaluation

Evaluate resultsMeasure achievement

Measure effectivenessAre we doing the right things?

To what degree are results achieved?

Summative evaluation

RBM&E: The logical model

Page 6: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

RBM&E: Choose your project

Choose a current, past or future projectOr use your own future as a project

Write a short description of:

Planned outputs (deliverables) Intended outcomes

Change in behaviour Change in knowledge Change in skills Change in status Change in level of functioning

Page 7: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

RBM&E: The adapted logical model

Page 8: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

RBM&E: The adapted logical

model

Page 9: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

RBM&E: For your project

For your chosen project

Write a short description of:

Your resourcesYour controlsYour inputs

Page 10: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

Monitor implementationMeasuring efficiencyFormative evaluation

Evaluate resultsMeasure effectivenessSummative evaluation

RBM&E: The adapted logical model

Page 11: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

Stakeholders may be individuals or groups, either friendly and supportive, or hostile and adversarial towards an organisation and its goals.

In the wide sense"Any identifiable group or individual who can affect the achievement of an organization's objectives or who is affected by the achievement of an organization's objectives" (Freeman & Reed, 1983)

In the narrow sense"Any identifiable group or individual on which the organization is dependent for its continued survival" (Freeman & Reed, 1983)

Stakeholder theory

PMBOK, 2004:24

Page 12: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

RBM&E: For your project

For your chosen project

List your stakeholders:And describe the intended impact of your

project on each stakeholderAny unintended impacts?

Page 13: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

Important aspect of stakeholders

Bi-directional

Stakeholder theory

Page 14: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

PMBOK 2004 Managing a project includes: “… Adapting the specifications,

plans, and approach to the different concerns and expectations of the various stakeholders”

The project management team has a professional responsibility to its stakeholders

Scope definition: “… Stakeholder needs, wants, and expectations are analyzed and converted into requirements”

Project Scope Management tools Stakeholder analysis Work breakdown structure

Important in Project Cost Management Change control Communication of cost performance measurements (CV, SV, CPI,

SPI) for WBS components Project Quality Management

Quality requirements per WBS component Cost-benefit analysis of stakeholder requirements

Project Communications Management Manage stakeholder process

Project Risk Management, etc.

PMBOK: Stakeholders

Page 15: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

PMBOK: Stakeholders

PMBOK, 2004:21,110

?Influence on stakeholders

Influence ON stakeholders

Page 16: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

?

RBM&E: Impact Map

?

Page 17: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

RBM&E: For your project

For your chosen project

Can you link your outputs to your outcomes?

Page 18: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

ControlsPolicies Processes

Standards GuidelinesFrameworks Strategy

Plans

Input Activities Output Outcome Impact

Transformed into output ==>Transforms input into

output ==>Direct product or service

delivered by activities ==>Changes in behaviour,

knowledge, skills, status or level of functioning

==>Fundamental intended and unintended change

At end of activities 1 - 6 years 7 - 10 years

Resources

People ToolsTechniques

Events TechnologyFinances

Document historyDocument:Purpose:Developed by: Jacques Myburgh, ThroughTheLine CoachingDateVersion

25/07/2013Prototype 0.1

Adapted Result-Based Monitoring & Evaluation Framework

Monitor implementationMeasure progress

Measuring efficiencyAre we doing things right?

Are we using resources economically?

Formative evaluation

Evaluate resultsMeasure achievement

Measure effectivenessAre we doing the right things?

To what degree are results achieved?

Summative evaluation

Adapted Monitoring and evaluation logic modelExplanation of monitoring & evaluation

Page 19: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

Who are your project’s stakeholders? Wide & narrow. What is the intended impact of the project on each stakeholder?

Fundamental change caused. What outcomes should be in place to create the intended impact?

Change in behaviour Change in knowledge Change in skills Change in status Change in level of functioning

What output is supposed to cause each outcome? i.e. Can you link outputs to outcomes?

What outputs are being delivered that are not linked to your outcomes?

What unintended outcome & impact will these outputs cause??? Risk analysis: What other unintended outcomes & impacts are

you and your project causing?

RBM&E: Questions to ask

Page 20: Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective

Jacques MyburghExistential CoachThroughTheLine Coaching

[email protected]

http://youtu.be/5f4rNEsyEYY

Project Management South Africa

Thank you