Upload
monster12
View
686
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
RESILIENT
JPMorgan High Yield Conference
March 3, 2010
2
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements made by representatives of LINN Energy, LLC during the course of this presentation that
are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. These statements are based on certain
assumptions and expectations made by the Company which reflect management’s experience,
estimates and perception of historical trends, current conditions, anticipated future developments and
other factors believed to be appropriate. Such statements are subject to a number of assumptions,
risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, which may cause
actual results to differ materially from those implied or anticipated in the forward-looking statements.
These include risks relating to financial performance and results, our indebtedness under our credit
facility, availability of sufficient cash flow to pay distributions and execute our business plan, prices
and demand for gas, oil and natural gas liquids, our ability to replace reserves and efficiently develop
our current reserves, our ability to make acquisitions on economically acceptable terms, and other
important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated or implied
in the forward-looking statements. See “Risk Factors” in the Company’s 2009 Annual Report on Form
10-K, and any other public filings and press releases. LINN Energy undertakes no obligation to
publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information or future
events. This presentation has been prepared as of February 25, 2010.
LINN Energy’s mission is to acquire, develop
and maximize cash flow from a growing portfolio of
long-life oil and natural gas assets.
4
LINN Overview
Note: Market data as of February 25, 2010 (LINE closing price of $26.62). All operational and reserve data as of December 31, 2009. Pro forma for $154.5 million acquisition.
(1) Based on proved reserves.
(2) Based on mid-point of guidance estimates announced on February 25, 2010.
KS
Corporate
Headquarters
(Houston)
Division Office(Brea)
CA
TX
Division Office
(Oklahoma City)California
189 Bcfe proved reserves
11% of total reserves
93% liquids
OK
TX PanhandleGranite Wash
TX PanhandleShallow
Mid-Continent
1.5 Tcfe proved reserves
83% of total reserves
51% natural gas
NM
LINN Operations
Recent Acquisition Area
Oklahoma
Permian Basin
117 Bcfe proved reserves
6% of total reserves
86% liquids
Oil
30%
2010E Production
NGL
18%
Gas
52%
Reserves by Category
22 year reserve life index (2)
Reserves by Commodity
NGL
19%
1.8 Tcfe of proved reserves
Oil
37%
220 MMcfe/d (2)
Proved
Developed72%
Proved
Undeveloped28%
Gas
44%
Top 25 largest domestic independent oil & gas
company and largest public E&P MLP/LLC (1)
Founded in 2003, IPO in 2006 (Nasdaq: LINE)
Equity market cap $3.5 billion
Total net debt $1.7 billion
Enterprise value $5.2 billion
Large, long-life diversified reserve base
1.8 Tcfe total proved reserves
72% proved developed
56% oil and NGL’s / 44% gas
22 year reserve-life index
Large inventory of lower risk development
opportunities
Over 4,200 engineered drilling locations;
multiple years at current drilling pace
PUD 0.5 Tcfe
High-confidence inventory 1.3 Tcfe
Total low-risk inventory 1.8 Tcfe
Total resource potential of 4.1-5.1 Tcfe
5
Mature U.S. oil and natural gas basins provide significant opportunity for
future growth and consolidation
LINN’s strategy is to :
Acquire mature oil and natural gas properties with the appropriate attributes
Asset Attributes
• Stable, long-life production
• High percentage of PDP
• Shallow decline
• Long reserve-life index
• Low-risk, low-cost repeatable drilling
Efficiently operate and develop acquired properties
Reduce commodity price and interest rate risk through hedging
Return cash flow through the form of a distribution payment to unitholders
LINN’s Acquisition Strategy
6
Attractive Acquisition Margins
(1) Represents weighted average blended five year forward oil and gas strip prices as of the closing date of acquisitions completed during the year. Source: Bloomberg.
Despite rising acquisition costs, acquisition margins remain strong
$4.65 $4.82
$6.42
$9.98
$7.92
$14.34 $13.92
$14.44
$0.83 $0.68
$2.10 $1.61
$2.41 $1.58 $1.91 $2.11
$4.32
$8.37 $5.51
$12.76 $12.02
$12.33
$0.00
$2.00
$4.00
$6.00
$8.00
$10.00
$12.00
$14.00
$16.00
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
NYMEX Five Year Forward Strip ($ per Mcfe) (1)
LINN Weighted Average Acquisition Cost ($ per Mcfe)
$3.82 $4.14
7
Year End 2009 Highlights
Total unitholder return of more than 100 percent
Record adjusted EBITDA of $566 million
Record adjusted net income of $1.73 per unit for 2009
Attractive finding and development cost of $1.59 per Mcfe and
112 percent of production replaced through the drillbit (1)
Increase in proved reserves of 3 percent to 1,712 Bcfe
100% hedged on an equivalent basis through 2011, 65% of oil
hedged in 2012 and 2013
(1) Excluding price revisions.
8
0 7,822’
FEET
DYCO
STILES RANCH
FRYE
RANCH
Wheeler County
IP: 21.0 MMcfe/d
IP: 14.9 MMcfe/d
IP: 25.0 MMcfe/d
Hemphill County
IP: 22.3 MMcfe/d
IP: 23.8 MMcfe/d
IP: 11.8 MMcfe/d
Proposed Location
Currently Drilling
Waiting on Completion
Producing Well
LINN Operated
Non- Operated
Industry Activity
LINN Activity
Granite Wash – Horizontal Activity
IP: 21.0 MMcfe/d
LINN Operated
(spud March 2010)
Tom Puryear 5-28H
(Non-operated)
IP: 17.0 MMcfe/d
IP: 12.0 MMcef/d
IP: 21.0 MMcfe/d
LINN Acreage Gross Net
Greater Stiles Ranch ~23,000 ~12,000
Industry Horizontal Activity
Rigs Operating 14
Wells Drilled 38
Waiting on Completion 9
Note: Based on public and available industry data.
IP: 18.6 MMcfe/d IP: 20.0 MMcfe/d
(Greater Stiles Ranch)
9
Granite Wash – Trend Area
LINN Acreage Gross Net Horizontal
Locations
Texas G.W. Area ~68,000 ~48,000 100+
Oklahoma G.W. Area ~100,000 ~25,000 ?
Total ~168,000 ~73,000 100+
Note: Acreage totals reflect only what acreage is shown in the gray area on the Granite Wash regional map.
Buffalo Wallow - 2 Step
7th Step - Mendota
Colony Granite WashChesapeake
Penn Virginia
Mayfield
ROBERTSHEMPHILL
GRAY
WHEELER
RODGER MILLS
BECKHAM
ELLIS
WASHITA
CUSTER
CADDO
BLAINE
DEWEY
` LINN Acreage
TEXAS
OKLAHOMA
Greater Stiles RanchDevon, Forest
Newfield, Questar
TX
OK
Granite Wash trend also extends into Oklahoma
LINN’s potential from its Oklahoma acreage is not included in the estimated 100 locations
10
Granite Wash / Atoka Wash Stratigraphy
Multiple laterals per location significantly increase LINN’s horizontal inventory
Carr
Britt
“A”
“A”
thru “C"
PRODUCING
ZONES
“B”
“C”
“D”
“E”
“F”
G
R
A
N
I
T
E
W
A
S
H
WAS
H
A
TOK
A
LATERAL BOREHOLES
MIDDLE
LOWER
UPPER
LOWER
UPPER
Lwr “C”
thru “E"
12,000’
15,000’
3,000’
Interval
Financial Overview
12
Low risk asset base (1)
1.8 Tcfe of proved reserves
22 year reserve life
72% proved developed
Financial flexibility
Credit facility with $1.64 billion borrowing base (August 2012)
In 2009, 2 public equity offerings and bond offering for gross proceeds of $542 million
Borrowing capacity, including available cash, of ~$427 million at January 31, 2010
High levels of hedging
~100% of current production hedged through 2011, 65% of oil hedged in 2012 and 2013
~100% of Mid-Continent basis hedged through 2011
~100% of floating interest rate expense hedged through 2013
Financial Strength
(1) Reserve data as of December 31, 2009. Pro forma for $154.5 million acquisition.
13
Note: Reserve data as of December 31, 2009. Reserves pro forma for $154.5 million acquisition.
(1) Based on mid-point of guidance estimates announced on February 25, 2010.
(2) Includes the effects of the Company’s interest rate hedges.
Financial Flexibility
LINN is well positioned for future acquisitions and growth opportunities
Credit Profile – 1/31/10
($ in millions, unless otherwise indicated)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Credit Facility
9 7/8% Senior Notes due 2018
Total Debt
Operating Metrics
Adjusted EBITDA (1) ($ millions)
Proved Reserves (Bcfe)
Proved Developed Reserves (Bcfe)
Credit Metrics
Total Net Debt / Proved Reserves ($/Mcfe)
Total Net Debt / Proved Developed Reserves ($/Mcfe)
Total Net Debt / Adjusted EBITDA (1)
Adjusted EBITDA / Interest Expense (1) (2)
Long-Term Debt
11 3/4% Senior Notes due 2017
$5
251
$1,704
$0.95
$1.33
3.0x
4.1x
$1,215
238
1,785
$570
1,282
14
$90.00 $90.00 $100.00 $100.00
$90.00 $90.00
$110.00 $75.00
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
2010 2011 2012 2013
Vo
lum
e (
MB
bls
)
50%48%
$99.68 $82.50
Puts provide upside on hedged volumes Puts and collars provide upside on
hedged volumes
Gas Positions Oil Positions
Current Hedge Position
$9.50
$8.90
$8.84
$8.11
0.0
8.0
16.0
24.0
32.0
40.0
48.0
56.0
64.0
2010 2011
Vo
lum
e (
Bc
f)
Swaps Puts (1)
31%
39%
$8.66
$9.25
Percent Puts (2)
Approximately 100% hedged through 2011 provides cash flow stability
(1) Includes puts which settle on the Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Index (PEPL) to hedge basis differential associated with gas production in the Mid-Continent.
(2) Calculated as percentage of hedged volume in the form of puts.
(3) As presented in the table above, the Company has outstanding fixed price oil swaps on 7,250 Bbls per day at a price of $100.00 per Bbl for the years ending December 31, 2012, and
December 31, 2013. The Company has derivative contracts that extend the swaps for each of the years ending December 31, 2014, December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2016, if
the counterparties determine that the strike prices are in-the-money on a designated date in each respective preceding year. The extension for each year is exercisable without
respect to the other years.
(4) Includes collars with floor / ceiling prices of $90.00 / $112.00 and $90.00 / $112.25 on 250 MBbls and 276 MBbls of oil for FY 2010-FY 2011, respectively.
Percent Puts (2)Swaps (3) Collars (4) Puts (2)
15
100%106%
43%
39%
30%
58%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
FY 2010E FY 2011E
LINE Swaps
% P
rod
uc
tio
n H
ed
ge
d
Note: 2010E production held flat through 2011E. LINN’s 2010E production based on mid-point of 2010E guidance announced on February 25, 2010. Source: Company filings and
press releases. E&P Peer Group includes: Berry Petroleum, Comstock Resources, Encore Acquisition, Mariner Energy, Petrohawk, Quicksilver Resources, SandRidge Energy,
Swift Energy and Whiting Petroleum.
(1) 2010E peer group production per Wall Street research. Hedge data based on publicly available data.
LINE PutsLINE Collars
LINN Production Hedged vs. Peers
Hedged much more than peers while still preserving upside potential
Average Production Hedged Q4 09 (1)
16
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
1/13/06 7/20/06 1/24/07 7/31/07 2/4/08 8/10/08 2/14/09 8/21/09 2/25/10
LINE Total Return LINE Price Appreciation S&P Mid-Cap E&P Index S&P 500 Index
LINN Historical Return
Note: Market data as of February 25, 2010 (LINE closing price of $26.62). Source: Bloomberg.
LINN Total Return and Stock Price Appreciation (LINE IPO – 2/25/10)
26.76%
-6.30%
89.53%
22.48%
17
E&P Peer Group Yield
Note: As of February 26, 2010
LINN’s bonds still represent good relative value
6.92%7.01%
7.88%8.17%8.21%8.27%
8.49%8.58%8.60%8.68%8.80%
8.93%9.00%
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
7.00%
8.00%
9.00%
10.00%
Quicksilver
(KWK)
(B3/B-)
Swift
(SFY)
(B3/BB-)
Encore
(EAC)
(B1/B)
Berry
(BRY)
(B3/B)
SandRidge
(SD)
(B3/B+)
Atlas
(ATN)
(B3/B+)
Whiting
(WLL)
(B1/BB)
9.875%
(LINE)
(B3/B-)
Petrohawk
(HK)
(B3/B)
Comstock
(CRK)
(B2/B)
Mariner
(ME)
(B3/B+)
11.75%
(LINE)
(B3/B-)
Average
LINN Energy’s mission is to acquire, develop
and maximize cash flow from a growing portfolio of
long-life oil and natural gas assets.
Appendix
20
The Company defines adjusted EBITDA as income (loss) from continuing operations plus the following adjustments: Net operating cash flow from acquisitions and divestitures, effective date through closing date; Interest expense; Depreciation, depletion and amortization; Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets; Write-off of deferred financing fees and other; (Gain) loss on sale of assets, net; Unrealized (gain) loss on commodity derivatives; Unrealized (gain) loss on interest rate derivatives; Realized (gain) loss on interest rate derivatives; Realized (gain) loss on canceled derivatives; Unit-based compensation expenses;
Exploration costs; and Income tax (benefit) expense.
Adjusted EBITDA is a measure used by Company management to indicate (prior to the establishment of any reserves by its Board of Directors) the cash distributions the Company expects to pay unitholders. Adjusted EBITDA is also a quantitative measure used throughout the investment community with respect to publicly-traded partnerships and limited liability companies.
Adjusted net income is a performance measure used by Company management to evaluate its operational performance from oil and natural gas properties, prior to derivative gains and losses, impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets and (gain) loss on sale of assets, net.
Historical Financial StatementsReconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
21
The following presents a reconciliation of income (loss) from continuing operations
to adjusted EBITDA:
Historical Financial StatementsAdjusted EBITDA
Three Months EndedDecember 31,
Year EndedDecember 31,
2009 2008 2009 2008
(in thousands)
Income (loss) from continuing operations $ (65,965) $ 888,054 $ (295,841) $ 825,657Plus:
Net operating cash flow from acquisitions and divestitures, effective date through closing date
(1)115 (872) 3,708 3,436
Interest expense, cash 23,195 16,782 74,185 81,704Interest expense, noncash 3,810 6,536 18,516 12,813Depreciation, depletion and amortization 49,848 46,834 201,782 194,093Impairment of goodwill and long -lived assets — 50,505 — 50,505Write-off of deferred financing fees and other — — 204 6,728(Gain) loss on sale of assets, net 239 (98,763) (23,051) (98,763)Unrealized (gain) loss on commodity
derivatives 128,652 (884,865) 591,379 (734,732)Unrealized (gain) loss on interest rate
derivatives (10,261) 44,634 (16,588) 50,638Realized loss on interest rate derivatives
(2)11,252 4,557 42,881 16,036
Realized (gain) loss on canceled derivatives — — (48,977) 81,358Unit-based compensation expenses 3,616 3,301 15,089 14,699Exploration costs 2,544 4,654 7,169 7,603Income tax (benefit) expense (4,600) 1,665 (4,221) 2,712
Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations $ 142,445 $ 83,022 $ 566,235 $ 514,487
Includes net operating cash flow from acquisitions and divestitures.
During 2009, the Company revised its definition of adjusted EBITDA to include realized (gains) losses on interest rate derivatives in order to match the related interest expense.
Amounts reported in adjusted EBITDA for all prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. This reclassification had no effect on the Company’s
reported net income.
(1)
(2)
22
Adjusted net income (a non-GAAP financial measure), as defined by the Company, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Therefore, adjusted net income should be considered in conjunction with net income from continuing operations and other performance measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted net income should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for GAAP measures, such as net income or any other GAAP measure of liquidity or financial performance. Adjusted net income is a performance measure used by management to evaluate the Company’s operational performance from oil and natural gas properties, prior to derivative gains and losses, impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets and (gain) loss on sale of assets, net.
The following presents a reconciliation of income (loss) from continuing operations to adjusted net income:
Three Months Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
2009 2008 2009 2008
(in thousands, except per unit amounts) Income (loss) from continuing operations $ (65,965) $ 888,054 $ (295,841) $ 825,657 Plus:
Unrealized (gain) loss on commodity derivatives 128,652 (884,865) 591,379 (734,732) Unrealized (gain) loss on interest rate derivatives (10,261) 44,634 (16,588) 50,638 Realized (gain) loss on canceled derivatives — — (48,977) 81,358 Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets — 50,505 — 50,505 (Gain) loss on sale of assets, net 239 (98,763) (23,051) (98,763)
Adjusted net income from continuing operations $ 52,665 $ (435) $ 206,922 $ 174,663
Income (loss) from continuing operations per
unit – basic $ (0.52) $ 7.72 $ (2.48) $ 7.18 Plus, per unit:
Unrealized (gain) loss on commodity derivatives 1.01 (7.69) 4.95 (6.39) Unrealized (gain) loss on interest rate derivatives (0.08) 0.39 (0.14) 0.44 Realized (gain) loss on canceled derivatives — — (0.41) 0.71 Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets — 0.44 — 0.44
(Gain) loss on sale of assets, net — (0.86) (0.19) (0.86)
Adjusted net income from continuing operations per unit – basic $ 0.41 $ — $ 1.73 $ 1.52
The following presents a reconciliation of income (loss) from continuing operations
to adjusted net income:
Historical Financial StatementsAdjusted Net Income
23
Reserve Replacement / F&D CalculationsReconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
Year Ended December 31,
2009 2008
Costs incurred – continuing operations (in thousands): Costs incurred in oil and natural gas property acquisition, exploration
and development $ 258,105 $ 900,256 Less:
Asset retirement obligation costs (371) (680) Property acquisition costs (115,929) (584,630)
Oil and natural gas capital costs expended, excluding acquisitions $ 141,805 $ 314,946
Reserve data – continuing operations (MMcfe):
Purchase of minerals in place 61,684 368,136 Extensions, discoveries and other additions 50,416 228,083 Add:
Revisions of previous estimates – workover activities and other 38,665 (9,571)
Annual additions, excluding price-related revisions 150,765 586,648
Less: Purchase of minerals in place (61,684) (368,136)
Annual additions, excluding price-related revisions and acquisitions 89,081 218,512
Annual production – continuing operations (MMcfe) 79,580 77,548
Reserve replacement metrics – continuing operations:
Reserve replacement cost per Mcfe (1)
$ 1.71 $ 1.53 Reserve replacement ratio
(2) 189% 756%
Finding and development cost from the drillbit per Mcfe (3)
$ 1.59 $ 1.44 Drillbit reserve replacement ratio
(4) 112% 282%
(1) (Oil and natural gas capital costs expended) divided by (Annual additions, excluding price-related revisions)
(2) (Annual additions, excluding price-related revisions) divided by (Annual production)
(3) (Oil and natural gas capital costs expended, excluding acquisitions) divided by (Annual additions, excluding price-related revisions and acquisitions)
(4) (Annual additions, excluding price-related revisions and acquisitions) divided by (Annual production)
24
Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors — The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (―SEC‖) permits oil and gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only proved reserves that a company has demonstrated by actual production or conclusi ve formation tests to be economically and legally producible under existing economic and operating conditions. Any reserve estimate s provided in this presentation that are not specifically designated as being estimates of proved reserves may include not o nly proved reserves, but also other categories of reserves that the SEC's guidelines strictly prohibit the Company from including in filings with the SEC. Investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in the Company’s Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, available from the Company at 600 Travis, Suite 5100, Houston, Texas 77002 (Attn: Investor Relations). You can also obtain this report from the SEC by calling 1-800-SEC-0330 or from the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.