View
2.088
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
High Capacity Transit
System PlanA Performance Based Approach
to Sustainable Regional Transitto Sustainable Regional Transit
Making the Greatest Place
90 miles of rail built by 2016
High Capacity Transit ModesCurrent Future
2,000,000,000
2,500,000,000
3,000,000,000
3,500,000,000LRT VMT
Person -
CAPACITY
AnnualLIFT VMT
Person -
CAPACITY
Annual
Annual Rides Per Resident
Service Capacity Increase by 2014
0
500,000,000
1,000,000,000
1,500,000,000
2,000,000,000
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
2021
2023
2025
2027
2029
2031
2033
2035
AnnualCom Rail VMT
Person -
CAPACITY
AnnualStreetcar VMT
Person -
CAPACITY
AnnualFreq Bus VMT
Person -
CAPACITY
Annual
Annual Rides Per Resident
Planning for a sustainable regionVehicle Miles Traveled
HCT System Plan Highlights
� Determining what
matters
� Process for prioritization
� Creating a dynamic
process for project
advancement
What Matters?
HCT Think TankHCT Think Tank
What Matters?
HCT Think TankHCT Think Tank
What Matters?
Public Engagement
What Matters?
What Matters?
What Matters?
What Matters?
Local Aspirations
What Matters?
Local Aspirations – Criterion Index Tool
What Matters?
Local Aspirations – Digital Charrettes
What Matters?
Evaluating
Opportunities
Possibilities…
Round I Screening
• Current and future ridership potential
• Connectivity & system benefit
• Cost &corridor availability
• Environment constraints• Environment constraints
• Equity
• Congestion
• Alignment with 2040 Growth Concept
• Transit origins and destinations
Planning for a sustainable region
Corridor map
Multiple Account Evaluation (MAE)
• Adopted from United Kingdom
• New Approach To Transport Appraisal (NATA)
• Multiple “benefit accounts” considered• Multiple “benefit accounts” considered
• Criteria selected based on local conditions/values
Applying the MAE
• Organized into three “accounts” that
correspond to the outcomes-based RTP
evaluation approach:
25 Evaluation CriteriaCommunity Environment Economy Deliverability
C1: Supportiveness of Existing Land Uses
C2: Local Aspirations
C3: Placemaking and Urban Form
C4: Ridership Generators
C5: Support of regional 2040 Growth Concept
C6: Integration with Regional Transit System (Addressed in White Paper)
EN1: Reduction in Emissions and Disturbance
EN2: Risk of Natural Resource Disturbance
EN3: Risk of 4(f) Resource Disturbance (Addressed in White
EC1: Transportation Efficiency (Operator –cost per rider)
EC2: Transportation Efficiency (System annualized capital & operating cost per rider)
D1: Total Project Capital Cost (Exclusive & Non-Exclusive ROW Options)
D2: Capital Cost Per Mile (Exclusive & Non-Exclusive ROW Options) (Addressed in White Paper)
C7: Integration with Other Road Uses
C8: Congestion Avoidance Benefit
C9: Equity Benefit
C10: Health (Promotion of Physical Activity)
C11: Safety and Security (Addressed in
White Paper)
C12: Housing + Transportation Affordability Benefit
C13: Transportation Efficiency (User Travel Time Savings)
(Addressed in White
Paper) EC3: Economic Competitiveness (Change in employment served)
EC4: Rebuilding/ Redevelopment Opportunity (vacant and redevelopableland)
Options)
D3: Operating & Maintenance Cost
D4: Total Corridor Ridership
D5: Funding Potential
MAE Matrix
Priority Tiers• Near Term Regional Priorities
Priority Tiers• Next Phase Regional Priorities
Priority Tiers• Developing Regional Priorities
Priority Tiers• Vision Corridors
Selecting the Next 30 Year Priorities
• Identifies which near-term regional priority corridor(s) should advance toward implementation
• Delineates a process by which potential HCT corridors can move closer to implementation,
System Expansion Policy
corridors can move closer to implementation, advancing from one tier to the next through a set of coordinated Metro and local jurisdiction actions.
MAE Evaluation
Rewarding Performance
• Supportive Land Use
• Station Context
• Urban Form
• Leadership
• Connectivity• Connectivity
• Housing Needs
• Financial Capacity
• Mobility Corridors
• RTP triple bottom line approach guides MAE evaluation
• MAE outcomes captured in SEP target areas
Target Score Target
Score
Minimum
Score
Meets
Minimum
Transit Supportive Land Use X 22 11 Y/N
Station Context & Urban Form X 28 17 Y/N
Community Support X 8 4 Y/N
Political Leadership/Partnerships X 16 8 Y/N
Scorecard Approach
Political Leadership/Partnerships X 16 8 Y/N
Regional Transit Network
Connectivity
X 6 3 Y/N
Housing Needs Supportiveness X 14 7 Y/N
Financial Capacity X 36 16 Y/N
Integrated Transportation System
Development
X 1 1 Y/N
Conceptual: Still under development
• Local jurisdictions required to form Corridor Working Group to advance project
• Requires determination of corridor problem statement, mode selection and concept station areas
Focus on Corridors
• Focus on corridors encourages:
– Development of complementary station types
– Balance of access and destination uses
– Density trades
Station A Station B Station C
Transit Supportive Land Use Criterion
½ mile
buffer of
station area
Potential
alignments
• Examine current and future land uses used to determine
corridor readiness and appropriate mode
• On-the-ground land uses are more critical as a project
approaches implementation phases
Regional Project Priority Tier On-Ground Land
Use
Zoned Land Use
Near Term 80% 20%
Transit Supportive Land Use Criterion
Next Phase 60% 40%
Developing 40% 60%
Vision 20% 80%
Urban Form (Streets)
Sidewalk Coverage: Percent of Streets with Existing or Programmed Sidewalks within ½ Mile of Concept Station Areas
• 75%+ = 6
• 50-74% = 4
• 25-49% = 2
• 0-24% = 0
Example: Urban Form - Streets
Bicycle Facility Coverage: Percent of Arterials and Collectors (entering station area) with Existing or Programmed On-Street Bike Lanes or Parallel Bike Facilities within 2 miles of Concept Station Areas
• 75%+ = 6
• 50-74% = 4
• 25-49% = 2
• 0-24% = 0
Conceptual: Still under development
Financial Capacity
Availability of local funding mechanisms: Credit given for any of the following mechanisms in place in corridor
• Urban renewal area = 2
• Tax increment financing= 2
• Local improvement district (LID) = 2
• Other proven funding mechanism = 2
Example: Financial Capacity
Operating Subsidies Identified: Project specific operating subsidies/revenues beyond traditional local/regional sources identified to support operations
• 20%+ of annual operating cost = 6
• 10 – 19% of annual operating cost = 4
• 1 – 9% of annual operating cost = 2
• 0% of annual operating cost = 0
Conceptual: Still under development
A virtuous cycle….
HCT System Plan Outcomes
• Strategies that support High Capacity Transit investments, ALSO:
– Create vibrant communities
– Encourage active transportation
– Reduce air/water pollution and reduce GHGs
Making the Greatest Place Values
– Reduce air/water pollution and reduce GHGs
– Support economic prosperity
– Provide safe and reliable transportation
– Enable equity of resource distribution and access
Local ProsperityEconomy &
Financial Sustainability
• Portland residents are 2
times more likely to use times more likely to use
transit; 7 times more
likely to bicycle
- Joe Cortright, Portland’s
Green Dividend
Cost to own and operate a car - $9,000
Transit System FinanceEconomy &
Financial Sustainability
Co
st p
er
bo
ard
ing
Co
st p
er
bo
ard
ing
Boarding rides per hour
Transit System UseEconomy &
Financial Sustainability
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
• For the same amount
of operating funds:
LRTFreq
Bus Mix
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
Additional AWD Boardings
of operating funds:
– 26 miles of LRT
– Or 148 miles of
Frequent Bus
– Or 15 miles of LRT & 75
miles of Frequent Bus
Vibrant NeighborhoodsCommunity Form and
Vitality
NW 23rdNW 23rd
HillsboroSellwood
Trips Not TakenCommunity Form and
Vitality
Environment & Climate
Change
Team Effort
Metro Lead Council: Carlotta Collette
Metro Project Manager: Tony Mendoza
Nelson\Nygaard Team Partners:
• Stear Davies Gleave
• HNTB• HNTB
• John Parker Consulting
• Criterion Planners
Public Involvement Team:
• CH2M Hill
• Jeanne Lawson Associates
Thank You
Thomas Brennan
Principal
Nelson\Nygaard
503.228.2152503.228.2152
N\N is hosting a Cocktail Party
Thursday 5th 5:30- 7:30
RIGHT NEXT DOOR