31
1 A Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?” Anthony Wong MACS CP President Australian Computer Society SEARCC

Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

Citation preview

Page 1: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

1

A Legal Perspective on Information Management

“New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

Anthony Wong MACS CP

President

Australian Computer Society SEARCC

Page 2: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

2

South-East Asia Regional South-East Asia Regional Computer Confederation (SEARCCComputer Confederation (SEARCC))

Page 3: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

3

Joining the ranks of lawyers accountants and engineers

Page 4: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

4

Businesses and Government agencies are increasingly using social media (or Web 2.0) tools to communicate and interact

Records of value may be created by the use of social media tools. These records need to be captured and maintained

Use of third-party sites raises questions about the status of the records

Information residing or stored on third-party sites may not be regarded legally as property and e.g. consequently may not be a Australian Government record (Section 3 of the Archives Act 1983)

New Social Media –

The New Record Format?

Page 5: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

5

Social Media Tools

Common social media tools used today include: Blogs Wikis Social networking sites Instant messaging Social bookmarking Media sharing Collaborative editing sites

Page 6: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

6

New Social Media –

The New Record Format? Facebook, MySpace and online forums – the new

meeting place For conversations with friends, colleagues or

acquaintances in a casual setting But published online – in a more permanent form

copied by users stored in cache archived copies

No security measures are perfect

Page 7: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

7

Issues arising from New Social Media - Publication

Page 8: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

8

What law governs the New Media

Subject to the same laws Emerging laws and codes specific to the Internet and

new media Possibly the laws of other countries International law

Page 9: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

9

Social media and Australian Government records

Social media and the 'authentic record' Social media is dynamic. Its content is ever-changing and government information

may be taken up by others for use and reuse. It is therefore important to ensure that an accurate and authentic ‘original’ copy of information is captured and saved as a record.

Allocating responsibility for records capture Agency records management policy or agency policy on using social media should

also include advice about the information and records management obligations that accompany social media use. Web administrators may routinely capture records of website social media interactions, but the policy needs to make it clear when this routine capture may not be sufficient, and when individual authors have responsibility for capturing information from the social media tools that they use. Staff in the records management unit should be able to assist with these decisions.

From www.naa.gov.au/records-management/create-capture-describe/socialmedia/index.aspx

Page 10: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

10

Social media and Australian Government records

What social media interactions need to be captured? The same records management principles apply to social media content as to other

records created in the agency. Agency staff using social media tools for official purposes need to consider which records need to be captured to comply with agency records management policy, or discuss this with their records management unit.

Do records of all social media interaction need to be kept? Different information has different value and, therefore, different requirements for

creation, capture and retention. For example, usually spam may be disposed of immediately. However, more valuable social media records such as feedback about policy would need to be retained appropriately. The decision is not always clear cut, and a judgement must be made about the material’s relevance to agency business. Records management staff can advise on an agency’s information management needs.

From www.naa.gov.au/records-management/create-capture-describe/socialmedia/index.aspx

Page 11: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

11

User activated 'deletion' vs Disposal of Records

Deleted photos on Facebook accessible online for up to 30 months

Users who have kept the direct link to photos were able to still gain access

Facebook uses a content distribution network (CDN), which stores multiple copies of content on servers around the globe so that it can be accessible more quickly

SMH Ben Grubb October 13, 2010 - 4:22PM

Page 12: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

12

Half of second-hand mobilephones contain personal data

Private personal data remains on discarded mobile phones, with intimate photos and credit card numbers and pins

Half of 50 handsets bought from second-hand resellers on eBay contained personal messages or photos, according to exclusive research from the mobile and forensics experts Disklabs

"Data is more portable, more accessible, more widely disseminated and more numerous than ever before," said Ferguson. "We tend to place our faith in the technology that we use to access our data, we believe that when we hit delete the data is gone, and we believe that if we restrict the audience we share with that the data will not go any further. These beliefs are often misplaced - as that story testifies."

SMH October 13, 2010 - 11:56AM

Page 13: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

13

Evidence from recovered data

Page 14: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

14

Legal risk and admissibility of electronic documents and records

critical to establish a thorough records management system

necessary to provide documentary evidence if there is a business dispute

also to satisfy statutory requirements regarding the retention of records

are electronic documents sufficient?

Page 15: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

15

Section 48 Australian Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) –original document rule (Best Evidence Rule) abolished and copies are as good as the originals but must keep evidence of integrity of process used to produce the copy

Best Evidence Rule expunged in Federal, ACT, Tasmania, Victoria and NSW

Generally, Australian Electronic Transactions Act 1999 (Cth) production of documents– Section 11 Requirement to produce a document is met if the person produces an

electronic form of the document provided the conditions that a reliable means of assuring the integrity and ready accessibility and useability for subsequent reference are met

Electronic Evidence

Page 16: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

16

Australia First to Allow Service by Facebook

Page 17: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

17

Facebook used to serve paternity test order

Page 18: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

18

Facebook Sign Up – Terms & Privacy

Page 19: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

19

Website Terms & Conditions

‘This contract is subject to our standard terms and conditions’- chance to read it?

reference statement with hyperlink– reference statement linked to a page with terms and conditions

display terms at bottom of order form or page dialogue box–user scrolls through terms before

clicking ‘I agree’

Page 20: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

20

Terms and Conditions of use

Page 21: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

21

Jurisdiction Issues in relation to Social Media

Some of the challenges: Identifying the location where the alleged offence was

perpetrated (eg. using a computer where offender is located) and the location where the harm resulted (eg. victims or damage to computers)

Deciding which sovereign nation and courts should have jurisdiction over a case

Deciding which law applies to what conduct eg. IP infringement, privacy, defamation, spam, fraud and deception

Page 22: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

22

Jurisdiction

jurisdiction is dependent on the sovereignty of a government

concept evolved in relation to geographical boundaries or territories

on premise that each state or country has absolute power to control persons and things located within its boundaries or territories

internet challenges these territorially based principles

law re jurisdiction in cyberspace is unsettled

Page 23: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

23

Where is Facebook located?

Operates out of the US

No physical presence in Australia

Difficulties in accessing and discovery of documents as evidence

Page 24: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

24

Facebook

Page 25: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

25

Canberra on alert for WikiLeaks

WikiLeaks to release classified diplomatic cables

Leak will include millions of classfied documents

Cables could be about War in Iraq, Guantanamo

Saudi king urged US to attack Iran

WikiLeaks reveals Iraqi torture, deaths

WikiLeaks: China directed Google hacking

The Australian November 26, 2010

Page 26: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

26

Sony PlayStation Networkuser data stolen

77 million electronic records compromised from Sony Electronics' PlayStation Network between April 17 and April 19 2011

Breach of accounts with names, addresses, email address, birthdates, usernames, passwords, logins, security questions and other personal data

credit card details encrypted but not personal data

Page 27: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

27

Privacy Commissioner Investigation into Sony data breach

On 26 April, Timothy Pilgrim opened an investigation asking what personal information was compromised what security measures was in place at the time of the

incident whether reasonable measures to take to protect its

customers' personal information There are a number of significant reforms to the Privacy Act

currently being considered by the Government. These include increased powers for the Commissioner to impose penalties, such as enforceable undertakings and civil penalties for serious breaches of privacy.  Further, the ALRC recommended that consideration should also be given to the introduction of mandatory data breach notification laws.

Page 28: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

28

Mandatory data breach notification laws The Privacy Minister, Brendan O'Connor, said he

was ''very concerned'' about the theft of personal information and expressed disappointment that Sony took ''several days'' to inform customers about the breach. This meant a mandatory ''data breach notification'' system now ''appears necessary'', he said.

Page 29: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

29

Other Recent Social Media controversies

Collection and use of private data by corporations like Google and Facebook

Increasing public concern about changes to Facebook's privacy settings - for making it difficult for users to put limits on how far the information they upload is shared

Google's collection of wireless connection data it gathered while compiling images for its Street View service

Government plans to monitor web users’ internet communications

Prompted an Australian Senate inquiry into the adequacy of privacy laws

Page 30: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

30

Data Collection and Online Privacy

Terms of Reference On the 24 June 2010 the Senate referred the following matter to the

Environment, Communications and the Arts References Committee for inquiry and report :

The adequacy of protections for the privacy of Australians online, with regard to:(a) privacy protections and data collection on social networking sites;(b) data collection activities of private companies;(c) data collection activities of government agencies; and(d) other related issues

Page 31: Legal Perspective on Information Management “New Social Media – The New Record Format?”

31

Thank You

[email protected]