13
Lost in Translation Lost in Translation Unique issues in tech vendor outsourcing Vinnie Mirchandani

Lost in Translation: Unique issues in tech vendor

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Lost in Translation: Unique issues in tech vendor

Lost in TranslationLost in Translation

Unique issues in tech vendor outsourcing

Vinnie Mirchandani

Page 2: Lost in Translation: Unique issues in tech vendor

Speaker ProfileSpeaker Profile• Ex Gartner analyst, PwC consultanty• Founder of Deal Architect, advisory firm which helps

buyers (corporations and vendors) in technology sourcing and negotiationssourcing and negotiations

• Over $ 5 billion in technology transaction experience• Writes two technology blogs – Deal Architect and

N Fl N R i hi h k ithNew Florence, New Renaissance which keep up with technology trends around world

• Exposure to number of global sourcing locations and g gissues

Page 3: Lost in Translation: Unique issues in tech vendor

30+ years of outsourcing has t ht f thitaught us a few things Whichgeography?

Inputs from multiple sourcesHR, legal, PR, others?

BCP, I.P protection, HR practices,

S i Communi- Detailed C V d D P tf li1 2 3 4 5 6 7

g g p yWhich vendor types?

Which roles tooutsource:

g HR practices, reference calls

Planning Sourcingstrategy

Communications Strategy

Detailed Require-ments

ComposeRFP

Vendor Duediligence

PortfolioRefinement

P G V d8 9 11 12 1310

outsource:Maintenance?QA?Innovation?

Processmanage-

ment

Govern-ance

models

Detailed Negotiations

Impactanalysis

Statementsof work

Vendormanage-

ment

Onsite, offsite,offshore transition plans

Rates, SLAs,Staff levels, staff mix

Page 4: Lost in Translation: Unique issues in tech vendor

Vendor CTO versus Corporate CIO O t iCIO Outsourcing

• 5 years versus 30+ years outsourcing experiencey y g p• Tech vertical less than 5% of total outsourcing• Still grudging acceptance by vendor CTOs, vendor

procurement/contracting maturity weak captives stillprocurement/contracting maturity weak – captives still preferred model

• Supplier/location decisions often driven by VC l ti hi “ t i ti ” f t t f lrelationships or “repatriation” factors, not formal

evaluations• Niche, but geographically broader supplier baseg g y• More willing to look at newer talent models like

communities

Page 5: Lost in Translation: Unique issues in tech vendor

Tech talent poolsp• Till recently, tech sector has

lagged its customers in use of global labor poolsglobal labor pools

– GE and 70/70/70 – Several banks with thousands of head

count offshore• Changing rapidly• Changing rapidly

– Most startups last few years have had global delivery baked in to business plans

– IBM Accenture Oracle – 3 of the biggestIBM, Accenture, Oracle 3 of the biggest employers in India now

• But preference for captives– In most sectors, outsourced global

resources far exceed captive resourcesresources far exceed captive resources– In tech, reverse e.g. Oracle bought out

outsource contracts after PeopleSoft acquisition

Page 6: Lost in Translation: Unique issues in tech vendor

Captives – the justifications and the realitiesand the realities

• Product is lifeblood– True, but focus on core, not context. Plenty of

development testing maintenance activities can bedevelopment, testing, maintenance activities can be outsourced

– Captives often run by executives whose prime qualification is they are repatriating to offshore location

• IP Risks of Outsourcing– Lots of contractual, tactical risk mitigation techniques g

have emerged• Large outsource margins

– Undocumented cost of slower ramp ups and recruiting challenges at captives

– Staff Productivity at captives often lags those of outsourcers Captives are also prime raiding ground foroutsourcers Captives are also prime raiding ground for product centric outsourcers

• Cultural differences with services firms– True of larger outsource firms, but specialists focused

on ISVs like Symphony and CSS are typically much more culturally aligned

• Most outsourcers leverage India which has• Most outsourcers leverage India which has turnover, inflation issues

– Plenty of E. European, China and S. American choices emerging

– Major outsourcers themselves hedging India bets

Page 7: Lost in Translation: Unique issues in tech vendor

Outsourcing – also hard work

• In spite of scale, economics an issue– Size, repetition economies not passed through, p p g– Reluctant automation

• Vendor Management not a core competence for most companies

– Takes governance, service level management and legal skill setsand legal skill sets

– Concern of getting “lost” in outsourcer’s list of customers

• Staffing inconsistency– Junior staff, typically lack of functional/process

skills rapid turnover in some marketsskills, rapid turnover in some markets– Core competence often IT support, not product

development• Outsourcing market itself in considerable

churnU ili i S S f i l ffi– Utility computing, SaaS, fractional staffing, service “productizing” expectations

– Global diversification a challenge for most outsourcers – considerable upheavals

Page 8: Lost in Translation: Unique issues in tech vendor

Too global for most vendors?1 S CType 1 – US Centric vendors Type 2 – Large India centric vendors

Type 3 – Mid-tier Indian/US Type 4 – Other country reps

Page 9: Lost in Translation: Unique issues in tech vendor

Next gen talent sourcingg g• Hybrid Outsourcing Models

– Build/Operate/Transfer – concept not new, but newer wrinkles emergingg g

– Hire to Spec options– “Rural” Sourcing as a option to get over

hassles of time zones, travel fatigue, accents• “Micro-nationals”

– Emergence of new start-ups with key executives who are nationals of different countries around the world. They then drive local talent sourcing

• CommunitiesCommunities– Open Source successes– SAP’s SDN – over million members. Q&A

response within 30 minutes. Shai Agassi: “I wish our support channels were that effective”

• Crowdsourcing– Amazon’s “Mechanical Turk”– uTest – open testing community

Page 10: Lost in Translation: Unique issues in tech vendor

Outsourcing in tech world often gets off to bad startoften gets off to bad start

• Religious war number 1g– Captive versus outsource

• Religious war number 2– Core versus context – what toCore versus context what to

keep in-house– Maintenance, QA, Innovation?

• Religious war number 3• Religious war number 3– Country choice – the

“repatriation” influence– Vendor choice – often pollutedVendor choice often polluted

by VC/partnering considerations

Page 11: Lost in Translation: Unique issues in tech vendor

And can end up with many points f f ilof failure

Someone’s second cousin’s outsourcing

Vague Statement ofWork Inadequate

Business Continuityand other Risks

S i Communi- Detailed C V d D P tf li1 2 3 4 5 6 7

cousin s outsourcing firm

Ill defined

Work. Inadequate Legal review

and other Risks

Planning Sourcingstrategy

Communications Strategy

Detailed Require-ments

ComposeRFP

Vendor Duediligence

PortfolioRefinement

P G V d8 9 11 12 1310

Ill defined scope

Processmanage-

ment

Govern-ance

models

Detailed Negotiations

Impactanalysis

Statementsof work

Vendormanage-

ment

“Twilight Time Zone”

Disappointing Economics

Page 12: Lost in Translation: Unique issues in tech vendor

SaaS and BPO will mature d t l t t t ivendor talent strategies

• As customers push SLAs, businessAs customers push SLAs, business continuity standards on SaaS vendors

• As software vendors partnerAs software vendors partner with/compete against BPO vendors

• As cloud computing becomes moreAs cloud computing becomes more pervasive

• Tech vendors will apply similar rigor toTech vendors will apply similar rigor to their own talent/outsourcing models

Page 13: Lost in Translation: Unique issues in tech vendor

In SummaryIn Summary

• Easy to point fingers on why talentEasy to point fingers on why talent strategies and outsourcing contracts fail

• The reality is there are too many pathsThe reality is there are too many paths and choices and not enough experience in the communityy

• Tech world is trying to learn in 5 years what the corporate world has been ptrying for 30+ years