21
Marketing Misalignment: Missing The Mark on Engagement

Marketing Misalignment

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This webinar will look at the breakdown in engagement between the changing B2B buyer and the marketers who are moving too slowly to respond to their changing behaviors. The presentation will feature side by side analysis of two recent studies which looked at the shifting influences and patterns of B2B buyers and a follow up study to gauge how marketers are changing their strategies and tactics to better-engage with the new behavior.

Citation preview

Page 1: Marketing Misalignment

Marketing Misalignment: Missing The Mark on

Engagement

Page 2: Marketing Misalignment

Welcome Webinar AttendeesYour GoToWebinar Attendee Viewer is made of 2 parts:

1. Viewer Window 2. Control Panel

Type your question here

Follow today’s webinar discussion on Twitter, #mktgmisaligned

Page 3: Marketing Misalignment

Panelists

Andrew GaffneyPublisherDemandGen Report

Matt WestDirector of Marketing ProgramsGenius.com

Page 4: Marketing Misalignment

Areas of Misalignment

1) Engaging Through Cold Calls, Reliance on Sales to Drive Early Stage Engagement

2) Gaps in Content Mapping

3) Lack of Formal Social Strategy

4) Inability to Measure Emerging Channel

Page 5: Marketing Misalignment

2 Views of Engagement

The Buyer’s View

• Only 10% of recent buyers said they were contacted cold by the solution provider they chose

Marketer’s Reality• 35% were attributed to

cold call from sales was the initial engagement in recent customer wins

• 50% responded to marketing campaign or website visit

Page 6: Marketing Misalignment

First point of contact/initial engagement made with recent customers

Sales team contacted prospect via cold call

Prospect contacted our team after visiting our web site.

Prospect contacted us directly following research

Our rep chatted with them via live chat

Prospect responded to a marketing campaign

Connected via social media

Page 7: Marketing Misalignment

Shifts In Influences

The Buyer’s View

• Top 3 Influences Ranked by Buyers:

1) Search

2) Vendor Website

3) White papers/Ebooks

Marketer’s Perception• Top 3 Influences Ranked

by Marketers

1) Direct Contact from a Sales Rep

2) Vendor Website

3) Conferences/Tradeshows

Page 8: Marketing Misalignment

Missing The Mark On Content

The Buyer’s View• 93% of recent buyers

said the solution provider they chose supplied ample content to navigate through each phase of the buying process

The Marketer’s Reality• Only half (50%) of

Marketers said they are currently mapping content offers to buying needs at different phases of the funnel

Page 9: Marketing Misalignment

Mapping Content

Who They AreHow they digest content

Behavior

Content

Where they are in the buying Process

Page 10: Marketing Misalignment

Social Signals

The Buyer’s View

• 65% of buyers indicated they used social media in their research and vendor selection process

Marketer’s Reality• 62% of marketers DO NOT

have budget for social media initiatives

• 66% of marketers said social media is a formal part of their marketing strategy

Page 11: Marketing Misalignment

Socialization Of Buying

41% followed discussions to learn more about topic

37% posted questions on social networking sites looking for suggestions/feedback

More than 20% connected directly with potential solution providers via social networking channels

Page 12: Marketing Misalignment

Socialization Of Buying 82% of marketers indicated only 1-5% of their

leads are coming through social media

12% indicated 5-15% of leads now coming via social media

4% generating 20% of leads or more

Page 13: Marketing Misalignment

Track Clicks Track Conversions Track ROI0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Missing The Mark On Measurement

Page 14: Marketing Misalignment

The New Image of Engagement

Drive to Website

Convert via form

Nurture

Alert Rep of Buying Behavior

Page 15: Marketing Misalignment

Increased Power of Peers

• Nearly 4 in 10 of buyers indicated they determined “the potential impact through other adopters and built a business case for immediate adoption,” then received approval although the project was unbudgeted.

Page 16: Marketing Misalignment

Increased Power of Peers

• 59% engaged with peers who addressed the challenge they were researching

• 48% followed industry conversations on topic

Page 17: Marketing Misalignment

The New Peer Influence

The Buyer’s View• 58% of buyers shared their

post purchase experiences and findings with other peers

• 68% shared experiences via 1:1 discussions

• Only 30% served as case study references

Marketer’s Perception• 53% sharing experiences

via 1:1 discussions• Believe 75% are serving as

case study references

Page 18: Marketing Misalignment

Reaching the 2.0 Buyer

• 66% of respondents indicated the “consistent and relevant communication provided by both the sales and marketing organizations” was a key influence in choosing that company as their solution provider.

Page 19: Marketing Misalignment

Key Takeaways

Give buyer more credit, engage on their levelDon’t rely on old world thinkingMap your content offers to buyer stagesEnable nurturing for longer sales cycles Increase social engagementAdd real measurement capabilities

Page 20: Marketing Misalignment

Thank you for attendingtoday’s webinar!

Andrew GaffneyEditorDemandGen [email protected]

Matt WestDirector of Marketing [email protected]

Page 21: Marketing Misalignment

Tune In For Part 2!

Marketing Misalignment: Part 2A Deep Dive Into Program Performance Improvement

Date: Wed., August 4th

Time: 1pm EST/10am PST

https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/139748762