21
Ramtin Soroush Mark Villamin Chung Long Wong Sean Young BUSM 1100 002 Langara College March 29, 2009

MEGA brands

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: MEGA brands

Ramtin SoroushMark Villamin

Chung Long WongSean Young

BUSM 1100 – 002Langara CollegeMarch 29, 2009

Page 2: MEGA brands

History 1967: Created by Victor and Rita Bertrand. Named Ritvik

Toys Inc.

1998: Amalgamated with Ritvik Holdings Inc.

2002: Name changed to MEGA Bloks Inc.

2006: Name changes to MEGA Brands Inc. after acquisition of various other brand names

Page 3: MEGA brands

What do they do? Market products under various brand names

Invest 3-4% of sales to drive innovation

Manufactures and distributes toys as well as office supplies for children and businesses

Page 4: MEGA brands

MEGA Brands’ International Divisional Structure

President & CEO - Marc Bertrand

Chief Innovation Officer - Vic Bertrand

Executive VP & CFO - Alain Tanguay

Executive VP & Chief Operations Officer - Anthony Bazan

President, Toys - Gerardo Yepez Reyna

President, Stationery & Activities - Al Hunyadi

Executive VP & Chief Marketing Officer - Kathleen Campisano

VP International - Michel Moggio

Page 5: MEGA brands

Social Responsibility Programs Developed safety standards

Worked with leading safety testing authorities

Implemented a zero-defects program

Planned safety programs

Page 6: MEGA brands

Defensive Stance Subject of 2 voluntary product recalls

Uncooperative with government

Violated the terms of one of the recalls

Improper follow-up after recall

Page 7: MEGA brands

Size and Location 6000 employees

Based in Canada

Have influence worldwide

Outsourced manufacturing in China

Page 8: MEGA brands

Industry and Competitors

Toy industry

Because of MEGA Bloks, their natural competitor is Lego

Other top competitors are Hasbro and Mattel

Page 9: MEGA brands

Customers and Benefits/Value Provided

Customers are families with young children

Contribute to development of growing children

Their mission benefits and places children first

Page 10: MEGA brands

Special Employee Program Created in year 2007

Extended training for qualified young employees

Create and maintain existing jobs

Sufficiently funded

Page 11: MEGA brands

Capital Structure Stocks: Common Stocks

Bonds: None

Utilize Equity Financing

Primary Capital needs are flexible, varying depending on the situation

Page 12: MEGA brands

Growing? Profitable? Sales of stationery and activity branches

Relocated/outsourced manufacturing

Partnership with Intertek

multi-year licensing deal with Nickelodeon and Viacom consumer products

licensing pact with Marvel

Net Loss of: $97,136

Page 13: MEGA brands

Short-Term Solvency and Activity Ratio

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

2006 2005 2004 2003

Rat

io

Years

Solvency and Activity Ratio

Short-Term Solvency

Activity

Page 14: MEGA brands

Solvency & Activity Comparison 2006

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Short-Term Solvency Activity

Rat

io

Short-Term and Activity Comparison

Industry Average

Mega Brands

Page 15: MEGA brands

Profitability Ratios

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

2006 2005 2004 2003

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Year

Profitability Ratios

Return on Equity %

Return on Sales %

Page 16: MEGA brands

Profitability Comparison 2006

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%

14.00%

16.00%

Return on Equity % Return on Sales %

PEr

can

tage

Profitability

Industry Average

Mega Brands

Page 17: MEGA brands

Earnings per share

$0.00

$0.20

$0.40

$0.60

$0.80

$1.00

$1.20

$1.40

2006 2005 2004 2003

Do

llar

Years

Earnings per share

Earnings per share

Page 18: MEGA brands

Earnings per share Comparison 2006

$0.00

$0.20

$0.40

$0.60

$0.80

$1.00

$1.20

$1.40

$1.60

$1.80

Industry Average Mega Brands

Do

llar

Earning per Share

Page 19: MEGA brands

Long-term Solvency

$0.00

$0.50

$1.00

$1.50

$2.00

$2.50

2006 2005 2004 2003

Do

llar

rati

o

Years

Long-Term Solvency Ratio

Long-Term Solvency

Page 20: MEGA brands

Long-term Solvency Comparison 2006

$0.00

$0.50

$1.00

$1.50

$2.00

$2.50

Do

llar

Long-Term Solvency Comparison

Industry Average

Mega Brand

Page 21: MEGA brands

Conclusion MEGA Brands’ long journey

Implementation of safety protocols

Employee programs

Growth

Ratios

Return to competitive status